Abstract
This qualitative study examines heritage language maintenance goals, motivation, and strategies in eleven Czech and Slovak immigrant families in the Southeastern United States. The goals of this article are threefold. First, this article outlines the changes in Czech and Slovak immigration patterns over time, documenting that while Czech immigrants used to settle mainly in Texas and the Midwest in the past, they generally opt for the East and West Coast today. Second, this article describes language practices of current Czech and Slovak immigrants in the Southeast and finds that the most successful factors of heritage language (HL) retention include: (a) expectations that children will need the language in the future; (b) consistent HL use by both parents; (c) annual lengthy trips overseas; and (d) parental ability to use additional strategies, such as involving grandparents or employing Slavic au pairs. Third, this article compares today’s HL maintenance with the classical period of immigration. In the past, Czech and Slovak children in the United States learned and used their native languages within ethnic communities. Today, the necessity to learn and use Czech or Slovak in the context of the United States has largely disappeared. Instead, it is the transnational context that is vital for HL retention.
References
Brittain, Carmina. 2002. Transnational messages: Experiences of Chinese and Mexican immigrants in American schools. New York, NY: LFB/Scholarly Publishing.Suche in Google Scholar
Brinton, Donna M., Olga Kagan & Susan Bauckus (eds.). 2008. Heritage language education: A new field emerging. New York, NY: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. 2014. North American less commonly taught languages course listings. [University of Minnesota database]. http://www.carla.umn.edu/lctl/db/index.php (accessed 30 October 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Crawford, James. 2008. Advocating for English learners: Selected essays. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847690746Suche in Google Scholar
Creswell, John W. 2008. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluation quantitative and qualitative research, 2nd edn. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.Suche in Google Scholar
Cummins, Jim. 2005. A proposal for action: Strategies for recognizing heritage language competence as a learning resource within the mainstream classroom. Modern Language Journal 89(4). 585–592.Suche in Google Scholar
Department of Homeland Security. 2012. Yearbook of immigration statistics. http://www.dhs.gov/yearbook-immigration-statistics (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Dutkova-Cope, Lida. 2006. Discontinued intergenerational transmission of Czech in Texas: “Hindsight is better than foresight.” Southern Journal of Linguistics 30(2). 1–49.Suche in Google Scholar
Eckert, Eva & Kevin Hannan. 2009. Vernacular writing and sociolinguistic change in the Texas Czech community. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 17(1–2). 87–161.10.1353/jsl.0.0019Suche in Google Scholar
Fedor, Helen. (Reference Librarian). 2010. The Slovaks in America. European Reading Room: Area Studies, European Division. The Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/rr/european/imsk/slovakia.html (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Ference, Gregory C. 1993. Slovak immigration to the United States. Nebraska History. http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/Czech_04%20_Slovak_Immig.pdf (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Fillmore, Lily W. 1991. When learning a second language means losing the first. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 6(3). 323–346.10.1016/S0885-2006(05)80059-6Suche in Google Scholar
FindLaw. 2013. Compulsory education laws: background. http://education.findlaw.com/education-options/compulsory-education-laws-background.html (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Fishman, Joshua A. 1991. Reversing the language shift: theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Suche in Google Scholar
García, Ofelia. 2009. Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Suche in Google Scholar
Gibson, Campbell & Kay Jung. 2006. Historical census statistics of the foreign-born population of the United States: 1850 to 2000 (Working Paper No. 81). Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/population/www/documentation/twps0081/twps0081.html (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Hrouda, Simone J. 2011. Czech language programs and Czech as a heritage language in the United States. Center for Applied Linguistics. http://www.cal.org/heritage/pdfs/briefs/czech-language-programs-in-the-united-states.pdf (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Kouritzin, Sandra G. 1999. Face[t]s of first language loss. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410603340Suche in Google Scholar
Kovtun, George. (Reference Librarian). 2010. The Czechs in America. European Reading Room: Area Studies, European Division. The Library of Congress. http://www.loc.gov/rr/european/imcz/ndl.html (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Lee, Jin Sook & Debra Suarez. 2009. A synthesis of the roles of heritage languages in the lives of children of immigrants: What educators need to know. In Terrence G. Wiley, Jin Sook Lee & Russell W. Rumberger (eds.), The education of language minority immigrants in the United States, 136–171. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692122-008Suche in Google Scholar
Nesteruk, Olena. 2010. Heritage language maintenance and loss among the children of Eastern European immigrants in the USA. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development 31(3). 271–286.10.1080/01434630903582722Suche in Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria. 2008. Heritage language narratives. In Donna M. Brinton, Olga Kagan & Susan Bauckus (eds.), Heritage language education: A new field emerging, 337–351. New York, NY: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar
Portes, Alejandro & Rubén Rumbaut. 2001. Legacies: The story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rong, Xue Lan & Judith Preissle. 2009. Educating immigrant students in the 21st century: What educators need to know, 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Suche in Google Scholar
Rumbaut, Rubén G. 2009. A language graveyard? The evolution of language competencies, preferences and use among young adult children of immigrants. In Terrence G. Wiley, Jin S. Lee & Russell W. Rumberger (eds.), The education of language minority immigrants in the United States, 35–71. Buffalo, NY: Multilingual Matters.10.21832/9781847692122-004Suche in Google Scholar
Ryan, Camille. 2013. Language use in the United States: 2011. American Community Survey Reports (ACS-22). Washington, DC: US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2013pubs/acs-22.pdf (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Schiller, Nina G., Linda Basch & Cristina S. Blanc. 1995. From immigrant to transmigrant: theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly 68(1). 48–63.10.2307/3317464Suche in Google Scholar
Tse, Lucy. 2001. Why don’t they learn English? Separating fact from fallacy in the US language debate. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Suche in Google Scholar
US Census Bureau. 2010. Language Use. [Detailed Tables. Table 1. Detailed Languages Spoken at Home and Ability to Speak English for the Population 5 Years and Over for the United States: 2006–2008]. http://www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/language/ (accessed 30 May 2014).Suche in Google Scholar
Vaculík, Jaroslav. 2009. České menšiny v Evropě a ve světě [Czech minorities in Europe and in the world]. Prague: Libri.Suche in Google Scholar
Valdés, Guadalupe. 2001. Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In Joy K. Peyton, Donald A. Ranard & Scott McGinnis (eds.), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource, 37–77. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Suche in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Multilingualism and minorities in the Czech sociolinguistic space: introduction
- Part I: The Czech sociolinguistic space in the Czech Republic
- The Czech language of Jews in Přemyslid Bohemia of the eleventh to fourteenth century
- The Others in the Czech Republic: their image and their languages
- Romani in the Czech sociolinguistic space
- Czech Sign Language in contemporary Czech society
- Part II: The Czech sociolinguistic space abroad
- Texas Czech Legacy Project: documenting the past and present for the future
- Czech immigrant dialects in the Northern Caucasus and Western Siberia
- Czech language minority in the South-eastern Romanian Banat
- Transnationalism and language maintenance: Czech and Slovak as heritage languages in the Southeastern United States
- Book Review
- Patrick Studer and Iwar Werlen: Linguistic diversity in Europe: current trends and discourses
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Multilingualism and minorities in the Czech sociolinguistic space: introduction
- Part I: The Czech sociolinguistic space in the Czech Republic
- The Czech language of Jews in Přemyslid Bohemia of the eleventh to fourteenth century
- The Others in the Czech Republic: their image and their languages
- Romani in the Czech sociolinguistic space
- Czech Sign Language in contemporary Czech society
- Part II: The Czech sociolinguistic space abroad
- Texas Czech Legacy Project: documenting the past and present for the future
- Czech immigrant dialects in the Northern Caucasus and Western Siberia
- Czech language minority in the South-eastern Romanian Banat
- Transnationalism and language maintenance: Czech and Slovak as heritage languages in the Southeastern United States
- Book Review
- Patrick Studer and Iwar Werlen: Linguistic diversity in Europe: current trends and discourses