Ecce in Archaic Latin: interjection or demonstrative?

References

Adams, James N. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511843433Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16(3). 435–485. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity-2012-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2/3). 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90048-g.Search in Google Scholar

Bednarczyk, Magdalena. 2016. Morphosyntactic features of interjections in German comic books. Białostockie Archiwum Językowe 15. 9–19. https://doi.org/10.15290/baj.2015.15.01.Search in Google Scholar

Bonilla Carvajal, Camilo Andrés. 2020. The syntax of the Latin presentative adverb ecce: Relation to focus phrase. Journal of Latin Linguistics 19(1). 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2020-0001.Search in Google Scholar

Castro Rivera, Renata. 2021. Adquisición del valor presentacional en los demostrativos ecce, sá tát y tam. Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile BA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 1998. Quelques remarques syntaxiques à propos de ecce. In Benjamín García Hernández (ed.), Estudios de lingüística latina: Actas del IX coloquio internacional de lingüística latina, vol. I, 261–271. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

De Carvalho, Paulo. 1991. “Deixis objective” vs “deixis subjective”. Sur les “substantifs démonstratifs” du latin. Bulletin de la Societe de Linguistique de Paris 86(1). 211–244. https://doi.org/10.2143/bsl.86.1.2013422.Search in Google Scholar

Del Vecchio, Tommaso. 2000. Evidence for zero metrical value of interjections in Plautus. In Gualtiero Calboli (ed.), Papers on grammar (V), 57–72. Bologna: CLUEB.10.1515/joll.2000.5.1.57Search in Google Scholar

de Vaan, Michiel. 2008. Etymological dictionary of Latin and the other Italic languages. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

de Vaan, Michiel. 2013. Reduplicated demonstratives in ancient Indo-European languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 113(1). 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968x.12038.Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, function and grammaticalization (Typological Studies in Language 42). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.42Search in Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17(4). 463–489. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.015.Search in Google Scholar

Dingemanse, Mark. 2017. On the margins of language: Ideophones, interjections and dependencies in linguistic theory. Dependencies in Language 15. 195–203.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert Malcom Ward. 2003. Demonstratives: A cross-linguistic typology. Studies in Language 27(1). 61–112. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.1.04dix.Search in Google Scholar

Dunkel, George E. 2014. Lexikon der indogermanischen Partikeln und Pronominal Stämme. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Fruyt, Michele. 2011. Grammaticalization in Latin. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical Latin syntax. Volume 4: Complex sentences, grammaticalization, typology, 661–864. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110253412.661Search in Google Scholar

Goldstein, David. 2023. Toward a non-teleological account of demonstrative reinforcement. In Darya Kavitskaya & Alan C. L. Yu (eds.), The life cycle of language, 85–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192845818.003.0006Search in Google Scholar

Gómez Asencio, José Jesús. 1981. Gramática y categorías verbales en la tradición española (1771–1847). Salamanca: Universidad de Salamanca.Search in Google Scholar

Julia, Marie-Ange. 2013a. Sur ecce et quelques présentatifs des langues anciennes. Paper presented at the XVII Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Rome, 20–23 May.Search in Google Scholar

Julia, Marie-Ange. 2013b. Les présentatifs français voici, violà et latins ecce, em, ēn: essai d’étude comparative. Paper presented at the XXVII Congrès international de linguistique et de philologie romanes, Nancy, 15–20 July.Search in Google Scholar

Julia, Marie-Ange. 2020. About Latin Ecce ‘Behold! Lo! See! There!’ and some ancient languages presentatives. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 8(1). 17–23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20200801.13.Search in Google Scholar

Keevallik, Leelo & Richard Ogden. 2020. Sounds on the margins of language at the heart of interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1). 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2020.1712961.Search in Google Scholar

Killian, Don. 2022. Towards a typology of predicative demonstratives. Linguistic Typology 26(1). 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1515/lingty-2021-2078.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 2018. Demonstratives: Patterns in diversity. In Stephen C. Levinson, Sarah Cutfield & Michael Dunn (eds.), Demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108333818.002Search in Google Scholar

Lüdtke, Jens. 2015. From Latin and Vulgar Latin to Romance languages. In Konstanze Jungbluth & Federica Da Milano (eds.), Manual of deixis in Romance languages (Manuals of Romance Linguistics 6), 537–557. Berlin & Boston: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110317732-027Search in Google Scholar

Morcillo Expósito, Guadalupe M. 2007. La interjección. Estudio diacrónico. Humanitas 59. 83–98.Search in Google Scholar

Nordgren, Lars. 2015. Greek interjections. Berlin & Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110339444Search in Google Scholar

Norrick, Neal R. 2009. Interjections as pragmatic markers. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 866–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.08.005.Search in Google Scholar

Perdicoyianni-Paléologou, Hélène. 2006. Les emplois de ecce, eccum, eccistum, eccillum chez Plaute. Faventia 28(1/2). 41–52.Search in Google Scholar

Pieroni, Silvia. 2010. Deixis and anaphora. In Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds.), New perspectives on historical syntax, vol. 3, 389–501. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110215465.389Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2021. The Oxford Latin syntax: Volume II: The complex sentence and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199230563.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Pociña Pérez, Andrés. 2007. Función dramática de los demostrativos en Plauto. Auster(12). 25–40.Search in Google Scholar

Porhiel, Sylvie. 2012. The presentative voici/violà – towards a pragmatic definition. Journal of Pragmatics 44. 435–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.01.001.Search in Google Scholar

Pugliarello, Mariarosaria. 1996. Interiectio: espressività e norma nella teoria grammaticale latina. Bollettino di Studi Latini 26. 69–81.Search in Google Scholar

RAE-ASALE. 2010. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Manual. Barcelona: Espasa.Search in Google Scholar

Richter, Paul. 1972. De usu particularum exclamatiuarum apud priscos scriptores latinos. In Wilhem Studemund (ed.), Studien auf dem Gebiete des Archaichen Lateins I, 387–642. Hildesheim & New York: Georg Olms.Search in Google Scholar

Sauciuc, Gabriela-Alina. 2004. Interjections as viewed by Latin grammarians. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 49(1–4). 101–118.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2012. Cuando los sentimientos irrumpen: valores expresivos de las interjecciones primarias en las comedias de Plauto. In Rosario López Gregoris (ed.), Estudios sobre teatro romano: el mundo de los sentimientos y su expresión, 347–395. Zaragoza: Pórtico.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2016a. Cuando las emociones irrumpen: análisis comparativo del empleo de las interjecciones en las comedias de Terencio y las tragedias de Séneca. Onomázein 38. 107–146. https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.38.06.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2016b. Cuando los sentimientos irrumpen (2): análisis de las interjecciones secundarias en las comedias de Plauto. In A. Penas Ibáñez & Benjamin García-Hernández (eds.), Semántica latina y románica. Unidades de significado conceptual y procedimental, 213–241. Berna: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Unceta Gómez, Luis. 2017. Discursive and pragmatic functions of Latin em. Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization… interjectionalization? In Camille Denizot & Olga Spevak (eds.), Pragmatic approaches to Latin and Ancient Greek, 63–82. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.190.04uncSearch in Google Scholar

Van Gelderen, Elly. 2011. The linguistic cycle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199756056.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Weiss, Michael. 2020. Outline of the historical and comparative grammar of Latin, 2nd edn. New York: Beech Stave Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. The semantics of interjections. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2/3). 159–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90050-l.Search in Google Scholar

Wilkins, David P. 1992. Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18(2/3). 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90049-h.Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, PatriciaR. 1980. Ambulas grammar. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Zheltova, Elena V. 2018. How to express surprise without saying “I’m surprised” in Latin. Philologia Classica 13(2). 228–240. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.204.Search in Google Scholar