Discontinuity of the noun phrase in Roman statutes from the Republican period

References

Adams, James N. 1971. A type of hyperbaton in Latin prose. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 17. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1750270500012781.Search in Google Scholar

Adams, James N. 2021. Asyndeton and its interpretation in Latin literature: History, patterns, textual criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108943284Search in Google Scholar

Ahlberg, Axel W. 1910. De traiectionis figura ab antiquissimis inscriptionibus Italicis adhibita. In Sertum philologicum Carolo Ferdinando Johansson oblatum, 39–51. Göteborg: Wettergren & Kerber.Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, Michael H. (ed.). 1996. Roman statutes, vol. 1. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Search in Google Scholar

de Jong, Jan. 1986. Hyperbaton en informatiestructuur. Lampas 19. 323–330.Search in Google Scholar

Elmer, Herbert. 1887. Que, et, atque in the inscriptions of the Republic, in Terence, and in Cato. American Journal of Philology 8(3). 292–328. https://doi.org/10.2307/287614.Search in Google Scholar

Halla-aho, Hilla. 2018. Left-dislocation in Latin: Topics and syntax in Republican texts. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004357464Search in Google Scholar

Marouzeau, Jules. 1922. L’ordre des mots dans la phrase latine. Vol. 1, Les groupes nominaux. Paris: Champion.Search in Google Scholar

Marouzeau, Jules. 1962. Traité de stylistique latine. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Search in Google Scholar

Norden, Eduard. 1915 Die antike Kunstprosa, vol. 1. Leipzig: Teubner.Search in Google Scholar

Orinsky, Kurt. 1922. Die Wortstellung bei Gaius. Glotta 12. 83–100.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2021. The Oxford Latin syntax. Vol. 2, The complex sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pompei, Anna. 2011. Relative clauses. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Vol. 4, Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 427–547. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.427Search in Google Scholar

Popan, Marin. 2012. L’hyperbate nominale en latin. Construction, typologie, raison de texte. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse 2 Le Mirail PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Powell, Jonathan. 2010. Hyperbaton and register in Cicero. In Eleanor Dickey & Anna Chahoud (eds.), Colloquial and literary Latin, 163–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511763267.011Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2010a. Constituent order in Classical Latin prose. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.117Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2010b. La place des déterminants et leurs combinaisons. In Olga Spevak (ed.), Le syntagme nominal en Latin, 57–75. Paris: l’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2014. The noun phrase in Classical Latin prose. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004265684Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2017. La construction -tio + esse dans les textes normatifs de l’époque préclassique. In Pedro Duarte, Frédérique Fleck, Peggy Lecaudé & Aude Morel (éds.), Histoires de mots: Études de linguistique latine et de linguistique générale offertes en hommage à Michèle Fruyt, 401‒410. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris-Sorbonne.Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. 2022. Nominalization in Latin. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192866011.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Spevak, Olga. Forthcoming. Relative clauses in Roman statutes from the Republican period.Search in Google Scholar

Szantyr, Anton. 1972. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Munich: C. H. Beck.Search in Google Scholar

Urbanová, Daniela. 2018. Latin curse tablets of the Roman Empire. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Search in Google Scholar

van Emde Boas, Evert, Albert Rijksbaron, Luuk Huitink & Mathieu de Bakker. 2019. Cambridge grammar of classical Greek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139027052Search in Google Scholar