Article
Licensed
Unlicensed
Requires Authentication
Seconda risposta alla Spangenberg
-
Gualtiero Calboli
Published/Copyright:
January 13, 2025
Published Online: 2025-01-13
Published in Print: 2024-05-27
© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
You are currently not able to access this content.
You are currently not able to access this content.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Foreword
- Risposta alla recensione di Elena Spangenberg Yanes alla mia edizione 2020 della Rhetorica ad Herennium
- Seconda risposta alla Spangenberg
- Dormivit et resurgit. A language-ecology approach to the diachrony of the Latin ingressive perfect
- Nisi paria non pugnant: argument structure alternations with lexical reciprocal verbs in Latin
- The synchrony and diachrony of example markers in Latin
- Ecce in Archaic Latin: interjection or demonstrative?
- (H)ariuga/(h)aruiga: an etymological research
- Discontinuity of the noun phrase in Roman statutes from the Republican period
- Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Articles
- Foreword
- Risposta alla recensione di Elena Spangenberg Yanes alla mia edizione 2020 della Rhetorica ad Herennium
- Seconda risposta alla Spangenberg
- Dormivit et resurgit. A language-ecology approach to the diachrony of the Latin ingressive perfect
- Nisi paria non pugnant: argument structure alternations with lexical reciprocal verbs in Latin
- The synchrony and diachrony of example markers in Latin
- Ecce in Archaic Latin: interjection or demonstrative?
- (H)ariuga/(h)aruiga: an etymological research
- Discontinuity of the noun phrase in Roman statutes from the Republican period
- Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar
