Home Medicine 3D/4D sonography – any safety problem
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

3D/4D sonography – any safety problem

  • EMAIL logo , , , , , , , , and
Published/Copyright: September 16, 2015

Abstract

Gray-scale image data are processed in 3D ultrasound by repeated scans of multiple planes within a few seconds to achieve one surface rendering image and three perpendicular plane images. The 4D image is achieved by repeating 3D images in short intervals, i.e. 3D and 4D ultrasound are based on simple B-mode images. During 3D/4D acquisition, a fetus in utero is exposed by ultrasound beam for only a few seconds, and it is as short as real-time B-mode scanning. Therefore, simple 3D imaging is as safe as a simple B-mode scan. The 4D ultrasound is also as safe as a simple B-mode scan, but the ultrasound exposure should be shorter than 30 min. The thermal index (TI) and mechanical index (MI) should both be lower than 1.0, and the ultrasound study is regulated by the Doppler ultrasound if it is combined with simple 3D or 4D ultrasound. Recently, some articles have reported the functional changes of animal fetal brain neuronal cells and liver cell apoptosis with Doppler ultrasound. We discuss cell apoptosis by ultrasound in this report. Diagnostic ultrasound safety is achieved by controlling the output pulse and continuous ultrasound waves using thermal and mechanical indices, which should be <1.0 in abdominal and transvaginal scan, pulsed Doppler, as well as 3D and 4D ultrasound. The lowest spatial peak temporal average (SPTA) intensity of the ultrasound to suppress cultured cell growth is 240 mW/cm2, below which no ultrasound effect has been reported. An ultrasound user must be trained to recognize the ultrasound bioeffects; thermal and mechanical indices, and how to reduce these when they are higher than 1.0 on the monitor display; and guide the proper use of the ultrasound under the ALARA principle, because the user is responsible for ensuring ultrasound safety.


Article note

All authors are members of the WAPM Working Group on Ultrasound in Obstetrics. This paper was produced under the auspices of the World Association of Perinatal Medicine.



Corresponding author: Ritsuko K. Pooh, Clinical Research Institute of Fetal Medicine PMC, 1-24, Uehommachi 7, Tennoji, Osaka#543-0001, Japan, Tel.: 81-(0)6-6775-8111, Fax: +81-(0)6-6775-8122, URL: http://www.fetal-medicine-pooh.jp/, E-mail:

References

[1] Pooh RK, Shiota K, Kurjak A. Imaging of the human embryo with magnetic resonance imaging microscopy and high-resolution transvaginal 3-dimensional sonography: human embryology in the 21st century. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204:77–9.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Pooh RK. Normal anatomy by three-dimensional ultrasound in the second and third trimesters. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;17:269–77.10.1016/j.siny.2012.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Pooh RK, Kurjak A. Three-dimensional/four-dimensional sonography moved prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomalies from the second to the first trimester of pregnancy. DSJUOG. 2012;6:376–390.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1260Search in Google Scholar

[4] Qin Y, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Wang Y, Sun W, Chen L, et al. Four-dimensional echocardiography with spatiotemporal image correlation and inversion mode for detection of congenital heart disease. Ulrasound Med Biol. 2014;40:1434–41.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.02.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Hata T, Kanenishi K, Hanaoka U, Marumo G. HDlive and 4D ultrasound in the assessment of fetal facial expressions. DSJUOG. 2015;9:44–50.10.5005/jp-journals-10009-1388Search in Google Scholar

[6] Pooh RK, Kurjak A. Novel application of three-dimensional HDlive imaging in prenatal diagnosis from the first trimester. J Perinat Med. 2015;43:147–58.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Kurjak A, Antsaklis P, Stanojevic M. Fetal neurology, present and future. DSUOG. 2015;9:6–29.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Rolo LC, Santana EF, da Silva PH, Costa FD, Nardozza LM, Tonni G, et al. Fetal cardiac interventricular septum: volume assessment by 3D/4D ultrasound using spatio-temporal image correlation (STIC) and virtual organ computer-aided analysis (VOCAL). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;10:1–6.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Barnett SB, Kossoff G, editors. WFUMB symposium on safety and standardization in medical ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;18:731–814.Search in Google Scholar

[10] American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine/National Electrical Manufacturers Association; Standard for Real Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sande RK, Matre K, Eid GE, Kisserad T. Ultrasound safety in early pregnancy: reduced energy setting does not compromise obstetric Doppler measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:438–43.10.1002/uog.10148Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Maeda K, Murao F, Yoshiga T, Yamauchi C, Tsuzaki T. Experimental studies on the suppression of cultured cell growth curves aftr irradiation with CW and pulsed ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Control. 1986;33:186–93.10.1109/T-UFFC.1986.26813Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Maeda K, Ide M. The imitation of the ultrasound intensity for diagnostic devices in the Japanese Industrial standards. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelect Freq Control. 1986;33:241–4.10.1109/T-UFFC.1986.26820Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Ang ESBC Jr, Glucic V, Duque A, Schafer ME, Rakic P. Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:12903–10.10.1073/pnas.0605294103Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[15] Li P, Wang PJ, Zhang W. Prenatal exposure to ultrasound affects learning and memory in young rats. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015;41:644–53.10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2014.09.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Exposure criteria for medical diagnostic ultrasound: I. Criteria based on thermal mechanisms. NCRP Report No. 113, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Shimizu T, Fukushima T, Shouji R. Ultrasound and teratogenesity. Obstet Gynecol (Japanese) 1972;37:1339–43.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Pellicer B, Herraiz S, Táboas E, Felipo V, Simon C, Pellicer A. Ultrasound bioeffects in rats: quantification of cellular damage in the fetal liver after pulsed Doppler imaging. Ultrasound in Obstet Gynecol. 2011;37:643–8.10.1002/uog.8842Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Guicciardi ME, Malhi H, Mott JL, Gores GJ. Apoptosis and necrosis in the liver. Compr Physiol. 2013;3:977–1010.10.1002/cphy.c120020Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[20] Salvesen KÅ, Lees C, Abramowicz J, Brezinka C, Ter Haar G, Maršál K. Safe use of Doppler ultrasound during the 11–13+ 6-week scan: is it possible? Ultrasound Obstet Gynrcol. 2011;37:625–8.10.1002/uog.9025Search in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Published Online: 2015-9-16
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Current topics on ultrasound in perinatology
  4. Recommendation and Guidelines for Perinatal Practice
  5. Ultrasound in Africa: what can really be done?
  6. 3D/4D sonography – any safety problem
  7. Controversial ultrasound findings in mid trimester pregnancy. Evidence based approach
  8. Academy’s Corner
  9. Sonoembryology by 3D HDlive silhouette ultrasound – what is added by the “see-through fashion”?
  10. Original articles – Obstetrics
  11. How effective is ultrasound-based screening for trisomy 18 without the addition of biochemistry at the time of late first trimester?
  12. Single center experience in selective feticide in high-order multiple pregnancy: clinical and ethical issues
  13. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis
  14. Birth weight-related percentiles of brain ventricular system as a tool for assessment of posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus and ventricular enlargement
  15. First trimester erythropoietin (EPO) serum concentration as a potential marker for abnormal placentation disorders. Reference values for erythropoietin (EPO) concentration at 11–13+6 weeks of gestation
  16. Original articles – Fetus
  17. Nonimmune fetal ascites: identification of ultrasound findings predictive of perinatal death
  18. First trimester severe ductus venosus flow abnormalities in isolation or combination with other markers of aneuploidy and fetal anomalies
  19. Evaluation of the adequacy of reference charts for the accurate identification of fetuses with bone length below the 5th percentile
  20. Does ethnicity have an effect on fetal behavior? A comparison of Asian and Caucasian populations
  21. Accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight and growth discordancy in triplet pregnancies
  22. Fetal nasal bone length in the second trimester: comparison between population groups from different ethnic origins
  23. Pregnancy outcome and long-term follow-up of fetuses with isolated increased NT: a retrospective cohort study
  24. Effect of antenatal betamethasone administration on Doppler velocimetry of fetal and uteroplacental vessels: a prospective study
  25. Opinion paper
  26. Fetal cerebro-placental ratio and adverse perinatal outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis of the association and diagnostic performance
  27. Congress Calendar
  28. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 25.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2015-0225/html
Scroll to top button