Home The most common graphicons in Mexican Spanish speaking WhatsApp communities composed of school parents
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

The most common graphicons in Mexican Spanish speaking WhatsApp communities composed of school parents

  • Elizabeth Flores-Salgado EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: July 4, 2024

Abstract

The present study examined the pragmatic functions of graphicons used in six different WhatsApp communities created by and for school parents, written in Mexican Spanish, which had the purpose of sharing information relating to daily classroom concerns. A total of 4,824 WhatsApp messages written by these 143 school parents were analyzed using the taxonomy proposed by Herring and Dainas (2017, Nice picture comment! Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. In: Proceedings of the Fifthieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Press, pp. 2185–2194. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41419). The findings revealed that emoji were the most common graphical device used and they were always visually connected to the verbal content of the speech acts they accompanied. Another result showed that photos were the second most preferred multimodal. These photos were impersonal and as well as emoji, they fulfilled requested tasks as this was a task-oriented group. The findings further suggested that the low frequency of the occurrence of stickers, videos, and GIFS was probably due to the particularities of this community of practice. Thus, the use of emoji and graphicons were constrained by the requested tasks of these communities.


Corresponding author: Elizabeth Flores-Salgado, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Puebla, Mexico, E-mail:

References

Al Rashdi, Fathiya. 2018. Functions of emojis in WhatsApp interaction among Omanis. Discourse Context Media 26. 117–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.07.001.Search in Google Scholar

Al Zidjaly, Najma. 2017. Memes as reasonably hostile laments: A discourse analysis of political dissent in Oman. Discourse & Society 28(6). 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517721083.Search in Google Scholar

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2011. Language change and digital media: A review of conceptions and evidence. In Nikolas Coupland & Tore Kristiansen (eds.), Standard languages and language standards in a changing Europe, 145–156. Oslo: Novus. Available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:37979787.Search in Google Scholar

Azuma, Junichi & Martin Ebner. 2008. A stylistic analysis of graphic emoticons: Can they be candidates for a universal visual language of the future? In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-Media). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Vienna, 972–977, 30 June–4 July 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Calero-Vaquera, María Luisa. 2014. El discurso del WhatsApp: entre el Messenger y el SMS. Oralia 17. 87–116.Search in Google Scholar

Cantamutto, Lucía & Vela Delfa, Cristina. 2019. Emojis frecuentes en las interacciones por WhatsApp: estudio comparativo entre dos variedades de español (Argentina y España). Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 77. 107–136. http://dx.doi.or/10.5209/CLAC.63282http://webs.ucm.es/info/circulo/no77/Cantamutto.pdf.10.5209/CLAC.63282Search in Google Scholar

Cantamutto, Lucía & Vela Delfa, Cristina. 2020. ¿De qué color es tu corazón? El uso de los emojis en el activismo social. Revista de Comunicación Social 6. 119–136.10.7203/rd.v1i6.183Search in Google Scholar

Chen, Ying-Yu, Frank Bentley, Christian Holz & Cheng Xu. 2016. Sharing (and discussing) the moment: The conversations that occur around shared mobile media. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 264–273. Available at: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:14227048.10.1145/2785830.2785868Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, Jacob. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1). 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104.Search in Google Scholar

Crystal, David. 2011. Internet linguistics. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203830901Search in Google Scholar

Danesi, Marcel. 2016. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Darics, Erika. 2013. Non-verbal signaling in digital discourse: The case of letter repetition. Discourse Context Media 2. 141–148.10.1016/j.dcm.2013.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Dürscheid, Christa & Cristina Margrit Siever. 2017. Jenseits des Alphabets e Kommunikation mit Emojis. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 45(2). 256–285. https://doi.org/10.1515/zgl-2017-0013.Search in Google Scholar

Figueroa Pliz, Amanda & Mario Ortega Olivares. 2010. Condición de género y elección profesional. El área de físico matemático en las mujeres. Investigación y ciencia de la Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes 46. 18–27.Search in Google Scholar

Flores-Salgado, Elizabeth & Teresa Castineira-Benitez. 2018. The use of politeness in WhatsApp discourse and move ‘request’. Journal of Pragmatics 133. 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.06.009.Search in Google Scholar

Ganster, Tina, Sabrina Eimler & Nicole Krӓmer. 2012. Same but different? The differential influence of smilies and emoticons on person perception. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15(4). 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0179.Search in Google Scholar

Garau, Maia, John Poisson, Scott Lederer & Chris Beckman. 2006. Speaking in pictures: Visual conversation using radar. PICS Workshop, Ubicomp. Available at http://groups.ischool.berkeley.edu/pics/papers/Garau_Poisson_Lederer_Beckmann_radar_pics06.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Ge, Jing. 2020. The anatomy of memetic stickers: An analysis of sticker competition on Chinese social media. In Proceedings of the ICWSM Workshops, 1–8.Search in Google Scholar

Ge, Jing & Susan C. Herring. 2018. Communicative functions of emoji sequences on Sina Weibo. First Monday 23(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v23i11.9413.Search in Google Scholar

Graham, Sage. 2019. A wink and a nod: The role of emojis in forming digital communities. Multilingua 38(4). 377–400. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2018-0037.Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan. 2019. The co-evolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated analysis. In Bou-Franch Patricia & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich Pilar (eds.), Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions, 25–67. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan & Jannis Androutsopoulos. 2015. Computer mediated discourse 2.0. In Deborah Tannen, Heidi Hamilton & Deborah Schiffrin (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 127–151. New Delhi: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584194.ch6Search in Google Scholar

Herring, Susan & Ashley Dainas. 2017. Nice picture comment! Graphicons in Facebook comment threads. In Proceedings of the Fiftieth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2185–2194. IEEE Press. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41419.10.24251/HICSS.2017.264Search in Google Scholar

Inkpen, Kori, Asta Roseway, Aaron Hoff, Paul Johns & HongluDu. 2012. Video kids: Augmenting close friendships with asynchronous video conversations in VideoPal. In Proceedings of CHI30. Available at: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/162215/VideoPal2_chi2012_camera_ready.pdf.10.1145/2207676.2208400Search in Google Scholar

Jou, Brendan, Subhabrata Bhattacharya & Shin Fu Chang. 2014. Predicting viewer perceived emotions in animated GIFs. In MM’14: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Orlando, Florida, 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1145/2647868.2656408.Search in Google Scholar

König, Katharina. 2015. Dialogkonstitution und Sequenzmuster in der SMS- und WhatsApp-Kommunikation. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique 63. 87–107. https://doi.org/10.26034/tranel.2015.2971. Available at: https://www.unine.ch/files/live/sites/tranel/files/Tranel/63/87-107_k%c3%b6nig_corr.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

König, Katharina. 2019. Stance taking with ‘laugh’ particles and emojis – Sequential and functional patterns of ‘laughter’ in a corpus of German WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics 142. 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.008.Search in Google Scholar

Lave, Jean & Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511815355Search in Google Scholar

Lim, Sun Sun. 2015. On stickers and communicative fluidity in social media. Social Media and Society 1(1). 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115578137.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam & Richards Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1. 9–33. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Search in Google Scholar

Maíz Arevalo, Carmen. 2018. Emotional self-presentation on WhatsApp: Analysis of the profile status. Russian Journal of Linguistics 22(1). 144–160. https://doi.org/10.22363/231291822018221144160.Search in Google Scholar

Manzo, Lidia K. & Alessandra Minello. 2020. Mothers, childcare duties, and remote working under COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: Cultivating communities of care. Dialogues in Human Geography 10(100). 204382062093426. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620934268.Search in Google Scholar

Marchetti, Daniela, Lilybeth Fontanesi, Cristina Mazza, Serena Di Giandomenico, Paolo Roma & Maria Cristina Verrocchio. 2020. Parenting-related exhaustion during the Italian COVID-19 lockdown. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 45(10). 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa093.Search in Google Scholar

Markman, Kris M. & Sae Oshima. 2007. Pragmatic play? Some possible functions of English emoticons and Japanese Kaomoji in computer-mediated discourse. In Proceedings of Association of Internet Researchers Annual Conference 8.0. Let’s Play, Vancouver, Canada, 1–19. Available at: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/qa764/.Search in Google Scholar

McDonald, David W. 2007. Visual conversation styles in web communities. In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-40) Kona, HI, January, 3–6.10.1109/HICSS.2007.605Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Hannah., Shuo Chang, Isaac Johnson, Loren Terveen & Brent, Hecht. 2016. Blissfully happy or ready to fight: Varying interpretations of emoji, AAAI. Available at: http://www-users.cs.umn.edu/∼bhecht/publications/ICWSM2016_emoji.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Milner, Ryan. 2013. Pop polyvocality: Internet memes, public participation, and the occupy wall street movement. International Journal of Communication 7. 2357–2390.Search in Google Scholar

Panckhurst, Rachel & Frontini, Francesca. 2020. Evolving interactional practices of emoji in text messages. In Crispin Thurlow, Christa Dürscheid and Federica Diémoz (eds.), Visualizing digital discourse: Interactional, institutional and ideological perspectives, 81–103. Germany: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501510113-005Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Sabater, Carmen. 2019. Emoticons in relational writing practices on WhatsApp: Some reflections on gender. In Bou-Franch Patricia & Garcés-Conejos Blitvich Pilar (eds.), Analysing digital discourse: New insights and future directions, 163–189. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-92663-6_6Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Sabater, Carmen. 2021. Moments of sharing, language style and resources for solidarity on social media: A comparative analysis. Journal of Pragmatics 180. 266–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.034.Search in Google Scholar

Petitjean, Cécile & Etienne Morel. 2017. “Hahaha”: Laughter as a resource to manage WhatsApp conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 110. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1987. On the preferences for agreement and contiguity in sequences in conversation. In Graham Button & John Lee (eds.). Talk and social organization, 54–69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781800418226-004Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emanuel. 1997. Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society 8(2). 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926597008002002.Search in Google Scholar

Sampietro, Agnese. 2016. Exploring the punctuating effect of emoji in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Lenguas Modernas 47. 91–113.Search in Google Scholar

Sampietro, Agnese. 2019a. Emoji and rapport management in Spanish WhatsApp chats. Journal of Pragmatics 143. 109–120.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Sampietro, Agnese. 2019b. Cómo hacer palabras con emojis: sustitución y enfatización visual de vocablos en WhatsApp. Revista de Estudios del Discurso Digital (REDD) 2. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.24197/redd.2.2019.1-33.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Moya, Alfonso & Olga Cruz-Moya. 2015. “Hey there! I am using WhatsApp”: A preliminary study of recurrent discursive realisations in a corpus of WhatsApp statuses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 212. 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.298.Search in Google Scholar

Schneebeli, Célia. 2019. GIFs in online interaction: Embodied cues and beyond. Cahiers de l’ILSL, La communication digitale 2: se mettre en scène en ligne 59. Available at: https://shs.hal.science/halshs-02142774v1.10.26034/la.cdclsl.2019.19Search in Google Scholar

Siebenhaar, Beat. 2018. Funktionen von Emojis und Altersabhängigkeit ihres Gebrauchs in der Whatsapp-Kommunikation. In Ziegler Arne (ed.), Jugendsprachen/youth languages: Aktuelle Perspektiven internationaler Forschung/current perspectives of international research, 749–772. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110472226-034Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.95.Search in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1984. Conversational style: Analyzing talk among friends. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Van House, Nancy A. 2009. Collocated photo sharing, story-telling, and the performance of self. Human-Computer Studies 67. 1073–1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.09.003.Search in Google Scholar

Vicentini, Alessandra. 2003. The economy principle in language. Notes and observations from early modern English grammars. Mots, Palabras. Words 3. 37–57.Search in Google Scholar

Voida, Amy & Elizabeth T. Mynatt. 2005. Six themes of the communicative appropriation of photographic images. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 171–180. Portland, OR: CHI’05.10.1145/1054972.1054997Search in Google Scholar

Watts, Richards. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wen, Miaomiao, Nancy Baym, Omer Tamuz, Jaime Teevan, Susan Dumais & Adam Kalia. 2015. Omg Ur Funny! Computer-aided humor with an application to chat. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity. Available at: http://computationalcreativity.net/iccc2015/proceedings/4_3Wen.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Yiqiong, Min Wang & Ying Li. 2020. More than playfulness: Emojis in the comments of a WeChat official account. Internet Pragmatics 4(2). 247–271. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.ooo48.zha.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-07-04
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2024-2010/html
Scroll to top button