Accuracy of ultrasound in estimating fetal weight and growth discordancy in triplet pregnancies

References

[1] Ferraretti AP, Goossens V, de Mouzon J, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2008: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2571–84.10.1093/humrep/des255Search in Google Scholar

[2] Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ, Nargund G, Beets G, Leridon H, Te Velde ER. The effect of in vitro fertilization on birth rates in Western countries. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1414–9.10.1093/humrep/dep004Search in Google Scholar

[3] Lynch L, Lapinski R, Alvarez M, Lockwood CL. Accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight in multiple pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995;6:349–52.10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.06050349.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Merritt TA, Goldstein M, Philips R, Peverini R, Iwakoshi J, Rodriguez A, et al. Impact of ART on pregnancies in California: an analysis of maternity outcomes and insights into the added burden of neonatal intensive care. J Perinatol. 2014;34:345–50.10.1038/jp.2014.17Search in Google Scholar

[5] Weissman A, Jakobi P, Yoffe N, Zimmer EZ, Paldi E, Brandes JM. Sonographic growth measurements in triplet pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:324–6.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Weissman A, Ulanovsky I, Burke Y, Makhoul IR, Blazer S, Drugan A. Triplet pregnancies–a three-decade perspective: do we fare better? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;170: 82–4.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.05.008Search in Google Scholar

[7] Abele H, Hoopmann M, Wagner N, Hahn M, Wallwiener D, Kagan KO. Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation of fetuses with a birth weight of 1500 g or less. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153:131–7.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.007Search in Google Scholar

[8] Dudley NJ. A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;25:80–9.10.1002/uog.1751Search in Google Scholar

[9] Jones JS, Newman RB, Miller MC. Cross-sectional analysis of triplet birthweight. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:135–40.10.1016/0002-9378(91)90643-6Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lamb DJ, Vink JM, Middeldorp CM, van Beijsterveldt CE, Haak MC, Overbeek LI, et al. Effects of chorionicity and zygosity on triplet birth weight. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2012;15:149–57.10.1375/twin.15.2.149Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Mordel N, Benshushan A, Zaijcek G, Laufer N, Schenker JG, Sadovski E. Discordancy in triplets. Am J Perinatol. 1993;10:224–5.10.1055/s-2007-994724Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[12] Papageorghiou AT, Bakoulas V, Sebire NJ, Nicolaides KH. Intrauterine growth in multiple pregnancies in relation to fetal number, chorionicity and gestational age. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008;32:890–3.10.1002/uog.6140Search in Google Scholar

[13] Jensen OH, Jenssen H. Prediction of fetal weights in twins. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:177–80.10.3109/00016349509008934Search in Google Scholar

[14] Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Sharman RS, Deter RL, Park SK. Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements – a prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151:333–7.10.1016/0002-9378(85)90298-4Search in Google Scholar

[15] Hata T, Deter RL, Hill RM. Individual growth curve standards in triplets: prediction of third trimester growth and birth characteristics. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:379–84.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kehl S, Schmidt U, Spaich S, Schild RL, Sütterlin M, Siemer J. What are the limits of accuracy in fetal weight estimation with conventional biometry in two-dimensional ultrasound? A novel postpartum study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2012;39:543–8.10.1002/uog.10094Search in Google Scholar

[17] Rodis JF, Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Nochimson DJ. Intrauterine fetal growth in discordant twin gestations. J Ultrasound Med. 1990;9:443–8.10.7863/jum.1990.9.8.443Search in Google Scholar

[18] Scott F, Beeby P, Abbott J, Edelman D, Boogert A. New formula for estimating fetal weight below 1000 g: comparison with existing formulas. J Ultrasound Med. 1996;15:669–72.10.7863/jum.1996.15.10.669Search in Google Scholar

[19] Cheung VY, Bocking AD, Dasilva OP. Preterm discordant twins: what birth weight difference is significant? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:955–9.10.1016/0002-9378(95)90027-6Search in Google Scholar

[20] Fountain SA, Morrison JJ, Smith SK, Winston RM. Ultrasonographic growth measurements in triplet pregnancies. J Perinat Med. 1995;23:257–63.10.1515/jpme.1995.23.4.257Search in Google Scholar

[21] Blickstein I, Kalish RB. Birthweight discordance in multiple pregnancy. Twin Res. 2003;6:526–31.10.1375/136905203322686536Search in Google Scholar

[22] Caravello JW, Chauhan SP, Morrison JC, Magann EF, Martin JN, Devoe LD. Sonographic examination does not predict twin growth discordance accurately. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89: 529–33.10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00010-0Search in Google Scholar

[23] Reberado MA, Martins L, Torgal M, Viana R, Seminova T, Casal E, et al. The source of error in the estimation of intertwin birth weight discordance. J Perinat Med. 2010;38:671–4.10.1515/jpm.2010.104Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Ananth CV, Demissie K, Hanley ML. Birth weight discordancy and adverse perinatal outcomes among twin gestations in the United States: the effect of placental abruption. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:954–60.10.1067/mob.2003.210Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Blickstein I, Manor M, Levi R, Goldchmit R. Is intertwin birth weight discordance predictable? Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1996;42:105–8.10.1159/000291901Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Branum AM, Schoendorf KC. The effect of birth weight discordance on twin neonatal mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:570–4.10.1097/00006250-200303000-00025Search in Google Scholar

[27] Ocer F, Aydin Y, Atis A, Kaleli S. Factors affecting the accuracy of ultrasonographical fetal weight estimation in twin pregnancies. J Matern Fetal Neonat Med. 2011;24:1168–72.10.3109/14767058.2010.545928Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[28] Siemer J, Egger N, Hart N, Meurer B, Muller A, Dathe O, et al. Fetal weight estimation by ultrasound: comparison of 11 different formulae and examiners with differing skill levels. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:159–4.10.1055/s-2007-963165Search in Google Scholar PubMed