Startseite GPER was associated with hypertension in post-menopausal women
Artikel Open Access

GPER was associated with hypertension in post-menopausal women

  • Shichao Liu , Tongbin Ding , Hang Liu und Liguo Jian EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 24. August 2018

Abstract

Objective

To explore the relationship between G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) and hypertension in post-menopausal women.

Methods

Using a matched case-control design, clinical and laboratory data were collected. Conditional logistic regression with stratified analysis was conducted to identify the association between GPER and hypertension.

Results

The GPER level was significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (126.3 ± 21.6 vs. 133.6 ± 27.3, P=0.000). The GPER levels of the hypertension cases with and those without menopause were significant (120.5 ± 11.8 and 127.2 ± 12.1, P=0.000). No significant difference in the GPER level between the controls with and those without menopause was observed (P=0.241). Logistic regression revealed that the GPER quartile was related to hypertension (odds ratio [OR]: 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.13–0.93, P=0.018) after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Stratified analysis revealed that the GPER quartile was not associated with hypertension in premenopausal women, and the fourth GPER quartile showed a predictive association with hypertension (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29–0.90) in menopausal women.

Conclusions

GPER level is associated with hypertension and is a protective factor for hypertension in menopausal women but not premenopausal women. Further research is required due to study limitations.

1 Introduction

Previous studies have reported an obvious elevation in blood pressure in women after menopause [1]. In women, hormonal changes and the use of exogenous hormones result in crucial differences in blood pressure rhythm [2]. Estrogen plays an important regulatory role not only in the reproductive system but also in the cardiovascular, immune, and nervous systems [3]. It was recently reported that estrogen exerts its biological effects on hypertension by binding to the estrogen receptor. Estrogen receptor-α and -β are typical estrogen receptors. Both receptors reduce estrogen’s regulatory function via specific transcription of target genes [4]. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is a transmembrane protein [5]. It has been suggested that GPER mediates the rapid non-genetic response of estrogen, acting as an estrogen receptor. It has been confirmed both in vitro and in vivo that GPER is widely expressed in the cardiovascular system and is associated with estrogen specificity. It was also found that selective activated GPER can expand blood vessels, lower blood pressure, and inhibit vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation, making GPER an indispensable material for maintaining normal blood pressure [6,7]. However, these results are inconsistent with those from clinical studies. In humans, blood pressure is affected by a variety of factors. However, it is uncertain whether GPER is associated with hypertension and whether it is an independent risk factor in hypertensive patients, especially females. This study explored the relationship between the GPER level and hypertension in females after adjusting for potential confounding factors, with the aims of identifying new indictors and therapeutic targets for hypertension.

2 Methods and materials

2.1 Study population

The study population included women who visited the physical examination center of our hospital between May 2016 and October 2016. The subject age ranged from 35 to 80 years old. Hypertension was diagnosed as follows: systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mmHg, a history of hypertension, or receiving a drug treatment during the past year [8]. We only included newly diagnosed hypertensive patients to exclude drug interference. The normal population (without hypertension) was treated as a control group during the same period. One patient was matched by age (±2 years). The following were excluded: those with coronary heart disease, kidney disease, cancer, or stroke or those who used estrogen. A total of 400 hypertensive patients and 400 healthy controls were included in this study.

Ethical approval: The research related to human use has been complied with all the relevant national regulations, institutional policies and in accordance the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration, and has been approved by the authors' institutional review board or equivalent committee.

Informed consent: Informed consent has been obtained from all individuals included in this study.

2.2 Data collection

A standard questionnaire was used to collect the following information: general demographic data, family history, smoking and drinking habits, menopause status, and history of drug usage. The research was performed by trained investigators. Height, weight, and waist circumference were measured using standard physical examination methods. Body mass index (BMI) was categorized as follows: obese, >28; overweight, 24–28; normal, 18.5–24; and underweight, <18.5[9]. Experienced doctors and nurses adopted an internationally standardized method for blood pressure measurements using the mercury blood pressure gauge. Blood pressure was measured three times after 5 min of rest with at least 15 s between measurements, with the mean taken as the final value. If a difference of > 5 mm Hg among measurements for a subject was found, blood pressure was measured again.

For biochemical data, 5 mL of venous blood were extracted from each subject after fasting for 12h. Laboratory examinations, including total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), blood glucose, and uric acid levels, were performed by an automatic biochemical analyzer (Hitachi 7020, Tokyo, Japan). A level of TC ≥ 6.22 mmol/L, LDL-C ≥ 4.14 mmol/L, HDL-C ≤ 1.04 mmol/L, or TG ≥ 2.26 mmol was defined as abnormal[10]. Blood glucose levels were categorized as follows: normal, < 6.1 mmol/L; high, ≥ 6.1 mmol/L. A uric acid level ≥ 357 was considered high [11]. The GPER level was measured using a double antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (Shanghai Xinyu Biological Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) with a detection range of 18–600 ng/L. The detection process was completed by the same researchers under the same conditions.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Continuous data are expressed as means ± standard error or as medians (quartile: Q25–Q75) according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Either Student’s t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test was used to determine differences between two groups. Categorical data are expressed as percentages, and differences between two groups were assessed using the Chi-square test. The GPER level was divided into four categories according to quartiles 1–4. Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify an association between the GPER level and hypertension after adjusting for age, family history, menopause status, overweight status, and high uric acid, high blood lipid, and high blood glucose levels. The relative odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also calculated. Stratified analysis was performed by stratifying by menopause status. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and P values < 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

3 Results

3.1 General characteristics of the study population

The present study included 400 hypertension cases and 400 normal controls. In the case group, the mean age was 53.8 ± 9.0 years, and 87% of subjects were in menopause. No hypertensive patients were on antihypertensive drug treatments. The mean age of the control group was 54.3 ± 8.2 years, and 77.7% of subjects were in menopause. The GPER level was significantly lower in the case group than in the control group (126.3 ± 21.6 vs. 133.6 ± 27.3 ng/L, respectively, P=0.000). The GPER levels of the hypertensive cases with and those without menopause were 120.5 ± 11.8 and 127.2 ± 12.1, respectively, and this difference was significant (P=0.000). The GPER levels of the controls with and those without menopause were 132.5 ± 12.1 and 134.2 ± 11.8, respectively; no significant difference was observed (P=0.241). Compared with the control group, the case group tended to have a greater waist circumference (P=0.000), BMI (P=0.000), systolic blood pressure (P=0.000), diastolic blood pressure (P=0.000), and uric acid (P=0.000), TG (P=0.000), and blood glucose (P=0.000) levels and a family history of hypertension (P=0.000). There were no significant differences in age, smoking or drinking habits, or total cholesterol, HDL-C, or LDL-C levels between the case and control groups (P>0.05). Table 1 presents the detailed results.

3.2 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses

We conducted conditional logistics regression analyses with and without adjusting for potential confounding factors. The results indicated that the GPER quartile (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.31–0.81, P=0.000), age, overweight status, family history, menopause status, high uric acid level, dyslipidemia, and high blood glucose level were associated with hypertension before adjusting for potential confounding factors. The GPER quartile was still related to hypertension (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.13–0.93, P=0.018) after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Other factors included age (OR: 2.89, 95% CI: 1.22–6.80, P=0.015), family history (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.17–1.61, P=0.000), menopause status (OR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.42–7.80, P=0.002), high uric acid level (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.17–2.45, P=0.005), and high blood glucose level (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.12–2.65, P=0.026). Table 2 presents the detailed results.

3.3 Stratified analysis

The study population was stratified by menopause status. The GPER level was divided into four categories according to quartile. We conducted conditional logistic regression using the first quartile as the reference. In premenopausal women, the GPER level was not associated with hypertension before adjusting for potential confounding factors, including age, smoking and drinking habits, family history, overweight status, high uric acid level, dyslipidemia, and high blood glucose level. Compared with the first quartile, the ORs for the second, third, and fourth quartiles were 1.05 (95% CI: 0.73–1.50), 0.41 (95% CI: 0.41–1.97), and 0.26 (95% CI: 0.30–3.40), respectively. After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the GPER quartile was still not associated with hypertension in premenopausal women, and the ORs were 1.03 (95% CI: 0.64–1.72), 0.62 (95% CI: 0.56–2.01), and 0.49 (95% CI: 0.26–1.42), respectively. In menopausal women, the results indicated that the second and third GPER quartiles were not associated with hypertension before adjusting for potential confounding factors. Compared with the first quartile, the ORs for the second and third quartiles were 1.08 (95% CI: 0.91–1.43) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.63–1.49), respectively. The fourth quartile was associated with hypertension (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.38–0.71). After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the second and third quartiles were still not associated with hypertension in premenopausal women. However, the fourth quartile showed a predictive association with hypertension (OR: 0.43, 95% CI: 0.29–0.90).

Table 1

Comparisons of general characteristics between case and control group

ParametersControl (n=400group)Case (n=400group)t/χ2P
Age (year)54.3±8.253.8±9.00.8210.412
Waist (cm)74.6±8.177.5±8.35.0010.000
BMI (kg/m2)22.8±3.223.6±2.83.7630.000
SBP (mmHg)122.6±11.7147.9±12.829.1780.000
DBP (mmHg)74.7±8.685.6±9.222.0750.000
History of family183 (45.8%)240 (60.0%)16.2990.000
Smoking (n, %)12 (3.0%)16 (4.0%)0.5920.442
Drinking (n, %)8 (2.0%)6 (1.5%)0.2910.589
Menopause (n, %)311 (77.7%)348 (87.0%)6.7830.009
Uric acid (μmol/L)261.2±21.8277.8±23.510.3570.000
Total cholesterol (mmol/L)5.1±2.15.2±2.80.5710.568
Triglyceride (mmol/L)1.1±0.81.4±0.85.3030.000
HDL-C (mmol/L)1.3±0.21.3±0.10.0000.999
LDL-C (mmol/L)3.1±3.0±1.6610.097
Blood glucose (mmol/L)4.7±2.55.1±3.52.7890.001
GPER(ng/L)133.6±27.3126.3±21.64.1940.000
  1. BMI: body mass index, SBP: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure: DBP, HDL-C: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LDL-C: low density lipoprotein cholesterol, GPER: G protein-coupled estrogen receptor

Table 2

Logistic regression analysis results for female hypertensive patients

Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
FactorsBOR(95%CI)P valueBOR(95%CI)P value
Age0.2481.28(1.06-1.54)0.0091.0602.89(1.22-6.80)0.015
Overweight1.1313.11(1.21-7.99)0.0180.0471.05(0.98-1.12)0.196
History of family0.5121.67(1.38-2.02)0.0000.3141.37(1.17-1.61)0.000
Smoking0.0161.02(0.79-1.31)0.9020.0341.03(0.81-1.21)0.476
Drinking-0.2370.79(0.62-1.76)0.602-0.3210.73(0.76-1.67)0.512
Menopause1.0952.99(1.11-8.05)0.0001.0582.88(1.42-7.80)0.002
High uric acid0.4501.57(1.19-2.07)0.0010.5261.69(1.17-2.45)0.005
Dyslipidemia0.5701.77(1.23-2.55)0.012-0.2960.74(0.55-1.21)0.061
High blood glucose1.1423.13(2.45-4.01)0.0000.2651.30(1.12-2.65)0.026
GPER quartile-0.3970.67(0.31-0.81)0.000-0.4650.63(0.13-0.93)0.018
Table 3

Logistic regression analysis results for hypertensive in female with and without menopause

GPERpremenopausalmenopause
UnadjustedAdjustedUnadjustedAdjusted
The first quartile1.001.001.001.00
The second quartile1.05(0.73-1.50)1.03(0.64-1.72)1.08(0.91-1.43)1.05(0.28-1.19)
The third quartile0.41(0.41-1.97)0.62(0.56-2.01)0.81(0.63-1.49)0.61(0.51-1.76)
The fourth quartile0.26(0.30-3.40)0.49(0.26-1.42)0.56(0.38-0.71)0.43(0.29-0.90)
  1. adjusted for age, smoking, drinking, history of family, overweight, high uric acid, dyslipidemia, high blood glucose

4 Discussion

Our study found (1) lower serum GPER levels in the hypertension group than in the normal healthy control group, (2) an independent association between the serum GPER level and hypertension in women after adjusting for potential confounding factors and a decreased risk of hypertension with elevated GPER levels, and (3) an association between the serum GPER level and hypertension in menopausal but not premenopausal women.

This epidemiologic investigation showed that the prevalence of hypertension is significantly lower in premenopausal women than in males [12]. The function of the ovary decreases gradually with the arrival of menopause, and the level of secreted estrogen is also gradually reduced [13]. The prevalence of hypertension increased and even outnumbered the male counterparts. It has been acknowledged that estrogen exerts its regulatory function via the estrogen receptor. Estrogen-α and -β belong to a nuclear receptor family that is widely distributed in many tissues, including those of the reproductive and cardiovascular systems [5]. It is believed that it takes several hours or even several days for estrogen to exert effects on gene transcription via its nuclear receptor. However, it takes only several seconds or minutes for GPER and its membrane receptor to exert such effects. Most importantly, this process cannot be blocked by protein and RNA production [14]. The biomedical function of GPER differs from that of estrogen-α and -β, and there may be synergistic interactions or antagonistic or independent effects [15,16]. The current research on the relationship between GPER levels and blood regulation has been restricted to in vitro and animal experiments. Animal studies have revealed that the risk of hypertension increases when the GPER gene is mutated [17]. GPER agonists cause blood vessel expansion in rodents and humans. The binding of GPER to its ligands exerts a cardiovascular-protective function via many mechanisms, such as improving local blood circulation, lowering blood pressure, exerting an anti-inflammation effect, and regulating glucose and lipid metabolism [18]. Activated GPER generates a vasodilation effect by promoting the release of nitric oxide from endothelial cells, generating an endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization factor, inhibiting Ca+ channels, and opening K+ channels [19]. Moreover, GPER also can inhibit vasoconstriction by downregulating angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression and reducing angiotensin-converting enzyme activity [20]. Our results confirm the protective effects of GPER on hypertension in menopausal women.

Although the current study is based on a case-control design, it is limited in that it did not evaluate the causal relationship between the GPER level and hypertension. The current results support the use of estrogen replacement therapy and hypertension prevention in menopausal women. Estrogen replacement therapy, which reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease in menopausal women, is practiced in the clinic. However, a previous multi-center randomized controlled study with a large sample size suggested that estrogen replacement therapy does not reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in those diagnosed with hypertension. In contrast, estrogen replacement therapy may increase the risks of stroke and deep vein thrombosis for reasons that remain unclear [21]. The in vitro and in vivo factors, including receptors, that may affect GPER-mediated signaling pathways are complicated and may vary. The serum estrogen level is associated with hypertension and regulates blood pressure via different mechanisms, but the specific mechanism has not yet been elucidated. Therefore, further study is required. Our study evaluated the serum GPER level only, and it should be confirmed whether this factor reflects the physiological or pathological status of estrogen.

In conclusion, our study found that the GPER level is associated with hypertension in menopausal women and is a protective factor for hypertension. This relationship remained after adjusting for potential confounding factors. Further research is required due to the limitations of the present study.


Tel.: +86-073163620616, Fax: +86-073163620616

Acknowledgments

JW and HLJ conceived and designed the experiments. DSG and JW participated in the design of the study and performed the statistical analysis. HLJ conceived of the study and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  1. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing or any commercial or proprietary interest in any drug, device, or equipment mentioned in the submitted article.

  2. Funding: None.

  3. Statement of proprietary interest: This study was approved by Institutional Review Board of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

References

[1] Migneco A, Ojetti V, Covino M, Mettimano M, Montebelli MR, Leone A, et al. Increased blood pressure variability in menopause. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2008; 12:89-95Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Sasser JM, Brinson KN, Tipton AJ, Crislip GR, Sullivan JC. Blood pressure, sex, and female sex hormones influence renal inner medullary nitric oxide synthase activity and expression in spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 410.1161/JAHA.114.001738Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[3] An KC. Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators. Asian Spine J 2016; 10:787-79110.4184/asj.2016.10.4.787Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[4] Barton M, Filardo EJ, Lolait SJ, Thomas P, Maggiolini M, Prossnitz ER. Twenty years of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER: Historical and personal perspectives. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 201710.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.03.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Revankar CM, Cimino DF, Sklar LA, Arterburn JB, Prossnitz ER. A transmembrane intracellular estrogen receptor mediates rapid cell signaling. Science 2005; 307:1625-163010.1126/science.1106943Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Feldman RD. Aldosterone and blood pressure regulation: recent milestones on the long and winding road from electrocortin to KCNJ5, GPER, and beyond. Hypertension 2014; 63:19-2110.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01251Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Lobo RA. What is the effect of estrogen on blood pressure after menopause? Menopause 2006; 13:331-33310.1097/01.gme.0000225142.06588.63Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Gabb GM, Mangoni AA, Arnolda L. Guideline for the diagnosis and management of hypertension in adults - 2016. Med J Aust 2017; 206:14110.5694/mja16.01132Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Wang H, Xue H, Du S, Zhang J, Wang Y, Zhang B. Time trends and factors in body mass index and obesity among children in China: 1997-2011. Int J Obes (Lond) 2017; 41:964-97010.1038/ijo.2017.53Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Joint committee issued Chinese guideline for the management of dyslipidemia in adults. [2016 Chinese guideline for the management of dyslipidemia in adults]. Chin J Cardiol 2016; 44:833-853Suche in Google Scholar

[11] Bragg F, Li L, Smith M, Guo Y, Chen Y, Millwood I, et al. Associations of blood glucose and prevalent diabetes with risk of cardiovascular disease in 500 000 adult Chinese: the China Kadoorie Biobank. Diabet Med 2014; 31:540-55110.1111/dme.12392Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[12] Lima R, Wofford M, Reckelhoff JF. Hypertension in postmenopausal women. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012; 14:254-26010.1007/s11906-012-0260-0Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[13] Pelosi E, Simonsick E, Forabosco A, Garcia-Ortiz JE, Schlessinger D. Dynamics of the ovarian reserve and impact of genetic and epidemiological factors on age of menopause. Biol Reprod 2015; 92:13010.1095/biolreprod.114.127381Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[14] Petrie WK, Dennis MK, Hu C, Dai D, Arterburn JB, Smith HO, et al. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor-selective ligands modulate endometrial tumor growth. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013; 2013:47272010.1155/2013/472720Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Samartzis EP, Noske A, Meisel A, Varga Z, Fink D, Imesch P. The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is expressed in two different subcellular localizations reflecting distinct tumor properties in breast cancer. Plos One 2014; 9:e8329610.1371/journal.pone.0083296Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[16] Yuan J, Liu M, Yang L, Tu G, Zhu Q, Chen M, et al. Acquisition of epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype in the tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell: a new role for G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in mediating tamoxifen resistance through cancer-associated fibroblast-derived fibronectin and beta1-integrin signaling pathway in tumor cells. Breast Cancer Res 2015; 17:6910.1186/s13058-015-0579-ySuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Prossnitz ER, Hathaway HJ. What have we learned about GPER function in physiology and disease from knockout mice? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2015; 153:114-12610.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.06.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[18] Feldman RD, Gros R, Ding Q, Hussain Y, Ban MR, McIntyre AD, et al. A common hypofunctional genetic variant of GPER is associated with increased blood pressure in women. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2014; 78:1441-145210.1111/bcp.12471Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[19] Chambliss KL, Wu Q, Oltmann S, Konaniah ES, Umetani M, Korach KS, et al. Non-nuclear estrogen receptor alpha signaling promotes cardiovascular protection but not uterine or breast cancer growth in mice. J Clin Invest 2010; 120:2319-233010.1172/JCI38291Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Lindsey SH, Liu L, Chappell MC. Vasodilation by GPER in mesenteric arteries involves both endothelial nitric oxide and smooth muscle cAMP signaling. Steroids 2014; 81:99-10210.1016/j.steroids.2013.10.017Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[21] White RJ. Estrogen: Friend or Foe in Pulmonary Hypertension? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193:1084-108610.1164/rccm.201512-2511EDSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2018-05-09
Accepted: 2018-07-04
Published Online: 2018-08-24

© 2018 Shichao Liu et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Regular Articles
  2. Cleidocranial dysplasia-dental disorder treatment and audiology diagnosis
  3. A hybrid neural network – world cup optimization algorithm for melanoma detection
  4. Early administration of venovenous extracorporeal life support for status asthmaticus during anaesthetic induction: case report and literature review
  5. Assessment of maximal isometric hand grip strength in school-aged children
  6. Evaluation of a neurokinin-1 antagonist in preventing multiple-day cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting
  7. Value of continuous video EEG and EEG responses to thermesthesia stimulation in prognosis evaluation of comatose patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  8. Platelet-rich plasma protects HUVECs against oX-LDL-induced injury
  9. Pharmacoeconomics of three therapeutic schemes for anti-tuberculosis therapy induced liver injury in China
  10. Small-cell lung cancer presenting as fatal pulmonary hemorrhage
  11. Correlation of retinopathy of prematurity with bronchopulmonary dysplasia
  12. Prognosis of treatment outcomes by cognitive and physical scales
  13. The efficacy of radiofrequency hyperthermia combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer
  14. Arcuate Fasciculus in Autism Spectrum Disorder Toddlers with Language Regression
  15. Aesthetic dental procedures: legal and medico-legal implications
  16. Blood transfusion in children: the refusal of Jehovah’s Witness parents’
  17. Burnout among anesthetists and intensive care physicians
  18. Relationship of HS CRP and sacroiliac joint inflammation in undifferentiated spondyloarthritis
  19. Ethical and legal issues in gestational surrogacy
  20. Effects of arginine vasopressin on migration and respiratory burst activity in human leukocytes
  21. Associations of diabetic retinopathy with retinal neurodegeneration on the background of diabetes mellitus. Overview of recent medical studies with an assessment of the impact on healthcare systems
  22. Pituitary dysfunction from an unruptured ophthalmic internal carotid artery aneurysm with improved 2-year follow-up results: A case report
  23. Effectiveness of treatment with endostatin in combination with emcitabine, carboplatin, and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective study
  24. Piercing and tattoos in adolescents: legal and medico-legal implications
  25. The central importance of information in cosmetic surgery and treatments
  26. Penile calciphylaxis in a patient with end-stage renal disease: a case report and review of the literature
  27. Serum CA72-4 as a biomarker in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
  28. Association between uric acid and metabolic syndrome in elderly women
  29. Distinct expression and prognostic value of MS4A in gastric cancer
  30. MAPK pathway involved in epidermal terminal differentiation of normal human epidermal keratinocytes
  31. Association of central obesity with sex hormonebinding globulin: a cross-sectional study of 1166 Chinese men
  32. Successful endovascular therapy in an elderly patient with severe hemorrhage caused by traumatic injury
  33. Inflammatory biomarkers and risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
  34. Related factors of early mortality in young adults with cerebral hemorrhage
  35. Growth suppression of glioma cells using HDAC6 inhibitor, tubacin
  36. Post-stroke upper limb spasticity incidence for different cerebral infarction site
  37. The esophageal manometry with gas-perfused catheters
  38. MMP-2 and TIMP-2 in patients with heart failure and chronic kidney disease
  39. Genetic testing: ethical aspects
  40. Intervention for physician burnout: A systematic review
  41. The melanin-concentrating hormone system in human, rodent and avian brain
  42. Clinical effects of piribedil in adjuvant treatment of Parkinson’s Disease: A meta-analysis
  43. Identification of a novel BRAF Thr599dup mutation in lung adenocarcinoma
  44. Adrenal incidentaloma – diagnostic and treating problem – own experience
  45. Common illnesses in tropical Asia and significance of medical volunteering
  46. Genetic risk in insurance field
  47. Genetic testing and professional responsibility: the italian experience
  48. The mechanism of mitral regurgitant jets identified by 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography
  49. Control of blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes
  50. Pseudomesotheliomatous primary squamous cell lung carcinoma: The first case reported in Turkey and a review of the literature
  51. Diagnostic efficacy of serum 1,3-β-D-glucan for invasive fungal infection: An update meta-analysis based on 37 case or cohort studies
  52. GPER was associated with hypertension in post-menopausal women
  53. Metabolic activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria from rodents with colitis
  54. Association of miRNA122 & ADAM17 with lipids among hypertensives in Nigeria
  55. The efficacy and safety of enoxaparin: a meta-analysis
  56. Cuffed versus uncuffed endotracheal tubes in pediatrics: a meta-analysis
  57. Thresholding for medical image segmentation for cancer using fuzzy entropy with level set algorithm
  58. Sleep deprivation in Intensive Care Unit – systematic review
  59. Benefits of computed tomography in reducing mortality in emergency medicine
  60. Ipragliflozin ameliorates liver damage in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
  61. Limits of professional competency in nurses working in Nicu
  62. MDA-19 suppresses progression of melanoma via inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway
  63. The effect of smoking on posttraumatic pseudoarthrosis healing after internal stabilization, treated with platelet rich plasma (PRP)
  64. Partial deletion of the long arm of chromosome 7: a case report
  65. Meta-analysis of PET/CT detect lymph nodes metastases of cervical cancer
  66. High Expression of NLRC5 is associated with prognosis of gastric cancer
  67. Is monitoring mean platelet volume necessary in breast cancer patients?
  68. Resectable single hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma in the left lobe of the liver: a case report
  69. Epidemiological study of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae
  70. The CCR5-Delta32 genetic polymorphism and HIV-1 infection susceptibility: a meta-analysis
  71. Phenotypic and molecular characterisation of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced vancomycin susceptibility derivated in vitro
  72. Preliminary results of Highly Injectable Bi-Phasic Bone Substitute (CERAMENT) in the treatment of benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions
  73. Analysis of patient satisfaction with emergency medical services
  74. Guillain-Barré syndrome and Low back pain: two cases and literature review
  75. HELLP syndrome complicated by pulmonary edema: a case report
  76. Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin in patients with different renal function levels
  77. Recurrent chronic subdural hematoma: Report of 13 cases
  78. Is awareness enough to bring patients to colorectal screening?
  79. Serum tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 125 levels and carotid atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease
  80. Plastic treatment for giant pseudocyst after incisional hernia mesh repair: a case report and comprehensive literature review
  81. High expression levels of fascin-1 protein in human gliomas and its clinical relevance
  82. Thromboembolic complications following tissue plasminogen activator therapy in patients of acute ischemic stroke - Case report and possibility for detection of cardiac thrombi
  83. The effects of gastrointestinal function on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients
  84. A report of chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction related to systemic lupus erythematosus
  85. Risk model in women with ovarian cancer without mutations
  86. Direct oral anticoagulants and travel-related venous thromboembolism
  87. How bispectral index compares to spectral entropy of the EEG and A-line ARX index in the same patient
  88. Henoch-schonlein purpura nephritis with renal interstitial lesions
  89. Cardiovascular risk estimated by UKPDS risk engine algorithm in diabetes
  90. CD5 and CD43 expression are associate with poor prognosis in DLBCL patients
  91. Combination of novoseven and feiba in hemophiliac patients with inhibitors
Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/med-2018-0051/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen