Startseite The syntax of the diminutive morpheme -aaj in Egyptian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Jordanian Arabic
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The syntax of the diminutive morpheme -aaj in Egyptian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Jordanian Arabic

  • Marwan Jarrah ORCID logo EMAIL logo und Abdulazeez Jaradat
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 26. Oktober 2022

Abstract

This article investigates the morphosyntactic behavior of the diminutive morpheme -aaj in three Arabic dialects (Egyptian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Jordanian Arabic). It argues that this morpheme is categorially a head that projects Size Phrase (cf. De Belder, Marijke. 2008. Size matters: Towards a syntactic decomposition of countability. In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 116–122. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project). In so doing, this analysis obviously challenges (Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2018. Constructing feminine to mean: Gender, number, numeral, and quantifier extensions in Arabic. Lanham: Lexington Books) recent proposal that (non-)concatenative diminutives in Arabic are modifiers that are adjoined to categorized words when they indicate smallness in size. Additionally, this article provides an account of the observation that the diminutive morpheme -aaj can only appear with the feminine ending and a certain group of nouns, including collective aggregates (e.g., fruits and vegetables) and granular aggregates (e.g., grains, nuts, and seeds). We show that words suffixed with the diminutive morpheme -aaj can only give rise to an individuation reading (not a partition or non-count reading). This is syntactically interpreted as indicating that Size Phrase (headed by -aaj) is always dominated in Arabic grammar by Division Phrase (cf. Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press), whose presence derives an individuation reading.


Corresponding author: Marwan Jarrah, Department of English Language and Literature, School of Foreign Languages, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan, E-mail:

References

Alshammari, Wafi & Stuart Davis. 2019. Diminutive and augmentative formation in northern Najdi/Hā’ili Arabic. In Amel Khalfaoui & Youssef A. Haddad (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXI: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic linguistics, Norman, Oklahoma, 2017, 51–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins‏.10.1075/sal.8.03alsSuche in Google Scholar

Bachrach, Asaf & Michael Wagner. 2007. Syntactically driven cyclicity vs. output-output correspondence: The case of adjunction in diminutive morphology. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 1–16.Suche in Google Scholar

Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2000. The ins and outs of contextual allomorphy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 10. 35–71.Suche in Google Scholar

Borer, Hagit. 2005. In name only. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89–155. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dali, Myriam & Éric Mathieu. 2020. Historical changes in sub-word formation: The case of Arabic -a(t). Journal of Historical Syntax 5. 1–34.Suche in Google Scholar

De Belder, Marijke. 2008. Size matters: Towards a syntactic decomposition of countability. In Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds.), Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 116–122. Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Suche in Google Scholar

De Belder, Marijke, Noam Faust & Nicola Lampitelli. 2014. On a low and high diminutive: Evidence from Italian and Hebrew. In Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds.), The syntax of roots and the roots of syntax, 149–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665266.003.0007Suche in Google Scholar

Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. 2018. Constructing feminine to mean: Gender, number, numeral, and quantifier extensions in Arabic. Lanham: Lexington Books.Suche in Google Scholar

Gadoua, Abdulhamid & Stuart Davis. 2019. Diminutive formation in a Libyan dialect with some phonological implications. In Amel Khalfaoui & Youssef A. Haddad (eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXI: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Norman, Oklahoma, 2017, 31–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins‏.10.1075/sal.8.02gadSuche in Google Scholar

Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2014a. Agreement and the development of gender in Semitic (Part I). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 164. 33–64.Suche in Google Scholar

Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2014b. Agreement and the development of gender in Semitic (Part II). Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 164. 319–344.Suche in Google Scholar

Jaradat, Abdulazeez & Marwan Jarrah. 2022. The syntax of plurals of collective and mass nouns: Views from Arabic. Poznan Journal of Contemporary Linguistics 58(3). 509–539. https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2022-0023.Suche in Google Scholar

Julien, Marit. 2000. Syntactic heads and word formation: A study of verbal inflection. Tromsø: University of Tromsø doctoral dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Jurafsky, Danial. 1988. On the semantics of Cantonese changed tones. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14. 304–318. https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.3357.Suche in Google Scholar

Jurafsky, Danial. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–578. https://doi.org/10.2307/416278.Suche in Google Scholar

Lahrouchi, Mohamed & Rachid Ridouane. 2016. On diminutives and plurals in Moroccan Arabic. Morphology 26(1–3). 453–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-016-9290-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Xuping & Hongyong Liu. 2019. Root and phrasal diminutive markers in Gan Chinese. Studia Linguistica 73(1). 37–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/stul.12089.Suche in Google Scholar

Masliyah, Sadok. 1997. The diminutive in spoken Iraqi Arabic. Zeitschrift für Arabische Linguistik 33. 68–88‏.Suche in Google Scholar

Mathieu, Éric. 2012. Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry 43(4). 650–679. https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00110.Suche in Google Scholar

Matushansky, Ora. 2006. Head movement in linguistic theory. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1). 69–109. ‏. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438906775321184.Suche in Google Scholar

Ott, Dennis. 2011. Diminutive-formation in German: Spelling out the classifier analysis. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics 14. 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-010-9040-x.Suche in Google Scholar

Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego. 2001. T-to-C movement: Causes and consequences. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language, 355–426. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0014Suche in Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2008. Form and function of expressive morphology: A case study of Russian. Vancouver: University of Vancouver dissertation.10.70163/0036-0252.1201Suche in Google Scholar

Steriopolo, Olga. 2013. Diminutive affixes in the number domain: A syntactic variation. Questions and Answers in Linguistics 1(2). 33–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/qal-2015-0003.Suche in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina. 2006. Why should diminutives count? In Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huijbregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds.), Organizing grammar: Linguistic studies in honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, 669–679. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110892994.669Suche in Google Scholar

Wiltschko, Martina & Olga Steriopolo. 2007. Parameters of variation in the syntax of diminutives. In Paper presented at the 2007 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, 26–29 May.Suche in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-03-05
Accepted: 2021-11-17
Published Online: 2022-10-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Editorial 2022
  4. Research Articles
  5. Perceptual similarity is not all: online perception of English coda stops by Korean listeners
  6. How Russian speakers express evolution in Pokémon names: an experimental study with nonce words
  7. Individual differences in simultaneous perceptual compensation for coarticulatory and lexical cues
  8. Phonetic change over the career: a case study
  9. Quantifying the importance of morphomic structure, semantic values, and frequency of use in Romance stem alternations
  10. The syntax of the diminutive morpheme -aaj in Egyptian Arabic, Syrian Arabic, and Jordanian Arabic
  11. Length, position, and functions of inter-clausal Chinese–English code-switching in a bilingual novel
  12. Discourse connectives and their arguments: an experiment on anaphoricity in German
  13. Modeling (im)precision in context
  14. The landscape of non-canonical ‘only’ in German
  15. Introducing Construction Semantics (CxS): a frame-semantic extension of Construction Grammar and constructicography
  16. Defining numeral classifiers and identifying classifier languages of the world
  17. A multivariate analysis of causative do and causative make in Middle English
  18. Unstressed versus stressed German additive auch – what determines a speaker’s choice?
  19. Metaphors are embodied otherwise they would not be metaphors
  20. A word-based account of comprehension and production of Kinyarwanda nouns in the Discriminative Lexicon
  21. Accounting for the relationship between lexical prevalence and acquisition with Bayesian networks and population dynamics
  22. L2 motivation and willingness to communicate: a moderated mediation model of psychological shyness
  23. Why are multiword units hard to acquire for late L2 learners? Insights from cognitive science on adult learning, processing, and retrieval
  24. Regularization in the face of variable input: Children’s acquisition of stem-final fricative plurals in American English
  25. The Manchester Voices Accent Van: taking sociolinguistic data collection on the road
  26. Interpreting the order of operations in a sociophonetic analysis
  27. Individual variation in performing reading-aloud speech among deaf speakers
  28. Generating hypotheses for alternations at low and intermediate levels of schematicity. The use of Memory-based Learning
  29. How can complex graphemes be identified in German?
  30. The Menzerath-Altmann law on the clause level in English texts
  31. A cognitive semantic analysis of ‘eat’ verb usages in Bangla
  32. Metonymy in the Korean internally headed relative clause construction
  33. Corpus linguistic and experimental studies on the meaning-preserving hypothesis in Indonesian voice alternations
  34. Monomodal and multimodal metaphors in editorial cartoons on the coronavirus by Jordanian cartoonists
  35. Corrigendum
  36. Corrigendum to: repetition in Mandarin-speaking children’s dialogs: its distribution and structural dimensions
Heruntergeladen am 19.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/lingvan-2021-0031/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen