Startseite The Red Hen Anonymizer and the Red Hen Protocol for de-identifying audiovisual recordings
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Red Hen Anonymizer and the Red Hen Protocol for de-identifying audiovisual recordings

  • Yash Khasbage ORCID logo , Daniel Alcaraz Carrión ORCID logo , Jennifer Hinnell ORCID logo , Frankie Robertson ORCID logo , Karan Singla , Peter Uhrig ORCID logo und Mark Turner ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Dezember 2022

Abstract

Scientists of multimodal communication have no established policy or default tool for sharing de-identified audiovisual recordings. Recently, new technology has been developed that enables researchers to de-identify voice and appearance. These software tools can produce output in JSON format that specifies bodypose and face and hand keypoints in numerical form, suitable for computer search, machine learning, and sharing. The Red Hen Anonymizer is a new tool for de-identification. This article presents the Red Hen Anonymizer and discusses guidelines for its use.


Corresponding author: Mark Turner, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA, E-mail: , http://markturner.org

Funding source: Google

Funding source: Competence Network for Scientific High Performance Computing in Bavaria (KONWIHR)

Funding source: Fundación Séneca

Award Identifier / Grant number: 21250/PD/19

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the funding of the software development by Google through their Google Summer of Code 2021 program. Some of the research was carried out within the project Talking Hands, funded by the Competence Network for Scientific High Performance Computing in Bavaria (KONWIHR). Some of this work was supported by an Anneliese Maier Research Award, from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Some of this work was supported by 21250/PD/19 Fundación Séneca. This work made use of the High Performance Computing Resource in the Core Facility for Advanced Research Computing at Case Western Reserve University.

References

Alcaraz Carrión, Daniel, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas & Javier Valenzuela. 2020. Enaction through co-speech gesture: The rhetorical handing of the mental timeline. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 68(4). 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2020-2020.Suche in Google Scholar

Cao, Zhe, Gines Hidalgo, Tomas Simon, Shih-En Wei & Yaser Sheikh. 2019. OpenPose: Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. arXiv.Suche in Google Scholar

Hinnell, Jennifer & Fey Parrill. 2020. Gesture influences resolution of ambiguous statements of neutral and moral preferences. Frontiers in Psychology – Cognition 11. 587129. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.587129.Suche in Google Scholar

Joo, Jungseock, Francis Steen & Mark Turner. 2017. Red Hen Lab: Dataset and tools for multimodal human communication research. KI – Künstliche Intelligenz 31. 357–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-017-0505-9.Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 1972. Some relationships between body motion and speech. In A. W. Siegman & B. Pope (eds.), Studies in dyadic communication, 177–216. New York: Pergamon.10.1016/B978-0-08-015867-9.50013-7Suche in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1985. So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review 92(3). 350–371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.92.3.350.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Nirkin, Yuval, Yosi Keller & Tal Hassner. 2019. FSGAN: Subject agnostic face swapping and reenactment. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, 7184–7193.10.1109/ICCV.2019.00728Suche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey & Kashmiri Stec. 2017. Gestures of the abstract. Pragmatics and Cognition 24(1). 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17006.par.Suche in Google Scholar

Parrill, Fey, Jennifer Hinnell, Grace Moran, Hannah Boylan, Ishita Gupta & Aisha Zamir. 2022. Observers use gesture to disambiguate contrastive expressions of preference. Language and Cognition 14(19). 46–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2021.20.Suche in Google Scholar

Pham, Kyle. 2022. A temporal approach to recover full human pose in occluded videos through generating transformation options. Cleveland, Ohio: Department of Computer and Data Science, Case Western Reserve University Unpublished Master of Science thesis. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4130581.Suche in Google Scholar

Revised Common Rule. 2017. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Federal Register 82(12). Rules and regulations.Suche in Google Scholar

Steen, Francis F., Anders Hougaard, Jungseock Joo, Inés Olza, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas, Anna Pleshakova, Soumya Ray, Peter Uhrig, Javier Valenzuela, Jacek Woźny & Mark Turner. 2018. Toward an infrastructure for data-driven multimodal communication research. Linguistics Vanguard 4(1). 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2017-0041.Suche in Google Scholar

Tong, Yao & Peter Uhrig. 2022. The Red Hen interview gesture collection. Available at: http://go.redhenlab.org/rhigc.Suche in Google Scholar

Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of LREC 2006, fifth international conference on language resources and evaluation. Genoa. Available at: https://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0013-1E80-B.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-02-06
Accepted: 2022-09-07
Published Online: 2022-12-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial 2023
  4. Research Articles
  5. Tapped /r/ in RP: a corpus-based sociophonetic study across the twentieth century
  6. Revisiting English written VP-ellipsis and VP-substitution: a dependency-based analysis
  7. Agreeing objects in Zulu can be indefinite and non-specific
  8. On the semantics of (negated) approximative kaada in Classical Arabic: a case for embedded exhaustification
  9. Imperatives as persuasion strategies in political discourse
  10. Primate origins of discourse-managing gestures: the case of hand fling
  11. Basic word order typology revisited: a crosslinguistic quantitative study based on UD and WALS
  12. The effect of L2 German on grammatical gender access in L1 Polish: proficiency matters
  13. Validation of two measures for assessing English vocabulary knowledge on web-based testing platforms: brief assessments
  14. Validation of two measures for assessing English vocabulary knowledge on web-based testing platforms: long-form assessments
  15. Cerebral asymmetries in the processing of opaque compounds in L1 Polish and L2 English
  16. Are preschool children sensitive to the function of accessibility markers? A visual world study with German-speaking three- to four-year-olds
  17. Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,130 Chinese words: relationships with other semantic and lexical psycholinguistic variables
  18. A corpus-based study of quoi in French native speech
  19. The overlooked effect of amplitude on within-speaker vowel variation
  20. Contextualized word senses: from attention to compositionality
  21. Words of scents: a linguistic analysis of online perfume reviews
  22. Constraction: a tool for the automatic extraction and interactive exploration of linguistic constructions
  23. The Red Hen Anonymizer and the Red Hen Protocol for de-identifying audiovisual recordings
  24. Novel metaphor and embodiment: comprehending novel synesthetic metaphors
Heruntergeladen am 18.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2022-0017/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen