Home Meaning-making in English-medium instruction science classroom interaction: from the systemic functional linguistics perspective
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Meaning-making in English-medium instruction science classroom interaction: from the systemic functional linguistics perspective

  • Jack Pun ORCID logo and Wenyun Jia ORCID logo EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: October 30, 2024

Abstract

Teaching science in English is increasingly common worldwide. This study explores the role of language in science meaning-making during classroom interactions by drawing on video-recorded classroom observations of four biology lessons in secondary English medium instruction (EMI) settings in Hong Kong. Informed by systemic functional linguistics (SFL), we integrate classroom interaction analysis with Lemke’s approach to thematic analysis. The results reveal similar interactional patterns across full- and partial-EMI science classrooms, characterised by a lack of interactivity and authoritative teacher behaviour in selecting student responses to engage with. During extended initiation–response–feedback exchanges, teachers’ feedback on students’ responses appears to underscore the importance of teachers’ modified input – specifically input emphasising semantic relations within the field of biology – in developing students’ content knowledge and language skills. The implications of the findings for applying SFL pedagogies in EMI science classrooms to improve teacher–student interaction are discussed.


Corresponding author: Wenyun Jia, Department of English, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, E-mail:

Funding source: Swire Educational Trust

Acknowledgments

We would like to say thank you the participants and the schools.

  1. Research ethics: Approved by the Oxford University Education DREC.

  2. Informed consent: The research obtained ethical approval and consent forms were provided for teachers and students.

  3. Author contributions: JP contributed to the conception, design, and data collection. WJ contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. Both authors contributed to writing and revising the manuscript.

  4. Competing interests: No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

  5. Research funding: This work was supported by Swire Educational Trust (2013 to 2017).

  6. Data availability: Upon request.

References

Alexander, Robin John. 2008. Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk, 4th edn. York: Dialogos.Search in Google Scholar

An, Jiangshan & Ann Childs. 2023. Teacher questions, wait time, and student output in classroom interaction in EMI science classes: An interdisciplinary view. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13(2). 471–493. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.38283.Search in Google Scholar

An, Jiangshan, Ernesto Macaro & Ann Childs. 2019. Language focused episodes by monolingual teachers in English medium instruction science lessons. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7(2). 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.18019.an.Search in Google Scholar

An, Jiangshan, Ernesto Macaro & Ann Childs. 2021. Classroom interaction in EMI high schools: Do teachers who are native speakers of English make a difference? System 98. 102482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102482.Search in Google Scholar

Axelsson, Monica & Britt Jakobson. 2020. Negotiating science-building thematic patterns of the scientific concept sound in a Swedish multilingual lower secondary classroom. Language and Education 34(4). 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2020.1740730.Search in Google Scholar

Byrnes, Heidi. 2019. Applying SFL for understanding and fostering instructed second language development. The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 512–536. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337936.022Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Chenguang. 2017. English-medium instruction in a medical school: Managing classroom discourse. In Jing Zhao & L. Quentin Dixon (eds.), English-medium Instruction in Chinese Universities, 79–104. London, England: Routledge.10.4324/9781315618623-5Search in Google Scholar

Cheng, Maurice M. W., Kristina Danielsson & Angel M. Y. Lin. 2020. Resolving puzzling phenomena by the simple particle model: Examining thematic patterns of multimodal learning and teaching. Learning: Research and Practice 6(1). 70–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/23735082.2020.1750675.Search in Google Scholar

de Oliveira, Luciana C. 2017. A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) in science for English language learners. In Alandeom W Oliveira & Molly H. Weinburgh (eds.), Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition. ASTE series in science education, 41–58. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9_3Search in Google Scholar

Dearden, Julie. 2015. English as a medium of instruction – a growing global phenomenon. British Council. https://www.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/e484_emi_-_cover_option_3_final_web.pdf (accessed 5 March 2024).Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Zhihui & Mary J. Schleppegrell. 2010. Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 53(7). 587–597. https://doi.org/10.1598/jaal.53.7.6.Search in Google Scholar

Fang, Zhihui. 2005. Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education 89(2). 335–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20050.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2013. Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. London, England: Routledge.10.4324/9780203431269Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1978. Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London, England: Arnold.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1993. Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education 5(2). 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-5898(93)90026-7.Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 2003. On the language of physical science. In Michael Alexander Kirkwood Halliday & James R. Martin (eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power, 59–75. London, England: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, Jennifer & Pauline Gibbons. 2005. Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education. Prospect 20(1). 6–30.Search in Google Scholar

Hammond, Jennifer. 2016. Dialogic space: Intersections between dialogic teaching and systemic functional linguistics. Research Papers in Education 31(1). 5–22. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315121833-2.Search in Google Scholar

Klingelhofer, Rachel Rennie & Mary Schleppegrell. 2019. Functional grammar analysis in support of dialogic instruction with text: Scaffolding purposeful, cumulative dialogue with English learners. In Pauline Jones & Jennifer Hammond (eds.), Talking to learn, 70–88. London, England: Routledge.10.4324/9781315121833-5Search in Google Scholar

Kong, Stella & Philip Hoare. 2011. Cognitive content engagement in content-based language teaching. Language Teaching Research 15(3). 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401152.Search in Google Scholar

Krashen, Stephen. 1985. The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. New York, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Lemke, Jay L. 1990. Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Llinares, Ana & Anne McCabe. 2023. Systemic functional linguistics: The perfect match for content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 26(3). 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985.Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Yuen Yi & Angel M. Y. Lin. 2019. Teaching, learning and scaffolding in CLIL science classrooms. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education 7(2). 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1075/jicb.00006.lo.Search in Google Scholar

Lo, Yuen Yi & Ernesto Macaro. 2012. The medium of instruction and classroom interaction: Evidence from Hong Kong secondary schools. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 15. 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2011.588307.Search in Google Scholar

Long, Michael Hugh. 1981. Input, interaction, and second-language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 379. 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x.Search in Google Scholar

Macaro, Ernesto, Samantha Curle, Jack Pun, Jiangshan An & Julie Dearden. 2018. A systematic review of English medium instruction in higher education. Language Teaching 51(1). 36–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444817000350.Search in Google Scholar

Macaro, Ernesto. 2022. English Medium Instruction: What do we know so far and what do we still need to find out? Language Teaching 55(4). 533–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444822000052.Search in Google Scholar

Maxwell-Reid, Corinne & Kwok-chi Lau. 2024. Investigating student difficulties in English-medium secondary classes: A functional linguist and a science educator in collaboration. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 67. 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101315.Search in Google Scholar

Mirhosseini, Seyyed-Abdolhamid. 2020. Collecting data through observation. Doing qualitative research in language education, 61–83. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-56492-6_4Search in Google Scholar

Mortimer, Eduardo & Philip Scott. 2003. Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Berkshire, England: Open University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Oliveira, Alandeom W. & Molly H. Weinburgh. 2017. Epilogue: Emergent trends and threads. In Science teacher preparation in content-based second language acquisition, 363–373. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-43516-9_20Search in Google Scholar

Oyoo, Samuel Ouma. 2012. Language in science classrooms: An analysis of physics teachers’ use of and beliefs about language. Research in Science Education 42. 849–873. https://doi-org.ezproxy.cityu.edu.hk/10.1007/s11165-011-9228-3.10.1007/s11165-011-9228-3Search in Google Scholar

Poon, Anita Y. K. & Connie M. Y. Lau. 2016. Fine-tuning medium-of-instruction policy in Hong Kong: Acquisition of language and content-based subject knowledge. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 20(1). 135–155.Search in Google Scholar

Pun, Jack KH & Ernesto Macaro. 2019. The effect of first and second language use on question types in English medium instruction science classrooms in Hong Kong. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 22(1). 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1510368.Search in Google Scholar

Pun, Jack KH. 2019. Salient language features in explanation texts that students encounter in secondary school chemistry textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 42. 100781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100781.Search in Google Scholar

Pun, Jack KH. 2021. Translanguaging in partial-EMI secondary science classrooms in Hong Kong. In BethAnne Paulsrud, Zhongfeng Tian & Jeanette Toth (eds.), English-medium instruction and translanguaging, 94–107. Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781788927338-011Search in Google Scholar

Pun, Jack K. H. & Nathan Thomas. 2020. English medium instruction: Teachers’ challenges and coping strategies. ELT Journal 74(3). 247–257. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa024.Search in Google Scholar

Rose, Heath, Ernesto Macaro, Kari Sahan, Ikuya Aizawa, Sihan Zhou & Minhui Wei. 2023. Defining English medium instruction: Striving for comparative equivalence. Language Teaching 56(4). 539–550. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444821000483.Search in Google Scholar

Sahan, Kari, Heath Rose & Ernesto Macaro. 2021. Models of EMI pedagogies: At the interface of language use and interaction. System 101. 102616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102616.Search in Google Scholar

Shanahan, Timothy & Cynthia Shanahan. 2012. What is disciplinary literacy and why does it matter? Topics in Language Disorders 32(1). 7–18. https://doi.org/10.1097/tld.0b013e318244557a.Search in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John McHardy & Malcolm Coulthard. 1975. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tang, Kok-Sing. 2017. Analyzing teachers’ use of metadiscourse: The missing element in classroom discourse analysis. Science Education 101(4). 548–583. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21275.Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, Lev Semenovich. 1978. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walldén, Robert. 2019. Scaffolding or side-tracking? The role of knowledge about language in content instruction. Linguistics and Education 54. 100760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2019.100760.Search in Google Scholar

Webster, Jonathan James. 2019. Key terms in the SFL model. In Geoff Thompson, Wendy L. Bowcher, Lise Fontaine & David Schönthal (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics, 35–54. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316337936.004Search in Google Scholar

Yip, Din-Yan, Do Coyle & Wing-Kwong Tsang. 2007. Evaluation of the effects of the medium of instruction on science learning of Hong Kong secondary students: Instructional activities in science lessons. Education Journal 35. 77–107.Search in Google Scholar


Supplementary Material

This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0109).


Received: 2024-04-01
Accepted: 2024-10-06
Published Online: 2024-10-30
Published in Print: 2025-03-26

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorial
  3. Broadening the appliability of systemic functional linguistics
  4. Research Articles
  5. Functional linguistics in life: an embodied approach in teacher education
  6. Teaching citation to university students
  7. Patterns of interaction between experiential and interpersonal meanings in student texts in Spanish: grounds for system-based applications in an academic writing context
  8. System networks as a resource in L2 writing education
  9. Teaching Chinese grammar through International Chinese Language Education micro-lectures: negotiating mass and presence through multimodal pedagogic discourse
  10. Meaning-making in English-medium instruction science classroom interaction: from the systemic functional linguistics perspective
  11. Scaffolding instruction in an EFL drama lesson: a systemic functional analysis
  12. Teaching mental processes to EFL learners: a blended-learning proposal
  13. SFL as a socially accountable praxis: who and what are we working for?
  14. Regular Articles
  15. The influence of task complexity and task modality on learners’ topic and turn management
  16. Explicit grammar instruction in the EFL classroom: studying the impact of age and gender
  17. Language pedagogies and late-life language learning proficiency
  18. The relative effects of corrective feedback and language proficiency on the development of L2 pragmalinguistic competence: the case of request downgraders
  19. Unraveling the dynamics of English communicative motivation and self-efficacy through task-supported language teaching: a latent growth modeling perspective
  20. Effects of random selection tests on second language vocabulary learning: a comparison with cumulative tests
  21. Determining the L2 academic writing development stage: a corpus-based research on doctoral dissertations
  22. Dynamic development of cohesive devices in English as a second language writing
  23. What pronunciation specialists believe CELTA tutors need to know to prepare student teachers to teach pronunciation
  24. The effect of collaborative prewriting on L2 collaborative writing production and individual L2 writing development
  25. Beyond learning opportunities: focused encounters in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition and teaching
  26. Funds of knowledge for synchronous online language teaching: a translanguaging view on an ESL teacher’s pedagogical practices
  27. A frequency, coverage, and dispersion analysis of the academic collocation list in university student writing
  28. Fostering well-being in the university L2 classroom: the “I am an author” project
  29. How teaching modality affects Foreign Language Enjoyment: a comparison of in-person and online English as a Foreign Language classes
  30. Toward a better understanding of student engagement with peer feedback: a longitudinal study
  31. Chinese EFL learners’ basic psychological needs satisfaction and foreign language emotions: a person-centered approach
  32. Are foreign language teaching enjoyment and motivation two sides of the same coin?
  33. Orchestrating listening in EMI university lectures: how listening proficiency and motivation shape students’ use of metacognitive listening strategies
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/iral-2024-0109/html
Scroll to top button