Impact factors on fetal descent rates in the active phase of labor: a retrospective cohort study

References

[1] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Caughey AB, Cahill AG, Guise JM, Rouse DJ. Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014;210:179–93.10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Friedman EA. Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1956;8:691–703.10.1097/00006250-195612000-00007Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Friedman EA. Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 1955;6:567–89.10.1097/00006250-195512000-00001Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Graseck A, Tuuli M, Roehl K, Odibo A, Macones G, Cahill A. Fetal descent in labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:521–6.10.1097/AOG.0000000000000131Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Carlhall S, Kallen K, Blomberg M. Maternal body mass index and duration of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;171:49–53.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.08.021Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW, Burkman R, Haberman S, Gregory KD, et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1281–7.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181fdef6eSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[7] Laughon SK, Berghella V, Reddy UM, Sundaram R, Lu Z, Hoffman MK. Neonatal and maternal outcomes with prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:57–67.10.1097/AOG.0000000000000278Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[8] Cheng YW, Caughey AB. Second stage of labor. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58:227–40.10.1097/GRF.0000000000000113Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181–93.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182704880Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[10] Zaki MN, Hibbard JU, Kominiarek MA. Contemporary labor patterns and maternal age. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:1018–24.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a9c92cSuche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[11] Albers LL, Schiff M, Gorwoda JG. The length of active labor in normal pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87:355–9.10.1016/0029-7844(95)00423-8Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Kilpatrick SJ, Laros RK Jr. Characteristics of normal labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;74:85–7.10.1097/00132582-199004000-00007Suche in Google Scholar

[13] Vahratian A, Hoffman MK, Troendle JF, Zhang J. The impact of parity on course of labor in a contemporary population. Birth 2006;33:12–7.10.1111/j.0730-7659.2006.00069.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Leftwich HK, Gao W, Wilkins I. Does increase in birth weight change the normal labor curve? Am J Perinatol. 2015;32:87–92.10.1055/s-0034-1376180Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Alexander JM, Sharma SK, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ. Epidural analgesia lengthens the Friedman active phase of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100:46–50.Suche in Google Scholar

[16] Greenberg MB, Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Stotland NE, Bryant AS, Caughey AB. Are there ethnic differences in the length of labor? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:743–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2006.06.016Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Schiessl B, Janni W, Jundt K, Rammel G, Peschers U, Kainer F. Obstetrical parameters influencing the duration of the second stage of labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2005;118:17–20.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.045Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Howell CJ. Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:CD000331.10.1002/14651858.CD000331Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee on Practice B-O. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 49, December 2003: dystocia and augmentation of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1445–54.10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.10.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Neilson JP, Lavender T, Quenby S, Wray S. Obstructed labour. Br Med Bull. 2003;67:191–204.10.1093/bmb/ldg018Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Seval MM, Yuce T, Kalafat E, Duman B, Aker SS, Kumbasar H, et al. Comparison of digital vaginal examination versus transperineal ultrasound during labor on pain and anxiety levels: a randomized controlled trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48:695–700.10.1002/uog.15994Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Downe S, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, Singata M. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013:CD010088.10.1002/14651858.CD010088Suche in Google Scholar

[23] Awan N, Rhoades A, Weeks AD. The validity and reliability of the StationMaster: a device to improve the accuracy of station assessment in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009;145:65–70.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.04.018Suche in Google Scholar

[24] Buchmann EJ, Libhaber E. Accuracy of cervical assessment in the active phase of labour. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;114:833–7.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01386.xSuche in Google Scholar

[25] DGGG GSoOaG. Tocolytics to prevent preterm birth. AWMF 1500252010.Suche in Google Scholar

[26] Hanley GE, Munro S, Greyson D, Gross MM, Hundley V, Spiby H, et al. Diagnosing onset of labor: a systematic review of definitions in the research literature. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:71.10.1186/s12884-016-0857-4Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Gurewitsch ED, Johnson E, Allen RH, Diament P, Fong J, Weinstein D, et al. The descent curve of the grand multiparous woman. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:1036–41.10.1067/S0002-9378(03)00762-2Suche in Google Scholar

[28] Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Nicholson JM, Caughey AB. Second stage of labor and epidural use: a larger effect than previously suggested. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:527–35.10.1097/AOG.0000000000000134Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Kominiarek MA, Zhang J, Vanveldhuisen P, Troendle J, Beaver J, Hibbard JU. Contemporary labor patterns: the impact of maternal body mass index. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:244 e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.014Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Laughon SK, Branch DW, Beaver J, Zhang J. Changes in labor patterns over 50 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:419 e1–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2012.03.003Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Greenberg MB, Cheng YW, Sullivan M, Norton ME, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. Does length of labor vary by maternal age? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:428 e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.06.058Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Albers LL. The duration of labor in healthy women. J Perinatol. 1999;19:114–9.10.1038/sj.jp.7200100Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[33] Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011:CD000331.10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[34] Molina FS, Nicolaides KH. Ultrasound in labor and delivery. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27:61–7.10.1159/000287588Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Bamberg C, Scheuermann S, Fotopoulou C, Slowinski T, Duckelmann AM, Teichgraber U, et al. Angle of progression measurements of fetal head at term: a systematic comparison between open magnetic resonance imaging and transperineal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:161 e1–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.867Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Ohel G, Gonen R, Vaida S, Barak S, Gaitini L. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia in labor: does it increase the risk of cesarean section? A randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:600–5.10.1016/j.ajog.2005.10.821Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[37] Gross MM, Fromke C, Hecker H. The timing of amniotomy, oxytocin and neuraxial analgesia and its association with labour duration and mode of birth. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289:41–8.10.1007/s00404-013-2916-7Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[38] Sng BL, Leong WL, Zeng Y, Siddiqui FJ, Assam PN, Lim Y, et al. Early versus late initiation of epidural analgesia for labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10: CD007238.10.1002/14651858.CD007238.pub2Suche in Google Scholar PubMed