Positive youth development programs for adolescents with greater psychosocial needs: evaluation based on program implementers

References

1. Carpenter-Aeby T, Carpenter VG. Reflections of client satisfaction: reframing family perceptions of mandatory alternative school assignment. J Instruct Psychol 2012;39:1–11.Suche in Google Scholar

2. Shek DTL. Subjective outcome and objective outcome evaluation findings: insights from a Chinese context. Res Social Work Prac 2010;20:293–301.10.1177/1049731509331951Suche in Google Scholar

3. O’Neal PD. Methodological problems associated with measuring consumer satisfaction in the mental health field. Aust Soc Work 1999;52:9–15.10.1080/03124079908414130Suche in Google Scholar

4. Harris G, Poertner J, Joe S. The parents with children in foster care satisfaction scale. Admin Soc Work 2000;24:15–27.10.1300/J147v24n02_02Suche in Google Scholar

5. Walsh T, Lord B. Client satisfaction and empowerment through social work intervention. Soc Work Health Care 2004;38:37–56.10.1300/J010v38n04_03Suche in Google Scholar

6. American Evaluation Association. Guiding principles for evaluators. In: Shadish WR, Newman DL, Scheirer M, Wye C, editors. Guiding principles for evaluators. New directions for program evaluation, no. 66. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1995:19–26.Suche in Google Scholar

7. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation: the new century text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.Suche in Google Scholar

8. Patton MQ. Utilization-focused evaluation, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.Suche in Google Scholar

9. Taut S. What have we learned about stakeholder involvement in program evaluation? Stud Educ Eval 2008;34:224–30.10.1016/j.stueduc.2008.10.007Suche in Google Scholar

10. Azzam T. Evaluator responsiveness to stakeholders. Am J Eval 2010;31:45–65.10.1177/1098214009354917Suche in Google Scholar

11. Huberman M, Cox P. Evaluation utilization: building links between action and reflection. Stud Educ Eval 1990;16:157–79.10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80077-XSuche in Google Scholar

12. Winefield HR, Barlow, JA. Client and worker satisfaction in a child protection agency. Child Abuse Negl 1995;19:897–905.10.1016/0145-2134(95)00052-ASuche in Google Scholar

13. Sun RCF, Shek DTL. Perceived program qualities and outcomes of a youth program in Hong Kong: based on the views of the workers. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S10–6.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.007Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Shek DTL, Ma CMS. Program implementers’ evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets over time. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012. Article ID 918437.10.1100/2012/918437Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

15. Osterman KF, Kottkamp RB. Reflective practice for educators: improving schooling through professional development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press, 1993.Suche in Google Scholar

16. Larrivee B. Transforming teaching practice: becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflect Pract 2000;1:293–307.10.1080/713693162Suche in Google Scholar

17. Ruch G. From triangle to spiral: reflective practice in social work education, practice and research. Soc Work Educ Int J 2002;21:199–216.10.1080/02615470220126435Suche in Google Scholar

18. Shek DTL. Tackling adolescent substance abuse in Hong Kong: where we should and should not go. ScientificWorldJ 2007;7:2021–30.10.1100/tsw.2007.315Suche in Google Scholar

19. DuRant RH, Altman D, Wolfson M, Barkin S, Kreiter S, et al. Exposure to violence and victimization, depression, substance use, and the use of violence by young adolescents. J Pediatr 2000;137:707–13.10.1067/mpd.2000.109146Suche in Google Scholar

20. Tapert SF, Aarons GA, Sedlar GR, Brown SA. Adolescent substance use and sexual risk-taking behavior. J Adolesc Health 2001;28:181–9.10.1016/S1054-139X(00)00169-5Suche in Google Scholar

21. Ng CSM, Hurry J. Depression amongst Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong: an evaluation of a stress moderation model. Soc Indic Res 2011;100:499–516.10.1007/s11205-010-9626-3Suche in Google Scholar

22. Shek DTL, Yu L. A review of validated youth prevention and positive youth development programs in Asia. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:317–24.10.1515/IJAMH.2011.028Suche in Google Scholar

23. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. Effectiveness of the Tier 1 program of project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on three years of program evaluation. ScientificWorldJ 2010;10:1509–19.10.1100/tsw.2010.122Suche in Google Scholar

24. Catalano RF, Fagan AA, Gavin LE, Greenberg MT, Irwin Jr CE, et al. Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent health. Lancet 2012;379:1653–64.10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60238-4Suche in Google Scholar

25. Shek DTL, Sun RCF. The Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: development, training, implementation, and evaluation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013;26:S2–9.10.1016/j.jpag.2013.03.009Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Shek DTL, Siu AMH, Lee TY. Subjective outcome evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on the perspective of the program implementers. ScientificWorldJ 2007;7:195–203.10.1100/tsw.2007.43Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

27. Shek DTL, Yu L. Subjective outcome evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S. (Extension Phase) based on the perspective of program implementer. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012. Article ID 589257.10.1100/2012/589257Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

28. Shek DTL, Ma CMS, Tang CYP. Subjective outcome evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:237–43.10.1515/ijamh.2011.050Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Taut SM, Alkin M. Program staff perceptions of barriers to evaluation implementation. Am J Eval 2003;24:213–26.10.1177/109821400302400205Suche in Google Scholar

30. Ryan AM, Patrick H. The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. Am Educ Res J 2001;38:437–60.10.3102/00028312038002437Suche in Google Scholar

31. Lumpkin A. Caring teachers: the key to student learning. Kappa Delta Pi Record 2007;43:158–60.10.1080/00228958.2007.10516474Suche in Google Scholar

32. Noddings N. The challenge to care in schools: an alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press, 1992.Suche in Google Scholar

33. Wentzel KR. Student motivation in middle school: the role of perceived pedagogical caring. J Educ Psychol 1997;89: 411–9.10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.411Suche in Google Scholar

34. Klem AM, Connell JP. Relationships matter: linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. J Sch Health 2004;74:262–73.10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.xSuche in Google Scholar PubMed

35. Danielsen AG, Wiium N, Wilhelmsen BU, Wold B. Perceived support provided by teachers and classmates and students’ self-reported academic initiative. J Sch Psychol 2010;48:247–67.10.1016/j.jsp.2010.02.002Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

36. DeCastro-Ambrosetti D, Cho G. Synergism in learning: a critical reflection of authentic assessment. High Sch J 2005;89:57–62.10.1353/hsj.2005.0015Suche in Google Scholar

37. Lau PSY, Wu FKY. Use of self as a strategy in teaching the P.A.T.H.S.in Hong Kong. Int J Adolesc Mental Health 2011;21:345–67.Suche in Google Scholar

38. Sargent T, Hannum E. Keeping teachers happy: job satisfaction among primary school teachers in rural Northwest. Comp Educ Rev 2005;49:173–204.10.1086/428100Suche in Google Scholar

39. Nock MK, Mendes WB. Physiological arousal, distress tolerance, and social problem-solving deficits among adolescent self-injurers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2008;76:28–38.10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.28Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

40. Shek DTL. Objective outcome evaluation of the Project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: findings based on individual growth curve models. ScientificWorldJ 2010;10:182–91.10.1100/tsw.2010.18Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

41. Shek DTL, Yu L, Ho VYT. Implementation of the secondary 2 program of the project P.A.T.H.S.: observations based on the co-walker scheme. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2012;24:253–60.10.1515/ijamh-2012-0036Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

42. Shek DTL, Yu L. Factorial validity of a subjective outcome evaluation tool for implementers of a positive youth development program. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S32–42.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.010Suche in Google Scholar PubMed