Home Linguistics & Semiotics An exploration of quasi-proper names based on Japanese data: Insights from cross-linguistic and language-specific perspectives
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

An exploration of quasi-proper names based on Japanese data: Insights from cross-linguistic and language-specific perspectives

  • Yoko Mizuta

    Yoko Mizuta obtained her PhD. in linguistics from the University of Chicago. She is a senior associate professor of linguistics at International Christian University, Japan. She is particularly interested in incorporating the perspectives and methods of linguistics and other areas into the investigations of philosophical issues.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: December 16, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the semantics and pragmatics of quasi-proper names (QP-names) from cross-linguistic and language-specific perspectives, based on Japanese data. First, a stronger basis is provided for the core part of QP-names from a cross-linguistic perspective. Specifically, supporting evidence is provided for direct reference and rigidity, by examining the reference of a QP-name in a modal context compared with the corresponding definite description. Then, indexicality as a unique property of QP-names is discussed in greater detail, with a clarification of the notion in relation to Kaplan’s theory of indexicals. On this basis, QP-names are characterized as rigid designators that apply to each individual in a relational scheme (such as a family tree) in such a way that they are assigned in a systematic way, with customization, to the individual’s superiors within a certain degree of relationship and are used from the individual’s perspective. Ambiguity and disambiguation are also discussed, using illustrations of phrasal and compound QP-names, which serve as full names and nicknames. Second, deviant cases of QP-names are investigated. Specifically, QP-names with a higher degree of quasi-ness, or quasi-quasi-proper names, are discussed, using illustrations of examples unique to Japanese. These include anata, which is derived from a second person pronoun (‘you’) to be used by a wife when talking to her husband even when he is not there. Furthermore, pseudo-quasi-proper names are discussed. They look like QP-names but have an essential difference. They are regarded as metonymically-created temporary names to be used in the context at issue. Based on the core features and deviant cases of QP-names, together with an observation of atypical proper names, it was proposed that we evaluate the quality of (quasi-)proper names on multiple criteria and consider a complex model of (quasi-)proper names, according to this evaluation.


Corresponding author: Yoko Mizuta, College of Liberal Arts, International Christian University, Tokyo, Japan, E-mail:
This paper is dedicated to the late Dr. Istvan Kecskes, with a sincere appreciation for his devoted work as editor-in-chief of Intercultural Pragmatics for many years.

About the author

Yoko Mizuta

Yoko Mizuta obtained her PhD. in linguistics from the University of Chicago. She is a senior associate professor of linguistics at International Christian University, Japan. She is particularly interested in incorporating the perspectives and methods of linguistics and other areas into the investigations of philosophical issues.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP22K18461. I am grateful to Dr. Alessandro Capone for sharing his pioneering work on quasi-proper names with the participants of the conference Pragmasophia 4 (June 2024, Messina, Italy) and for kindly welcoming me to the exploration of this area. Thanks also go to the reviewers for helpful comments.

References

Allan, Keith. 2024. The semantics and pragmatics of names and naming. In Alessandro Capone, Pietro Perconti & Roberto Graci (eds.), Philosophy, cognition and pragmatics, 165–188. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-50109-8_10Search in Google Scholar

Bach, Kent. 2015. The predicate view of proper names. Philosophy Compass 10(11). 772–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12261.Search in Google Scholar

Burge, Tyler. 1973. Reference and proper names. Journal of Philosophy 70(14). https://doi.org/10.2307/2025107.Search in Google Scholar

Capone, Alessandro. 2024a. On quasi-proper names. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale 58. 185–214.10.30687/AnnOc/2499-1562/2024/12/011Search in Google Scholar

Capone, Alessandro. 2024b. Proper names as speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics 21(5). 647–667. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2024-5003.Search in Google Scholar

Capone, Alessandro. 2025a. Proper names, quasi-proper names, de se thoughts, and communication. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-95013-1Search in Google Scholar

Capone, Alessandro. 2025b. Quasi-proper names, linguistic use and contextuality. Intercultural Pragmatics 22(4). (forthcoming).10.1515/ip-2025-4006Search in Google Scholar

Davis, Wayne A. 2005. Nondescriptive meaning and reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199261652.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Delgado, Laura. 2019. Between singularity and generality: The semantic life of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 42. 381–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-018-9251-1.Search in Google Scholar

Donnellan, Keith. 1966. Reference and definite descriptions. Philosophical Review 75(3). 281–304. (Published by: Duke University Press on behalf of Philosophical Review). https://doi.org/10.2307/2183143.Search in Google Scholar

Fara, Delia G. 2015. Names are predicates. Philosophical Review 124(1). 59–117. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2812660.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1997. Lectures on deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

García-Carpintero, Manuel. 2017. The Mill-Frege theory of proper names. Mind 127(508). 1107–1168.10.1093/mind/fzx010Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, David B. 1989[1977]. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, 481–563. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kecskes, Istvan. 2015. Intracultural communication and intercultural communication: Are they different? International Review of Pragmatics 7. 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-00702002.Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, Saul A. 1980. Naming and necessity. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Maier, Emar. 2015. Reference, binding, and presupposition: Three perspectives on the semantics of proper names. Erkenntnis 80. 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-014-9702-1.Search in Google Scholar

Martí, Genoveva. 2017. Names, properties, and the object-property distinction. In Maria de Ponte & Kepa Korta (eds.), Reference and representation in thought and language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mizuta, Yoko. 2024. On quasi-proper names in Japanese. A reply to A. Capone. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale 58. 215–222.10.30687/AnnOc/2499-1562/2024/12/012Search in Google Scholar

Mizuta, Yoko. 2025. A functional theory of proper names: Insights from quasi-proper names. Intercultural Pragmatics 22(1). 47–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2025-0004.Search in Google Scholar

Predelli, Stefano. 2015. Who’s afraid of the predicate theory of names? Linguistics and Philosophy 38. 363–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-015-9177-9.Search in Google Scholar

Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and categorization, 27–48. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781032633275-4Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-12-16
Published in Print: 2025-11-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2025-5008/pdf
Scroll to top button