Home The impact of COVID-19 on smoking cessation in pregnancy
Article Open Access

The impact of COVID-19 on smoking cessation in pregnancy

  • Nadja Bednarczuk , Emma E. Williams ORCID logo , Gareth Absalom , Judith Olaitan-Salami and Anne Greenough ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: May 10, 2022

Abstract

Objectives

A greater proportion of non-pregnant smokers attempted to stop smoking during compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of this study was to determine if a greater proportion of pregnant women also attempted to stop smoking during the pandemic rather than before.

Methods

The use of antenatal smoking cessation services and nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) in pregnant women was audited before (2019–2020) and during the COVID pandemic (2020–2021). Anonymised data from January 2019 to March 2021 were analysed from the Lambeth and Southwark smoking cessation service.

Results

A total of 252 pregnant women who smoked were referred to their local antenatal smoking cessation service, of which 90 (35.7%) (median age: 31 years [19–52 years]) chose to attend smoking cessation clinics. The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with an increase in the number of women attending smoking cessation clinics, (2020–2021 n=46 [40.8%] of 110); compared to (2019–2020 n=44 [30.9%] of 142 referred pregnant women pre-pandemic) p=0.061. Eighty-two women utilised NRT to help them stop smoking and the frequency of NRT use did not change during the pandemic (2019–2020 n=39, 2020–2021 n=43; p=0.420). No significant difference in smoking cessation rates between the two periods was observed at either the four-week (p=0.285) or twelve-week follow-up (p=0.829).

Conclusions

Smoking cessation rates in pregnant women and the demand for antenatal smoking cessation services was unchanged during compared to before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Introduction

A greater number of smokers attempted to stop smoking during the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Available UK data for pregnant women, however, suggested only a small decrease in smoking rates, falling from a mean of 10.42% in 2019 to 9.75% in the first half of 2020 [2]. To reduce the rates of smoking in pregnancy, all pregnant smokers should be referred to antenatal smoking cessation services [3]. Those clinics provide detailed cessation advice and, in line with current National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, can recommend behavioural interventions, such as cognitive behavioural therapy and motivational interviewing, as first line interventions to help women stop smoking [3]. If those methods are unsuccessful, NICE guidance advises the use of pharmacological nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) [3]. From March 2020 smoking cessation services continued their clinics virtually due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Despite increased attempts to stop smoking during the pandemic, no increase in uptake of smoking cessation support, including NRT use, was observed amongst non-pregnant adults [1]. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the demand for antenatal smoking cessation services, however, has not been considered. We, therefore, audited the use of a community antenatal smoking cessation service and uptake of nicotine replacement therapies in pregnant women, before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and methods

Anonymized data from pregnant women attending the Lambeth and Southwark community specialist smoking cessation service from the 1st of April 2019 to March 31st, 2021 were reviewed. These data included demographic information, medical history, cigarette smoking habits, the smoking cessation strategies utilised and the success of those strategies. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic was considered by comparing data from 2019–2020 to data from 2020–2021. This audit was approved by the local Trust Clinical Governance and Audit department.

Ethical statement

The authors confirm that they have complied with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki regarding ethical conduct of research involving human subjects.

Statistical analysis

Differences were assessed for statistical significance using a chi-squared test and SPSS software, version 26.0.

Results

A total of 252 pregnant women who smoked were referred to their local antenatal smoking cessation service, of which 90 (35.7%) (median age: 31 years [19–52 years]) chose to attend smoking cessation clinics. The COVID-19 pandemic was not associated with an increase in the number of women attending smoking cessation clinics (2020–2021 n=46 of 110 [40.8%] compared to pre-pandemic 2019–2020 n=44 of 142 [30.9%] referred pregnant women) (p=0.061). Eighteen (20%) women had a history of mental health problems. The number of women disclosing mental health problems did not increase in the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–2020 n=9, 2020–2021 n=9). Other medical co-morbidities included asthma (n=7, 7.8%), dermatological conditions (n=3, 3.3%) and cancer (n=1, 1.1%).

Prior to smoking cessation, 30% of women (2019–2020 n=14, 2020–2021 n=12) reported smoking 11 cigarettes or less, and 26.7% of women smoked 11 to 20 cigarettes per day (2019–2020 n=11, 2020–2021 n=13). Thirty women (33.3%) exclusively utilised cigarettes, whilst 14 (15.6%) used roll-ups, and 6 (6.7%) women used both. One woman reported only using chewing tobacco, 39 women did not quantify their smoking habits (2019–2020 n=19, 2020–2021 n=20).

Most women (n=59, 65.6%) had the date on which they stopped smoking as well as the due date for their pregnancy recorded. Women stopped smoking a median of 127 days (range: 18–274 days) into their pregnancy in the 2019–2020 cohort. Similarly, women stopped smoking a median of 124 days (43–237 days) during the COVID-19 pandemic. When comparing cessation dates before and during the pandemic, there was no significant difference (p=0.235) in the number of women trying to stop smoking before 20 weeks of gestation (Figure 1).

Figure 1: 
Comparison of smoking cessation dates in context of pregnancy duration before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Figure 1:

Comparison of smoking cessation dates in context of pregnancy duration before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

To help them stop smoking, 82 women (91.1%) utilised NRT, whilst 8 did not. There was no significant difference (p=0.420) in the frequency of NRT use before and during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019–2020 n=39, 2020–2021 n=43). NRT was provided in multiple different formats, including a nicotine patch, nicotine inhalators, mouth sprays, chewing gums or lozenges. Fifty-eight (64.4%) women utilised more than one type of NRT throughout their pregnancy and 19 (21.1%) utilised more than two different types. The most frequently utilised NRT format was the nicotine patch (n=71, 78.8%), followed by mouth spray (n=38, 42.2%), nicotine inhaler (n=27, 30%), chewing gum (n=19, 21.1%) and lozenges (n=12, 13.3%). The popularity of different NRT formats did not change due to the COVID-19 pandemic (Figure 2).

Figure 2: 
Frequency of use of varying nicotine-replacement therapies.
Figure 2:

Frequency of use of varying nicotine-replacement therapies.

When considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on smoking cessation rates (Table 1), there was no significant difference in the rates of abstinence at either four-week (p=0.285) or twelve-week follow-up (p=0.829) (Table 1).

Table 1:

Comparison of smoking cessation rates by year from 2019 to 2021.

2019–2020 2020–2021
4 weeks 12 weeks 4 weeks 12 weeks
Abstinent 33 (75%) 19 (43.2%) 32 (70%) 18 (39.1%)
Reduced consumption 4 (9.1%) 10 (22.7%) 6 (13%) 9 (19.6%)
Unchanged smoking habits 3 (6.8%) 3 (6.8%) 6 (13%) 4 (8.7%)
Unknown 4 (9.1%) 12 (27.3%) 2 (4.35%) 15 (32.6%)
  1. The data are demonstrated as n (%).

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that during the COVID-19 pandemic there were no significant changes in smoking cessation rates in pregnancy or the demand for antenatal smoking cessation services. Rates of NRT use also remained unchanged. A recent study of smoking cessation in non-pregnant adults, similarly, demonstrated no increased uptake of formal smoking cessation support or the use of NRT during the COVID-19 pandemic [1]. Smoking cessation rates, however, remained unaffected by the COVID-19 pandemic in our cohort of pregnant women, whereas greater attempts to stop smoking were observed in non-pregnant adults [1]. As such, other factors may be exerting a greater influence on smoking cessation in pregnancy independent from the COVID-19 pandemic. For instance, mental health diagnoses are well-recognised confounding factors that may hinder pregnant women from giving up smoking [4] and were the most frequent co-morbidity observed in our cohort of women, both before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Similar levels of did not attend rates were seen pre and during the pandemic

Recent studies have demonstrated widespread non-adherence to smoking cessation therapies in large cohorts of pregnant women [5]. As the majority of women were utilising NRT, the unchanged smoking cessation rates may reflect a lack of effectiveness of NRT. Indeed, hepatic nicotine metabolism is increased in pregnancy, potentially explaining the need for women to utilise different types of NRT with varying onsets of action [6]. Our data may reflect insufficient use of higher dose levels of NRT rather than ineffectiveness of NRT.

In conclusion, our data demonstrate that smoking cessation rates in pregnant women and the demand for antenatal smoking cessation services remained unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic, thereby differing from the trends observed in the general adult population during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Corresponding author: Anne Greenough, Professor, Department of Women and Children’s Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK; Asthma UK Centre for Allergic Mechanisms in Asthma, King’s College London, London, UK; and NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St. Thomas NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK, Phone: 0203 299 3037, E-mail:

Funding source: SLE

Award Identifier / Grant number: N/A

Funding source: Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust

Award Identifier / Grant number: N/A

Funding source: NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London

Award Identifier / Grant number: N/A

  1. Research funding: Emma Williams was supported by a grant from the Charles Wolfson Charitable Trust and a non-conditional educational grant from SLE. This research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The study was registered with Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust Clinical Governance and Audit department.

References

1. Jackson, SE, Garnett, C, Shahab, L, Oldham, M, Brown, J. Association of the COVID-19 lockdown with smoking, drinking and attempts to quit in England: an analysis of 2019–20 data. Addiction 2021;116:1233–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15295.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

2. NHS Digital. Statistics on women’s smoking status at time of delivery: england - quarter 3, 2020-21; 2021. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/publications/statistical/statistics-on-women-s-smoking-status-at-time-of-delivery-england/statistics-on-womens-smoking-status-at-time-of-delivery-england---quarter-3-2020-21.Search in Google Scholar

3. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Overview | smoking: stopping in pregnancy and after childbirth | guidance. London and Manchester: NICE; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

4. Tong, VT, Farr, SL, Bombard, J, D’Angelo, D, Ko, JY, England, LJ. Smoking before and during pregnancy among women reporting depression or anxiety. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:562–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001595.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

5. Claire, R, Chamberlain, C, Davey, MA, Cooper, SE, Berlin, I, Leonardi-Bee, J, et al.. Pharmacological interventions for promoting smoking cessation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;3:CD010078. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010078.pub3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

6. Bowker, K, Lewis, S, Coleman, T, Cooper, S. Changes in the rate of nicotine metabolism across pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Addiction 2015;110:1827–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13029.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Received: 2022-04-06
Accepted: 2022-04-08
Published Online: 2022-05-10
Published in Print: 2022-09-27

© 2022 Nadja Bednarczuk et al., published by De Gruyter, Berlin/Boston

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Review
  3. Neonatal and child mortality – are they different in developing and developed countries?
  4. WAPM Guideline
  5. First trimester examination of fetal anatomy: clinical practice guideline by the World Association of Perinatal Medicine (WAPM) and the Perinatal Medicine Foundation (PMF)
  6. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  7. Symptoms of maternal psychological distress during pregnancy: sex-specific effects for neonatal morbidity
  8. Efficacy of the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/lymphocyte ratio (LLR) to reduce the need for X-ray in pregnant patients with COVID-19
  9. Attitude of pregnant and lactating women toward COVID-19 vaccination in Jordan: a cross-sectional study
  10. Association between maternal thyroid function and risk of gestational hypertension and preeclampsia
  11. Evaluation of umbilical cord immune cells in pregnancies with autoimmune disorders and/or methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms
  12. The association between induction of labour in nulliparous women at term and subsequent spontaneous preterm birth: a retrospective cohort study
  13. Transvaginally surgically treatment of early postpartum hemorrhage caused by lower uterine segment atony
  14. Value of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor test in third trimester of pregnancy for predicting preeclampsia in asymptomatic women
  15. Fetal growth regulation via insulin-like growth factor axis in normal and diabetic pregnancy
  16. Intrapartum cardiotocography in pregnancies with and without fetal CHD
  17. Racial and ethnic representation in 17-hydroxyprogesterone caproate preterm birth prevention studies: a systematic review
  18. Original Articles – Fetus
  19. Improved method for revising the Israel birthweight references
  20. A single center experience in 90 cases with nonimmune hydrops fetalis: diagnostic categories ‒ mostly aneuploidy and still often idiopathic
  21. Original Articles – Neonates
  22. Diagnosis of congenital infections in premature, low-birthweight newborns with intrauterine growth restriction caused by cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), Parvo-B 19, and Zika virus: a systematic review
  23. The impact of COVID-19 on smoking cessation in pregnancy
  24. Letter to the Editor
  25. Early placenta previa percreta and treatment with supracervical abortion hysterectomy
Downloaded on 19.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2022-0178/html
Scroll to top button