Startseite Ecological discourse analysis and meaning interpretation of BBC news reports on 2019 Australian bushfires from the perspective of transitivity system
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Ecological discourse analysis and meaning interpretation of BBC news reports on 2019 Australian bushfires from the perspective of transitivity system

  • Meijing Li ORCID logo und Zhencong Liu EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 3. Juli 2024

Abstract

The unprecedented 2019/20 Australian bushfires prompted this paper to conduct a transitivity analysis on the top three processes (material, relational, and verbal) in selected BBC news reports. Guided by the ecological philosophical view of “harmony with diversity, interaction, and coexistence,” the research aims to interpret ecological meanings in the text and enhance people’s awareness of environment conservation. The findings reveal that these news reports predominantly utilized material and relational processes to depict the devastating impact of the Australian bushfires on wildlife, the efforts of firefighters, volunteer rescue missions for wildlife, and the roles of individuals involved. These reports also conveyed extensive ecological information, highlighting the ecological crisis arising from the fires, the threat to species diversity, and the active social responsibility of various stakeholders. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of the ecological implications of the Australian bushfires and encourages proactive ecological protection measures.


Corresponding author: Zhencong Liu, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, China, E-mail:

References

Abram, Nerilie, Benjamin Henley, Alex Gupta, Tanya Lippmann, Hamish Clarke, Andrew Dowdy, Jason Sharples, Rachael Nolan, Tianran Zhang, Martion Wooster, Jennifer Wurtzel, Katrin Meissner, Andrew Pitman, Anna Ukkola, Brett Murphy, Nigel Tapper & Matthias Boer. 2021. Connections of climate change and variability to large and extreme forest fires in southeast Australia. Communications Earth & Environment 2(1). 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-020-00065-8.Suche in Google Scholar

Alexander, Richard & Arran Stibbe. 2014. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse. Language Sciences 41. 104–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.08.011.Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, Wei & YuanyuanZhao. 2019. The image of China in the argentine mainstream media: Based on a critical discourse analysis of the relevant reports of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University 27(3). 37–42.Suche in Google Scholar

DongDian. 2021. Multidimensional ecological discourse analysis of news discourses in the new era. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education 197(1). 92–97+15.Suche in Google Scholar

Fill, Alwin & Peter Muhlhausler. 2001. The ecolinguistics reader: Language, ecology and environment, 43–53. London: Continuum.Suche in Google Scholar

Finke, Peter. 2017. Transdisciplinary linguistics: Ecolinguistics as a pace-maker into a new scientific age, 406–419. London & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315687391-28Suche in Google Scholar

GongHeng & Lingling Liu. 2018. Ecological discourse analysis of an UN environmental story in terms of transitivity process. Advances in Language and Literary Studies 9(3). 67–77. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.67.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael. 1994. An introduction to functional grammar, 2nd edn. London: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael. 2000. An introduction to functional grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Suche in Google Scholar

He, Wei & Rong Wei. 2017. An analytical framework of transitivity for international ecological discourse. Modern Foreign Languages 5. 597–607.Suche in Google Scholar

He, Wei & Rong Wei. 2018. Diversity and harmony, interaction and co-existence – ecosophy for international ecological discourse analysis. Foreign Language Research (6). 28–35.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Guowen & Ruihua Zhao. 2019. What is ecolinguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Suche in Google Scholar

JingLin. 2023. An ecological discourse analysis of biodiversity action guide from the perspective of transitivity system. Journal of Heihe University 14(5). 116–119+122.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Juan. 2010. Transitivity and lexical cohesion: Press representations of a political disaster and its actors. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12). 3444–3458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.04.028.Suche in Google Scholar

Stibbe, Arran. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, ecology and the stories we live by. London & New York: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Sun, Ju & Jinhui Guo. 2022. Ecological discourse analysis of news reports on Amazon rainforest fire from the perspective of transitivity. Foreign Languages in China 19(6). 70–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Jinjun & Jingfang Liu. 2024. The construction of China’s national image in news reports on poverty alleviation in China Daily (2012–2022): A transitivity-based analysis. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing (Social Sciences Edition) 40(3). 61–69.Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, Hui & Liping Wang. 2020. Exploring an ecological transitivity analytic model: Illustrated by educational discourse. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching (6). 43–54+120+148.Suche in Google Scholar

ZhangHong. 2018. The “Belt and Road” initiative in South Africa’s media coverage. Foreign Languages in China 15(3). 66–71.Suche in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2024-2007).


Published Online: 2024-07-03
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2024-2007/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen