Home Improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure ventilation use in neonates in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure ventilation use in neonates in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Fatima Usman ORCID logo , Zubaida L. Farouk ORCID logo , Fatimah I. Tsiga-Ahmed EMAIL logo , Muhammed Abdussalam , Rabiu I. Jalo , Sa’adatu S. Mohammad and Muktar H. Aliyu
Published/Copyright: March 10, 2022

Abstract

Objectives

In the face of limited fiscal and technical resources, improvised methods have been used to provide effective and sustainable ventilatory support in low-resource settings to reduce neonatal mortality associated with respiratory complications. This study assessed the use of improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure (ibCPAP) ventilation among neonates with respiratory complications and determined its effect on neonatal outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Content

Hospital-based studies conducted between 2010 and 2020 in LMICs were reviewed. Rayyan® software for systematic review was used for screening and article selection. We used Stata® Statacorp Texas USA software to estimate pooled prevalence, proportion estimates, weighted mean differences and 95% Confidence Interval (CI), using the random effects model.

Summary

A total of 193 articles were generated and 125 were reviewed. Thirteen articles with 806 neonates on ibCPAP ventilation were included. The pooled prevalence of ibCPAP use was 7.0% (95% CI: 3.0%–13.0%). There was a significant difference in mean oxygen saturation before and after ibCPAP use (−1.34% [95% CI: −1.65% to −1.02%, p<0.01). The duration of oxygen requirement among neonates on ibCPAP was 6.5 hours less than controls (0.27 days [95%CI: −0.49 to −0.05, p<0.01).

Outlook

IbCPAP had no effect on the respiratory rate, duration of admission, mortality and survival. IbCPAP use in LMIC hospitals is low and its use improved oxygen saturation and duration on oxygen among the neonates, but had no impact on length of stay, respiratory rate, mortality or survival.


Corresponding author: Fatimah I. Tsiga-Ahmed, MBBS, MSc, FWACP, Department of Community Medicine, Bayero University, Kano & Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria, Phone: +234 8033148264, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: No external funding was involved in the preparation of this manuscript.

  2. Author contribution: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. UN Inter Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality 2019. New York: United Nations Children’s Fund; 2019.Search in Google Scholar

2. Mejía-Guevara, I, Zuo, W, Bendavid, E, Li, N, Tuljapurkar, S. Age distribution, trends, and forecasts of under-5 mortality in 31 sub-saharan african countries: a modeling study. PLoS Med 2019;16:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002757.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. Iwelunmor, J, Blackstone, S, Veira, D, Nwaozuru, U, Airhihenbuwa, C, Munodawafa, D, et al.. Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and conceptual framework. Implement Sci 2016;11:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0392-8.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Pype, P, Mertens, F, Helewaut, F, Krystallidou, D. Healthcare teams as complex adaptive systems: understanding team behaviour through team members’ perception of interpersonal interaction. BMC Health Serv Res 2018;18:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-018-3392-3/TABLES/4.Search in Google Scholar

5. McKenna, K, Leykum, LK, McDaniel, RR. The role of improvising in patient care. Health Care Manag Rev 2013;38:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0b013e31823ea9c7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Wheeler, CR, Smallwood, CD. 2019 Year in review: neonatal respiratory support. Respir Care 2020;65:693–704. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07720.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Nasef, N, Rashed, HM, Aly, H. Practical aspects on the use of non-invasive respiratory support in preterm infants. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med 2020;7:19–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2020.02.005.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Kamath, BD, MacGuire, ER, McClure, EM, Goldenberg, RL, Jobe, AH. Neonatal mortality from respiratory distress syndrome: lessons for low-resource countries. Pediatrics 2011;127:1139–46. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2010-3212.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

9. Tagare, A, Kadam, S, Vaidya, U, Pandit, A, Patole, S. Bubble CPAP versus ventilator CPAP in preterm neonates with early onset respiratory distress – a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr 2013;59:113–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fms061.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Koyamaibole, L, Kado, J, Qovu, JD, Colquhoun, S, Duke, T. An evaluation of bubble-CPAP in a neonatal unit in a developing country: effective respiratory support that can be applied by nurses. J Trop Pediatr 2005;52:249–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmi109.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Amadi, HO, Okonkwo, IR, Abioye, IO, Amina, L, Olateju, EK, Adesina, CT, et al.. A new low-cost commercial bubble CPAP (bCPAP) machine compared with a traditional bCPAP device in Nigeria. Paediatr Int Child Health 2019;39:184–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/20469047.2019.1598125.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Carns, J, Kawaza, K, Liaghati-Mobarhan, S, Asibon, A, Quinn, MK, Chalira, A, et al.. Neonatal CPAP for respiratory distress across Malawi and mortality. Pediatrics 2019;144:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-0668.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Thaddanee, R, Chaudhari, A, Chauhan, H. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure machine versus indigenous bubble continuous positive airway pressure as a respiratory support in preterm babies with respiratory distress sydrome: a prospective outcome research at a tertiary care centre in Gujur. Int J Contemp Paediatr 2018;5:493–8. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3291.ijcp20180542.Search in Google Scholar

14. Jalo, I, Isaac, EW, Aliu, R, Raymond, MP. Improvised continuous positive pressure airway ventilation for treatment of respiratory distress in neonates in resource limited setting. Jewel J Med Sci 2020;1:20–6.Search in Google Scholar

15. Audu, L, Otuneye, A, Mairami, A, Mukhtar, M. Improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure ( BCPAP ) device at the National Hospital Abuja gives immediate improvement in respiratory rate and oxygenation in neonates with respiratory distress. Niger J Paediatr 2015;42:12–6.10.4314/njp.v42i1.4Search in Google Scholar

16. Abdulkadir, I, Hassan, L, Abdullahi, F, Purdue, S, Ogala, WN, Isa, A. Nasal bubble CPAP: one year experience in a neonatal unit of a tertiary health facility in northwestern Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2015;22:1–5.10.4103/1117-1936.163360Search in Google Scholar

17. Daga, S, Mhatre, S, Borhade, A, Khan, D. Home-made continuous positive airways pressure device may reduce mortality in neonates with respiratory distress in low-resource setting. J Trop Pediatr 2014;60:343–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmu023.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Ezenwa, B, Akintan, P, Fajolu, I, Ladele, J, Ezeaka, C. Bubble CPAP in the management of respiratory distress syndrome in resource constrained setting: the luth experience. Pediatr Oncall 2016;13:9–12.10.7199/ped.oncall.2016.11Search in Google Scholar

19. Okonkwo, I, Okolo, A. Bubble CPAP in Nigerian tertiary hospitals; patented and improvised. Niger J Paediatr 2016;43:286–90.10.4314/njp.v43i4.10Search in Google Scholar

20. Mwatha, AB, Mahande, M, Olomi, R, John, B, Philemon, R. Treatment outcomes of Pumani bubble-CPAP versus oxygen therapy among preterm babies presenting with respiratory distress at a tertiary hospital in Tanzania-Randomised trial. PLoS One 2020;15:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235031.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

21. Ahmed, Z, Awais, S, Hassan, U, Khan, UN, Subhani, FA. Use of indigenously designed nasal bubble continuous positive airway pressure (NB-CPAP) in neonates with respiratory distress – experience from a military hospital. Pak Armed Forces Med J 2016;66:645–50.Search in Google Scholar

22. Thukral, A, Sankar, MJ, Chandrasekaran, A, Agarwal, R, Paul, VK. Efficacy and safety of CPAP in low- and middle-income countries. J Perinatol 2016;36:S21–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.29.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

23. Kinshella, MLW, Walker, CR, Hiwa, T, Vidler, M, Nyondo-Mipando, AL, Dube, Q, et al.. Barriers and facilitators to implementing bubble CPAP to improve neonatal health in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Publ Health Rev 2020;41:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-020-00124-7.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Ouzzani, M, Hammady, H, Fedorowicz, Z, Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016;5:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

25. Wong, WCW, Cheung, CSK, Hart, GJ. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2008;5:3–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-23.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

26. Ethodology, M, Nyaga, VN, Arbyn, M, Aerts, M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Publ Health 2014;72:1–10.10.1186/2049-3258-72-39Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Borenstein, M, Hedges, LV, Higgins, JPT, Rothstein, HR. A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2010;1:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.12.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

28. Kawaza, K, Machen, HE, Brown, J, Mwanza, Z, Iniguez, S, Gest, A, et al.. Efficacy of a low-cost bubble CPAP system in treatment of respiratory distress in a neonatal ward in Malawi. Malawi Med J 2016;28:131–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086327.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Okello, F, Egiru, E, Ikiror, J, Acom, L, Loe, K, Olupot-Olupot, P, et al.. Reducing preterm mortality in eastern Uganda: the impact of introducing low-cost bubble CPAP on neonates. BMC Pediatr 2019;19:2–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1698-x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

30. McAdams, RM, Hedstrom, AB, Diblasi, RM, Mant, JE, Nyonyintono, J, Otai, CD, et al.. Implementation of bubble CPAP in a rural Ugandan neonatal ICU. Respir Care 2015;60:437–45. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.03438.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

31. Nyondo-Mipando, AL, Kinshella, MLW, Bohne, C, Suwedi-Kapesa, LC, Salimu, S, Banda, M, et al.. Barriers and enablers of implementing bubble continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP): perspectives of health professionals in Malawi. PLoS One 2020;15:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228915.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

32. Rantakari, K, Rinta-Koski, OP, Metsäranta, M, Hollmén, J, Särkkä, S, Rahkonen, P, et al.. Early oxygen levels contribute to brain injury in extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Res 2021;90:131–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01460-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

33. Verhagen, EA, Van Braeckel, KNJA, van der Veere, CN, Groen, H, Dijk, PH, Hulzebos, CV, et al.. Cerebral oxygenation is associated with neurodevelopmental outcome of preterm children at age 2 to 3 years. Dev Med Child Neurol 2015;57:449–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/DMCN.12622.Search in Google Scholar

34. Saugstad, OD, Aune, D. Optimal oxygenation of extremely low birth weight infants: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the oxygen saturation target studies. Neonatology 2014;105:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1159/000356561.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Bracci, R, Perrone, S, Vento, M, Buonocore, G. Oxygen toxicity in newborns. In: Buonocore, G, Bracci, R, Weindling, M, editors. Neonatology. Cham: Springer; 2017. pp. 1–18.10.1007/978-3-319-18159-2_180-1Search in Google Scholar

36. Weinberger, B, Laskin, DL, Heck, DE, Laskin, JD. Oxygen toxicity in premature infants. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2002;181:60–7. https://doi.org/10.1006/TAAP.2002.9387.Search in Google Scholar

37. Graham, HR, Olojede, OE, Bakare, AA, Iuliano, A, Olatunde, O, Isah, A, et al.. Measuring oxygen access: lessons from health facility assessments in Lagos, Nigeria. BMJ Glob Heal 2021;6:6069. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006069.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

38. Saksena, P, Xu, K, Elovainio, R, Perrot, J. Utilization and expenditure at public and private facilities in 39 low-income countries. Trop Med Int Health 2012;17:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02894.x.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

39. Alkire, S, Assa, J, Calderón, C, Casarini, A, Conceição, P, Dirksen, J, et al.. Global multidimensional poverty index: unmasking disparities by ethnicity, caste and gender. New York and Oxford: United Nations Development Programme and Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative; 2021.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-01-07
Revised: 2022-02-07
Accepted: 2022-02-14
Published Online: 2022-03-10
Published in Print: 2023-09-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Reviews
  3. Covid-19 vaccination and pregnancy: a systematic review of maternal and neonatal outcomes
  4. Improvised bubble continuous positive airway pressure ventilation use in neonates in resource-limited settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  5. Opinion Papers
  6. Anger: an underappreciated destructive force in healthcare
  7. Severe maternal thrombocytopenia and prenatal invasive procedures: still a grey zone
  8. Commentary
  9. The care of the magic of life before and after its beginning
  10. Original Articles – Obstetrics
  11. The impact of trimester of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes after recovery
  12. Adverse outcomes and maternal complications in pregnant women with severe-critical COVID-19: a tertiary center experience
  13. Are bacteria, fungi, and archaea present in the midtrimester amniotic fluid?
  14. Bioavailability of the tumor necrosis factor alpha/regulated on activation, normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES) biosystem inside the gestational sac during the pre-immune stages of embryo development
  15. The role of the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1/placental growth factor (sFlt-1/PIGF) – ratio in clinical practice in obstetrics: diagnostic and prognostic value
  16. Prenatal diagnosis of non-mosaic sex chromosome abnormalities: a 10-year experience from a tertiary referral center
  17. Prediction of lung maturity through quantitative ultrasound analysis of fetal lung texture in women with diabetes during pregnancy
  18. Evaluation of an artificial intelligent algorithm (Heartassist™) to automatically assess the quality of second trimester cardiac views: a prospective study
  19. Original Article – Fetus
  20. Fetal brain activity and the free energy principle
  21. Predictive value of ultrasound in prenatal diagnosis of hypospadias: hints for accurate diagnosis
  22. The effect of maternal diabetes on the expression of gamma-aminobutyric acid and metabotropic glutamate receptors in male newborn rats’ inferior colliculi
  23. Original Articles – Neonates
  24. Respiratory function monitoring during early resuscitation and prediction of outcomes in prematurely born infants
  25. Quality improvement sustainability to decrease utilization drift for therapeutic hypothermia in the NICU
  26. Short Communication
  27. Use of a pocket-device point-of-care ultrasound to assess cervical dilation in labor: correlation and patient experience
  28. Letters to the Editor
  29. Correspondence on “COVID-19 vaccination and pregnancy”
  30. Response to the letter to the editor regarding “Covid-19 vaccination and pregnancy: a systematic review of maternal and neonatal outcomes”
Downloaded on 10.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2022-0009/html
Scroll to top button