Startseite Advanced cervical dilatation and spontaneous preterm labor: a comparison between twin and singleton gestations
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Advanced cervical dilatation and spontaneous preterm labor: a comparison between twin and singleton gestations

  • Michal Dviri , Michal J. Simchen EMAIL logo , Anat Kalter , Shali Mazaki Tovi , Orit Moran , Eyal Schiff , Eyal Sivan und Israel Hendler
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 19. Februar 2014

Abstract

Objective: To determine the admission to delivery interval and the rate of immediate delivery in twin versus singleton gestation complicated by spontaneous preterm labor (SPTL).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pregnant women presenting with advanced cervical dilatation of 3–5 cm and frequent uterine contractions at 24–34 weeks of gestation was performed. The rate of progression to delivery within 12 h and 24 h, as well as rates of prolonged latency, were compared between twins and singletons gestations.

Results: Sixty-nine women were included, of which 25 carried twins and 44 singletons. The overall rate of spontaneous delivery within 12 h and 24 h was 47.8% and 59.4%, respectively, and similar between twins and singletons. Nevertheless, prolonged latency of 10 days or more after presentation was more frequent among twins compared with singletons [10/25 (40%) vs. 7/44 (15.9%), respectively; P=0.026]. Moreover, women carrying twins presenting with advanced cervical dilatation had a better chance of completing a full 2-dose antenatal betamethasone course compared with singletons [19/25 (76%) of twins compared with 21/44 (47.7%) of singletons, odds ratio 3.5, 95% confidence interval 1.16–10.34; P=0.022].

Conclusion: Up to 60% of women presenting with advanced cervical dilatation prior to 34 weeks’ gestation give birth within 24 h. Nevertheless, women carrying twins have a better chance of completing a betamethasone course and having prolonged latency compared with singletons.


Corresponding author: Michal J. Simchen, MD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, 52621, Israel, Tel.: +972-3-5302169, Fax: 972-3-5303944, E-mail: ;

References

[1] Bastek JA, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK, McShea MA, Foreman MN, Elovitz MA, et al. Clinical prediction rules for preterm birth in patients presenting with preterm labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:1119–28.10.1097/AOG.0b013e31825503e5Suche in Google Scholar

[2] Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88:31–8.10.2471/BLT.08.062554Suche in Google Scholar

[3] Chauhan SP, Scardo JA, Hayes E, Abuhamad AZ, Berghella V. Twin: prevalence, problems, and preterm births. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:305–15.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.031Suche in Google Scholar

[4] Copper RL, Goldenberg RL, Dubard MB, Hauth JC, Cutter GR. Cervical examination and tocodynamometry at 28 weeks’ gestation: prediction of spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:666–71.10.1016/0002-9378(95)90590-1Suche in Google Scholar

[5] Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY. Preterm birth. In: Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Rouse DJ, Spong CY, editors. Williams Obsteterics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2010. p. 804–31.Suche in Google Scholar

[6] Effect of corticosteroids for fetal maturation on perinatal outcomes. NIH Consensus Statement. 1994;12:1–24.Suche in Google Scholar

[7] Fuchs IB, Henrich W, Osthues K, Dudenhausen JW. Sonographic cervical length in singleton pregnancies with intact membranes presenting with threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2004;24:554–7.10.1002/uog.1714Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] How HY, Khoury JC, Sibai BM. Cervical dilatation on presentation for preterm labor and subsequent preterm birth. Am J Perinatol. 2009;26:1–6.10.1055/s-0028-1090586Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Iams JD, Romero R. Preterm birth. In: Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, editors. Obstetrics: normal and problem pregnancies. Maryland Heights: Churchill Livingstone; 2007. p. 669–76.10.1016/B978-0-443-06930-7.50028-1Suche in Google Scholar

[10] Jain S, Earhart A, Ruddock N, Wen T, Hankins GD, Saade GR. The validity of cervical dilation as an indication of true labor between 32 and 36 weeks 6 days of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:431.e1–3.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Mathews TJ, Osterman MJ. Births: final data for 2008. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2010;59:3–71.Suche in Google Scholar

[12] Pereira L, Cotter A, Gómez R, Berghella V, Prasertcharoensuk W, Rasanen J, et al. Expectant management compared with physical examination-indicated cerclage (EM-PEC) in selected women with a dilated cervix at 14(0/7)-25(6/7) weeks: results from the EM-PEC international cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;197:483.e1–8.10.1016/j.ajog.2007.05.041Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Psomiadis N, Goldkrand J. Efficacy of aggressive tocolysis for preterm labor with advanced cervical dilatation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;18:47–52.10.1080/14767050500073142Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Simchen MJ, Dulitzky M, Mashiach S, Schiff E. Does preterm cervical dilatation imply imminent labor in twin pregnancies? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;103:119–21.10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00040-4Suche in Google Scholar

[15] Tsoi E, Akmal S, Geerts L, Jeffery B, Nicolaides KH. Sonographic measurement of cervical length and fetal fibronectin testing in threatened preterm labor. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;27:368–72.10.1002/uog.2723Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Vis JY, Wilms FF, Kuin RA, Reuvers JM, Stam MC, Pattinaja DA, et al. Time to delivery after the first course of antenatal corticosteroids: a cohort study. Am J Perinatol. 2011;28:683–8.10.1055/s-0031-1280596Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Wapner RJ, Sorokin Y, Thom EA, Johnson F, Dudley DJ, Spong CY, et al. Single versus weekly courses of antenatal corticosteroids: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;195:633–42.10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.087Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Wilms FF, Vis JY, Pattinaja DA, Kuin RA, Stam MC, Reuvers JM, et al. Relationship between the time interval from antenatal corticosteroid administration until preterm birth and the occurrence of respiratory morbidity. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:49.e1–7.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.035Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Received: 2013-11-20
Accepted: 2014-1-17
Published Online: 2014-2-19
Published in Print: 2015-7-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Erich Saling – The Father of Prenatal and Perinatal Medicine—Dedication to his 90th birthday
  4. Original articles - Obstetrics
  5. A transcervical amniotic fluid collector: a new medical device for the assessment of amniotic fluid in patients with ruptured membranes
  6. Advanced cervical dilatation and spontaneous preterm labor: a comparison between twin and singleton gestations
  7. Comparison of a novel test for placental alpha microglobulin-1 with fetal fibronectin and cervical length measurement for the prediction of imminent spontaneous preterm delivery in patients with threatened preterm labor
  8. Does recent sexual intercourse during pregnancy affect the results of the fetal fibronectin rapid test? A comparative prospective study
  9. Usefulness of maternal serum C-reactive protein with vaginal Ureaplasma urealyticum as a marker for prediction of imminent preterm delivery and chorioamnionitis in patients with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes
  10. Effect of blood on ROM diagnosis accuracy of PAMG-1 and IGFBP-1 detecting rapid tests
  11. Single versus combination tocolytic regimen in the prevention of preterm births in women: a prospective cohort study
  12. Recommendations of activity restriction in high-risk pregnancy scenarios: a Danish national survey
  13. Is pharmacologic research on pregnant women with psychoses ethically permissible?
  14. Women’s knowledge and attitude towards pregnancy in a high-income developing country
  15. Impact of maternal body mass index on the cesarean delivery rate in Germany from 1990 to 2012
  16. Justified skepticism about Apgar scoring in out-of-hospital birth settings
  17. The effect of the use of oxytocin on blood loss during different postpartum periods
  18. Original articles - Fetus
  19. The T/QRS ratio values in pregnancies complicated by threatened preterm labour treated with intravenous infusions of fenoterol
  20. Cardiotocography patterns and risk of intrapartum fetal acidemia
  21. Combined spinal epidural analgesia for labor using sufentanil epidurally versus intrathecally: a retrospective study on the influence on fetal heart trace
  22. Original articles - Newborn
  23. Predicting fetal growth deviation in parous women: combining the birth weight of the previous pregnancy and third trimester ultrasound scan
  24. Letter to the Editor
  25. A cerclage is not a modified total cervical occlusion!
  26. Letter Reply
  27. Reply to: a cerclage is not a modified Total Cervical Occlusion!
  28. Congress Calendar
  29. Congress Calendar
Heruntergeladen am 26.9.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jpm-2013-0316/html
Button zum nach oben scrollen