Home Discussion of Carbon Emissions for Charging Hot Metal in EAF Steelmaking Process
Article Open Access

Discussion of Carbon Emissions for Charging Hot Metal in EAF Steelmaking Process

  • Ling-zhi Yang , Tao Jiang , Guang-hui Li EMAIL logo and Yu-feng Guo
Published/Copyright: September 10, 2016

Abstract

As the cost of hot metal is reduced for iron ore prices are falling in the international market, more and more electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking enterprises use partial hot metal instead of scrap as raw materials to reduce costs and the power consumption. In this paper, carbon emissions based on 1,000 kg molten steel by charging hot metal in EAF steelmaking is studied. Based on the analysis of material and energy balance calculation in EAF, the results show that 146.9, 142.2, 137.0, and 130.8 kg/t of carbon emissions are produced at a hot metal ratio of 0 %, 30 %, 50 %, and 70 %, while 143.4, 98.5, 65.81, and 31.5 kg/t of carbon emissions are produced at a hot metal ratio of 0 %, 30 %, 50 %, and 70 % by using gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production) for EAF steelmaking unit process. However, carbon emissions are increased by charging hot metal for the whole blast furnace–electric arc furnace (BF–EAF) steelmaking process. In the condition that the hot metal produced by BF is surplus, as carbon monoxide in gas increased by charging hot metal, the way of coal gas production can be used for waste heat utilization, which reduces carbon emissions in EAF steelmaking unit process.

Introduction

Cold scrap is the main raw material of traditional electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmaking. The cost of ironmaking process is reduced for iron ore prices are falling in the international market. So, the hot metal that is products in ironmaking becomes the low cost of steelmaking raw materials. In this case, more and more EAF steelmaking enterprises use partial hot metal instead of scrap as raw materials, which reduce raw material costs and reduce the power consumption by the hot metal with high physical and chemical heat [1, 2, 3].

Governments and industries have attached greater importance to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions with global warming becoming increasingly serious. As the iron and steel industry produced large amounts of carbon dioxide, modern iron and steel plants increasingly focus on the reduction of CO2 emissions [4, 5]. There are many works to study on CO2 emissions reduction for iron and steel enterprises and workers.

With the development of EAF technology, metallurgical workers are also focus on energy conservation and emissions reduction in EAF steelmaking [6, 7, 8]. For reduction of raw material costs by charging hot metal in EAF steelmaking, this article will study carbon emissions under the condition of the EAF process.

Analysis of material and energy balance calculation in EAF

In order to study the carbon emissions by charging hot metal in EAF steelmaking process, this article will make the following research work. First, chemical reactions need to be analyzed for metal materials (hot metal and scrap) in steelmaking process. Then, material and energy balance are analyzed for scrap and hot metal in the steelmaking process. Finally, according to the calculation results of material and energy balance and the carbon emissions standards, carbon emissions are calculated under the condition of different hot metal charging ratio.

Conditionals

The hot metal is the product of blast furnace in ironmaking. Scrap is collected from the society. Composition of hot metal and scrap is all unstable. Therefore, for studying the reaction in the process of steelmaking, composition and temperature of hot metal, scrap, and molten steel need to be setting, which are given in Table 1.

Table 1:

Composition and temperature of hot metal, scrap, and molten steel.

Composition contentC (%)Si (%)Mn (%)P (%)S (%)Temperature (°C)
Hot metal4.0000.8000.0800.1800.0501,300
Scrap0.1800.2000.4500.0300.03025
Molten steel0.0800.0000.0200.0120.0401,650

The EAF is charged with hot metal and scrap that mainly need to complete decarburization and dephosphorization. In addition, silicon and manganese are oxidized. Some of the chemical reactions are shown in eqs. (1)–(5), as follows:

(1)[C]+[O]={CO}
(2)[C]+2[O]=CO2
(3)2[P]+5/52O22O2+3(CaO)=3CaOP2O5
(4)[Si]+2[O]=SiO2
(5)[Mn]+[O]=(MnO)

The calculation for hot metal

Table 2 has been prepared according to composition and temperature of hot metal and molten steel in Table 1.

Table 2:

Oxidizing capacities of each element of hot metal in EAF steelmaking process.

Composition contentC (%)Si (%)Mn (%)P (%)S (%)
Hot metal4.0000.8000.0800.1800.050
Molten steel0.0800.0000.0200.0120.040
Oxidizing capacities3.9200.8000.0600.1680.010

According to the chemical reactions are shown in eqs. (1)–(5), oxygen consumption, oxidation product quantity, and heat output are calculated as shown in Table 3 on the basis of 100 kg of inlets hot metal in EAF steelmaking process. For decarburization reaction, 10 % C is oxidized to CO2, 90 % C is oxidized to CO.

Table 3:

Results of material and energy analysis for 100 kg of inlet hot metal.

Chemical reactionOxidizing (kg)ΔH (kJ/kg)Oxygen (kg)Oxidation (kg)Heat output (kJ)
C → CO3.528011,6394.70408.232041,062
C → CO20.392034,8341.04531.437313,655
Si → SiO20.800029,2020.91431.714323,362
Mn → MnO0.06006,5940.01750.0775396
P → P2O50.168018,9800.21680.38483,189
Fe → FeO1.72894,2500.49402.22287,348
Fe → Fe2O30.15566,4600.06670.22231,005
Sum6.84257.458590,016

According to the material balance calculation, and considering the loss caused by dust, splash, and iron beads, 1,103.82 kg hot metal is consumed as shown in Figure 1 for 1,000 kg molten steel.

Figure 1: Hot metal consumption for per ton steel in EAF steelmaking process.
Figure 1:

Hot metal consumption for per ton steel in EAF steelmaking process.

The calculation for scrap

Table 4 has been prepared according to composition and temperature of scrap and molten steel in Table 1.

Table 4:

Oxidizing capacities of each element of scrap in EAF steelmaking process.

Composition contentC (%)Si (%)Mn (%)P (%)S (%)
Scrap0.1800.2000.4500.0300.030
Molten steel0.0800.0000.0200.0120.040
Oxidizing capacities0.1000.2000.4300.018−0.010

According to the chemical reactions are shown in eqs. (1)–(5), oxygen consumption, oxidation product quantity, and heat output are calculated as shown in Table 5 on the basis of 100 kg of inlets scrap in EAF steelmaking process.

Table 5:

Results of material and energy analysis for 100 kg of inlet scrap.

Chemical reactionOxidizing (kg)ΔH (kJ/kg)Oxygen (kg)Oxidation (kg)Heat output (kJ)
C → CO0.09011,6390.1200.2101,048
C → CO20.01034,8340.0270.037348
Si → SiO20.20029,2020.2290.4295,840
Mn → MnO0.4306,5940.1250.5552,835
P → P2O50.01818,9800.0230.041342
Fe → FeO0.6674,2500.1910.8572,833
Fe → Fe2O30.3336,4600.1430.4762,153
Sum1.7480.85715,400

According to the material balance calculation, and considering the loss caused by dust and splash, 1,044.69 kg scrap is consumed as shown in Figure 2 for 1,000 kg molten steel.

Figure 2: Scrap consumption for per ton steel in EAF steelmaking process.
Figure 2:

Scrap consumption for per ton steel in EAF steelmaking process.

Calculation of energy balance

There is a lot of physical heat by charging hot metal in EAF steelmaking process. Meanwhile, oxidation reactions by C, Si, Mn, P elements in hot metal produce large amounts of chemical energy. According to the theoretical calculation and practical experience, hot metal has a large number of surplus energy in steelmaking. This part of the heat can be provided to the scrap and reduce the energy supplement (consumption of power) of EAF steelmaking process.

The solid specific heat of pig iron and liquid specific heat of hot metal is 0.745 and 0.837 kJ/kg °C, respectively, the latent heat of fusion of the hot metal is 218 kJ/kg. The solid specific heat of steel and liquid specific heat of steel is 0.699 and 0.837 kJ/kg °C, respectively, the latent heat of fusion of the steel is 272 kJ/kg. The heat of slag is 1.248 kJ/kg °C and the latent heat of fusion of the slag is 209 kJ/kg. Physical heat of the furnace gas in EAF is the energy taken away by the high-temperature gas. The specific heat of the furnace gas is 1.137 kJ/kg °C, for which the temperature is 1,200 °C [9, 10]. According to the study of EAF steelmaking, heat loss is 2.0–4.0 % of total energy income in EAF steelmaking process, this article set to 3.2 %.

According to Table 3 and the thermodynamic parameters, the energy balance during the EAF steelmaking process for hot metal is calculated as shown in Table 6. The physical heat of per ton hot metal is 329.1 kW h. The chemical heat of per ton hot metal is 263.0 kW h. The physical heat of 905.95 kg (Figure 1) molten steel is 360.8 kW h.

Table 6:

Energy balance during the EAF steelmaking process for per ton hot metal.

Energy inputk×103kW hEnergy outputkJ×103kW h
Physical heat of hot metal118.48329.1Physical heat of molten steel129.90360.8
Chemical heat of hot metal94.67263.0Physical heat of slag25.0669.6
Oxidation heat of dust5.5215.3Physical heat of dust2.617.3
Physical heat of gas16.4445.7
Physical heat of iron beads0.862.4
Physical heat of splash1.153.2
Endothermic of decomposition1.083.0
Heat loss6.9719.4
Input summary218.67607.4Output summary184.07511.3
  1. Note: Surplus energy=607.4 –511.3 kW h=96.1 kW h

According to energy balance calculation, it is concluded that the surplus energy of hot metal is 96.1 kW h/t. Similarly, according to scrap energy balance calculation, it is concluded that endothermic value of scrap melting is 402.4 kW h/t, and exothermic value of scrap elements oxidation is 42.8 kW h/t. So the exothermic value of scrap is 359.6 kW h/t in EAF steelmaking.

As the surplus energy of hot metal is less than the endotherm heat of scrap in EAF steelmaking process, lack of energy need to be studied, as shown below in eq. (6).

(6)QLack=QScrapQHM=MScrap×qScrapMHM×qH.M

According to the material and energy balance calculation (Figures 1 and 2 and Table 6), the quality of hot metal, the quality of scrap and lack of energy under the condition of different hot metal charging ratio are calculated, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7:

Analysis of energy under the condition of different hot metal charging ratio.

HM ratio (%)HM (kg/t)Scrap (kg/t)HM surplus energy (kW h/t)Scrap endotherm (kW h/t)Lack of energy (kW h/t)
00.01,044.690.0375.7375.7
30318.53743.2330.6267.3236.7
50536.72536.7251.6193.0141.4
70759.77325.6273.0117.144.1
  1. Note: HM: Hot metal.

Analysis of power consumption

With the increase of hot metal charging ratio, physical and chemical heat supply greatly increased and lack of energy for EAF reduced. Power that is supplied to the furnace through the electrodes is the main mode of external power, and injection of carbon powder and natural gas can also supply part of energy. This article assumes that the lack of energy for EAF is all provided by power. Power consumption is affected by power efficiency, which is shown in eq. (7), as follows:

(7)QPower=kPower×QLack

kPower is the energy use efficiency of power.

Energy use efficiency of power is different in different smelting conditions in EAF steelmaking process. In previous studies [9], in the condition that the hot metal charging ratio is 50 %, 170 kW h for per ton molten steel in average is supplied by the electric energy during the EAF steelmaking process. Meanwhile, according to the other research of the power consumption for charging hot metal in EAF, it is concluded that the power on average for per ton molten steel under different hot metal charging ratio is 420 kW h for 0 %, 275 kW h for 30 %, 170 kW h for 50 %, and 60 kW h for 70 %. That is shown in Table 8.

Table 8:

Analysis of power under the condition of different hot metal charging ratio.

HM ratio (%)HM (kg/t)Scrap (kg/t)HM surplus energy (kW h/t)Scrap endotherm (kW h/t)Lack of energy (kW h/t)Power (kW h/t)
00.01,044.690.0375.7375.7420.0
30318.53743.2330.6267.3236.7275.0
50536.72536.7251.6193.0141.4170.0
70759.77325.6273.0117.144.160.0
  1. Note: HM: Hot metal.

Discussion

Analysis of carbon emissions in EAF process

Carbon emission is a collective name or abbreviation of greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon dioxide as a major greenhouse gas has been attached great importance to the whole society due to the huge emissions. Steel industry as one of the heaviest carbon dioxide emitters need to control carbon emissions. Therefore, carbon emissions for charging hot metal in EAF steelmaking also need to be analyzed based on the analysis of the material and energy balance calculation in this article.

“Carbon footprint” is the foreign widely used method for calculating carbon emission. For calculating carbon emissions, the total products are calculated based on the defined system boundaries. Then the total CO2 emissions of the system are gotten [11, 12, 13]. The results are converted to values on the basis of tons of steel [14, 15].

Calorific value of standard coal is 7,000 kcal/kg (29.3076 MJ/kg). According to the IPCC database, carbon content of standard coal such as lignite CScoal is 25.8 kg/GJ.

According to the results of energy conservation condition in the Chapters 2 and 3, carbon emissions (for per ton molten steel) in different hot metal charging ratio are calculated as shown in eq. (8) [5, 9].

(8)MEAFi=4412×QElectrici×CScoal

MEAFi is the carbon emissions of power, i is hot metal ratio, i=0, 30, 50, or 70; QElectrici is the power consumption of per ton molten steel.

  1. Calculation for carbon emissions of power at hot metal ratio of 0 %.

    (9)MEAF0=4412×QElectric0×CScoal=4412×420.0×3.6×103GJ×25.8kg/kgGJGJ=143.0kg
  2. Calculation for carbon emissions of power at hot metal ratio of 30 %.

    (10)MEAF30=4412×QElectric30×CScoal=4412×275.0×3.6×103GJ×25.8kg/kgGJGJ=93.7kg
  3. Calculation for carbon emissions of power at hot metal ratio of 50 %.

    (11)MEAF50=4412×QElectric50×C=4412×170.0×3.6×103GJ×25.8kg/GJ=57.9kg
  4. Calculation for carbon emissions of power at hot metal ratio of 70 %.

    (12)MEAF70=4412×QElectric70×C=4412×60.0×3.6×103GJ×25.8kg/GJ=20.4kg

Carbon emissions of hot metal and scrap are calculated by decarburization reaction in EAF steelmaking process, which is shown in eq. (13), as follows:

(13)MSumi=MEAFi+MHotmetali+MScrapi

MSumi is the total carbon emissions for per ton molten steel; MHotmetali is the carbon emissions of hot metal per ton molten steel; MScrapi is the carbon emissions of scrap for per ton molten steel.

According to the above calculation, carbon emissions (for per ton molten steel) under the condition of different hot metal ratio in EAF is summarized in Table 9.

Table 9:

Summary of carbon emissions under the condition of different hot metal charging ratio.

HM ratio (%)Material and energyCarbon emissions (kg/t)
HM (kg/t)Scrap (kg/t)Power (kW h/t)E HME ScrapE PowerE Sum
00.001,044.69420.00.03.8143.0146.9
30318.53743.23275.045.82.793.7142.2
50536.72536.72170.077.12.057.9137.0
70759.77325.6260.0109.21.220.4130.8
  1. Note: 146.9, 142.2, 137.0, and 130.8 kg/t of carbon emissions are produced at a hot metal ratio of 0 %, 30 %, 50 %, and 70 %, respectively.

Analysis of carbon emissions by waste heat utilization in EAF process

Actually, CO2 emissions calculated in this paper is composed of two parts as carbon emissions oxidized from carbon in hot metal or scrap and indirect carbon emissions from the electricity consumption in the EAF. Addition, as different scrap ratio leads to different furnace gas and different physical heat away from the furnace gas has a greater impact on the results, the recycled waste heat of furnace gas should be included as a deductible item in the final greenhouse gas emissions. So, the system boundaries have been amplified, which contains waste heat recovery process.

A lot of energy, about 15 % of the total EAF energy and sometimes as high as 30 % or above, was taken away by the high temperature furnace gas, which has great potential for energy conservation and emissions reduction. In the research on the ways for EAF gas waste heat utilization (scrap preheating, electricity generation, steam production, and coal gas production), it is concluded that coal gas production is the most effective way for energy saving and emission reduction [9, 16, 17].

Coal gas production is the way that recycles carbon monoxide in gas in EAF steelmaking process. Based on data from Tables 3 and 5, 82.32 kg carbon monoxide is produced for per ton hot metal, and 2.10 kg carbon monoxide is produced for per ton scrap. Meanwhile, the calculation for carbon emissions by gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production) is shown in eq. (14), as follows:

(14)MSum.Ai=MSumiMcgpi=MSumi4428MCOi

MSum.Ai is the total carbon emissions for per ton molten steel by gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production), Mcgpi is the carbon emission reduction for per ton molten steel by gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production). MCOi is the quality of carbon monoxide produced for per ton molten steel in EAF steelmaking process.

Therefore, by using gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production), carbon emissions (for each per ton molten steel) under the condition of different hot metal ratio in EAF is summarized in Table 10 and Figures 36.

Table 10:

Summary of carbon emissions by using gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production).

HM ratio (%)Material and energyCarbon emissions (kg/t)
HM (kg/t)Scrap (kg/t)Power (kW h/t)E HME ScrapE PowerE Coal gas productionE Sum
00.001,044.69420.00.03.8143.0−3.4143.4
30318.53743.23275.045.82.793.7−43.798.5
50536.72536.72170.077.12.057.9−71.265.8
70759.77325.6260.0109.21.220.4−99.431.5
Figure 3: Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 0 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.
Figure 3:

Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 0 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.

Figure 4: Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 30 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.
Figure 4:

Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 30 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.

Figure 5: Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 50 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.
Figure 5:

Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 50 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.

Figure 6: Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 70 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.
Figure 6:

Schematic for carbon emissions under the condition of 70 % hot metal charging ratio in EAF steelmaking process.

By using gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production), 143.4, 98.5, 65.8, and 31.5 kg/t of carbon emissions are produced at a hot metal ratio of 0 %, 30 %, 50 %, and 70 %, respectively.

Analysis of carbon emissions in BF–EAF process

With the hot metal ratio increased, carbon emissions are reduced in EAF steelmaking unit process. It is not concluded that charging hot metal in EAF is an energy conservation and emissions reduction process.

The blast furnace is the most energy-intensive step in the blast furnace/basic oxygen furnace (BF/BOF) steelmaking process, generating large quantities of CO2. Energetics, Inc. gives a range of energy use of 13.0–14.1 GJ/t pig iron [18, 19], which the average carbon emissions is 349.6 kg/t (CScoalis 25.8 kg/GJ). Therefore, carbon emissions are increased by charging hot metal for the whole BF–EAF steelmaking process, as shown in Figure 7.

Figure 7: Schematic for carbon emissions in BF–EAF process (hot metal ratio is 50 %).
Figure 7:

Schematic for carbon emissions in BF–EAF process (hot metal ratio is 50 %).

Conclusion

(1) In present study, analyses of carbon emissions based on 1,000 kg molten steel are obtained. A quantity of 146.9, 142.2, 137.0, and 130.8 kg/t carbon emissions are produced at a hot metal ratio of 0 %, 30 %, 50 %, and 70 % for EAF steelmaking unit process. By using gas waste heat utilization (coal gas production), 143.4, 98.5, 65.81, and 31.5 kg/t of carbon emissions are produced at a hot metal ratio of 0 %, 30 %, 50 %, and 70 % for EAF steelmaking unit process.

(2) For reduction of raw material costs by charging hot metal, carbon emissions are also reduced in EAF steelmaking unit process. However, as the average carbon emissions is 349.6 kg for per ton hot metal in BF process, carbon emissions are increased by charging hot metal for the whole BF–EAF steelmaking process.

(3) Nowadays, there is a certain advantage for charging hot metal in EAF steelmaking process, in the condition that the hot metal produced by BF is surplus. First, it consumes a large number of surplus hot metal and reduced raw material by hot metal instead of scrap. Second, carbon emissions are also reduced in EAF steelmaking unit process by using energy of the high-temperature hot metal. Finally, as carbon monoxide in gas increased by charging hot metal, the way of coal gas production can be used for waste heat utilization, which reduces carbon emissions in EAF steelmaking unit process.

Funding statement: National Natural Science Foundation of China, (Grant/Award No. 51234008).

Acknowledgments

Financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51234008) and postdoctoral workstation of the Central South University are gratefully acknowledged. And the authors gratefully acknowledge the valuable cooperation of Guohong Ma (School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing in Beijing) preparing this application note.

References

[1] X.Y. Deng, J.C. Ma and W.J. Zhao, J. Iron Steel Res., 25 (2013) 14–18.Search in Google Scholar

[2] B. Lee, J.W. Ryu and I. Sohn, Steel Res. Int., 86 (2015) 302–309.10.1002/srin.201400157Search in Google Scholar

[3] B. Lee and I. Sohn, ISIJ Int., 55 (2015) 491–499.10.2355/isijinternational.55.491Search in Google Scholar

[4] J.X. Fu, C. Zhang and W.S. Hwang, Int. J. Greenh Gas Con., 8 (2012) 143–149.10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.012Search in Google Scholar

[5] J.X. Fu, G.H. Tang and R.J. Zhao, J. Iron Steel Res., 26 (2014) 275–281.10.1007/s42243-018-0142-zSearch in Google Scholar

[6] Y. Li and L. Zhu, Appl. Energ., 130 (2014) 603–616.10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.014Search in Google Scholar

[7] L.Z. Yang, R. Zhu and K. Dong, Adv. Mater. Res., 881–883 (2014) 1540–1544.10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.881-883.1540Search in Google Scholar

[8] K. Dong, W.J. Liu and R. Zhu, High Temp Mat. Pr-Isr., 34 (2015) 539–547.Search in Google Scholar

[9] L.Z. Yang, R. Zhu and G.H. Ma, High Temp Mat. Pr-Isr., 35 (2016) 195–200.10.1515/htmp-2014-0183Search in Google Scholar

[10] L.B. He, Ind. Furnace, 35 (2013) 16–17. Chinese.Search in Google Scholar

[11] S.G. Kotakar and R.R. Navthar, Appl. Mech. Mater., 110–116 (2012) 2049–2053.Search in Google Scholar

[12] B. Hileman, Chem. Eng. News, 81 (2003) 16.Search in Google Scholar

[13] J.J. Wang and L. Li, Adv. Mater. Res., 869–870 (2014) 636–839.Search in Google Scholar

[14] P. Singh, A. Kansal and C. Carliell-Marquet, J. Environ. Manage., 165 (2016) 22–30.10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.017Search in Google Scholar

[15] S. Marras, S. Masia and P. Duce, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 214 (2015) 350–356.10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.08.270Search in Google Scholar

[16] H.F. Wang, C.X. Zhang and C.Q. Hu, J. Iron Steel Res., 20 (2008) 1–4.10.1016/S1006-706X(08)60021-7Search in Google Scholar

[17] C.Q. Hu, C.X. Zhang and X.X. Zhang, J. Iron Steel Res., 19 (2007) 16–20.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Energetics, Inc. Steel industry-energy bandwidth study,(2004).10.2172/815045Search in Google Scholar

[19] A. Hasanbeigi, M. Arens and L. Price, Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev., 33 (2014) 645–658.10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.031Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-28
Accepted: 2016-5-6
Published Online: 2016-9-10
Published in Print: 2017-7-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Downloaded on 27.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/htmp-2015-0292/html
Scroll to top button