Determining the L2 academic writing development stage: a corpus-based research on doctoral dissertations

References

Ahmad, Muhammad. (Submitted). Phrasal complexity in Pakistani academic writing: A corpus-based comparative study of doctoral dissertations across disciplines. Faisalabad, Pakistan: Government College University Faisalabad dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Ansarifar, Ahmad, Hesamoddin Shahriari & Reza Pishghadam. 2018. Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate students and expert writers in applied linguistics. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 31. 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.12.008.Suche in Google Scholar

Atak, Nesrin & Aysel Saricaoglu. 2021. Syntactic complexity in L2 learners’ argumentative writing: Developmental stages and the within-genre topic effect. Assessing Writing 47. 100506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100506.Suche in Google Scholar

Basturkmen, Helen. 2009. Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 8(4). 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2009.07.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Beers, Scott F. & William E. Nagy. 2009. Syntactic complexity as a predictor of adolescent writing quality: Which measures? Which genre? Reading and Writing 22. 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-007-9107-5.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University.10.1017/CBO9780511621024Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Victoria Clark. 2002. Historical shifts in modification patterns with complex noun phrase structures: How long can you go without a verb? In Teresa Fanego, Javier Pérez-Guerra & María José López-Couso (eds.), English historical syntax and morphology, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.223.06bibSuche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2010. Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9(1). 2–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2010.01.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2011. Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2). 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674311000025.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2016. Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511920776Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2011. Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? Tesol Quarterly 45(1). 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2013. Pay attention to the phrasal structures: Going beyond t-units-a response to WeiWei Yang. Tesol Quarterly 47(1). 192–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.84.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray & Shelley Staples. 2016. Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics 37(5). 639–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu059.Suche in Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples & Jesse Egbert. 2021. The register-Functional approach to grammatical complexity: Theoretical foundation, descriptive research findings, application. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003087991Suche in Google Scholar

Casal, J. Elliott & Joseph J. Lee. 2019. Syntactic complexity and writing quality in assessed first-year L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 44. 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005.Suche in Google Scholar

Crossley, Scott A. & Danielle S. McNamara. 2014. Does writing development equal writing quality? A computational investigation of syntactic complexity in L2 learners. Journal of Second Language Writing 26. 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Durrant, Philip, Mark Brenchley & McCallum Lee. 2021. Understanding development and proficiency in writing: Quantitative corpus linguistic approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108770101Suche in Google Scholar

Durrant, Philip. 2022. Corpus linguistics for writing development: A guide for research. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781003152682Suche in Google Scholar

Fang, Zhihui. 2021. Demystifying academic writing: Genres, moves, skills, and strategies. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781003131618Suche in Google Scholar

Gray, Bethany. 2015. Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/scl.71Suche in Google Scholar

Gray, Bethany, Geluso Joe & Phuong Nguyen. 2019. The longitudinal development of grammatical complexity at the phrasal and clausal levels in spoken and written responses to the TOEFL iBT® test. ETS Research Report Series 2019(1). 1–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12280.Suche in Google Scholar

Gray, Bethany, Shelley Staples & Jesse Egbert. 2017. Complexity in writing development: Untangling two approaches to measuring grammatical complexity. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/documents/college-artslaw/corpus/conference-archives/2017/pre-conference-workshop-2-attachment.pdf (accessed 1 May 2023).Suche in Google Scholar

Hyland, Ken. 2004. Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Wenying. 2012. Measurements of development in L2 written production: The case of L2 Chinese. Applied Linguistics 34(1). 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams019.Suche in Google Scholar

Kreyer, Rolf & Steffen Schaub. 2018. The development of phrasal complexity in German intermediate learners of English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(1). 82–111. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.16011.kre.Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher. 2016. Measuring syntactic development in L2 writing: Fine grained indices of syntactic complexity and usage-based indices of syntactic sophistication. Atlanta: Georgia State University Dissertation.Suche in Google Scholar

Kyle, Kristopher & Scott A Crossley. 2018. Measuring syntactic complexity in L2 writing using fine-grained clausal and phrasal indices. The Modern Language Journal 102(2). 333–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12468.Suche in Google Scholar

Lambert, Zachary M. 2022. Analyzing patterns of complexity in pre-university L2 English writing. Utah: Brigham Young University MA thesis.Suche in Google Scholar

Lan, Ge, Qiandi Liu & Shelley Staples. 2019. Grammatical complexity: ‘What does it mean’ and ‘so what’ for L2 writing classrooms? Journal of Second Language Writing 46. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.100673.Suche in Google Scholar

Lan, Ge & Yachao Sun. 2019. A corpus-based investigation of noun phrase complexity in the L2 writings of a first-year composition course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38. 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen–Freeman, Diane. 1978. An ESL index of development. Tesol Quarterly 12(4). 439–448. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586142.Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen–Freeman, Diane. 2006. The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics 27(4). 590–619. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml029.Suche in Google Scholar

Larsen–Freeman, Diane. 2009. Adjusting expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp043.Suche in Google Scholar

Leech, Geoffrey, Marianne Hundt, Christian Mair & Nicholas Smith. 2009. Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511642210Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Yang, Larisa Nikitina & Patricia N. Riget. 2022. Development of syntactic complexity in Chinese university students’ L2 argumentative writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 56. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101099.Suche in Google Scholar

Lim, J. Miin-Hwa, Chek-Kim Loi, Azirah Hashim & May S. Liu. 2015. Purpose statements in experimental doctoral dissertations submitted to U.S. universities: An inquiry into doctoral students’ communicative resources in language education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 20. 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.06.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Liu, Liming & Li Lan. 2016. Noun phrase complexity in EFL academic writing: A corpus- based study of postgraduate academic writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL 13(1). 48–65. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2016.13.1.4.48.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei. 2011. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. Tesol Quarterly 45(1). 36–62. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.240859.Suche in Google Scholar

Lu, Xiaofei & Haiyang Ai. 2015. Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing: Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds. Journal of Second Language Writing 29. 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.003.Suche in Google Scholar

Martínez, A. Cristina Lahuerta. 2023. Analysis of changes in L2 writing over the time of a short-term academic English programme. Porta Linguarum 39. 111–127. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.22842.Suche in Google Scholar

Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2012. Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009030199Suche in Google Scholar

Nesi, Hilary & Sheena Gardner. 2019. Complex, but in what way? A step towards greater understanding of academic writing proficiency. In Chisato Danjo, Indu Meddegama, Dai O’Brien, John Prudhoe, Linda Walz & Rachel Wicaksono (eds.), Online Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics: Taking Risks in Applied Linguistics, 83–85. York: British Association for Applied Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar

Neumann, Heike. 2014. Teacher assessment of grammatical ability in second language academic writing: A case study. Journal of Second Language Writing 24. 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.04.002.Suche in Google Scholar

Norris, John M. & Lourdes Ortega. 2009. Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics 30(4). 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp044.Suche in Google Scholar

Ortega, Lourdes. 2003. Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing. Applied Linguistics 24(4). 492–518. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/24.4.492.Suche in Google Scholar

Parkinson, Jean & Jill Musgrave. 2014. Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for academic purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 14. 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.12.001.Suche in Google Scholar

Pérez-Guerra, Javier & Elizaveta A. Smirnova. 2023. How complex is professional academic writing? A corpus-based analysis of research articles in ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ disciplines. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 20. 149–183. https://doi.org/10.35869/vial.v0i20.4357.Suche in Google Scholar

Qin, Wenjuan & Xizi Zhang. 2022. Do EFL learners use different grammatical complexity features in writing across registers? Reading and Writing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-022-10367-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Ravid, Dorit & Ruth A. Berman. 2010. Developing noun phrase complexity at school age: A text-embedded cross-linguistic analysis. First Language 30(3). 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723709350531.Suche in Google Scholar

Rosmawati, Rosmawati. 2020. Profiling the dynamic changes of syntactic complexity in L2 academic writing: A multilevel synchrony method. In Gary G. Fogal & Marjolijn H. Verspoor (eds.), Complex Dynamic Systems Theory and L2 Writing Development, 109–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.54.05rosSuche in Google Scholar

Saricaoglu, Aysel & Nesrin Atak. 2022. Syntactic complexity and lexical complexity in argumentative writing: Variation by proficiency. Novitas-Research on Youth and Language 16(1). 56–73.Suche in Google Scholar

Staples, Shelley, Jesse Egbert, Biber Douglas & Bethany Gray. 2016. Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity across level of study, discipline, and genre. Written Communication 33(2). 149–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527.Suche in Google Scholar

Stockwell, Glenn & Michael Harrington. 2003. The incidental development of L2 proficiency in NS-NNS email interactions. CALICO Journal 20(2). 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.v20i2.337-359.Suche in Google Scholar

Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Taguchi, Naoko, William Crawford & Danielle Z. Wetzel. 2013. What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program. Tesol Quarterly 47(2). 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.91.Suche in Google Scholar

Thompson, Paul. 2005. Points of focus and position: Intertextual reference in PhD theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 4(4). 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.07.006.Suche in Google Scholar

Thongyoi, Krittaya & Kornwipa Poonpon. 2020. Phrasal complexity measures as predictors of EFL university students’ English academic writing proficiency. Reflections 27(1). 44–61.10.61508/refl.v27i1.241750Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Sue & Gulbahar Beckett. 2017. “My excellent college entrance examination achievement” noun phrase use of Chinese EFL students’ writing. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 8(2). 271–277. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0802.07.Suche in Google Scholar

Wang, Miao & Wander Lowie. 2021. Understanding advanced level academic writing on syntactic complexity. In Proceedings of the 35th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 455–465. Shanghai, China. Association for Computational Lingustics.Suche in Google Scholar

Weigle, Sara Cushing. 2002. Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511732997Suche in Google Scholar

Wright, Laura J. 2008. Writing science and objectification: Selecting, organizing, and decontextualizing knowledge. Linguistics and Education 19(3). 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.004.Suche in Google Scholar

Wolfe–Quintero, Kate, Shunji Inagaki & Hae-Young Kim. 1998. Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, WeiWei. 2013. Response to Biber, Gray, and Poonpon (2011). Tesol Quarterly 47(1). 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.76.Suche in Google Scholar

Yin, Shuhui, Yuan Gao & Xiaofei Lu. 2021. Syntactic complexity of research article part-genres: Differences between emerging and expert international publication writers. System 97. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102427.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhu, Wei. 2004. Faculty views on the importance of writing, the nature of academic writing, and teaching and responding to writing in the disciplines. Journal of Second Language Writing 13. 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.004.Suche in Google Scholar