Home Physical Sciences Exergy Analysis of Oxidative Steam Reforming of Methanol for Hydrogen Producton: Modeling Study
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Exergy Analysis of Oxidative Steam Reforming of Methanol for Hydrogen Producton: Modeling Study

  • EMAIL logo , , and
Published/Copyright: July 9, 2013

Abstract

Hydrogen production by oxidative steam reforming of methanol in a fixed bed catalytic reactor was modeled and simulated. The addition of O2 to feed reduced the temperature in the reformer. 99.86% conversion was obtained at 550 K and S/C molar ratio of unity in steam reforming while it is at 540 K in oxidative steam reforming. Although H2 and CO yields were decreased in oxidative steam reforming in comparison to steam reforming, the reductoin H2 yield was note significant whereas reduction in CO was appreciably high. The thermal and exergy efficiencies were favored by reforming temperature and S/C molar ratios. However, variation in S/C molar ratio showed negligibly small effect on efficiencies. The reforming temperature had a notable influence on the efficiencies. The exergy destruction was found to be lower at higher temperature and S/C molar ratio. Thus, oxidative steam reforming of methanol at 540 K and S/C molar ratio of unity utilizes sufficient amount of input energy in the form of useful work and thermodynamic irreversibilities in the reactor are quantitatively small.

References

1 Simpson A.P., Lutz A.E., “Exergy analysis of hydrogen production via steam methane reforming”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007;32:4811–4820.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.08.025Search in Google Scholar

2 Choi K.S., Choi I.J., Hwang S., Kim H.M., Dorr J.L., Erickson P.A., “An experimental study of methanol autothermal reformation as a method of producing hydrogen for transportation applications”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010;35:6210–6217.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.03.083Search in Google Scholar

3 Wang S., Wang S., “Exergy analysis and optimization of methanol generating hydrogen system for PEMFC”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006;31:1747–1755.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.12.005Search in Google Scholar

4 Holladay J.D., Hu J., King D.L., Wang Y., “An overview of hydrogen production technologies”, Catalysis Today, 2009;139:244–260.10.1016/j.cattod.2008.08.039Search in Google Scholar

5 Winter C., “Hydrogen energy-Abundant, efficient, clean: A debate over the energy-system-of-change”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009;34:S1–S52.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.063Search in Google Scholar

6 Ouzounidou M., Ipsakis D., Voutetakis S., Papadopoulou S., Seferlis P., “A combined methanol autothermal steam reforming and PEM fuel cell pilot plant unit: Experimental and simulation studies”, Energy, 2009;34:1733–1743.10.1016/j.energy.2009.06.031Search in Google Scholar

7 Choi K.S., Kim H.M., Dorr J.L., Yoon H.C., Erickson P.A., “Equilibrium model validation through the experiments of methanol autothermal reformation”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008;33:7039–7047.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.09.015Search in Google Scholar

8 Katiyar N., Kumar S., Kumar S., “Comparative thermodynamic analysis of adsorption, membrane and adsorption-membrane hybrid reactor systems for methanol steam reforming”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2013;38:1363–1375.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.11.032Search in Google Scholar

9 Lattner J.R., Harold M.P., “Comparison of Methanol-based fuel processors for PEM fuel cell systems”, Applied Catalysis. B: Environmental, 2005;56:149–169.10.1016/j.apcatb.2004.06.024Search in Google Scholar

10 Bargigli S., Raugei M., Ulgiati S., “Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes”, Energy, 2004;29:2145–2159.10.1016/j.energy.2004.03.018Search in Google Scholar

11 Vosough A., Noghrehabadi A., Ghalambaz M., Vosough S., “Exergy Concept and its Characteristic”, International Journal of Multidisciplinary Sciences and Engineering, 2011;2:47–52.Search in Google Scholar

12 Chein R.Y., Chen Y.C., Zhu H.J., Chung J. N., “Numerical Simulation of Flow Disturbance and Heat Transfer Effects on the Methanol-Steam Reforming in Miniature Annulus Type Reformers”, Energy Fuels, 2012;26:1202–1213.10.1021/ef201498tSearch in Google Scholar

13 Diisterwald H. G., Hohlein B., Kraut H., Meusinger J., Peters R., Stimming U., “Methanol Steam-Reforming in a Catalytic Fixed Bed Reactor”, Chemical Engineering Technology, 1997;20:617–623.10.1002/ceat.270200908Search in Google Scholar

14 Wang J., Chen H., Tian Y., Yao M., Li Y., “Thermodynamic analysis of Hydrogen production for fuel cells from oxidative steam reforming of methanol”, Fuel, 2012;97:805–811.10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.008Search in Google Scholar

15 Casas Y., Arteaga L.E., Morales M., Rosa E., Peralta L.M., Dewulf J., “Energy and exergy analysis of an ethanol fueled solid oxide fuel cell power plant”, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010;162:1057–1066.10.1016/j.cej.2010.06.021Search in Google Scholar

16 Lindstrom B., Pettersson L. J., “Hydrogen generation by steam reforming of methanol over copper-based catalysts for fuel cell applications”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2001;26:923–933.10.1016/S0360-3199(01)00034-9Search in Google Scholar

17 Patel S., Pant K.K., “Kinetic modelling of oxidative steam reforming of methanol over Cu/ZnO/CeO2/Al2O3 catalyst”, Applied Catalysis, 2009;356:189–200.10.1016/j.apcata.2009.01.002Search in Google Scholar

18 Huang T., Chren S., “Kinetics of Partial Oxidation of Methanol over a Copper–Zinc Catalyst”, Applied Catalysis, 1988;40:43–52.10.1016/S0166-9834(00)80424-8Search in Google Scholar

19 Reitz T.L., Ahmed S., Krumpelt M., Kumar R., Kung H.H., “Characterization of CuO/ZnO under oxidising conditions for the oxidative Methanol reforming reactions”, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2000;162:275–285.10.1016/S1381-1169(00)00296-XSearch in Google Scholar

20 Peppley B.A., Amphlett J.C., Kearns L.M., Mann R.F., “Methanol–Steam reforming on CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 Catalysts. Part 2. A Comprehensive Kinetic Model”, Applied Catalysis A: General, 1999;179:31–49.10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00299-3Search in Google Scholar

21 Smith J.M., Vannes H.C., Abott M.M., “Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics” 5th edition, New York, McGraw Hill, 1996.Search in Google Scholar

22 Gobina E., Hou K., Hughes R., “Mathematical analysis of ethylbenzene dehydrogenation: Comparison of microporous and dense membrane systems”, Journal of Membrane Science,1995;105:163–176.10.1016/0376-7388(95)00057-JSearch in Google Scholar

23 Oklany J.S., Hou K., Hughes R., “A simulative comparison of dense and microporous membrane reactors for the steam reforming of methane”, Applied Catalysis A: General, 1998;170:13–22.10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00027-1Search in Google Scholar

24 Kumar S., Kumar S., Prajapati J.K., “Hydrogen production by partial oxidation of methane: Modeling and Simulation”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009;34:6655–6668.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.06.043Search in Google Scholar

25 Douvartzides S., Coutelieris F., Tsiakaras P., “Exergy analysis of a solid oxide fuel cell power plant fed by either ethanol or methane”, Journal of Power Sources, 2004;131:224–230.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.10.015Search in Google Scholar

26 Ortiz F.J.G., Ollero P., Serrera A., Galera S., “Process integration and exergy analysis of the autothermal reforming of glycerol using supercritical water”, Energy, 2012;42:192–203.10.1016/j.energy.2012.03.069Search in Google Scholar

27 Ishihara A., Mitsushima S., Kamiya N., Ota K., “Exergy analysis of polymer electrolyte fuel cell systems using methanol”, Journal of Power Sources, 2004;126:34–40.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2003.08.029Search in Google Scholar

28 Tzanetis K.F., Martavaltzi C.S., Lemonidou A.A., “Comparative exergy analysis of sorption enhanced and conventional methane steam reforming”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012;37:16308–16320.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.02.191Search in Google Scholar

29 Hajjaji N., Pons M.N., Houas A., Renaudin V., “Exergy analysis: An efficient tool for understanding and improving hydrogen production via the steam methane reforming process”, Energy Policy, 2012;42:392–399.10.1016/j.enpol.2011.12.003Search in Google Scholar

30 Ji P., Van der Kooi H.J., Arons J.S. “Simulation and thermodynamic analysis of conventional and oxygen permeable CPO reactors”, Chemical Engineering Science, 2003;58:2921–2930.10.1016/S0009-2509(03)00131-3Search in Google Scholar

31 Delsman E.R., Uju C.U., Croon M.H.J.M. de, Schouten J.C., Ptasinski K.J., “Exergy analysis of an integrated fuel processor and fuel cell (FP–FC) system”, Energy, 2006;31:3300–3309.10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.011Search in Google Scholar

32 Chen B., Liao Z., Wang J., Yu H., Yang Y., “Exergy analysis and CO2 emission evaluation for steam methane reforming”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012;37:3191–3200.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.102Search in Google Scholar

33 Cengel Y.A., Boles M.A., “Thermodynamics: An Engineering Approach”, 6th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

34 Hajidavalloo E., Vosough A., “Energy and exergy analyses of a supercritical power plant “, International Journal of Exergy, 2011;9:435–452.10.1504/IJEX.2011.044059Search in Google Scholar

35 Silva A.L., Müller I.L., “Hydrogen production by sorption enhanced steam reforming of oxygenated hydrocarbons (ethanol, glycerol, n-butanol and methanol): Thermodynamic modeling”, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011;36:2057–2075.10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.11.051Search in Google Scholar

36 Lattner J.R., Harold M.P., “Autothermal Reforming of methanol: Experiments and Modeling”, Catalysis Today, 2007;120:78–89.10.1016/j.cattod.2006.07.005Search in Google Scholar

37 Basile A., Gallucci F., Paturzo L., “A dense Pd/Ag membrane reactor for methanol steam reforming: Experimental study”, Catalysis today, 2005;104:244–250.10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.066Search in Google Scholar

38 Leo T.J., Raso M.A., Navarro E., Sanchez-de-la-Blanca E., “Comparative exergy analysis of direct alcohol fuel cells using fuel mixtures”, Journal of Power sources, 2011;196:1178–1183.10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.08.096Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2013-07-09

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Masthead
  2. Masthead
  3. Efficient Synthesis of 1-Acetylpyrene Using [Bmim]Cl–FeCl3 Ionic Liquid as Dual Catalyst and Solvent
  4. Ethanol Steam Reforming for Hydrogen Production in Microchannel Reactors: Experimental Design and Optimization
  5. Modeling NOx Adsorption onto Fe/ZSM-5 Catalysts in a Fixed Bed Reactor
  6. Multistep Optimization and Residue Disposal Study for Electrochemical Treatment of Textile Wastewater Using Aluminum Electrode
  7. Effect of Vibrating Sparger on Mass Transfer, Gas Holdup, and Bubble Size in a Bubble Column Reactor
  8. Production of Silicon from SiH4 in a Fluidized Bed, Operation and Results
  9. Reforming of Glycerol into Bio-Crude: A Parametric Study
  10. Hydrodynamic and Mass Transfer Characteristics in a Large-Scale Slurry Bubble Column Reactor for Gas Mixtures in Actual Fischer–Tropsch Cuts
  11. Optimization of l-Asparaginase Production by Isolated Aspergillus niger C4 from Sesame (black) Oil Cake under SSF using Box–Behnken Design in Column Bioreactor
  12. Simplified Kinetic Model for Thermal Combustion of Lean Methane–Air Mixtures in a Wide Range of Temperatures
  13. Identification and Optimization of Recombinant E. coli Fed-Batch Fermentation Producing γ-Interferon Protein
  14. A Comparison of Monomeric Phenols Produced from Lignin by Fast Pyrolysis and Hydrothermal Conversions
  15. Design and Optimization of a Fixed Bed Reactor for Direct Dimethyl Ether Production from Syngas Using Differential Evolution Algorithm
  16. Conversion Enhancement of Fixed-Bed Reactors Using Two-Dimensional Hollow Cylindrical Catalyst Pellet
  17. Bubble Columns with Internals: A Review
  18. A Historic Review on R&D of China’s FCC Riser Termination Device Technologies
  19. Recent Advances of Spout-Fluid Bed: A Review of Fundamentals and Applications
  20. Ethanol Catalytic Oxidation on Ordered Mesoporous CuO/KIT-6 Catalyst
  21. A Novel Kinetics Study on H2O2 Decomposition inthe Propylene Epoxidation System in a Fixed-Bed Reactor
  22. Implementation of Homotopy Perturbation Method to Solve a Population Balance Model in Fluidized Bed
  23. Experimental Research on Utilization of Steel Rolling Sludge in Sintering Process
  24. Application of Honey-Bee Mating Optimization to Naphtha Reforming Reactor
  25. Modeling and Simulation of a Fischer–Tropsch Slurry Bubble Column Reactor Using Different Kinetic Rate Expressions for Iron and Cobalt Catalysts
  26. Solids Suspension Study in a Side-Entering Stirred Tank Through CFD Modeling
  27. Triphase Catalysis Using Silica Gel as Support
  28. Enhanced Trichloroethylene CatalyticOxidation on Modified Lanthanum Manganite ano-Perovskites
  29. A Novel Reactor for Microwave Hydrothermal Scale-up Nanopowder Synthesis
  30. Production of Amino and Organic Acids from Protein Using Sub-Critical Water Technology
  31. Purification of Crude Glycerine Obtained from Transesterification of Cottonseed Oil
  32. Predicting the Liquid Film Thickness and Droplet–Gas Flow in Effervescent Atomization: Influence of Operating Conditions and Fluid Viscosity
  33. Zinc-Modified MCM-22 as Potential Solid acid Catalyst for Friedel–Crafts Alkylation Reaction
  34. Dynamic Characteristics and Speed Control Strategy of Cellulose Hydrolysis Reactor at High Solids Loading
  35. Kinetic Study of Light Mercaptans in the Presence of Merox Catalyst and Caustic Soda
  36. Applications of Feed-Forward Neural Network to Study Irregular-Shape Particle Effects on Hydrodynamics Behavior in a Liquid–Solid Circulating Fluidized Bed Riser
  37. Experimental Investigation on the Translational and Rotational Motion of Biomass Particle in a Spout-Fluid Bed
  38. Industrial Methanol from Syngas: Kinetic Study and Process Simulation
  39. Study of Co-pyrolysis Characteristics of Lignite and Rice Husk in a TGA and a Fixed-Bed Reactor
  40. Exergy Analysis of Oxidative Steam Reforming of Methanol for Hydrogen Producton: Modeling Study
  41. Lead (II) Pollution Enhances the Binding of Transgenic Toxin in Brown and Red Soils: Equilibrium and Kinetics
  42. Influence of a Second Liquid Phase upon Carbon Dioxide Chemical Absorption
  43. Brackish Water Desalination by Electrodialysis: CaCO3 Scaling Monitoring During Batch Recirculation Operation
  44. The Effect of TiO2 Contained within a Titanium Silicalite (TS-1) Catalyst and on the Selective Oxidation of Ammonia
  45. Understanding Pt–Rh Synergy in a Three-Way Catalytic Converter
  46. Mathematical Modelling of Microwave Pyrolysis
  47. Photocatalytic Purification of Wastewater Polluted by Odorant Sulfur Compounds Using Titanium Oxide in a Continuous Photoreactor
  48. Adsorption Kinetics of Oxytetracycline onto Activated Carbon in a Closed-Loop Fixed Bed Reactor
  49. Catalytic Wet Peroxide Oxidation of Chlorophenol Over a Ce0.86Cu0.14–xO2 Catalyst
  50. Chemical Reaction Effect upon Gas–Liquid Interfacial Area in a Bubble Column Reactor
  51. Comparative Studies on Nitrophenol Removal byAdsorption and Simultaneous Adsorption-Biodegradation Processes
  52. Ultrasound-Assisted Enzymatic Synthesis of Poly-ε-Caprolactone: Kinetic Behavior and ReactorDesign
Downloaded on 25.3.2026 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijcre-2012-0073/html
Scroll to top button