Home Medicine A prospective cohort study: can advanced ultrasonography replace magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placental adhesion disorders?
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

A prospective cohort study: can advanced ultrasonography replace magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placental adhesion disorders?

  • Sabahattin Anil Ari , Asli Suner , Ayse Rabia Senkaya , Firat Okmen , Ali Akdemir ORCID logo EMAIL logo and Ahmet Mete Ergenoglu
Published/Copyright: January 6, 2023

Abstract

Objectives

To define and compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonography (USG) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the placental adhesive disorder (PAD).

Methods

A prospective study was conducted between January 2019 and February 2020 in a tertiary referral university hospital. A total of 115 placenta previa cases were included in the study during the third trimester of gestation. USG examination was performed, and the placenta was scanned in a systematic manner using gray-scale ultrasound, color Doppler flow mapping, and 3-D imaging for each participant. Thereafter, all participants underwent an MRI examination. USG and MRI findings were compared with histopathological findings.

Results

Loss of the retroplacental sonolucent zone (71% [95% CI 47–88]) and an irregular retroplacental sonolucent zone (71% [95% CI 47–88]) were the most sensitive USG parameters. For MRI, the uterine bulging parameter was the most sensitive (60% [95% CI 36–80]) and specific (91% [95% CI 83–96]) findings, and it had the highest accuracy rate (85% [95% CI 77–91]). Overall, the USG sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were 77% (95% CI 54–92), 87% (95% CI 79–93), and 85% (95% CI 77–91), respectively. The MRI sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates for all participants were 81% (95% CI 59–94), 85% (95% CI 76–92), and 84% (95% CI 76–90), respectively.

Conclusions

In the diagnosis of PAD, the specificity and accuracy of USG are higher than that of MRI, whereas the sensitivity of MRI is better than that of USG.


Corresponding author: Assoc. Prof. Ali Akdemir, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University School of Medicine, Kazim Dirik, University St., 3100, Izmir, Türkiye, Phone: +905056748904, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contribution: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Ege University Ethics Committee with 18–10.2/38 reference ID in September 2018.

References

1. Doumouchtsis, SK, Arulkumaran, S. The morbidly adherent placenta: an overview of management options. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:1126–33. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.503869.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Silver, RM, Landon, MB, Rouse, DJ, Leveno, KJ, Spong, CY, Thom, EA, et al.. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:1226–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000219750.79480.84.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Wu, S, Kocherginsky, M, Hibbard, JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:1458–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.074.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Zelop, CM, Harlow, BL, Frigoletto, FD, Safon, LE, Saltzman, DH. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1443–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9378(11)90779-0.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Tikkanen, M, Paavonen, J, Loukovaara, M, Stefanovic, V. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta leads to reduced blood loss. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1140–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01147.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Eller, AG, Porter, TT, Soisson, P, Silver, RM. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG 2009;116:648–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02037.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Warshak, CR, Eskander, R, Hull, AD, Scioscia, AL, Mattrey, RF, Benirschke, K, et al.. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:573–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000233155.62906.6d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Zaghal, AA, Hussain, HK, Berjawi, GA. MRI evaluation of the placenta from normal variants to abnormalities of implantation and malignancies. J Magn Reson Imag 2019;50:1702–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26764.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Masselli, G, Gualdi, G. MR imaging of the placenta: what a radiologist should know. Abdom Imag 2013;38:573–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-012-9929-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Srisajjakul, S, Prapaisilp, P, Bangchokdee, S. Magnetic resonance imaging of placenta accreta spectrum: a step-by-step approach. Korean J Radiol 2021;22:198–212. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2020.0580.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Chou, MM, Ho, ESC, Lee, YH. Prenatal diagnosis of placenta previa accreta by transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;15:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00018.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Pagani, G, Cali, G, Acharya, G, Trisch, IT, Palacios-Jaraquemada, J, Familiari, A, et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018;97:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13238.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Romeo, V, Sarno, L, Volpe, A, Ginocchio, MI, Esposito, R, Mainenti, PP, et al.. US and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study. Abdom Radiol 2019;44:3398–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02185-y.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. D’Antonio, F, Iacovella, C, Bhide, A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:509–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13194.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. MedCalc Diagnostic test evaluation calculator [Internet]. Available from: https://www.medcalc.org/calc/diagnostic_test.php [Accessed 17 Mar 2022].Search in Google Scholar

16. Comstock, CH, Love, JJ, Bronsteen, RA, Lee, W, Vettraino, IM, Huang, RR, et al.. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:1135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.024.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Chalubinski, KM, Pils, S, Klein, K, Seemann, R, Speiser, P, Langer, M, et al.. Prenatal sonography can predict degree of placental invasion. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:518–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12451.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Lerner, JP, Deane, S, Timor‐Tritsch, IE. Characterization of placenta accreta using transvaginal sonography and color Doppler imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995;5:198–201. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05030198.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

19. Comstock, CH. Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: a review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;26:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1926.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Levine, D, Barnes, PD, Edelman, RR. Obstetric MR imaging. Radiology 1999;211:609–17. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.211.3.r99jn20609.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Maurea, S, Romeo, V, Mainenti, PP, Ginocchio, MI, Frauenfelder, G, Verde, F, et al.. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing placental adhesion disorder in patients with placenta previa: correlation with histological findings. Eur J Radiol 2018;106:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.07.014.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Kapoor, H, Hanaoka, M, Dawkins, A, Khurana, A. Review of MRI imaging for placenta accreta spectrum: pathophysiologic insights, imaging signs, and recent developments. Placenta 2021;104:31–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2020.11.004.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. D’Antonio, F, Iacovella, C, Palacios-Jaraquemada, J, Bruno, CH, Manzoli, L, Bhide, A. Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:8–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13327.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24. Palacios-Jaraquemada, JM, Bruno, CH, Martín, E. MRI in the diagnosis and surgical management of abnormal placentation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:392–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01527.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-08-20
Revised: 2022-11-12
Accepted: 2022-12-08
Published Online: 2023-01-06
Published in Print: 2023-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Disquiet concerning cesarean birth
  4. Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome among incarcerated pregnant individuals in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  5. Corner of Academy
  6. Does COVID-19 infection acquired in different pregnancy trimester influence placental pathology?
  7. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  8. Did the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic impact the cesarean delivery rate? A retrospective cohort study at a primary care center in Switzerland
  9. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection
  10. Hidden in plain sight in the delivery room – the Apgar score is biased
  11. Comparison of phase rectified signal averaging and short term variation in predicting perinatal outcome in early onset fetal growth restriction
  12. Serum levels of kynurenine in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction and oligohydramnios
  13. Effect of third trimester maternal vitamin D levels on placental weight to birth weight ratio in uncomplicated pregnancies
  14. One-third of patients with eclampsia at term do not have an abnormal angiogenic profile
  15. Chorioangioma: a single tertiary care center retrospective study
  16. A prospective cohort study: can advanced ultrasonography replace magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placental adhesion disorders?
  17. Original Articles – Fetus
  18. Fetal left brachiocephalic vein diameters in normal and growth restricted fetuses
  19. Functional assessment of atrial wall excursion and foramen ovale flap tracings in 3rd trimester as predictor of short-term hemodynamic stability in congenital heart defects fetuses
  20. Original Articles – Neonates
  21. Developing a new pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program
  22. Patterns of placental injury in various types of fetal congenital heart disease
  23. Short Communication
  24. Prenatal care in the era of economic collapse
  25. Letters to the Editor
  26. Does fetus feel stress or pain on uterine contraction?
  27. Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A for the prediction of small for gestational age
  28. Reply to: Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A for the prediction of small for gestational age
Downloaded on 31.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2022-0407/html
Scroll to top button