References

Ableeva, R. 2008. The effects of dynamic assessment on L2 listening comprehension. In J. Lantolf & M. Poehner (eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second language. London: Equinox.Suche in Google Scholar

Aljaafreh, A. & J. P. Lantolf. 1994. Negative feedback as regulation: Second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal 78. 465–483.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02064.xSuche in Google Scholar

Ammar, A. 2008. Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research 12. 183–210.10.1177/1362168807086287Suche in Google Scholar

Bitchener, J. 2008. Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing 17. 102–118.10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004Suche in Google Scholar

Bitchener, J., S. Young & D. Cameron. 2005. The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 14. 191–205.10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001Suche in Google Scholar

Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. NY: Pearson Education.Suche in Google Scholar

Chandler, J. 2003. The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 12. 267–296.10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00038-9Suche in Google Scholar

Chrabaszcz, A. & N. Jiang. 2014. The role of the native language in the use of the English nongeneric definite article by L2 learners: A cross-linguistic comparison. Second Language Research 30. 351–379.10.1177/0267658313493432Suche in Google Scholar

Dao, P. & N. Iwashita. 2018. Teacher mediation in L2 classroom task-based interaction. System 74. 183–193.10.1016/j.system.2018.03.016Suche in Google Scholar

Davin, K. J. 2013. Integration of dynamic assessment and instructional conversations to promote development and improve assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research 17. 303–322.10.1177/1362168813482934Suche in Google Scholar

Davin, K. J. & R. Donato. 2013. Student collaboration and teacher-directed classroom dynamic assessment: a complementary pairing. Foreign Language Annals 46. 5–22.10.1111/flan.12012Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R. 2012. Language teaching research and language pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.10.1002/9781118271643Suche in Google Scholar

Ellis, R., S. Loewen & R. Erlam. 2006. Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28. 339–368.10.1017/S0272263106060141Suche in Google Scholar

Erlam, R., R. Ellis & R. Batstone. 2013. Oral corrective feedback on L2 writing: Two approaches compared. System 41. 257–268.10.1016/j.system.2013.03.004Suche in Google Scholar

Gass, S. 2003. Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. Long (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, 224–255. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756492.ch9Suche in Google Scholar

Goo, J. 2012. Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34. 445–474.10.1017/S0272263112000149Suche in Google Scholar

Granena, G. & Y. Yilmaz. 2018. Corrective feedback and the role of implicit sequence‐learning ability in l2 online performance. Language Learning10.1111/lang.12319.Suche in Google Scholar

Guo, X. & Y. Yang. 2018. Effects of corrective feedback on EFL learners’ acquisition of third-person singular form and the mediating role of cognitive style. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research10.1007/s10936-018-9566-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). 2000. Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. 2011. Dynamic assessment in the classroom: Vygotskian praxis for second language development. Language Teaching Research 15. 11–33.10.1177/1362168810383328Suche in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & S. L. Thorne. 2006. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. & M. E. Poehner. 2014. Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education. Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203813850Suche in Google Scholar

Long, M. 1996. The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (eds.), Handbook of research on second language acquisition, 413–468. New York: Academic.10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3Suche in Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & J. Izquierdo. 2009. Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning 59. 453–498.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00512.xSuche in Google Scholar

Lyster, R. & L. Ranta. 1997. Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20. 37–66.10.1017/S0272263197001034Suche in Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. 2016. Anniversary article Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research 20(4). 535–562.10.1177/1362168816644940Suche in Google Scholar

Nassaji, H. & M. Swain. 2000. A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness 9. 34–51.10.1080/09658410008667135Suche in Google Scholar

Nyikos, M. & R. Hashimoto. 1997. Constructivist theory applied to collaborative learning in teacher education: In search of ZPD. The Modern Language Journal 81(4). 506–517.10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05518.xSuche in Google Scholar

Ohta, A. S. 2000. Rethinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 51–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Poehner, M. E. 2008. Dynamic assessment: A Vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting second language development. Berlin: Springer Publishing.10.1007/978-0-387-75775-9Suche in Google Scholar

Poehner, M. E. 2009. Group dynamic assessment: Mediation for the L2 classroom. TESOL Quarterly 43. 471–491.10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00245.xSuche in Google Scholar

Poehner, M. E. & R. A. van Compernolle. 2013. L2 development around tests: Learner response processes and dynamic assessment. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(4). 353–377.10.1515/iral-2013-0015Suche in Google Scholar

Rassaei, E. 2013. Corrective feedback, learners’ perceptions, and L2 development. System 41. 472–483.10.1016/j.system.2013.05.002Suche in Google Scholar

Rassaei, E. 2014. Scaffolded feedback, recasts, and L2 development: a sociocultural perspective. The Modern Language Journal 98. 417–431.10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12060.xSuche in Google Scholar

Rassaei, E. 2015. Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System 49. 98–109.10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002Suche in Google Scholar

Sato, M. & S. Loewen. 2018. Metacognitive instruction enhances the effectiveness of corrective feedback: Variable effects of feedback types and linguistic targets. Language Learning 68(2). 507–545.10.1111/lang.12283Suche in Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. 2007. The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies, 301–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. 2008. Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning 58. 835–874.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2008.00480.xSuche in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 1993. The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review 50. 158–164.10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158Suche in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J.P. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning, 97–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Takahashi, E. 1998. Language development in social interaction: A longitudinal study of a Japanese FLES program from a Vygotskyan approach. Foreign Language Annals 31. 392–406.10.1111/j.1944-9720.1998.tb00584.xSuche in Google Scholar

van Compernolle, R. A. & C. Kinginger. 2013. Promoting metapragmatic development through assessment in the zone of proximal development. Language Teaching Research 17(3). 282–302.10.1177/1362168813482917Suche in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1987. The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. vol. 1. New York: Plenum.Suche in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. 1998. The problem of age. In R.W. Rieber (ed.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky: Volume 5: Child psychology, 187–206. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4615-5401-1_6Suche in Google Scholar

Yang, Y. & R. Lyster. 2010. Effects of form-focused practice and feedback on Chinese EFL learners’ acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32. 235–263.10.1017/S0272263109990519Suche in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Y. 2013. Relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback: The role of working memory capacity and language analytic ability. Applied Linguistics 34. 344–368.10.1093/applin/ams044Suche in Google Scholar

Zdorenko, T. & J. Paradis. 2008. The acquisition of articles in child second language English: Fluctuation, transfer or both?. Second Language Research 24. 227–250.10.1177/0267658307086302Suche in Google Scholar