Home Fetal left brachiocephalic vein diameters in normal and growth restricted fetuses
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Fetal left brachiocephalic vein diameters in normal and growth restricted fetuses

  • Didem Kaymak ORCID logo , Verda Alpay ORCID logo , Ebru Alıcı Davutoğlu ORCID logo , Melike Makul ORCID logo and Riza Madazlı ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 5, 2022

Abstract

Objectives

To develop a nomogram for fetal left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV) diameters during a healthy pregnancy and to assess LBCV values in fetuses with fetal growth restriction (FGR).

Methods

This prospective observational study included 31 FGR pregnancies and 438 low-risk pregnancies. The low-risk group was used to determine the 5th, mean, and 95th percentiles for the LBCV between 12 and 39 weeks of gestation based on gestational age. On growth charts, LBCV measurements of FGR fetuses were displayed, and those above the gestational age 95th percentile were considered wide vein. Cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilical artery (UA), middle cerebral artery (MCA), and ductus venosus (DV) Doppler parameters were evaluated in FGR fetuses.

Results

LBCV diameter increased significantly with advancing gestational age. The LBCV diameters were above the 95th percentile in 23 of the 31 FGR fetuses (74.2%). All fetuses (15/15, 100%) with early-onset (EO)-FGR and 8 fetuses (8/16, 50%) with the late-onset (LO)-FGR had LBCV values above the 95th percentile (p<0.01). UA-PI was significantly higher and MCA-PI and CPR were significantly lower in LO-FGR fetuses with LBCV diameters above the 95th percentile (p<0.05).

Conclusions

LBCV diameters of fetuses with FGR were significantly wider than the normal population. In the LO-FGR group, there was a good correlation between LBCV diameter and CPR.


Corresponding author: Riza Madazlı, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İstanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Kocamustafapasa, Istanbul, Turkey, Phone: 00905326138081, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: D.K, conceptualization, methodology, data collection, data analysis, writing; V.A and E.AD, data collection, data analysis; M.M, data collection; R.M, methodology, data analysis, writing, supervision, review and editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from each participant included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: The Human Research Committee of the Research Institute approved the study protocol. (Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty- E-528-25153-604.01.01–364555).

References

1. Chaoui, R, Heling, KS, Karl, K. Ultrasound of the fetal veins part 2: veins at the cardiac level. Ultraschall der Med 2014;35:302–21. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1366848.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Sinkovskaya, E, Abuhamad, A, Horton, S, Chaoui, R, Karl, K. Fetal left brachiocephalic vein in normal and abnormal conditions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;40:542–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.11166.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Tongsong, T, Luewan, S, Jatavan, P, Tongprasert, F, Sukpan, K. Rule for prenatal diagnosis of total anomalous pulmonary venous return. J Ultrasound Med 2016;35:1601–7. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.08016.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Karl, K, Sinkovskaya, E, Abuhamad, A, Chaoui, R. Intrathymic and other anomalous courses of the left brachiocephalic vein in the fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:464–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15795.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Gordijn, SJ, Beune, IM, Thilaganathan, B, Papageorghiou, A, Baschat, AA, Baker, PN, et al.. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;48:333–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15884.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Figueras, F, Gratacos, E. Update on the diagnosis and classification of fetal growth restriction and proposal of a stage-based management protocol. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;36:86–98. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357592.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Bilardo, CM, Hecher, K, Visser, GHA, Papageorghiou, AT, Marlow, N, Thilaganathan, B, TRUFFLE Group. Severe fetal growth restriction at 26–32 weeks: key messages from the TRUFFLE study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:285–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18815.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Khalil, A, Thilaganathan, B. Role of uteroplacental and fetal Doppler in identifying fetal growth restriction at term. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017;38:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.003.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Ebbing, C, Rasmussen, S, Godfrey, KM, Hanson, MA, Kiserud, T. Redistribution pattern of fetal liver circulation in intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:1118–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016340903214924.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Bhide, A, Acharya, G, Bilardo, CM, Brezinka, C, Cafici, D, Hernandez-Andrade, E, et al.. ISUOG practice guidelines: use of Doppler ultrasonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;41:233–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12371.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. RCOG. Small for gestational age fetus, investigation and management (Green-top Guideline No. 31), 2nd ed.; 2013:31 p. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg31/.Search in Google Scholar

12. Fleiss, JL, Levin, B, Paik, MC. Statistical inference for a single proportion. In: Shewart, WA, Wilks, SS, editors. Statistical methods for rates and proportions. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2003:17–49 pp.10.1002/0471445428.ch2Search in Google Scholar

13. Shah, N. Fetal left brachiocephalic vein (LBCV): visualization and its measurements in Indian population. J Fetal Med 2020;7:145–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40556-020-00239-6.Search in Google Scholar

14. Han, J, Sun, L, Gu, X, Zhang, Y, Guo, Y, Hao, X, et al.. Prenatal diagnosis of the fetal retroesophageal left brachiocephalic vein: case series and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2020;39:397–405. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15099.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

15. Crispi, F, Miranda, J, Gratacós, E. Long-term cardiovascular consequences of fetal growth restriction: biology, clinical implications, and opportunities for prevention of adult disease. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:869–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.012.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Kiserud, T, Ebbing, C, Kessler, J, Rasmussen, S. Fetal cardiac output, distribution to the placenta and impact of placental compromise. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006;28:126–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2832.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-07-24
Accepted: 2022-11-08
Published Online: 2022-12-05
Published in Print: 2023-06-27

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Disquiet concerning cesarean birth
  4. Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome among incarcerated pregnant individuals in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  5. Corner of Academy
  6. Does COVID-19 infection acquired in different pregnancy trimester influence placental pathology?
  7. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  8. Did the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic impact the cesarean delivery rate? A retrospective cohort study at a primary care center in Switzerland
  9. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection
  10. Hidden in plain sight in the delivery room – the Apgar score is biased
  11. Comparison of phase rectified signal averaging and short term variation in predicting perinatal outcome in early onset fetal growth restriction
  12. Serum levels of kynurenine in pregnancies with fetal growth restriction and oligohydramnios
  13. Effect of third trimester maternal vitamin D levels on placental weight to birth weight ratio in uncomplicated pregnancies
  14. One-third of patients with eclampsia at term do not have an abnormal angiogenic profile
  15. Chorioangioma: a single tertiary care center retrospective study
  16. A prospective cohort study: can advanced ultrasonography replace magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of placental adhesion disorders?
  17. Original Articles – Fetus
  18. Fetal left brachiocephalic vein diameters in normal and growth restricted fetuses
  19. Functional assessment of atrial wall excursion and foramen ovale flap tracings in 3rd trimester as predictor of short-term hemodynamic stability in congenital heart defects fetuses
  20. Original Articles – Neonates
  21. Developing a new pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) program
  22. Patterns of placental injury in various types of fetal congenital heart disease
  23. Short Communication
  24. Prenatal care in the era of economic collapse
  25. Letters to the Editor
  26. Does fetus feel stress or pain on uterine contraction?
  27. Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A for the prediction of small for gestational age
  28. Reply to: Pregnancy associated plasma protein-A for the prediction of small for gestational age
Downloaded on 17.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2022-0356/html
Scroll to top button