Qualitative evaluation of general university requirements in a new 4-year university curriculum: findings based on experiences of students

References

1. Mason G, Willians G, Cranmer S. Employability skills initiatives in higher education: what effects do they have on graduate labor market outcomes? Educ Econ 2006;17:1–30.10.1080/09645290802028315Suche in Google Scholar

2. Shafie LA, Nayan S. Employability awareness among Malaysian undergraduates. Int J Bus Manag 2010;5:119–23.Suche in Google Scholar

3. Robinson JP. What are employability skills? Alabama Cooperative Extension System; 2000. Available at: http://www.fremont.k12.ca.us/cms/lib04/CA01000848/Centricity/Domain/189/employability-skills.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

4. Fine MB, Clark PW. Satisfaction of marketing/management students in higher education. Proceedings of the 20^th Annual Conference of the American Society of Business and Behavioral Sciences (ASBBS); 2013 Feb 21–24. Las Vega: ASBBS; 2013:572–8. Available at: http://asbbs.org/files/ASBBS2013V1/PDF/F/Fine_Clark(P572-578).pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

5. Grebennikov L, Shah M. Student voice: using qualitative feedback from students to enhance their university experience. Teach High Educ 2013;18:606–18.10.1080/13562517.2013.774353Suche in Google Scholar

6. Richardson TE. Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assess Eval High Educ 2005;30:387–415.10.1080/02602930500099193Suche in Google Scholar

7. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1351–9.10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00213-5Suche in Google Scholar

8. Scott G, Grebennikov L, Shah M. Using qualitative data to prove and improve quality in Australian higher education. Proceedings of the 2008 Australasian Higher Education Evaluation Forum (AHEEF); 2008 Oct 2–3. Melbourne: AHEEF; 2008:97–111.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Kabanoff B, Richardson A, Brown S. Business graduates’ perception of the quality of their course: a view from their workplace. J Institu Res 2003;12:1–12.Suche in Google Scholar

10. Davison E, Price J. How do we rate? An evaluation of online student evaluations. Assess Eval High Educ 2009;34:51–65.10.1080/02602930801895695Suche in Google Scholar

11. Kindred J, Mohammed SN. ‘He will crush you like an academic ninja!’: exploring teacher ratings on ratemyprofessors.com. J Comput-Mediat Comm 2005;10. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00257.x/full.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00257.xSuche in Google Scholar

12. Ragin C. Constructing social research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar

13. Vaterlaus JM, Higginbotham BJ. Qualitative program evaluation methods. The Forum for Family and Consumer Issues in NC State University; 2001. Available at: http://ncsu.edu/ffci/publications/2011/v16-n1-2011-spring/vaterlaus-higginbotham.php.Suche in Google Scholar

14. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

15. Royse D. Research methods in social work. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, 2004.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Conners NA, Franklin KK. Using focus groups to evaluate client satisfaction in an alcohol and drug treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat 2000;18:313–20.10.1016/S0740-5472(99)00083-5Suche in Google Scholar

17. Jaffee D. The general education initiative in Hong Kong: organized contradictions and emerging tensions. High Educ 2012;64:193–206.10.1007/s10734-011-9487-ySuche in Google Scholar

18. Laird FN, Niskode-Dossett A, Kuh GD. What general education courses contribute to essential learning outcomes. J Gen Educ 2009;58:65–84.10.1353/jge.0.0037Suche in Google Scholar

19. Lowden K, Hall S, Elliot D, Lewin J. Employers’ perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. Glasgow: University Glasgow SCRE Centre, Edge Foundation, 2011.Suche in Google Scholar

20. Lewis HL. Excellence without soul: how a great university forgot education. New York: Public Affairs, 2006.Suche in Google Scholar

21. Shek DTL, Yu L, Wu FKY, Chai WY. General University Requirements at The Hong Kong Polytechnic University: evaluation findings based on student focus groups. Assess Eval High Educ 2014;40:1017–31.10.1080/02602938.2014.960362Suche in Google Scholar

22. Shek DTL, Yu L, Wu FKY, Ng CSM. General education program in a new 4-year university curriculum in Hong Kong: findings based on multiple evaluation strategies. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2015;14:377–84.10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0459Suche in Google Scholar

23. Shek DTL, Lee TY, Siu A, Lam CM. Qualitative evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. based on the perceptions of the program participants. ScientificWorldJ 2006;6:2254–64.10.1100/tsw.2006.354Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

24. Katula RA, Threnhauser E. Experiential education in the undergraduate curriculum. Commun Educ 1999;48:238–55.10.1080/03634529909379172Suche in Google Scholar

25. McLeod PL. Experiential learning in an undergraduate course in group communication and decision making. Small Group Res 2013;44:360–80.10.1177/1046496413488217Suche in Google Scholar

26. Swaray R. An evaluation of a group project designed to reduce free-riding and promote active learning. Assess Eval High Educ 2012;37:285–92.10.1080/02602938.2010.531246Suche in Google Scholar

27. Quality Assurance Agency (QAA). Subject benchmark statement economics. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education; 2007. Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/en/Publications/Documents/Subject-benchmark-statement-Economics.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

28. Morris R, Hayes C. Small group work: are group assignments a legitimate form of assessment? In: Pospisil R, Willcoxson L, editors. Learning through teaching: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Teaching Learning Forum; 1997 Feb; Perth: Murdoch University, 1997:229–33.Suche in Google Scholar

29. Ruël G, Bastiaans N. Free-riding and team performance in project education. Int J Manag Educ 2003;3:26–37.Suche in Google Scholar

30. Morgan CK, Tam M. Unravelling the complexities of distance education student attrition. Dist Educ 1999;20:96–108.10.1080/0158791990200108Suche in Google Scholar

31. Gardner DH, Parkinson TJ. Optimism, self-esteem, and social support as mediators of the relationships among workload, stress, and well-being in veterinary students. J Vet Med Educ 2011;38:60–6.10.3138/jvme.38.1.60Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

32. Kember D. Interpreting student workload and the factors which shape students’ perceptions of their workload. Stud High Educ 2004;29:165–84.10.1080/0307507042000190778Suche in Google Scholar

33. Diseth A, Pallesen S, Hovland A, Larsen S. Course experiences, approaches to learning and academic achievement. J Educ Train 2006;48:156–69.10.1108/00400910610651782Suche in Google Scholar

34. Lee SC, Tajino A. Understanding students’ perceptions of difficulty with academic writing for teacher development: a case study of the University of Tokyo writing program. Kyoto University High Educ Res 2008;14:1–11.Suche in Google Scholar

35. Education Commission. Enhancing language proficiency: a comprehensive strategy. Hong Kong: Education Commission; 1995. Report No. 6. Available at: http://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/about-edb/publications-stat/major-reports/ecr6_e_2.pdf.Suche in Google Scholar

36. Yin, R. Case study research: design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.Suche in Google Scholar