Community-based positive youth development program in Hong Kong: views of the program implementers

References

1. Alden DL, Hoa DM, Bhawuk D. Client satisfaction with reproductive health-care quality: integrating business approaches to modeling and measurement. Soc Sci Med 2004;59:2219–32.10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.026Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. DeShields OW, Kara A, Kaynak E. Determinants of business student satisfaction and retention in higher education: applying Herzberg’s two-factor theory. Int J Educ Manage 2005;19:128–39.10.1108/09513540510582426Search in Google Scholar

3. Kendall M. Teaching online to campus-based students: the experience of using WebCT for the community information module at Manchester Metropolitan University. Educ Inform 2001;19:325–46.10.3233/EFI-2001-19404Search in Google Scholar

4. Weiler RM, Pigg RM. An evaluation of client satisfaction with training programs and technical assistance provided by Florida’s coordinated school health program office. J School Health 2000;70:361–7.10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb07274.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Hong KS, Lai KW, Holton D. Students’ satisfaction and perceived learning with a web-based course. Educ Tech Soc 2003;6. Available at: http://www.ifets.info/others/journals/6_1/hong.html.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kara A, DeShields OW. Business student satisfaction, intentions and retention in higher education: an empirical investigation. Market Educ Quart 2004;3:1–25.Search in Google Scholar

7. Lyke J, Frank M. Comparison of student learning outcomes in online and traditional classroom environments in a psychology course. J Instructional Psychol 2012;39:245–50.Search in Google Scholar

8. Patton MG. Utilization-focused evaluation, 4th ed. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

9. Asgary-Eden V, Lee CM. So now we’ve picked an evidence-based program, what’s next? perspectives of service providers and administrators. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2011;42:169–75.10.1037/a0022745Search in Google Scholar

10. Shek DT, Yu L. A review of validated youth prevention and positive youth development programmes in Asia. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:317–24.Search in Google Scholar

11. Shek DT, Ma CM. Program implementers’ evaluation of the project P.A.T.H.S.: findings based on different datasets over time. ScientificWorldJ 2012;2012: Article ID 918437.10.1100/2012/918437Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

12. Sun RC, Shek DT. Perceived program qualities and outcomes of a youth program in Hong Kong based on the views of the workers. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S10–6.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Shek DT, Yu L. Factorial validity of a subjective outcome evaluation tool for implementers of a positive youth development program. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2014;27:S32–42.10.1016/j.jpag.2014.02.010Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Yu L, Shek DTL. Testing factorial invariance across groups: an illustration using AMOS. Int J Disabil Hum Dev 2014;13:205–16.10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0306Search in Google Scholar

15. Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development. A matter of time: risk and opportunity in the non-school hours. New York: Carnegie Corporation, 1992.Search in Google Scholar

16. Shek DT, Yu L. Interim evaluation of project P.A.T.H.S.: an integration of findings based on program implementers. In: Shek DT, Sun RC, editors. Development and evaluation of positive adolescent training through holistic social programs (P.A.T.H.S.). Heidelberg: Springer, 2013:149–64.10.1007/978-981-4451-54-3_10Search in Google Scholar

17. Shek DT, Sun RC. The project P.A.T.H.S. in Hong Kong: development, training, implementation, and evaluation. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013; 26:S2.10.1016/j.jpag.2013.03.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed