Home Does recent sexual intercourse during pregnancy affect the results of the fetal fibronectin rapid test? A comparative prospective study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Does recent sexual intercourse during pregnancy affect the results of the fetal fibronectin rapid test? A comparative prospective study

  • Gilles Faron EMAIL logo , Ronald Buyl and Walter Foulon
Published/Copyright: June 14, 2014

Abstract

Objective: We conducted a prospective comparative cohort study to determinate the influence of coitus on quantitative fetal fibronectin test results under normal pregnancy conditions. We also compared values obtained in cervical and vaginal secretions.

Methods: In a population of women with normal singleton pregnancies between 22 and 28 weeks gestation, we have performed (cervical and vaginal) quantitative fetal fibronectin tests in two separate groups classified according to timing after coitus (one group of women had intercourse within 24 h before sampling and the control group had intercourse >24 h before sampling). The main outcome measures were the proportion of positive tests in both groups and the correlation between cervical and vaginal values through the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results: Both groups were similar in terms of general characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. The proportions of positive results in the vaginal secretions were 7.5% and 25.0% (P=0.007) in the control and coitus group, respectively. In the cervical secretions, the proportions of positive tests were greater, but not statistically different (39.7% and 40.0%, respectively). The Pearson correlation coefficients were very low (<0.3) indicating poor correlation between both sampling locations. Even if the cervical values were generally greater than the vaginal values, they were lower in 26% of the women.

Conclusions: Coitus definitely interferes with vaginal fetal fibronectin test results. In cervical secretions, the positive rate was so high that coitus had no influence, but cervical sampling in this location should be avoided.


Corresponding author: Gilles Faron, Department of Obstetrics, UZ Brussel (Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090 Jette, Brussels, Belgium, Tel.: +3224763682, Fax: +3224776790, E-mail:

References

[1] Bartnicki J, Casal D, Kreaden US, Saling E, Vetter K. Fetal fibronectin in vaginal specimens predicts preterm delivery and very-low-birth-weight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;174:971–4.10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70335-6Search in Google Scholar

[2] Feinberg RF, Wang CL. Monoclonal antibody FDC-6 exhibits binding to human plasma fibronectin: a caveat for cervicovaginal oncofetal fibronectin testing? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;171:1302–8.10.1016/0002-9378(94)90152-XSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Goffinet F. Primary predictors of preterm labour. Br J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;112(Suppl 1):38–47.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00583.xSearch in Google Scholar

[4] Goldenberg RL, Klebanoff M, Carey JC, Macpherson C, Leveno KJ, Moawad AH, et al. Vaginal fetal fibronectin measurements from 8 to 22 weeks gestation and subsequent spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;183:469–75.10.1067/mob.2000.106073Search in Google Scholar

[5] Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, et al. (for the GRADE working group). Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Br Med J. 2008;336:924–6.10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ADSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Honest H, Bachmann LM, Gupta JK, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Accuracy of cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test in predicting risk of spontaneous preterm birth: systematic review. Br Med J. 2002;325:301–10.10.1136/bmj.325.7359.301Search in Google Scholar

[7] Iams JD, Romero R, Culhane JF, Goldenberg RL. Primary, secondary, and tertiary interventions to reduce the morbidity and mortality of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008;371:164–75.10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60108-7Search in Google Scholar

[8] Kallioniemi H, Rahkonen L, Heikinheimo O, Paavonen J. Early pregnancy vaginal fluid phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 predicts preterm delivery. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33:378–83.10.1002/pd.4072Search in Google Scholar

[9] Lockwood CJ, Senyei AE, Dische MR, Casal D, Shah KD, Thung SN, et al. Fetal fibronectin in cervical and vaginal secretions as a predictor of preterm delivery. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:669–74.10.1056/NEJM199109053251001Search in Google Scholar

[10] Mardh PA. The vaginal ecosystem. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;165:1163–8.10.1016/S0002-9378(12)90721-8Search in Google Scholar

[11] Morrison JC, Allbert JR, McLaughlin BN, Whitworth NS, Roberts WE, Martin RW. Oncofetal fibronectin in patients with false labor as a predictor of preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;168:538–42.10.1016/0002-9378(93)90488-5Search in Google Scholar

[12] Pelaez LM, Fox NS, Chasen ST. Negative fetal fibronectin: who is still treating for threatened preterm labor and does it help? J Perinat Med. 2008;36:202–5.10.1515/JPM.2008.040Search in Google Scholar

[13] Rossel Goffeng A, Holst E, Milsom I, Lindstedt G, Lundberg PA, Andersch B. Factors influencing vaginal fetal fibronectin concentrations during pregnancy. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1999;47:83–8.10.1159/000010068Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sanchez-Ramos L, Delke I, Zamora J, Kaunitz AM. Fetal fibronectin as a short-term predictor of preterm birth in symptomatic patients: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:631–40.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b47217Search in Google Scholar

[15] Shimoya K, Hashimoto K, Shimizu T, Saji F, Murata Y. Effect of sexual intercourse on fetal fibronectin concentration in cervicovaginal secretions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;179:255–6.10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70280-7Search in Google Scholar

[16] Slattery MM, Morrison JJ. Preterm delivery. Lancet. 2002;360:1489–97.10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11476-0Search in Google Scholar

[17] Yost NP, Owen J, Berghella V, Thom E, Swain M, Dildy GA, 3rd et al. Effect of coitus on recurrent preterm birth: a prospective study. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;107:793–7.10.1097/01.AOG.0000206757.92602.b5Search in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2014-4-15
Accepted: 2014-5-19
Published Online: 2014-6-14
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Erich Saling – The Father of Prenatal and Perinatal Medicine—Dedication to his 90th birthday
  4. Original articles - Obstetrics
  5. A transcervical amniotic fluid collector: a new medical device for the assessment of amniotic fluid in patients with ruptured membranes
  6. Advanced cervical dilatation and spontaneous preterm labor: a comparison between twin and singleton gestations
  7. Comparison of a novel test for placental alpha microglobulin-1 with fetal fibronectin and cervical length measurement for the prediction of imminent spontaneous preterm delivery in patients with threatened preterm labor
  8. Does recent sexual intercourse during pregnancy affect the results of the fetal fibronectin rapid test? A comparative prospective study
  9. Usefulness of maternal serum C-reactive protein with vaginal Ureaplasma urealyticum as a marker for prediction of imminent preterm delivery and chorioamnionitis in patients with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes
  10. Effect of blood on ROM diagnosis accuracy of PAMG-1 and IGFBP-1 detecting rapid tests
  11. Single versus combination tocolytic regimen in the prevention of preterm births in women: a prospective cohort study
  12. Recommendations of activity restriction in high-risk pregnancy scenarios: a Danish national survey
  13. Is pharmacologic research on pregnant women with psychoses ethically permissible?
  14. Women’s knowledge and attitude towards pregnancy in a high-income developing country
  15. Impact of maternal body mass index on the cesarean delivery rate in Germany from 1990 to 2012
  16. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings
  17. The effect of the use of oxytocin on blood loss during different postpartum periods
  18. Original articles - Fetus
  19. The T/QRS ratio values in pregnancies complicated by threatened preterm labour treated with intravenous infusions of fenoterol
  20. Cardiotocography patterns and risk of intrapartum fetal acidemia
  21. Combined spinal epidural analgesia for labor using sufentanil epidurally versus intrathecally: a retrospective study on the influence on fetal heart trace
  22. Original articles - Newborn
  23. Predicting fetal growth deviation in parous women: combining the birth weight of the previous pregnancy and third trimester ultrasound scan
  24. Letter to the Editor
  25. A cerclage is not a modified total cervical occlusion!
  26. Letter Reply
  27. Reply to: a cerclage is not a modified Total Cervical Occlusion!
  28. Congress Calendar
  29. Congress Calendar
Downloaded on 28.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2014-0127/html
Scroll to top button