Qui pro quo in Plautus’ grammar

References

Adema, Suzanne M. 2007. Temporal bases and the use of the narrative infinitive in the Aeneid. In Gérald Purnell & Joseph Denooz (eds.), Ordre et cohérence en Latin, 7–18. Liège: Université de Liège.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16. 435–485.10.1515/lity-2012-0017Search in Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2016. Sentence types. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 141–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199591435.013.8Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, Charles E. 1910. Syntax of early Latin. Vol. I: The verb. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511813085Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1995. The semantic development of past tense modals in English. In Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 503–518. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32.22bybSearch in Google Scholar

Cristofaro, Sonya. 2012. Descriptive notions vs. grammatical categories: Unrealized states of affairs and ‘irrealis’. Language Sciences 34. 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Cuzzolin, Pierluigi. 2018. Some remarks on the infinitivus indignantis. Is this label necessary? Journal of Latin Linguistics 17(2). 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2018-0010.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrushina, Nina. 2008. Imperatives in conditional and concessive subordinate clauses. In Edward J. Vajda (ed.), Subordination and coordination strategies in North Asian languages (current Issues in linguistic theory 300), 123–141. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.300.13dobSearch in Google Scholar

Fleischman, Suzanne. 1995. Imperfective and irrealis. In Joan L. Bybee & Suzanne Fleischman (eds.), Modality in grammar and discourse, 519–552. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.32.23fleSearch in Google Scholar

Forker, Diana. 2018. Evidentiality and its relations with other verbal categories. In Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald (ed.), The Oxford handbuch of evidentiality, 65–84. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.3Search in Google Scholar

Hofmann, Johann Baptist & Anton Szantyr. 1972. Lateinische Syntax und Stilistik. Teil 2. Bd. 2. München: C. H. Beck Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Holvoet, Axel. 2020. Sources and pathways for non-directive imperatives. Linguistics 58(2). 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2020-0043.Search in Google Scholar

Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530Search in Google Scholar

Isačenko, Alexander V. 1963. Binarnost’, privativnyje oppoziciji i grammatičeskije značenija [Binary relations, privative oppositions, and grammatical meanings]. Voprosy jazykoznanija [Questions of linguistics] 2. 39–56.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman O. 1936. Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 6. 240–288.Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman O. 1958. Morfologiceskije nabljudenija nad slavjanskim sklonenijem [Morphological observations on Slavic declension]. In American Contributions to the fourth international Congress of Slavicists. Moscow, September 1958, 127–156.Search in Google Scholar

Khlebnikova, Irina B. 1973. Oppositions in morphology. As exemplified in the English tense system. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.10.1515/9783110815580Search in Google Scholar

la Roi, Ezra. 2022. Insubordination in Archaic and Classical Latin: Commands, requests, wishes and assertives. Journal of Latin Linguistics 21(1). 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/joll-2022-2008.Search in Google Scholar

Matveeva, Natalja N. 1978. Oppozitsii v sintaksise [Oppositions in syntax]. In Alexander S. Heard (ed.), Strukturnaja i prikladnaja lingvistica [Structural and applied linguistics], 11–18. Leningrad: Leningrad University. https://www.academia.edu/11793233/_ON_OPPOSITIONS_OF_SYNTAX (Accessed 15 September 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2011. How directive constructions emerge: Grammaticalization, constructionalization, cooptation. Journal of Pragmatics 43. 3489–3521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.08.001.Search in Google Scholar

Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sanso. 2012. What do languages encode when they encode reality status? Language Sciences 34. 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.11.004.Search in Google Scholar

Pinkster, Harm. 2015. Oxford Latin syntax, Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283613.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Plungian, Vladimir A. 2010. Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In Gabriele Diewald & Elena Smirnova (eds.), Linguistic realization of evidentiality in European languages (Empirical approaches to language typology 49), 15–58. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110223972.15Search in Google Scholar

Pozdniakov, Konstantin I. 2009. O prirode i funktsijah vnemorphemnyh znakov [On the nature and functions of non-morphemic signs]. Voprosy Yazykoznanija [Questions of linguistics] 6. 35–64.Search in Google Scholar

Risselada, Rodie. 1993. Imperatives and other directive expressions in Latin: A study in the pragmatics of a dead language. Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben.10.1163/9789004408975Search in Google Scholar

Rosén, Hannah. 1999. Latine loqui: Trends and directions in the crystallization of classical Latin. München: Fink.Search in Google Scholar

Smyth, Herbert W. 1968 [1956]. Greek grammar, revised by G. M. Messing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Squartini, Mario. 2016. Interaction between modality and other semantic categories. In Jan Nuyts & Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Oxford handbook of modality and mood, 50–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. 1939. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague 7.Search in Google Scholar

van Rooy, Raf. 2016. The relevance of evidentiality for Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 16. 3–46. https://doi.org/10.1163/15699846-01502002.Search in Google Scholar

van Valin, Robert D. & Randy J. LaPolla. 1997. Syntax. Structure, meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166799Search in Google Scholar

Zheltova, Elena V. 2017. Evidential strategies in Latin. Hyperboreus. Studia Classica 23(2). 313–337.Search in Google Scholar

Zheltova, Elena V. 2018. How to express surprise without saying “I’m surprised” in Latin. Philologia Classica 13(2). 228–240. https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu20.2018.204.Search in Google Scholar

Zheltova, Elena V. 2020. Future paradigms in Latin: Pesky anomaly or sophisticated technique? Graeco-Latina Brunensia 25(1). 211–223. https://doi.org/10.5817/glb2020-1-14.Search in Google Scholar

Zheltova, Elena V. & Alexander Y. Zheltov. 2020. Latin case system: Towards a motivated paradigmatic structure. Philologia Classica 15(2). 208–229. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu20.2020.203.Search in Google Scholar