Home Microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of rotary friction-welded dissimilar AISI 431 steel/AISI 1018 steel joints
Article Open Access

Microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of rotary friction-welded dissimilar AISI 431 steel/AISI 1018 steel joints

  • Dhamothara kannan Thirumalaikkannan EMAIL logo , Sivaraj Paramasivam , Balasubramanian Visvalingam , Tushar Sonar , Mikhail Ivanov and Seeman Murugaesan
Published/Copyright: March 18, 2023

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to analyze the microstructural characteristics and strength performance of dissimilar AISI 431 steel/AISI 1018 steel joints developed using rotary friction welding. The microstructural characteristics of different regions of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints were analyzed using optical microscopy. The tensile properties and microhardness of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints were evaluated to assess the joint performance. The microhardness distribution across the cross-sectional region of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints was recorded and correlated with the tensile failure. Scanning electron microscopy was used to analyze the fractured region of dissimilar rod-to-plate tensile specimens. Results showed that the dissimilar AISI 431 steel/AISI 1018 steel joints steel exhibited a tensile strength of 650 MPa, a yield strength of 452 MPa, and a % elongation of 18%. The microhardness of the weld interface (WI) was higher up to 515 HV0.5. The grain growth and resulting lower hardness in heat-affected zone (HAZ) are mainly responsible for the failure of the joints in HAZ only. The superior tensile properties and greater interface hardness of dissimilar AISI 431 steel/AISI 1018 steel joints are correlated with the evolution of finer grain microstructure in the WI zone.

1 Introduction

Dissimilar metal joining offers the benefits of utilizing the mechanical properties of different metals to meet engineering specifications. The main purpose of joining different metal grades is to achieve the combination of good mechanical properties of different metals such as high strength, low specific weight, good corrosion resistance, and low cost [1]. As a result, dissimilar metal welding have gained significant attention in recent years. It is mainly focused on significant reduction of weight and cost in both vehicle components and structures. AISI 1018 is a low-carbon steel (LCS) containing less than 0.2% carbon and manganese content of up to 2%. Its lower carbon content makes it more malleable and ductile than other grades of steel. It finds its applications in automotive industries for automotive frames and body as it possesses high formability, good weldability, and high modulus of elasticity, and is of low cost [2]. AISI 431 is a 4XXX series martensitic stainless steel (MSS) with high chromium (Cr) and lower carbon (C) content of up to 17.0 and 0.2%, respectively. It exhibits higher tensile strength (TS), good corrosion resistance, and hardenability. It is used in the aerospace and automotive industry for fasteners, nuts and bolts, pumps and propeller shafts, etc. [3].

The joining of the AISI 431 steel rod to the AISI 1018 plate is of significant importance in applications such as pump hub and shaft, hydraulic jack, transmission output shaft, and piston rod. The joining of dissimilar steels by fusion welding is difficult due to the problems such as solidification cracking, wider heat-affected zone (HAZ), the evolution of detrimental phases in the weld metal, and distortion of the welded dissimilar rod-to-plate joint, which significantly deteriorates the strength performance of joints [4]. To overcome these problems, rotary friction welding (RFW) is employed to join AISI 431 steel rod to AISI 1018 plate. RFW is a solid-state material-joining process, which involves the coalescence of two joining surfaces using frictional heat generated by rotating one workpiece relative to another under the action of axial compressive force [5]. The frictional heat generated between two joining surfaces of metal plasticizes the interface region. The plasticized material is displaced from the interface due to the action of axial compressive force. This expels the oxide layer, impurities, and other contaminants from the joining surface, thereby promoting sound welded joint [6]. The peak temperature in RFW is lower than in fusion welding, which reduces intermetallic evolution and allows a range of dissimilar materials to be welded [7]. Figure 1 shows the schematic of the RFW process [8].

Figure 1 
               Schematic representation of RFW.
Figure 1

Schematic representation of RFW.

The research work on friction welding, so far, is mainly reported on dissimilar joining of AISI 304/AISI 4140 steel [9], Al alloy/steel [10,11], AA6061 alloy/AISI 1018 steel [12], AA 2219 alloy/AISI 304 steel [13], different grades of carbon steel [14], AISI 304/AISI 1060 steel [15], AISI 304/AISI 1045 steel [16], AISI 316L/AISI 1045 steel [17], AA 1050 alloy/AISI 304 steel [18], armor steel/medium-carbon steel [19], Ti/stainless steel [20], Inconel 718/SM45C steel [21], and AISI 1020/AISI 1018 steel [22,23,24]. There is a lack of studies on RFW to develop dissimilar rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431/AISI 1018 steel [25]. So, the main objective of this study is to analyze microstructural characteristics, strength, and weld interface (WI) hardness of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431/AISI 1018 steel developed using RFW.

2 Experimental procedure

2.1 Materials and dissimilar rod-to-plate joint fabrication

The dissimilar metals used in this work are AISI 1018 LCS plates with dimensions of 32 mm × 32 mm × 15 mm and AISI 431 MSS rods with dimensions of 120 mm in length and 12 mm in diameter. The chemical composition and mechanical properties of base metal are listed in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1

Chemical composition (wt%) of AISI 1018 steel plate and AISI 431 steel rod

Material Cr Mn C Mo Si S P Ni Fe
AISI 1018 0.129 0.617 0.172 0.024 0.194 0.021 0.048 0.124 Bal
AISI 431 15.29 0.946 0.193 0.154 0.365 0.027 0.038 1.300 Bal
Table 2

Mechanical properties of AISI 1018 steel plate and AISI 431 steel rod

Material TS (MPa) Yield strength (MPa) EL (%) Hardness (HV0.5)
AISI 1018 440 341 15 150
AISI 431 770 490 20 270

The dissimilar rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431/AISI 1018 steel were developed using the semi-automatic RFW machine (Manufacturer: RV machine tools; Model: FWB30; Capacity: 3 Tonnes), as shown in Figure 2. The AISI 431 steel rod and AISI 1018 steel plates were joined in the dissimilar rod-to-plate joint configuration, as shown in Figure 3. A special fixture was developed to hold the AISI 1018 steel plates in the rotating chuck of the RFW machine, as shown in Figure 4. The RFW parameters used to develop dissimilar rod-to-plate joints are reported in Table 3. The photograph of AISI 431 steel rods and AISI 1018 steel plates is shown in Figure 5. The photograph of fabricated dissimilar rod-to-plate joints is shown in Figure 6.

Figure 2 
                  Photograph of the RFW machine used to develop rod-to-plate joints.
Figure 2

Photograph of the RFW machine used to develop rod-to-plate joints.

Figure 3 
                  Dimensions of rod-to-plate joint configuration.
Figure 3

Dimensions of rod-to-plate joint configuration.

Figure 4 
                  Photograph of fixture developed to hold the AISI 1018 plates.
Figure 4

Photograph of fixture developed to hold the AISI 1018 plates.

Table 3

Optimized RFW parameters used to develop rod-to-plate joint

Rotational speed (rps) Forging pressure (MPa/s) Forging time (s) Friction pressure (MPa/s) Friction time (s)
26.6 7.14 7 7.14 7
Figure 5 
                  Photograph of unwelded (a) AISI 1018 steel plates and (b) AISI 431 steel rods.
Figure 5

Photograph of unwelded (a) AISI 1018 steel plates and (b) AISI 431 steel rods.

Figure 6 
                  Photograph of rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431 steel–AISI 1018 steel.
Figure 6

Photograph of rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431 steel–AISI 1018 steel.

2.2 Microstructure

The cross-section of joints was mirror-polished and etched using a standard reagent for 30 s. The macrostructure of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints was recorded using a stereozoom microscope (Manufacturer: Carl Zeiss, German; Model: STEMI105). The microstructure of WI was analyzed using an optical microscope (Manufacturer: MEJI, Japan; model: MIL-7100). The fractured surfaces were analyzed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Manufacturer: JEOL, Japan; Model: 5610 LV) to evaluate the failure mode of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints.

2.3 Mechanical properties

The miniature tensile specimens were cut using the ASTM standard of E8M-05, as shown in Figure 7. The miniature tensile specimens were sliced to 1 mm thickness without any curved surfaces using CNC wire-cut EDM machine (Manufacturer: Ratnaparkhi; Model: 4050 NXG). A servo-controlled UTM (Manufacturer: Tinius Olsen; Model: H50KL; capacity: 50 kN) was used to evaluate the joint strength. The miniature tensile specimens of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints were loaded at the rate of 1.5 kN/min. The Vickers microhardness testing was done on the mirror-polished cross-section of rod-to-plate joints by the Vickers microhardness testing machine (Manufacturer: SHIMADZU, Japan; Model: HMV-T1). The indentation load of 0.5 kg and the dwell time of 10 s were used as per ASTM E347 standard to evaluate the microhardness distribution across the cross-section of dissimilar rod-to-plate joint. The microhardness results were correlated with tensile failure of rod-to-plate joints.

Figure 7 
                  (a) Miniature tensile specimen dimensions and (b) specimen extraction.
Figure 7

(a) Miniature tensile specimen dimensions and (b) specimen extraction.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Macrostructure and microstructure

Figure 8 shows the macrostructure of the dissimilar rod-to-plate joint. It revealed the formation of a flash on the rod side of joints. The flash formation is higher on the rod side of AISI 431 steel compared to that on the plate side of AISI 1018 steel. It is due to the smaller joining area of the rod in contact with the larger joining area of the plate. The higher forging pressure was applied to stationary AISI 431 steel, which is also responsible for higher flash formation on the rod side of joints. All dissimilar rod-to-plate joints were observed to be sound without the defects of porosity, cracking, and joint penetration. The satisfactory bond occurred at the WI. The macrograph showed four distinct zones: fully deformed zone (FDZ), partially deformed zone (PDZ), HAZ, and parent metal (PM). The frictional heat and plastic deformation at the joining interface result in thermal gradient and formation of distinct zones in the welded joint. The FDZ exhibited wider width due to the mixing of different materials and the application of forging pressure to extrude the material on the rod side in the form of a flash at higher temperature. The HAZ of the plate side of the joint is wider compared to that of the rod side of the joint due to the higher thermal conductivity of AISI 1018 steel compared to AISI 431 steel. According to the Schaeffler diagram, the chromium equivalent (Creq) and nickel (Nieq) equivalent of AISI 431 steel were calculated as 16.005 and 7.563, respectively. Based on the percentage of C req and Nieq, AISI 431 steel exhibits martensite phases with 20% retained austenite.

Figure 8 
                  Cross-sectional macrostructure of rod-to-plate joint.
Figure 8

Cross-sectional macrostructure of rod-to-plate joint.

The microstructure of base metals is shown in Figure 9. The microstructure of AISI 1018 steel is composed of equiaxed ferrite with an average grain size of 12 µm and small colonies of pearlite. The presence of a plate-like martensite structure was observed in AISI 431 steel. The XRD profiles of the AISI 1018 steel plate, AISI 431 steel rod, and dissimilar rod-to-plate joints are shown in Figure 10. The XRD pattern of the sample was taken from FDZ of the dissimilar rod-to-plate joint. The unwelded AISI 1018 steel and AISI 431 steel primarily consist of ferrite. The WI showed the evolution of ferrite and retained austenite phases. The retained austenite and ferrite phases at the WI of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints are due to the rapid rate of cooling rate associated with RFW. The austenite phase evolves near the ferrite grain boundaries and within the grain. The absence of other phases, such as carbides in the dissimilar rod-to-plate joint, is due to their low weight percentage and tiny size, or the welding procedure did not allow sufficient time for carbide formation. The optical micrographs of different regions of the dissimilar rod-to-plate joint are shown in Figure 11. The joining surfaces of AISI 1018 and AISI 431 steel are bonded with each other due to severe plastic deformation. The FDZ showed the evolution of acicular martensite and retained austenite. It is mainly due to the dynamic recrystallization and rapid cooling at room temperature. Dynamic recrystallization causes the refinement of grains in the weld center when the frictional pressure and the forging pressure are employed to join metal surfaces. The PDZ is the region where microstructural changes started to take place. It shows the partial refinement of grains due to less dynamic recrystallization owing to less frictional heat input and pressure. The PDZ of the AISI 431 steel rod showed the evolution of intragranular martensite. The intragranular martensite was formed due to the increase in temperature above the austenitizing temperature of 800°C during welding. The PDZ of the AISI 1018 steel plate revealed the evolution of finer ferrite and coarse pearlite at grain boundaries. The size of the pearlite was coarser owing to the higher rate of cooling during self-quenching at room temperature after welding. It becomes finer toward the direction of WI due to the deformation of grains. The HAZ of the AISI 431 steel rod showed the evolution of elongated grains in a direction toward the WI. It is attributed to an increase in heat flow and pressure over the grains from HAZ to WI, leading to grain elongation (EL) and deformation. The HAZ of the AISI 1018 steel plate shows coarser ferrite and fewer pearlite colonies. It is due to less deformation during welding.

Figure 9 
                  Optical microstructure of PM: (a) AISI 1018 steel and (b) AISI 431 steel.
Figure 9

Optical microstructure of PM: (a) AISI 1018 steel and (b) AISI 431 steel.

Figure 10 
                  XRD patterns of AISI 1018 steel, AISI 431 steel, and dissimilar rod-to-plate joint.
Figure 10

XRD patterns of AISI 1018 steel, AISI 431 steel, and dissimilar rod-to-plate joint.

Figure 11 
                  Optical microstructures of different regions of rod-to-plate joint: (a) weld interface, (b) FDZ, (c) PDZ of AISI 431 steel rod, (d) PDZ of AISI 1018 steel plate, (e) HAZ of AISI 431 steel rod, and (f) HAZ of AISI 1018 steel plate.
Figure 11

Optical microstructures of different regions of rod-to-plate joint: (a) weld interface, (b) FDZ, (c) PDZ of AISI 431 steel rod, (d) PDZ of AISI 1018 steel plate, (e) HAZ of AISI 431 steel rod, and (f) HAZ of AISI 1018 steel plate.

3.2 Tensile properties

Figure 12 shows the photographs of miniature tensile samples (before and after testing). The tensile properties of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints are reported in Table 4. The miniature tensile specimens failed from HAZ to the plate side during tensile loading. The dissimilar rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431/AISI 1018 steel exhibited a TS of 650 MPa, a yield strength (YS) of 452 MPa, and a % EL of 18%. The tensile properties of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints are greater than those of the AISI 1018 steel. The dissimilar rod-to-plate joints showed 47.72, 32.55, and 20% improvement in TS, YS, and % EL compared to the base metal (AISI 1018 steel) plate. It showed 15.58, 7.75, and 10% reduction in TS, YS, and % EL of rod-to-plate joints compared to base metal (AISI 431 steel) rod. The superior tensile properties of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints are due to the evolution of finer grain microstructure in WI. The dynamic recrystallization causes the refinement of grains in weld center when the frictional pressure and forging pressure are employed to join metal surfaces. The dynamic recrystallization of grains is evolved by optimum frictional heating and plastic deformation of WI.

Figure 12 
                  Fractured miniature tensile specimens: (a) before testing and (b) after testing.
Figure 12

Fractured miniature tensile specimens: (a) before testing and (b) after testing.

Table 4

Tensile properties of dissimilar rod-to-plate joint

TS (MPa) YS (MPa) EL in 6 mm gauge length (%) Location of failure
650 452 18 HAZ on plate side

3.3 Fractured surface analysis

The fractured surfaces of tensile samples were subjected to SEM analysis, which reveals the mixed mode of failure (both ductile and brittle). Figure 13 shows the SEM fractographs of PM (AISI 431 steel and AISI 1018 steel) and dissimilar rod-to-plate joint specimens at lower and higher magnifications. The fractured surfaces of PMs are characterized by the ductile failure mode, revealing the formation of dimples and microvoids. The fractured surfaces of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints also disclosed the evolution of finer and deeper dimples, revealing ductile failure mode. The fractured tensile surface revealed three distinct regions: peripheral region, center region, and concourse region. The mechanism of fracture depends on central region. The central region exhibits more dimples. In the peripheral region, river pattern of dimples with quasi-cleavage was noticed. It disclosed the appearance of cleavage facet regions, fewer dimples, and tearing ridges. The concourse region is less dimpled with quasi-cleavage characteristics.

Figure 13 
                  SEM fractograph of tensile specimens: (a) and (b) center region, (c) and (d) peripheral region, and (e) and (f) concourse region.
Figure 13

SEM fractograph of tensile specimens: (a) and (b) center region, (c) and (d) peripheral region, and (e) and (f) concourse region.

3.4 Microhardness

The microhardness was measured at the cross-section of the dissimilar rod-to-plate joint. The hardness distribution of different zones of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints is shown in Figure 14. The greater hardness of 515 HV0.5 was observed at the WI due to the evolution of finer acicular martensitic structure. The hardness decreased gradually from WI to other zones such as PDZ, HAZ, and base metal. It is attributed to the difference in microstructural characteristics of FDZ, PDZ, HAZ, and base metal. The hardness of the PDZ of the AISI 431 steel rod varies from 490 HV0.5 to 514 HV0.5, whereas the hardness of the PDZ of the AISI 1018 steel plate ranges from 210 HV0.5 to 514 HV0.5. It is due to the greater plastic deformation on the AISI 431 rod side compared to the AISI 1018 plate side of joints. The HAZ region of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints revealed lower hardness compared to FDZ and PDZ regions. The HAZ hardness on the rod side of the joint varies from 347 HV0.5 to 490 HV0.5, whereas the HAZ hardness on the plate side of the joint varies from 160 HV0.5 to 200 HV0.5. The HAZ on the plate side of joint experiences more coarsening of grains compared to HAZ on the rod side of joint. The lower hardness observed in the plate side of joint is mainly responsible for the tensile failure of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints. The hardness of PDZ on MSS rod side was higher than that of the LCS plate side due to the presence intragranular martensitic structure. Similarly, the hardness of HAZ on the MSS rod side is greater than on the LCS plate side due to the evolution of elongated grains and comparatively lower grain coarsening. The WI is 47% harder than the base metal rod.

Figure 14 
                  Microhardness distribution of dissimilar rod-to-plate joint cross-section.
Figure 14

Microhardness distribution of dissimilar rod-to-plate joint cross-section.

4 Conclusions

  1. The dissimilar rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431/AISI 1018 steel were developed using RFW without the problems of porosity, intermetallic formation, and solidification cracking encountered in fusion welding.

  2. The FDZ showed the evolution of finer acicular martensite and retained austenite. It is mainly due to the dynamic recrystallization and rapid cooling at room temperature.

  3. The dissimilar rod-to-plate joints of AISI 431/AISI 1018 steel exhibited greater TS of 650 MPA, YS of 452 MPa, and % EL of 18%. It showed 47.72, 32.55, and 20% improvement in TS, YS, and % EL compared to the base metal plate.

  4. The enhancement in tensile properties and hardness of dissimilar rod-to-plate joints is attributed to the evolution of finer grain microstructure in WI.

  5. The microhardness of WI was greater up to 515 HV0.5 due to the evolution of fully recrystallized grains of finer acicular martensite. The grain growth and resulting lower hardness in HAZ are mainly responsible for the failure of the joints in HAZ only.

  1. Funding information: The authors declare that no funding is received to carry out this study.

  2. Author contributions: All the authors have contributed in the concept, experiment, testing, analysis, and manuscript writing.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

References

[1] Gotawala N, Shrivastava A. Investigation of interface microstructure and mechanical properties of rotatory friction welded dissimilar aluminum-steel joints. Mater Sci Eng A. 2021;825:141900.10.1016/j.msea.2021.141900Search in Google Scholar

[2] Kumar A, Pankaj P, Biswas P, Rao AG. Finite element analysis and experimental investigation on effect of process parameters in plasma-assisted friction stir welding of low carbon steel. Trans Ind Inst Met. 2022;75(10):1–21.10.1007/s12666-022-02624-3Search in Google Scholar

[3] Rajasekhar A, Reddy GM, Mohandas T, Murti VSR. Influence of post-weld heat treatments on microstructure and mechanical properties of AISI 431 martensitic stainless steel friction welds. Mater Sci Technol. 2008;24(2):201–12.10.1179/174328407X179773Search in Google Scholar

[4] Martinsen K, Hu SJ, Carlson BE. Joining of dissimilar materials. Cirp Ann. 2015;64(2):679–99.10.1016/j.cirp.2015.05.006Search in Google Scholar

[5] Li W, Vairis A, Preuss M, Ma T. Linear and rotary friction welding review. Int Mater Rev. 2016;61(2):71–100.10.1080/09506608.2015.1109214Search in Google Scholar

[6] Vairis A, Papazafeiropoulos G, Tsainis AM. A comparison between friction stir welding, linear friction welding and rotary friction welding. Adv Manuf. 2016;4(4):296–304.10.1007/s40436-016-0163-4Search in Google Scholar

[7] Uday MB, Ahmad Fauzi MN, Zuhailawati H, Ismail AB. Advances in friction welding process: A review. Sci Technol Weld Join. 2010;15(7):534–58.10.1179/136217110X12785889550064Search in Google Scholar

[8] The Welding Institute, UK. https://www.twi-global.com/technical-knowledge/job-knowledge/rotary-friction-welding-148 (Accessed on 20 June 2022). 2021.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Arivazhagan N, Singh S, Prakash S, Reddy GM. Investigation on AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel to AISI 4140 low alloy steel dissimilar joints by gas tungsten arc, electron beam and friction welding. Mater Des. 2011;32(5):3036–50.10.1016/j.matdes.2011.01.037Search in Google Scholar

[10] Ma H, Qin G, Geng P, Wang S, Zhang D. Microstructural characterisation and corrosion behaviour of aluminium alloy/steel hybrid structure produced by friction welding. J Manuf Proc. 2021;61:349–56.10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.11.014Search in Google Scholar

[11] Zhang C, Wang S, Luo D, Shi W, Liu X, Cui G, et al. Study of the mechanical properties and microstructures of conical joints for aluminum/steel continuous drive friction welding. J Manuf Proc. 2021;67:241–52.10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.04.070Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chen CM, Kovacevic R. Joining of Al 6061 alloy to AISI 1018 steel by combined effects of fusion and solid state welding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf. 2004;44(11):1205–14.10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.011Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dang Z, Qin G, Ma H. Interfacial microstructural characterization and mechanical properties of inertia friction welding of 2219 aluminum alloy to 304 stainless steel. Mat Sci Eng: A. 2021;822:141689.10.1016/j.msea.2021.141689Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kalsi NS, Sharma VS. A statistical analysis of rotary friction welding of steel with varying carbon in workpieces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2011;57(9):957–67.10.1007/s00170-011-3361-zSearch in Google Scholar

[15] Ates H, Kaya N. Mechanical and microstructural properties of friction welded AISI 304 stainless steel to AISI 1060 Steel AISI 1060. Arch Metall Mater. 2014;59(3):841–6.10.2478/amm-2014-0142Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ma H, Qin G, Geng P, Li F, Fu B, Meng X. Microstructure characterization and properties of carbon steel to stainless steel dissimilar metal joint made by friction welding. Mater Des. 2015;86:587–97.10.1016/j.matdes.2015.07.068Search in Google Scholar

[17] Khidhir GI, Baban SA. Efficiency of dissimilar friction welded 1045 medium carbon steel and 316L austenitic stainless steel joints. J Mater Res Technol. 2019;8(2):1926–32.10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.01.010Search in Google Scholar

[18] Alves EP, Piorino Neto F, An CY. Welding of AA1050 aluminum with AISI 304 stainless steel by rotary friction welding process. J Aero Technol Manag. 2010;2:301–6.10.5028/jatm.2010.02037110Search in Google Scholar

[19] Karthick K, Malarvizhi S, Balasubramanian V. Mechanical properties and microstructural characteristics of rotary friction welded dissimilar joints of rolled homogeneous armor steel and medium carbon steel. J Mech Behav Mater. 2021;30(1):171–8.10.1515/jmbm-2021-0017Search in Google Scholar

[20] Cheepu M, Ashfaq M, Muthupandi V. A new approach for using interlayer and analysis of the friction welding of titanium to stainless steel. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2017;70(10):2591–600.10.1007/s12666-017-1114-xSearch in Google Scholar

[21] Cheepu M, Che WS. Characterization of interfacial microstructure in friction welds between Inconel 718 and SM45C steel. Trans Indian Inst Met. 2020;73(6):1567–71.10.1007/s12666-020-01921-zSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Thirumalaikkannan DK, Paramasivam S, Visvalingam B, Sonar T, Sivaraj S. Parametric mathematical modeling and 3D response surface analysis for rod to plate friction welding of AISI 1020 steel/AISI 1018 steel. Multidiscipl Model Mater Struct. 2023;19(1):54–70.10.1108/MMMS-08-2022-0148Search in Google Scholar

[23] Thirumalaikkannan DK, Paramasivam S, Murugesan S, Visvalingam B. Effect of rotational speed on the microstructure and mechanical properties of rotary friction welded AISI 1018/AISI 1020 asymmetrical joints. Mater Test. 2022;64(11):1561–71.10.1515/mt-2022-0188Search in Google Scholar

[24] Dhamotharakannan T, Sivaraj P, Seeman M, Balasubramanian V. Mechanical and metallurgical characteristics of rotary friction welded low carbon steel plate/rod joints. Key Eng Mater. 2022;934:153–60.10.4028/p-51a271Search in Google Scholar

[25] Dhamotharakannan T, Sivaraj P, Balasubramanian V, Sonar T, Ivanov M, Sathiya S. Unsymmetric rod to plate rotary friction welding of dissimilar martensitic stainless steel and low carbon steel for automotive applications–mathematical modeling and optimization. Inter J Interact Des Manuf. 2023. (ahead-of-print). 10.1007/s12008-022-01193-5.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-08
Revised: 2022-10-16
Accepted: 2022-11-29
Published Online: 2023-03-18

© 2023 the author(s), published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Research Articles
  2. The mechanical properties of lightweight (volcanic pumice) concrete containing fibers with exposure to high temperatures
  3. Experimental investigation on the influence of partially stabilised nano-ZrO2 on the properties of prepared clay-based refractory mortar
  4. Investigation of cycloaliphatic amine-cured bisphenol-A epoxy resin under quenching treatment and the effect on its carbon fiber composite lamination strength
  5. Influence on compressive and tensile strength properties of fiber-reinforced concrete using polypropylene, jute, and coir fiber
  6. Estimation of uniaxial compressive and indirect tensile strengths of intact rock from Schmidt hammer rebound number
  7. Effect of calcined diatomaceous earth, polypropylene fiber, and glass fiber on the mechanical properties of ultra-high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete
  8. Analysis of the tensile and bending strengths of the joints of “Gigantochloa apus” bamboo composite laminated boards with epoxy resin matrix
  9. Performance analysis of subgrade in asphaltic rail track design and Indonesia’s existing ballasted track
  10. Utilization of hybrid fibers in different types of concrete and their activity
  11. Validated three-dimensional finite element modeling for static behavior of RC tapered columns
  12. Mechanical properties and durability of ultra-high-performance concrete with calcined diatomaceous earth as cement replacement
  13. Characterization of rutting resistance of warm-modified asphalt mixtures tested in a dynamic shear rheometer
  14. Microstructural characteristics and mechanical properties of rotary friction-welded dissimilar AISI 431 steel/AISI 1018 steel joints
  15. Wear performance analysis of B4C and graphene particles reinforced Al–Cu alloy based composites using Taguchi method
  16. Connective and magnetic effects in a curved wavy channel with nanoparticles under different waveforms
  17. Development of AHP-embedded Deng’s hybrid MCDM model in micro-EDM using carbon-coated electrode
  18. Characterization of wear and fatigue behavior of aluminum piston alloy using alumina nanoparticles
  19. Evaluation of mechanical properties of fiber-reinforced syntactic foam thermoset composites: A robust artificial intelligence modeling approach for improved accuracy with little datasets
  20. Assessment of the beam configuration effects on designed beam–column connection structures using FE methodology based on experimental benchmarking
  21. Influence of graphene coating in electrical discharge machining with an aluminum electrode
  22. A novel fiberglass-reinforced polyurethane elastomer as the core sandwich material of the ship–plate system
  23. Seismic monitoring of strength in stabilized foundations by P-wave reflection and downhole geophysical logging for drill borehole core
  24. Blood flow analysis in narrow channel with activation energy and nonlinear thermal radiation
  25. Investigation of machining characterization of solar material on WEDM process through response surface methodology
  26. High-temperature oxidation and hot corrosion behavior of the Inconel 738LC coating with and without Al2O3-CNTs
  27. Influence of flexoelectric effect on the bending rigidity of a Timoshenko graphene-reinforced nanorod
  28. An analysis of longitudinal residual stresses in EN AW-5083 alloy strips as a function of cold-rolling process parameters
  29. Assessment of the OTEC cold water pipe design under bending loading: A benchmarking and parametric study using finite element approach
  30. A theoretical study of mechanical source in a hygrothermoelastic medium with an overlying non-viscous fluid
  31. An atomistic study on the strain rate and temperature dependences of the plastic deformation Cu–Au core–shell nanowires: On the role of dislocations
  32. Effect of lightweight expanded clay aggregate as partial replacement of coarse aggregate on the mechanical properties of fire-exposed concrete
  33. Utilization of nanoparticles and waste materials in cement mortars
  34. Investigation of the ability of steel plate shear walls against designed cyclic loadings: Benchmarking and parametric study
  35. Effect of truck and train loading on permanent deformation and fatigue cracking behavior of asphalt concrete in flexible pavement highway and asphaltic overlayment track
  36. The impact of zirconia nanoparticles on the mechanical characteristics of 7075 aluminum alloy
  37. Investigation of the performance of integrated intelligent models to predict the roughness of Ti6Al4V end-milled surface with uncoated cutting tool
  38. Low-temperature relaxation of various samarium phosphate glasses
  39. Disposal of demolished waste as partial fine aggregate replacement in roller-compacted concrete
  40. Review Articles
  41. Assessment of eggshell-based material as a green-composite filler: Project milestones and future potential as an engineering material
  42. Effect of post-processing treatments on mechanical performance of cold spray coating – an overview
  43. Internal curing of ultra-high-performance concrete: A comprehensive overview
  44. Special Issue: Sustainability and Development in Civil Engineering - Part II
  45. Behavior of circular skirted footing on gypseous soil subjected to water infiltration
  46. Numerical analysis of slopes treated by nano-materials
  47. Soil–water characteristic curve of unsaturated collapsible soils
  48. A new sand raining technique to reconstitute large sand specimens
  49. Groundwater flow modeling and hydraulic assessment of Al-Ruhbah region, Iraq
  50. Proposing an inflatable rubber dam on the Tidal Shatt Al-Arab River, Southern Iraq
  51. Sustainable high-strength lightweight concrete with pumice stone and sugar molasses
  52. Transient response and performance of prestressed concrete deep T-beams with large web openings under impact loading
  53. Shear transfer strength estimation of concrete elements using generalized artificial neural network models
  54. Simulation and assessment of water supply network for specified districts at Najaf Governorate
  55. Comparison between cement and chemically improved sandy soil by column models using low-pressure injection laboratory setup
  56. Alteration of physicochemical properties of tap water passing through different intensities of magnetic field
  57. Numerical analysis of reinforced concrete beams subjected to impact loads
  58. The peristaltic flow for Carreau fluid through an elastic channel
  59. Efficiency of CFRP torsional strengthening technique for L-shaped spandrel reinforced concrete beams
  60. Numerical modeling of connected piled raft foundation under seismic loading in layered soils
  61. Predicting the performance of retaining structure under seismic loads by PLAXIS software
  62. Effect of surcharge load location on the behavior of cantilever retaining wall
  63. Shear strength behavior of organic soils treated with fly ash and fly ash-based geopolymer
  64. Dynamic response of a two-story steel structure subjected to earthquake excitation by using deterministic and nondeterministic approaches
  65. Nonlinear-finite-element analysis of reactive powder concrete columns subjected to eccentric compressive load
  66. An experimental study of the effect of lateral static load on cyclic response of pile group in sandy soil
Downloaded on 16.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jmbm-2022-0273/html
Scroll to top button