Home Linguistics & Semiotics Silent imperatives: A multimodal approach to warning expressions
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Silent imperatives: A multimodal approach to warning expressions

  • Alessandra Giorgi

    Alessandra Giorgi is a Professor of Linguistics at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy, where she teaches Theoretical Linguistics. She has published extensively on various topics, including the syntax of noun phrases, the interpretation of pronouns, the temporal and aspectual properties of Romance and Germanic languages, Armenian syntax, and the linguistic expression of emotions. She has authored over 100 research articles in international journals and volumes. Her books include The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge University Press; Tense and Aspect, Oxford University Press; and About the Speaker, Oxford University Press.

    EMAIL logo
    and Erika Petrocchi

    Erika Petrocchi earned her PhD in Linguistics from Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy, in 2022. She is a Postdoctoral Researcher at Ca’ Foscari and an Adjunct Professor of Linguistics at the University of Padua. Her main interests include multimodality in language, the syntax and pragmatics of expressive language, the syntax of Italian Sign Language, the analysis of linguistic gestures, and the interface between prosody and syntax.

Published/Copyright: December 16, 2025
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

This article argues in favor of a formal model that views language as an integrated multimodal system where syntax, prosody, and gestures are linked. It demonstrates that specific syntactic structures trigger sensorimotor realizations, which include intonation, phonology, and gestures. We argue that gestures, in particular non-lexical co-speech gestures, are not merely an additional channel but a fundamental part of grammar, integrated into the same system that governs word order and phonological realization. We suggest a syntactic representation of warning expressions that combines syntactic and pragmatic aspects, based on Italian data and experimental evidence. Specifically, we argue that warnings always include a warning call, which can be either lexical in content or expressed solely through special prosody and gestures.


Corresponding author: Alessandra Giorgi, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Venice, Italy. E-mail:

About the authors

Alessandra Giorgi

Alessandra Giorgi is a Professor of Linguistics at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy, where she teaches Theoretical Linguistics. She has published extensively on various topics, including the syntax of noun phrases, the interpretation of pronouns, the temporal and aspectual properties of Romance and Germanic languages, Armenian syntax, and the linguistic expression of emotions. She has authored over 100 research articles in international journals and volumes. Her books include The Syntax of Noun Phrases, Cambridge University Press; Tense and Aspect, Oxford University Press; and About the Speaker, Oxford University Press.

Erika Petrocchi

Erika Petrocchi earned her PhD in Linguistics from Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy, in 2022. She is a Postdoctoral Researcher at Ca’ Foscari and an Adjunct Professor of Linguistics at the University of Padua. Her main interests include multimodality in language, the syntax and pragmatics of expressive language, the syntax of Italian Sign Language, the analysis of linguistic gestures, and the interface between prosody and syntax.

Acknowledgements

Erika Petrocchi is supported by TheNextGenerationEU and the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) as part of the PRIN Project CUP: H53D23004410006. The authors collaboratively developed all parts of this research; however, regarding legal responsibility, Alessandra Giorgi takes official responsibility for sections 1, 2, 3, 4 and 7. Erika Petrocchi takes official responsibility for sections 5 and 6. We thank the students who completed their internships under Alessandra Giorgi’s supervision and participated in this research: Ester Ferrari, Lisa Gavioli, Francesca Riosa, and Manuel Pittelli. We are grateful to our reviewers for their comments, to Alessandro Capone and the audience at Messina University for interesting discussions, and to Maria Teresa Guasti and Natale Stucchi for valuable insights and suggestions regarding the statistical analysis. All errors are, of course, our own.

References

Alcázar, Asier & Mario Saltarelli. 2014. The syntax of imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511794391Search in Google Scholar

Avesani, Cinzia. 1990. A contribution to the synthesis of Italian intonation. In Proceedings ICSLP 90 - 1990 international conference on spoken language processing, vol. 1, 834–836. Japan: Kobe.10.21437/ICSLP.1990-106Search in Google Scholar

Avesani, Cinzia. 1995. ToBIt: Un sistema di trascrizione per l’intonazione italiana. In Atti delle Quinte Giornate di Studio del Gruppo di Fonetica Sperimentale, vol. 1994. 85–98.Povo (TN): A.I.A.Search in Google Scholar

Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 1991. Il verbo. In Renzi Lorenzo, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, vol. 99, 1–121. Bologna: Il Mulino.Search in Google Scholar

Bertone, Carmela. 2011. Fondamenti di grammatica della Lingua dei segni italiana. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Search in Google Scholar

Bogliotti, Caroline, Hatice Aksen & Frédéric Isel. 2020. Language experience in LSF development: Behavioral evidence form a sentence repetition task. PLoS One 15. e0236729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236729.Search in Google Scholar

Branchini, Chiara & Lara Mantovan. 2020. A grammar of Italian sign language (LIS). Venezia: Edizioni Ca’Foscari.10.30687/978-88-6969-474-5Search in Google Scholar

Bressem, Jana & Silvia H. Ladewig. 2011. Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica 184. 53–91. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2011.022.Search in Google Scholar

Capone, Alessandro & Roberto Graci. 2024. Pragmemes revisited. A theoretical framework. Frontiers in Psychology 15. 1329291. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1329291.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris Pub..Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin Roger, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of howard lasnik, 89–155. MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken hale: A life in language, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4056.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of jean-roger vergnaud, 133–166. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7713.003.0009Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projections. Lingua 130. 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.Search in Google Scholar

Church, Breckinridge R., Martha W. Alibali & Spencer D. Kelly (eds.). 2017. Why gesture: How the hands function in speaking, thinking and communicating. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.10.1075/gs.7Search in Google Scholar

Colasanti, Valentina. 2023. Functional gestures as morphemes: Some evidence from the languages of southern Italy. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 8(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/glossa.9743.Search in Google Scholar

Cornelia, Ebert. 2014. Gestures, demonstratives, and the attributive/referential distinction. In Handout of a talk given at semantics and philosophy in Europe (SPE 7), June 25–28. Berlin: Ger.Search in Google Scholar

De Gelder, Beatrice. 2006. Towards the neurobiology of emotional body language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7(3). 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1872.Search in Google Scholar

D’Imperio, Mariapaola. 2002. Italian intonation: An overview and some questions. Probus 14(1). 37–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/prbs.2002.005.Search in Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert. 2022. A new grammar of dyirbal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780192859907.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Domaneschi, Filippo & Valentina Bambini. 2021. Pragmatic competence. In E. Fridland & C. Pavese (eds.), The routledge handbook of philosophy of skill and expertise, 419–430. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315180809-40Search in Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul. 1979. About brows: Emotional and conversational signals. In Cranach M. von, K. Foppa, W. Lepenies & D. Ploog (eds.), Human ethology: Claims and limits of a new discipline, 169–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul. 1993. Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48(4). 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.48.4.384.Search in Google Scholar

Ekman, Paul. 2003. Emotions revealed. Understanding faces and feelings. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Search in Google Scholar

Esipova, Maria. 2019. Acceptability of at-issue co-speech gestures under contrastive focus. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1). 11. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.635.Search in Google Scholar

Faller, Martina, Eva Schultze-Berndt & Marine Vuillermet (eds.). 2025. Apprehensional constructions in a cross-linguistic perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra. 2015. Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery. In Bayer Josef, Roland Hinterhölzl & Andreas Trotzke (eds.), Discourse-oriented syntax, 229–250. New York: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.226.10gioSearch in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra. 2018. Ma non era rosso? (but wasn’t it red?): On counter-expectational questions in Italian. In Repetti Lori & Francisco Ordóñez (eds.), Selected papers from the 46th linguistic symposium on romance languages (LSRL), 69–84. New York: John Benjamins.10.1075/rllt.14.05gioSearch in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra. 2023. Micro-discourses and context-enrichment: Interjections, vocatives and adversative particles. In Balsemin Tommaso, Irene Caloi, Jacopo Garzonio, Nicolas Lamoure & Francesco Pinzin (eds.), Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt, vol. 25, 571–600. Padova: ASIt.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra & Chiara Dal Farra. 2019. On the syntax/pragmatics interface: Expressing Surprise and disapproval. Intercultural Pragmatics 16(3). 335–361. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0017.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra & Erika Petrocchi. 2024. A cross-cultural analysis of the gestural pattern of Surprise and surprise-disapproval questions. Intercultural Pragmatics 21(3). 307–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2024-3002.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra & Erika Petrocchi. 2025. On the syntactic representation of co-speech gestures in expressive language. In Lingue e Linguaggio 1. 21–39.Search in Google Scholar

Giorgi, Alessandra & Fabrizio Sorrisi. 2018. An Evaluative Head in Romance: the Palermitan affix -vu. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie Occidentale 52. 65–85.10.30687/AnnOc/2499-1562/2018/01/003Search in Google Scholar

Grice, Martine, Mariapaola D’Imperio, Michelina Savino & Cinzia Avesani. 2005. Strategies for intonation labeling across varieties of Italian. In Jun Sun-Ah (ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 362–389. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199249633.003.0013Search in Google Scholar

Ippolito, Michela. 2021. The contribution of gestures to the semantics of non-canonical questions. Journal of Semantics 38(3). 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffab007.Search in Google Scholar

Ippolito, Michela, Francesca Foppolo & Francesca Panzeri. 2022. Is the mano a tulipano a gesture compatible with canonical questions? An empirical study of a speech act marking gesture. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung, 451–464.Search in Google Scholar

Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2004. Gestures as expletives: Multichannel syntax. In Garding Gina & Mimu Trujimura (eds.), WCCFL 23 proceedings, 101–114. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jouitteau, Mélanie. 2007. Listen to the sound of salience: Multichannel syntax of Q particles. In Baauw Sergio & Frank Drijkoningen (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2007. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cilt.291.13jouSearch in Google Scholar

Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1017/CBO9780511807572Search in Google Scholar

Loehr, Daniel P. 2012. Temporal, structural, and pragmatic synchrony between intonation and gesture. Laboratory Phonology 3(1). 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/lp-2012-0006.Search in Google Scholar

McNeill, D. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226514642.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Moro, Andrea. 2017. Existential sentences and expletive There. In Everaert Martin & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The wiley blackwell companion to syntax, 2nd edn., 210–236. New York: John Wiley.10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom044Search in Google Scholar

Nobe, Shuichi. 2000. Where do most spontaneous representational gestures actually occur with respect to speech? In D. McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 186–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620850.012Search in Google Scholar

Noordewier, Marret K. & Eric van Dijk. 2018. Surprise: Unfolding of facial expressions. Cognition & Emotion 33(5). 915–930. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1517730.Search in Google Scholar

Noroozi, Fatemeh, Ciprian Adrian, Corneanu, Dorota, Kamińska, Tomasz, Sapiński, Sergio, Escalera & Gholamreza Anbarjafari. 2021. Survey on emotional body gesture recognition. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 12(2). 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1517730.Search in Google Scholar

Nota, Naomi, James P. Trujillo & Judith Holler. 2023. Conversational eyebrow frowns facilitate question identification: An online study using virtual avatars. Cognitive Science 47(12). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13392.Search in Google Scholar

Petrocchi, Erika. 2022. Multimodality in grammar: The case of special questions expressing Surprise in oral and sign language. PhD Thesis. Venice: Ca’ Foscari University.Search in Google Scholar

Pfau, Roland, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll. 2012. Sign language - An international handbook. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110261325Search in Google Scholar

Polišenská, Kamila, Shula Chiat & Penny Roy. 2015. Sentence repetition: What does the task measure? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 50(1). 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12126.Search in Google Scholar

Quek, F., D. McNeill, R. Bryll, S. Duncan, X.-F.Ma, C. Kirbas, K. E. McCullough & R. Ansari. 2002. Multimodal human discourse: Gesture and speech. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 9(3). 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12126.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position INT(ERROGATIVE) in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax, 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780585473949_016.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge MA, USA: MIT PhD Dissertation.Search in Google Scholar

Rujas, Irene, Sonia Mariscal, Eva Murillo & Miguel Lázaro. 2021. Sentence repetition tasks to detect and prevent language difficulties: A scoping review. Children 8(7). 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8070578.Search in Google Scholar

Rupp, Laura. 2003. The syntax of imperatives in English and Germanic. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230505179Search in Google Scholar

Sailor, Craig. & Valentina Colasanti. 2020. Co-speech gestures under ellipsis: A first look. In Paper presented at the 2020 LSA annual meeting.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe. 2018. Gesture projection and cosuppositions. Linguistics and Philosophy 41. 295–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-017-9225-8.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, Philippe. to appear. The meaning and grammar of pure gestures: Theoretical insights (survey article). Annual Review of Linguistics.Search in Google Scholar

Schönström, Krister & Peter C. Hauser. 2021. The sentence repetition task as a measure of sign language proficiency. Applied PsychoLinguistics 43(1). 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716421000436.Search in Google Scholar

Schönström, Krister, Peter C. Hauser & Christian Rathmann. 2022. Validation of signed language tests for adult L2 learners. In Tobias Haug, Wolfgang Mann & Ute Knoch (eds.), The handbook of language assessment Across modalities, 285–294. London: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190885052.003.0024Search in Google Scholar

Searle, John. 1975. Indirect speech acts. In Cole Peter & Jerry L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 59–82. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_004Search in Google Scholar

Seyfeddinipur, Mandana. 2006. Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture. In MPI series in psycholinguistics 39. Nimegen: University of Nijmegen.Search in Google Scholar

Sowa, Timo. 2006. Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in object shape descriptions. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft Aka GmbH.Search in Google Scholar

Türk, Olcay & Sasha Calhoun. 2023. Multimodal cues to intonational categories: Gesture apex coordination with tonal events. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 14(1). 1–50. https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.6432.Search in Google Scholar

Yasinnik, Yelena, Margaret, Renwick & Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel. 2004. The timing of speech-accompanying gestures with respect to prosody. Paper presented at From Sound to Sense. Cambridge MA, USA: MIT.Search in Google Scholar

Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2008. Encoding the addressee in the syntax: Evidence from English imperative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(1). 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-007-9029-6.Search in Google Scholar

Zanuttini, Raffaella, Miok Pak & Paul, Portner. 2012. A syntactic analysis of interpretive restrictions on imperative, promissive, and exhortative subjects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 30(4). 1231–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-012-9176-2.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-12-16
Published in Print: 2025-11-25

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.12.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ip-2025-5006/html
Scroll to top button