Response Surface Methodology Approach for Optimization of Extrusion Process of Production of Poly (Hydroxyl Butyrate-Co-Hydroxyvalerate) /Tapioca Starch Blends

References

1. Song JH, Murphy RJ, Narayan R, Davies GB. Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to conventional plastics. Phil Trans R Soc B 2009;364(1526):2127–2139.10.1098/rstb.2008.0289Search in Google Scholar

2. Narayan R. Rationale, drivers, standards, and technology for biobased materials. Graziani EM, Fornasiero P, editors. Renewable resources and renewable energy. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006.10.1201/9781420020861.pt1Search in Google Scholar

3. Narayan R. Biobased and biodegradable polymer materials: rationale, drivers, and technology exemplars. ACS Symp 2006;939(18):282–363.10.1021/bk-2006-0939.ch018Search in Google Scholar

4. Mizuno K, Ohta A, Hyakutake M, Ichinomiya Y, Tsuge T. Isolation of polyhydroxyalkanoate-producing bacteria from a polluted soil and characterization of the isolated strain Bacillus cereus YB-4. Polym Degrad Stab 2010;95(8):1335–1339.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.033Search in Google Scholar

5. Shah AA, Hasan F, Hameed A, Ahmed S. Biological degradation of plastics: A comprehensive review. Biotechnol Adv 2008;26(3):246–265.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.12.005Search in Google Scholar

6. Anderson AJ, Dawes EA. Occurrence, Metabolism, Metabolic Role, and Industrial Uses of Bacterial Polyhydroxyalkanoates. Microbiol Rev 1990;54(4):450–472.10.1128/mr.54.4.450-472.1990Search in Google Scholar

7. Koller M, Hesse P, Bona R, Kutschera C, Atlić A, Braunegg G. Biosynthesis of High Quality Polyhydroxyalkanoate Co- and Terpolyesters for Potential Medical Application by the Archaeon Haloferax mediterranei. Macromol Symp 2007;253(1):33–39.10.1002/masy.200750704Search in Google Scholar

8. Park SJ, Lee TW, Lim SC, Kim TW, Lee H, Kim MK, et al. Biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates containing 2-hydroxybutyrate from unrelated carbon source by metabolically engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012;93(1):273–283.10.1007/s00253-011-3530-xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Sudesh K, Abe H, Doi Y. Synthesis, structure and properties of polyhydroxyalkanoates: biological polyesters. Prog Polym Sci 2000;25(10):1503–1555.10.1016/S0079-6700(00)00035-6Search in Google Scholar

10. Aramvash A, Shahabi ZA, Aghjeh SD, Ghafari MD. Statistical physical and nutrient optimization of bioplastic polyhydroxybutyrate production by Cupriavidus necator. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2015;12(7):2307–2316. Int J Environ Sci Technol.10.1007/s13762-015-0768-3Search in Google Scholar

11. Isayev AI, Palsule S. Encyclopedia of polymer blends: Volume 2: Processing. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2010.10.1002/9783527805204Search in Google Scholar

12. Ke Y, Zhang XY, Ramakrishna S, He LM, Wu G. Synthetic routes to degradable copolymers deriving from the biosynthesized polyhydroxyalkanoates: a mini review. Express Polym Lett 2016;10(1):36–53.10.3144/expresspolymlett.2016.5Search in Google Scholar

13. Baharuddin NH, Sulaiman NM, Aroua MK. Removal of zinc and lead ions by polymer-enhanced ultrafiltration using unmodified starch as novel binding polymer. Int J Environ Sci Technol 2015;12(6):1825–1834.10.1007/s13762-014-0549-4Search in Google Scholar

14. Bastioli C. Global status of the production of biobased packaging materials. Starch/Staerke 2001;53(8):351–355.10.1002/1521-379X(200108)53:8<351::AID-STAR351>3.0.CO;2-RSearch in Google Scholar

15. Rodriguez-Gonzalez FJ, Ramsay BA, Favis BD. Rheological and thermal properties of thermoplastic starch with high glycerol content. Carbohydr Polym 2004;58(2):139–147.10.1016/j.carbpol.2004.06.002Search in Google Scholar

16. Liu Z, Dong Y, Men H, Jiang M, Tong J, Zhou J. Post-crosslinking modification of thermoplastic starch/PVA blend films by using sodium hexametaphosphate. Carbohydr Polym 2012;89(2):473–477.10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.076Search in Google Scholar

17. Ferrarezi MM, Taipina MD, De Siva LC, Gencalves MD. Poly (ethylene glycol) as a compatibilizer for poly (lactic acid)/thermoplastic starch blends. J Polym Environ 2013;21(1):151–159.10.1007/s10924-012-0480-zSearch in Google Scholar

18. Silva KM, Tarverdi K, Withnall R, Silver J. Incorporation of wheat starch and coupling agents into poly (lactic acid) to develop biodegradable composite. Plast Rubber Compos 2011;40(1):17–24.10.1179/174328911X12940139029202Search in Google Scholar

19. Godbole S, Gote S, Latkar M, Chakrabarti T. Preparation and characterization of biodegradable poly-3-hydroxybutyrate-starch blend films. Bioresour Technol 2003;86(1):33–37.10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00110-4Search in Google Scholar

20. Shogren RL. Poly (ethylene oxide)-coated granular starch- poly (hydroxyl butyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) composite materials. J Environ Polym Degrad 1995;3(2):75–80.10.1007/BF02067483Search in Google Scholar

21. Kotnis MA, O’Brien GS, Willett JL. Processing and mechanical properties of biodegradable Poly (hydroxyl butyrate-co-valerate)-starch compositions. Environ Polym Degrad 1995;3(2):97.10.1007/BF02067485Search in Google Scholar

22. Willett JL, Finkenstadt VL. Preparation of strach-graft-polyacrylamide copolymers by reactive extrusion. Polym Eng Sci 2003;43(10):1666–1674.10.1002/pen.10140Search in Google Scholar

23. Raquez JM, Narayan R, Dubois P. Recent advances in reactive extrusion processing of biodegradable polymer-based compositions. Macromol Mater Eng 2008;293(6):447–470.10.1002/mame.200700395Search in Google Scholar

24. Wang N, Yu J, Ma X. Preparation and characterization of thermoplastic starch/PLA blends by one-step reactive extrusion. Polym Int 2007;56(11):1440–1447.10.1002/pi.2302Search in Google Scholar

25. Cailloux J, Santana OO, Franco-Urquiza E, Bou JJ, Carrasco F, Maspoch ML. Sheets of branched poly (lactic acid) obtained by one-step reactive extrusion-calendering process: physical aging and fracture behavior. J Mater Sci 2014;49(11):4093–4107.10.1007/s10853-014-8101-ySearch in Google Scholar

26. Carrasco F, Cailloux J, Sánchez-Jiménez PE, Maspoch ML. Improvement of the thermal stability of branched poly (lactic acid) obtained by reactive extrusion. Polym Degrad Stab 2014;104:40–49.10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2014.03.026Search in Google Scholar

27. Nerkar M, Ramsay JA, Ramsay BA, Vasileiou AA, Kontopoulou M. Improvements in the melt and solid-state properties of poly (lactic acid), poly-3-hydroxyoctanoate and their blends through reactive modification. Polymer 2015;64:51–61.10.1016/j.polymer.2015.03.015Search in Google Scholar

28. Bezerra MA, Santelli RE, Oliveira EP, Villar LS, Escaleira LA. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 2008;76(5):965–977.10.1016/j.talanta.2008.05.019Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Colonna P, Doublier JL, Melcion JP, Monredon FD, Mercier C. Extrusion cooking and drum drying of wheat starch. I. Physical and macromolecular modifications. Cereal Chem 1984;61(6):538–543.Search in Google Scholar

30. Teh CY, Wu TY, Juan JC. Optimization of agro-industrial wastewater treatment using unmodified rice starch as a natural coagulant. Ind Crop Prod 2014;56:17–26.10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.02.018Search in Google Scholar

31. Shak KP, Wu TY. Optimized use of alum together with unmodified Cassia obtusifolia seed gum as a coagulant aid in treatment of palm oil mill effluent under natural pH of wastewater. Ind Crop Prod 2015;76:1169–1178.10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.07.072Search in Google Scholar

32. Wu TY, Mohammad AW, Jahim JM, Anuar N. Optimized reuse and bioconversion from retentate of pre-filtered palm oil mill effluent (POME) into microbial protease by Aspergillus terreus using response surface methodology. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 2009;84(9):1390–1396.10.1002/jctb.2194Search in Google Scholar

33. Maridass B, Gupta BR. Process optimization of devulcanization of waste rubber powder from syringe stoppers by twin screw extruder using response surface methodology. Polym Compos 2008;29(12):1350–1357.10.1002/pc.20379Search in Google Scholar

34. Li YX, Peng J, Lui WB, Lin J. Effects of glycerol and ethylene–acrylic acid on composition optimization of PVOH/starch-blended biodegradable resin using response surface methodology. J Appl Polym Sci 2009;114(5):2915–2921.10.1002/app.30851Search in Google Scholar

35. Zare Y, Garmabi H, Sharif F. Optimization of mechanical properties of PP/Nanoclay/CaCO3 ternary nanocomposite using response surface methodology. J Appl Polym Sci 2011;122(5):3188–3200.10.1002/app.34378Search in Google Scholar

36. Montgomery DC. Design and analysis of experiments, 5 . New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.Search in Google Scholar

37. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM. Response surface methodology, 3 . Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

38. Wang T, Yin J, Zheng Z, Mao Z. Optimization of reaction conditions for polyurethane foam synthesis with liquefied corn stalk by response surface methodology. J Appl Polym Sci 2012;125(S2):E278–E282.10.1002/app.36917Search in Google Scholar

39. Weng W, Liu W, Lin W. Studies on the optimum models of the dairy product Kou Woan Lao using response surface methodology. Asian Aust J Anim Sci 2001;14(10):1470–1476.10.5713/ajas.2001.1470Search in Google Scholar

40. Alvarez-Martinez L, Kondury KP, Harper JM. A general model for expansion of extruded products. J Food Sci 1988;53(2):609–615.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1988.tb07768.xSearch in Google Scholar

41. Haber A, Runyon R. General statistics, 3 . Reading, London: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1977.Search in Google Scholar

42. Filmore EB, Kramer A, Gerald K. Response surface techniques. Filmore FE, Kramer A, Gerald K, editors. Systems analysis for food industry. Westport, CT: AVI, 1976:127.Search in Google Scholar

43. Hay JX, Wu TY, Teh CY, Jahim JM. Optimized growth of Rhodobacter sphaeroides O.U.001 using response surface methodology (RSM. J Sci Ind Res 2012;71(2):149–154.Search in Google Scholar

44. Xiao A, Huang Y, Ni H, Cai H, Yang Q. Statistical optimization for tannase production by Aspergillus tubingensis in solid-state fermentation using tea stalks. Electron J Biotechnol 2015;18(3):143–147.10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.02.001Search in Google Scholar

45. Mo J, Wang Z, Xu W, Li S, Yu Z. Enhanced production of dimethyl phthalate-degrading strain Bacillus sp. Electron J Biotechnol 2015;18(3):244–251.10.1016/j.ejbt.2015.03.013Search in Google Scholar

46. Wu W, Tian H, Xiang A. Influence of polyol plasticizers on the properties of polyvinyl alcohol films fabricated by melt processing, J. Polym Environ 2012;20(1):63–69.10.1007/s10924-011-0364-7Search in Google Scholar

47. Vera Sorroche J, Kelly A, Brown EC, Coates P, Karnachi N, Harkin-Jones E. Thermal optimization of polymer extrusion using in-process monitoring techniques. Appl Therm Eng 2014;53(2):405–413.10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.04.013Search in Google Scholar

48. Melik DH, Schechtman LA. Biopolyester melt behavior by torque rheometry. Polym Eng Sci 1995;35(22):1795–1806.10.1002/pen.760352209Search in Google Scholar

49. Renstad R, Karlsson S, Albertsson AC. Influence of processing parameters on the molecular weight and mechanical properties of poly (3-hydroxy butyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate. Polym. Degrad. Stab 1997;57(3):331–338.10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00028-1Search in Google Scholar

50. Baltieri RC, Mei LHI, Bartoli J. Study of the influence of plasticizers on the thermal and mechanical properties of poly (3-hydroxybutyrate) compounds. Macromol Symp 2003;197(1):33–44.10.1002/masy.200350704Search in Google Scholar

51. Bodros E, Pillin I, Montrelay N, Baley C. Could biopolymers reinforced by randomly scattered flax fiber be used in structural applications? Compos Sci Technol 2007;67(3–4):462–470.10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.024Search in Google Scholar

52. Rauwendaal C. Polymer extrusion, 2 . Munich: Hanser, 1990.Search in Google Scholar

53. Dealy JM, Wissbrun KF. Melt rheology and its role in plastics processing: theory and applications. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.10.1007/978-1-4615-9738-4Search in Google Scholar

54. Talja R, Helén H, Roos Y, Jouppila K. Effect of various polyols and polyol contents on physical and mechanical properties of potato starch-based films. Carbohyd Polym 2007;67(3):288–295.10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.05.019Search in Google Scholar

55. Mathew AP, Dufresne A. Plasticized waxy maize starch: effect of polyols and relative humidity on material properties. Biomacromolecules 2002;3(5):1101–1108.10.1021/bm020065pSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

56. Gomez MH, Aguilera JM. Changes in the starch fraction during extrusion cooking of corn. J Food Sci 1983;48(2):378–381.10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb10747.xSearch in Google Scholar

57. Muscat D, Adhikari B, Adhikari R, Chaudhary DS. Comparative study of film forming behaviour of low and high amylose starches using glycerol and xylitol as plasticizers. J Food Eng 2012;109(2):189–201.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.10.019Search in Google Scholar