The Others in the Czech Republic: their image and their languages

References

Baker, Paul. 2005. Public discourses of gay men. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203643532Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul. 2010. Representations of Islam in British broadsheet and tabloid newspapers 1999–2005. Journal of Language and Politics 9(2). 310–338.10.1075/jlp.9.2.07bakSuche in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos & Tony McEnery. 2013. Sketching Muslims: A corpus driven analysis of representations around the word ‘Muslim’ in the British press 1998–2009. Applied Linguisitcs 34(3). 255–278.10.1093/applin/ams048Suche in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos, Majid KhosraviNik, Michal Krzyzanowski, Tony McEnery & Ruth Wodak. 2008. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse and Society 19.273–306.10.1177/0957926508088962Suche in Google Scholar

Bolinger, Dwight. 1976. Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1. 1–14.10.1515/9783110815733.95Suche in Google Scholar

Cahn, Claude. 2002. Roma rights: Race, justice, and strategies for equality. New York: International Debate Education Association.Suche in Google Scholar

Fidler, Masako, & Václav, Cvrček. 2016 (forthcoming). A Data-Driven Analysis of Reader Viewpoints: Reconstructing the Historical Reader Using Keyword Analysis. Journal of Slavic Linguistics.10.1353/jsl.2015.0018Suche in Google Scholar

Dąbrowska, Ewa. 2004. Language, mind and brain: Some psychological and neurological constraints on theories of grammar. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.10.1515/9781474466011Suche in Google Scholar

Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20(1). 29–62.10.1515/text.1.2000.20.1.29Suche in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and power. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay & Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3). 501–538.10.2307/414531Suche in Google Scholar

Hardt-Mautner, Gerlinde. 1995. How does one become a good European: The British press and European integration. Discourse and Society 6(2). 177–205.10.1177/0957926595006002003Suche in Google Scholar

Holomáč, Jiří, Kamila Karhanová & Jiří Nekvapil (eds.). 2003. Obraz Romů v středoevropských masmédiích po roce 1989 [Portrayal of the Romas in the Central European mass media after 1989]. Brno, CR: Doplněk.Suche in Google Scholar

Jackendoff, Ray 2002. Foundations of language: brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198270126.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Krausová, Tereza. 2014. Cizinci v České republice podle dat sčítání lidu [Foreigners in the Czech Republic in the national census]. http://www.scitani.cz/csu/2014edicniplan.nsf/publ/170222-14-n_2014, (accessed 18 May 18 2014)Suche in Google Scholar

Mautner, Gerlinde. 2007. Mining large corpora for social information: The case of elderly. Language in Society 36. 51–72.10.1017/S0047404507070030Suche in Google Scholar

Nekvapil, Jiří. 2000a. O non-self-evident relationships between language and ethnicity: How Germans do not speak German, and Czechs do not speak Czech. Multilingua 19(1–2). 37–54.10.1515/mult.2000.19.1-2.37Suche in Google Scholar

Nekvapil, Jiří. 2000b. Z biografických vyprávění Němců žijících v Čechách: jazykové biografie v rodině pana a paní S. [From the biographical narratives of Germans living in Czechia: Linguistic biography in the family of Mr. and Mrs. S]. Slovo a Slovesnost 61. 30–46.Suche in Google Scholar

Nekvapil, Jiří. 2000c. The presentation of Roma/Gypsies in the central European mass media. In Jan Kuklík & Jiří Hasil (eds.), Přednášky z XLIII. běhu letní školy slovanských studií [Lectures from the XLIIIth term of the Summer School of Slavonic Studies], 65–76. Prague: Charles University in Prague.Suche in Google Scholar

Nekvapil, Jiří, Marián Sloboda & Peter Wagner. 2009. Mnohojazyčnost v České republice: Základní informace [Multilingualism in the Czech Republic: Basic Information]. Prague: Lidové noviny.Suche in Google Scholar

Němeček, Jiří. 2012. Dospělí Češi mají zájem o studium jazyků. Tisková zpráva. Český statistický úřad. http://www.czso.cz/csu/tz.nsf/i/dospeli_cesi_maji_zajem_o_studium_jazyku (accessed 18 May 18 2014).Suche in Google Scholar

Neustupný, Jiří V. & Jiří Nekvapil. 2006. Language management in the Czech Republic. In Robert B. Kaplan & Richard B. Baldauf (eds.), The Czech Republic, the European Union, and Northern Ireland (Language planning and policy in Europe 2),16–201. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781853598142-003Suche in Google Scholar

Nicolae, Valeriu & Hannah Slavik (ed.). 2007. Roma diplomacy. New York: International Debate Education Association.Suche in Google Scholar

O’Nions, Helen. 2007. Minority rights protection in international law: the Roma of Europe. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar

Partington, Alan 2012. The changing discourses on antisemitism in the UK press from 1993 to 2009. A modern-diachronic corpus-assisted discourse study. Journal of Language and Politics 11(1). 51–76.10.1075/jlp.11.1.03parSuche in Google Scholar

Pawley, Andrew & Frances H. Syder. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Jack C. Richards & Richard W. Schmidt (eds.), Language and communication, 191–226. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Scott, Mike & Chris Tribble. 2006. Textual patterns. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/scl.22Suche in Google Scholar

Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, concordance, collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stauber, Roni & Raphael Vago (eds.). 2007. The Roma. A minority in Europe: Historical, political and social perspectives. New York: CEU Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 1996. Text and corpus analysis. London: Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 2001/2003. Computer-assisted text and corpus analysis: Lexical cohesion and communicative competence. In Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen & Heidi E. Hamilton (eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis, 304–320. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470753460.ch17Suche in Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah. 1979. What’s in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectations. In Roy Freedle (ed.), New directions in discourse processing, 137–181. Harwood, NJ: Ablex.Suche in Google Scholar

Tuggy, David. 2007. Schematicity. In Dirk Geeraerts & Herbert Cuyckens (eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics. 82–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar