Startseite Al-Ḥajjāj’s rhetoric of intimidation and humiliation
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Al-Ḥajjāj’s rhetoric of intimidation and humiliation

  • Aadel Shakkour EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 21. Juni 2024

Abstract

This article discusses the strategy of intimidation and humiliation in Al-Ḥajjāj ibn Yūsuf al-Thaqafῑ’s most famous speech delivered in the city of Kufa in Iraq in the seventh century. The linguistic devices used by Al-Ḥajjāj are analyzed by applying the theory of Critical Discourse Analysis. This approach reveals his rhetoric of intimidation, humiliation, and emotional manipulation, reflecting Al-Ḥajjāj’s intention to act with extreme cruelty against the Kufa rebels. In this speech, he strove to normalize and legitimize violence against the rebels, for example, by likening the inhabitants of Kufa to animals, thereby framing the beheading and slaughtering of them as normal, in the way that animal slaughter is perceived as normal behavior.


Corresponding author: Aadel Shakkour, Al-Qasemi Academy, Baqa al-Gharbiyye, Israel, E-mail:

References

Abadi, Adina. 1988. Discourse syntax of contemporary Hebrew. Jerusalem: Magnes [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Baider, Fabienne & Monika, Kopytowska. 2017. Conceptualising the other: Online discourses on the current refugee crisis in Cyprus and in Poland. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 13(2). 203–233. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2017-0011.Suche in Google Scholar

Bengio, Ofra. 1956. Saddam’s Iraq. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University.Suche in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230501706Suche in Google Scholar

Darshan, Anat. 2000. Rhetorical characteristics of speeches given by Arab leaders during the late 1990s. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University MA dissertation [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2009. Friendly fire: War-normalizing metaphors in the Israeli political discourse. Journal of Peace Education 6(2). 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/17400200903090252.Suche in Google Scholar

Gavriely-Nuri, Dalia. 2011. War metaphors as women’s business. Panim 56. 93. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Gvura, Avi & Doly Levi. 2016. Syntactic–rhetorical repetition as persuasion technique in Yair Lapid’s political speeches. Hebrew Linguistics 70. 37–58. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Hart, Christopher. 2010. Critical discourse and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230299009Suche in Google Scholar

Koller, Veronika. 2012. How to analyse collective identity in discourse: Textual and contextual parameters. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 5(2). 19–38.Suche in Google Scholar

Kopytowska, Monika. 2010. Television news and the ‘meta war. In Iwona Witczak Plisiecka (ed.), Pragmatic perspectives on language and linguistics, 301–362. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, Irit & David Green. 2005. Troubled talk: Metaphorical negotiation in problem discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110897630Suche in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, Irit & David Green. 2008. Narrators defend their side of the story metaphorically at troubled narrative junctions. Narrative Inquiry 18. 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1075/ni.18.2.05kup.Suche in Google Scholar

Kupferberg, Irit. 2016. Touching the sky: Text and discourse-oriented figurative language analysis. Tel Aviv: Mofet Institute [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1991. Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research 23. 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2012.4.2.5.Suche in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. London: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Landau, Rachel. 1988. The rhetoric of parliamentary speeches in Israel. Tel Aviv: Eked. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Landau, Rachel. 1993. Citation as a rhetorical technique in contemporary rabbinical speeches. Am Vasefer 8. 50–63. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Livnat, Zohar. 2014. Introduction to the theory of meaning: Semantics and pragmatics, vol. 2. Raanana: Open University of Israel. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Meyer, Michael. 2001. Between theory, method, and politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 14–31. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n2Suche in Google Scholar

Mio, Jeffrey Scott. 1997. Metaphor and politics. Metaphor and Symbol 12(2). 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1202_2.Suche in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230504516Suche in Google Scholar

Musolff, Andreas. 2019. Hostility towards immigrants’ languages in Britain: A backlash against ‘super-diversity. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 40(3). 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2018.1520859.Suche in Google Scholar

Reisigl, Martin & Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and anti-semitism. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Heidi. 2003. Critical discourse analysis: What is it? 1–4. https://www.sesync.org/resources/critical-discourse-analysis-what-it.Suche in Google Scholar

Semino, Elena. 2008. Metaphors in discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Shakkour, Aadel. 2024. Operations iron Sword and Al-Aqsa flood: Metaphors as rhetorical tools in channel 12 and Al-Jazeera broadcasts. Israel Studies in Language and Society 17. 94–113. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

Shakkour, Aadel & Abd al-Rahman Marʿi. 2020. The formulation of metaphors in the political discourse of Arab politicians in the state of Israel. Hebrew Studies 61. 299–331. https://doi.org/10.1353/hbr.2020.0021.Suche in Google Scholar

Shakkour, Aadel & Nader Qasim. 2021. Metaphor in the written discourse of Arab students at a college of education in Israel. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 17(1-2). 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1515/lpp-2021-0006.Suche in Google Scholar

Spiegel, Nathan. 1994. The art of persuasion. Jerusalem: Magnes. [Hebrew].Suche in Google Scholar

van Dijk, Teun A. 2001. Critical discourse analysis. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 352–371. Oxford: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Weizman, Elda. 2008. Positioning in media dialogue: negotiating roles in the news interview. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ds.3Suche in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2001a. What CDA is about: Summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer (eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis, 1–13. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n1Suche in Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth. 2001b. The discourse–historical approach. In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meye (eds.), Methods of critical discourse, 63–94. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857028020.n4Suche in Google Scholar

Online References

Scott, Heidi. 2023. Critical discourse analysis: What is it? 1–4. https://www.sesync.org/resources/critical-discourse-analysis-what-it.Suche in Google Scholar

Al-Ḥajjāj ibn Yūsuf al-Thaqafῑ’s most famous speech delivered in the city of Kufa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VaIQABdibmsSuche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-06-21
Published in Print: 2024-05-27

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 5.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lpp-2024-2004/pdf?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen