Home Physical Sciences Mechanistic insight on the sonolytic degradation of phenol at interface and bulk using additives
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Mechanistic insight on the sonolytic degradation of phenol at interface and bulk using additives

  • Sarjerao Bapu Doltade and Vitthal L. Gole EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: August 2, 2017
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Present work investigated the degradation of phenol based on theoretical knowledge of bubble dynamic and experimental studies. Optimum parameters of theoretical knowledge such as initial concentration of phenol: 1.1 mole/L; concentration of additive: 2 g/L; liquid medium temperature: 35°C and pressure of liquid medium: 101325 Pa were considered for the experimental study. The degradation was further explored in the presence of zinc oxide (effect of particle size), hydrogen peroxide (effect on hydroxyl radical concentration), and sodium chloride (effect of a change in liquid properties) and its effect on degradation of phenol. The degradation of phenol increased in the presence catalyst such as 0.61±0.013 moles L-1 min-1 (hydrogen peroxide), 0.44±0.014 moles L-1 min-1 (zinc oxide), and 0.5±0.013 moles L-1 min-1 (sodium chloride) compare to the absence of catalyst 0.24±0.009 moles L-1 min-1. The results confirmed that maximum degradation of phenol obtains in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (cavitational yield: 15.9×10-5 mg/J, the rate constant: 4.8×l0-5 min-1, and TOC removal 28.5%). The presence of sodium chloride showed the considerable effect on degradation and TOC removal. Results confirmed that the degradation of phenol is driven by the hydroxyl radicals’ mechanism and increased with increase in the concentration of hydroxyl radicals. The degradation of phenol was highly dependent on the concentration of phenol near vicinity of the liquid-bubble interface.


Tel.: +1-520-328-4796, Fax: +1-520-621-8059

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to thank Professor V S Moholkar, Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, India for his valuable guidance for conceptual understanding of bubble dynamics model.

Nomenclature

As

surface area of bubble

Cp

concentration of pollutant molecules in the bubble

Cpi

heat capacities of species at constant pressure

Cp,mix

heat capacity of gaseous mixture at constant pressure

Cpr

concentration of pollutant molecules at bubble wall

Cv,mix

heat capacity of mixture at constant volume

Cw

concentration of water molecules in the bubble

Cwr

concentration of water molecules at bubble wall

dV

change in volume of bubble

Dp

diffusion coefficient of pollutant.

Dw

diffusion coefficient of water

E

net energy in the bubble

h

radius of Wander Vaals hard sphere

hw

molecular the enthalpy of water

k

Boltzman constant

K

thermal conductivity of species

Lp

length scale of diffusion in the presence of pollutants

Lth

thermal diffusive penetration length

Lw

length scale of diffusion or thickness of diffusive water layer around bubble

Ntot

total number of molecules in the bubble

Nw, NAr and NP

number of molecules of water, argon, and pollutants respectively

Pi

pressure inside the bubble

Q

net heat in the bubble

R

radius of bubble at any time ‘t’

R0

initial radius of bubble

T

temperature inside bubble

T0

temperature at interface

Uw

internal energy of water molecule

W

work done by the bubble

ρi

densities of species

ρmix

density of gas mixture

λij

thermal conductivity of bubble

References

1 Sivasankar T.; Moholkar V. S. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 149, 57-69.10.1016/j.cej.2008.10.004Search in Google Scholar

2 Sivasankar T.; Moholkar V. S. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2009, 16, 769-781.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2009.02.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3 Gogate P. R.; Sutkar V. S.; Pandit A. B. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166, 1066-1082.10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.069Search in Google Scholar

4 Dharmadhikari A. K.; Dharmadhikari J. A.; Mahulkar A. V.; Ramanandan G.; Ramachandran H.; Pandit A. B.; Mathur D. J. Phys. Chem. C., 2011, 115, 6611-6617.10.1021/jp111412dSearch in Google Scholar

5 Anju S. G.; Yesodharan S.; Yesodharan E. P. Chem. Eng. J. 2012,189-190, 84-93.10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.032Search in Google Scholar

6 Busca G.; Berardinelli S.; Resini C.; Arrighi L. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 160, 265-28810.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.03.045Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7 Gultekin I.; Tezcanli-Guyer G.; Ince N. H., J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 2008, 12, 105-110.Search in Google Scholar

8 Lim M.; Son Y.; Khim J. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1976-1981.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.03.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9 Barbier P. F.; Petrier C, J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 1996, 1, 154-159.Search in Google Scholar

10 Oztekin R.; Sponza D. T. Treatment of wastewaters from the olive mill industry by sonication, J. Chem. Technol. Biot., 2013, 88, 212-225.10.1002/jctb.3808Search in Google Scholar

11 Sponza D. T.; Oztekin R. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1244-125710.1016/j.ultsonch.2013.10.011Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12 Jothiramalingam R.; Tsao T.; Wang M. K. Kinet. Catal. 2009, 50, 741-747.10.1134/S0023158409050164Search in Google Scholar

13 Kidak R.; Ince N. H. J. Adv. Oxid. Technol., 2008, 11, 583-587.10.1515/jaots-2008-0319Search in Google Scholar

14 Emery R. J.; Aki M. P.; Mantzavinos D. Environ. Technol., 24, 2003, 1491-1500.10.1080/09593330309385694Search in Google Scholar

15 Karri A.; Arslan-Alaton I.; Olmez-Hanci T.; Bekbolet M. Chem. Eng. J., 2013, 224, 4-9.10.1016/j.cej.2012.11.049Search in Google Scholar

16 Sutkar V. S.; Gogate P. R.; Csoka L. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 290-295.10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.049Search in Google Scholar

17 Sutkar V.S.; Gogate P. R. Chem. Eng. J. 2010, 158, 296-304.10.1016/j.cej.2010.01.051Search in Google Scholar

18 Kumar K. S.; Moholkar V. S. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2007, 62, 2698-2711.10.1016/j.ces.2007.02.010Search in Google Scholar

19 Krishnan J. S.; Dwivedi P.; Moholkar V. S. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45, 1493-1504.10.1021/ie050839tSearch in Google Scholar

20 Uddin M. H.; Nanzai B.; Okitsu K. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 28, 144-149.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.06.028Search in Google Scholar

21 Entezari M. H.; Petrier C.; Devidal P. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2003, 10, 103-108.10.1016/S1350-4177(02)00136-0Search in Google Scholar

22 Khokhawala I. M.; Gogate P. R. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2010, 1, 833-838.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.02.012Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23 Malani R. S.; Khanna S.; Chakma S.; Moholkar V. S. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2014, 21, 1400-1406.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.01.028Search in Google Scholar PubMed

24 Sáez V.; Esclapez M. D.; Bonete P.; J.Walton D. J.; Rehorek A.; Louisnard O.; González-García J. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2011, 18, 104-113.10.1016/j.ultsonch.2010.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

25 Gole V. L.; Alhat A. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 1393-1399.10.1007/s11814-017-0033-1Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-2-19
Revised: 2017-4-18
Accepted: 2017-5-26
Published Online: 2017-8-2

© 2017 by Walter De Gruyter GmbH and Sycamore Global Publications LLC

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Editorial
  2. Excitation Kinetics of Oxygen O(1D) State in Low-Pressure Oxygen Plasma and the Effect of Electron Energy Distribution Function
  3. Using amino-functionalized Fe3O4-WO3 nanoparticles for diazinon removal from synthetic and real water samples in presence of UV irradiation
  4. Treatment of high salinity wastewater using CWPO process for reuse
  5. Electrochemical Advanced Oxidation Processes (EAOP) to degrade per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)
  6. Effect of feedstock impurities on activity and selectivity of V-Mo-Nb-Te-Ox catalyst in ethane oxidative dehydrogenation
  7. Photocatalytic Degradation of Azo Dyes Over Semiconductors Supported on Polyethylene Terephthalate and Polystyrene Substrates
  8. Effects of calcination temperature on sol-gel synthesis of porous La2Ti2O7 photocatalyst on degradation of Reactive Brilliant Red X3B
  9. ClO2-oxidation-based demulsification of oil-water transition layer in oilfields: An experimental study
  10. Semi-permanent hair dyes degradation at W/WO3 photoanode under controlled current density assisted by visible light
  11. Degradation of PVA (polyvinyl alcohol) in wastewater by advanced oxidation processes
  12. Degradation of imidacloprid insecticide in a binary mixture with propylene glycol by conventional fenton process
  13. Gemini surfactant-assisted synthesis of BiOBr with superior visible light-induced photocatalytic activity towards RhB degradation
  14. Photocatalytic paraquat degradation over TiO2 modified by hydrothermal technique in alkaline solution
  15. Enhancement of Profenofos Remediation Using Stimulated Bioaugmentation Technique
  16. Mechanistic insight on the sonolytic degradation of phenol at interface and bulk using additives
  17. Biosolubilization of low-grade rock phosphate by mixed thermophilic iron-oxidizing bacteria
  18. Degradation of methyl orange using dielectric barrier discharge water falling film reactor
  19. Rapid prediction of hydrogen peroxide concentration eletrogenerated with boron doped diamond electrodes
Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/jaots-2017-0013/html
Scroll to top button