Abstract
The silicate-type and Eu3+-activated Sr3SiO5 and Mg3SiO5 were prepared through the high temperature solid state reaction method under an open atmosphere. DTA/TG analysis was conducted to obtain information about the thermal behaviors of the mixed reactants. Using the DTA/TG results, the sintering process was achieved and the phase properties were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The effects of the same activator (Eu3+) and co-dopant (Dy3+) on the photoluminescence (PL) properties of the host lattices were investigated by using a photoluminescence spectrometer.
Introduction
Photoluminescent materials have attracted much interest due to their possible applications in many different areas, such as emergency and general illumination in a dark environment, LEDs, display devices, optical storage, etc. [1]. Among the inorganic phosphor systems, silicate-based phosphors are known for being more chemically and thermally stable, and are less costly compared with sulfide or even aluminate-based phosphors. Until now, intense, different types of color emitting oxide phosphors have been commercially and scientifically researched which have better properties than other phosphor systems. Therefore, much research on phosphors with silicate type hosts has been conducted owing to the growing interest in silicate-based photoluminescent materials [2, 3]. Also, the family of phosphors activated with Eu2+ or Eu3+ rare-earth ions is commonly used as components for conventional lighting to obtain blue to red region emissions due to their high efficiencies and color purities [1]. Among the silicate systems, for example the SrO–SiO2 binary system, there are three transition compounds, namely SrSiO3, Sr2SiO4 and Sr3SiO5 [4]. In this research, the photoluminescent properties of the silicate-based Sr3-x-ySiO5: xEu3+, yDy3+, Mg3SiO5: xEu3+, yDy3+ and Sr3-x-y-zSiO5: xEu3+, yDy3+, zMg2+ (x: 0.50, y: 0.25 and z: 0. 1) phosphor systems, in particular were investigated by means of the high temperature solid state reaction method.
Material and methods
The silicate-based Sr1.25Eu0.5Dy0.25SiO5, Mg1.25Eu0.5Dy0.25SiO5 and Sr1.15Mg0.1Eu0.5Dy0.25SiO5 phosphor systems were synthesized via the high temperature ceramic method. The compositions were stoichiometrically calculated and appropriate amounts of the high purity starting reagents, namely 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O (A.R.), SrCO3 (99.9 %), SiO2 (99.9 %), Eu2O3 (99.99 %) and Dy2O3 (99.99 %), were thoroughly mixed and ground in a agate mortar to ensure fine and homogenous particle mixing. Subsequently, the heat treatments of the samples were done in pure alumina crucibles in a muffle furnace (Protherm PTF 16/50/450); they were then cooled down slowly to room temperature. The sintered samples were again ground to powder form prior to the characterizations.
Simultaneous differential thermal analysis (DTA) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis (Seiko Instruments Inc./Exstar TG/DTA 6200) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min from room temperature to 1,300 °C were performed to determine the decomposition and the oxidation process of the reactants. Then the pre-sintering (calcination) and sintering processes were applied according to the DTA/TG results, and a BRUKER AXS D8 ADVANCE model X-ray diffractometer, which was run at 40 kV and 30 mA (Cu-Kα radiation) in a step-scan mode (0.02°/2θ), was used to obtain the phases after sintering. Finally, the photoluminescent spectra which showed the excitations and emissions of the phosphors were analyzed by a spectrophotometer (Photon Technology International (PTI), QuantaMasterTM 30).
Results and discussion
Thermal analysis
The thermal behaviors of the phosphor systems, which were basically composed of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O and SrCO3, were obtained between 50 °C and 1,300 °C (Figures 1–3).
The DTA/TG/DTG analysis results of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+ are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 shows that there is a significant weight loss between 800 and 1,150 °C which is due to the decomposition of SrCO3 and removal of CO2 in the system. The decomposition of SrCO3 under heating can be given as follows:

DTA/TG/DTG curves of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+.
The endothermic peaks at 944 and 1,040 °C are attributed to an orthorhombic to rhombohedral transition and then the decomposition of SrCO3 to SrO [5]. The TG curve exhibits a mass loss equal to 25.0 %, which is almost similar to the calculated mass loss (~25.0 %).
Figure 2 shows that the decomposition and dehydration of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O and SrCO3 for the Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+ system are similar to the DTA/TG/DTG curves of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, as expected.

DTA/TG/DTG curves of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+.
The Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+ system has almost similar DTA/TG/DTG results. Thus, this system exhibits the decomposition of SrCO3 and also the decomposition of a small amount of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O as the MgO source in the system. The decomposition of SrCO3 under heating is given for the previous system.
Therefore, the endothermic peaks at 944 and 1,040 °C were attributed to an orthorhombic to rhombohedral transition followed by the decomposition of SrCO3 to SrO [5], and that of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O to MgO. The TG curve exhibits a mass loss equal to 25.3 %, which is almost similar to the calculated mass loss (~25.0 %).
Figure 3, which is shown below, shows the thermal analysis results of Mg3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+ phosphor which is mainly composed of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O.

DTA/TG/DTG curves of Mg3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+.
When subjected to thermal analysis, hydrated magnesium carbonates are decomposed by endothermic reactions and result in the departure of H2O and CO2 from the compound due to decomposition of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O to MgO. Much research has been conducted and it was found that the thermal decomposition of hydromagnesite proceeds via dehydration at 100–300 °C and decarbonation at 350–650 °C toward the end product, namely MgO [6]. Therefore, in our analysis, the weight losses starting from 150 to 600 °C are related to the decomposition of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O in the system (Figure 3). The decomposition of 4MgCO3·Mg(OH)2·5H2O under heating can be summarize as follows:
The first endothermic peak (at 267 °C) is attributed to the partition of the hydroxyl group from Mg(OH)2. The second endothermic peak to (at 450 °C) belongs the decomposition of MgCO3 to MgO. The TG curve exhibits a total mass loss equal to 47.2 %, which is similar to calculated mass loss (~48.8 %).
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis
The heat treatment temperatures of each phosphor system were determined according to thermal analysis results. The sintering processes of the phosphor systems were applied as a pre-sintering stage at 800 °C for 2 h followed by main sintering processes. The base sintering temperatures are described below:
After high temperature sintering processes, the XRD analysis was applied. Figure 4 shows the XRD pattern of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+.

The XRD patterns at different sintering temperatures of Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+.
While the XRD patterns of the Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ phosphors for different sintering temperatures were achieved according to the DTA/TG/DTG results, several reactions occurred simultaneously, including the grain growth of SrO and SiO2, the diffusion of Si4+ into the SrO lattice, and a phase formation reaction of Sr2SiO4-Sr3SiO5 [7]. Therefore, the crystallinity and base phase of the Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ powders improved and were well indexed with increasing sintering temperature. The Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ powders sintered at 1,470 °C for 12 h exhibited improved crystallinity compared to powders sintered at 1,300 °C for 6 h, as proved by the relatively high and sharp peaks in the XRD pattern. The phosphor sample XRD results proved that the expected crystal system could be indexed by increasing sintering temperature. Therefore the XRD pattern of Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ matched well with the PDF 00-026-0984 Sr3SiO5 card [8] owing to at sintering conditions 1,470 °C for 12 h. Almost all the peaks showed a single phase except that β-Sr2SiO4 secondary phases were observed despite the higher sintering temperature and holding time at that temperature. The sample crystallized in the tetragonal structure, the lattice parameters of which were a=6.9476 Å b=6.9476 Å, c=10.753 Å, (alpha) α=90°, (beta) β=90° and (gamma) γ=90°.
The XRD patterns of the Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+ powders (Figure 5) were observed to be similar to Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, as expected. The obtained products were mainly composed of Sr3SiO5 in the 1,460 °C sintered sample except that some β-Sr2SiO4 phase existed in the system. Furthermore the result clearly suggests that trace amounts of Eu3+, Dy3+ or Mg2+ were incorporated into the lattice and caused no change in the lattice structure, as can be seen by the unchanged diffraction patterns. At lower sintering conditions, for example 1,300 °C for 6 h, β-Sr2SiO4 presented as the major phase, but this situation was changed by the higher temperatures and holding times, then the β-Sr2SiO4 phase was minor and the expected phase was Sr3SiO5. To obtain a pure Sr3SiO5 structure, it is necessary to increase the sintering temperature and holding time. The XRD pattern of Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+ matched well with the PDF 00-026-0984 Sr3SiO5 card [8] at sintering conditions of 1,460 °C for 12 h. The sample crystallized in the tetragonal structure similar to Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+, the lattice parameters of which were a=6.9476 Å, b=6.9476 Å, c=10.753 Å, (alpha) α=90°, (beta) β=90° and (gamma) γ=90°.

The XRD patterns at different sintering temperatures of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+.
The XRD pattern of the Mg3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ phosphor that was sintered at different temperatures to obtain a pure structure is shown in Figure 6.

The XRD patterns at different sintering temperatures of Mg3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+.
It was determined that the base phase is Mg2SiO4; also the major first two phases of the peaks indicate those of MgO although the sintering temperature was repeated and increased as 1,250 °C. Despite the fact that a higher thermal treatment was applied for this type of phosphor according to DTA/TG results, the expected crystal system could not be indexed in XRD analysis except for Mg2SiO4 and MgO. Also, it is well known that the formation of the Mg3SiO5 phase occurs at very high temperatures, namely above 1,850 °C, according to the MgO-SiO2 phase diagram [9].
Photoluminescence properties
All of the photoluminescence studies gave effective results with excitation and emission spectra. Although not all of the objective phosphor systems could be synthesized as pure structures, they still have fascinating PL properties. Therefore, the impressive excitation and emission bands are thanks to activated Eu3+, rare-earth ion.
Figure 7 shows the PL spectra of the Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ phosphor system upon excitation at 311 nm in the UV region and the obtained sharp emission with a maximum at 618 nm in the red region.

The PL spectra of Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+ system phosphor.
It appeared that the PL result of this system indicates maximum emission bands at 617 nm, 579 nm and 698 nm which are attributed to 5D0 → 7F2, 5D0 → 7F1 [10, 11, 12] and 5D0 → 7F4 [12, 13] transitions of the Eu3+ ion, respectively. Furthermore, the sharp excitation peaks generally between 250 nm and 500 nm are associated with typical intra-4f transitions of the Eu3+ ion. The minör excitation bands at 396 and 465 nm are attributed to 7F0 → 5L6 [12, 14, 15, 16] and 7F0 → 5D2 [12, 15, 16, 17] transitions of the Eu3+ ion, respectively.
The PL spectra of the Sr3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+ phosphor powders are shown in Figure 8. The sample was excited at 287 nm in the UV region and presented maximum emission at 586 nm in the yellow-red region.

The PL spectra of Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+, Mg2+ system phosphor.
It appears that the PL result of this system indicates maximum emission bands at 586 nm, 613 nm and 701 nm, correlatively with the Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ phosphor, which are attributed to the 5D0 → 7F1, 5D0 → 7F2 [10, 11, 12], and 5D0 → 7F4 [12, 13] transitions of the Eu3+ ion, respectively. Moreover, the sharp excitation peak at 287 nm and very little peaks at 394 nm and 463 nm are associated with typical intra-4f, 7F0 → 5L6 [12, 14, 15, 16] and 7F0 → 5D2 [12, 15, 16, 17] transitions of the Eu3+ ion, respectively. Recently, Jee et al. reported that the incorporation of Mg2+ into SrSi2O2Ni2:Eu2+ improves the luminescence intensity and thermal quenching [18]. Therefore, in this study, the aim was to achieve more intense luminescence properties with the Sr3SiO5:Eu3+, Dy3+ phosphor. By combining the effects of replacing Sr2+ with Mg2+, significant enhancement of emission intensity was obtained while the spectral distribution of the emission was maintained, as can be seen from Figures 7 and 8. In Figure 8, the remarkable almost 75 % improvement in emission intensity is highlighted, with an excitation maximum in the range of 500 nm to 750 nm, which is quite attractive for different types of phosphor applications.
The last PL analysis results of Mg3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+ are also similar to the two previous studies, because the same activator, namely Eu3+, was used (Figure 9).

The PL spectra of Mg3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+ system phosphor.
All excitation (between 250–500 nm) and emission bands (between 550–750 nm) are almost the same as the previous two Eu3+-doped and Dy3+ co-doped systems. So the transitions of Eu3+ ion appeared.
The important and prominent point here is that, apart from having the same PL results, these the intensities change according to the hosts. The Mg3SiO5: Eu3+, Dy3+ system phosphor has the most intense PL results among them.
Conclusions
Three silicate-type phosphors, namely Sr1.25Eu0.5Dy0.25SiO5, Mg1.25Eu0.5Dy0.25SiO5 and Sr1.15Mg0.1Eu0.5Dy0.25SiO5, were prepared by the high temperature solid-state reaction method under an open atmosphere. The Sr3SiO5 structure is rather difficult to achieve when applying higher sintering temperatures. However, its formation could be seen by increasing temperature via the XRD results. Also, the Mg3SiO5 phase could not be formed because it needs temperatures of more than 1,800 °C based on the MgO-SiO2 phase diagram. Briefly, photoluminescence analysis exhibited that all of the different activated hosts exhibit emissions due to Eu3+ emission center. Therefore, Eu3+-doped hosts generally created red emissions because of their f-f transitions. Additionally, the two phosphor systems with the same hosts have different PL intensities due to Mg2+ ions occurring in one of them. Finally, it was proved that the activator ions PL properties in the phosphor systems are independent of the phase forming process except for possible different PL intensities.
Funding statement: The authors would like thank to Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University’s, Scientific Research Projects Commission (BAP), 06-YL-14 project number in the, Republic of Turkey for their financial support.
References
[1] E. Öztürk and E. Karacaoglu, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 120 (2015) 1139–1143.10.1007/s10973-015-4439-xSearch in Google Scholar
[2] C. Guang, L. Quansheng, C. Liqun, L. Liping, S. Haiying, W. Yiqing, B. Zhaohui, Z. Xiyan and Q. Guanming, J. Rare Earths, 28 (2010) 526–528.10.1016/S1002-0721(09)60146-0Search in Google Scholar
[3] Z. Xin, X. Xu-Hui, Q. Jian-Bei and Y. Xue, Chin. Phys. B, 22 (2013) 097801–1–5.10.1088/1674-1056/22/9/097801Search in Google Scholar
[4] W. Hsu, M. Sheng and M. Tsai, J. Alloys Compd., 467 (2009) 491–495.10.1016/j.jallcom.2007.12.014Search in Google Scholar
[5] A. Nag and T. R. Narayanan Kutty, J. Mater. Chem., 13 (2003) 370–376.10.1039/b207756fSearch in Google Scholar
[6] C. Unluer and A. Al-Tabbaa, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 115 (2014) 595–607.10.1007/s10973-013-3300-3Search in Google Scholar
[7] H. Kyoung Yang, H. Mi Noh, B. Kee Moon, J. Hyun Jeong and S. Soo Yi, Ceramics Int. 40 (2014) 12503–12508.10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.04.105Search in Google Scholar
[8] W. Xiaochun, Z. Xiyan, W. Chen, Q. Weida and S. Jiaxun, J. Rare Earths, 31 (2013) 456–460.10.1016/S1002-0721(12)60303-2Search in Google Scholar
[9] S. Schlemmer, T. Giesen and H. Mutschke, Laboratory Astrochemistry: From Molecules Through Nanoparticles to Grains, John Wiley & Sons (2015), p. 461.10.1002/9783527653133Search in Google Scholar
[10] J. Kaur, Y. Parganiha and V. Dubey, Phys. Res. Int., (2013) 2–5.10.1155/2013/494807Search in Google Scholar
[11] S. Georgescu, M. Popescu, F. Sava, A. Velea and G. Pavelescu, Chalcogenide Lett., 8 (2011) 737– 738.Search in Google Scholar
[12] Q. Yanmin, Z. Xinbo, Y. Xiao, C. Yan and G. Hai, J. Rare Earths, 27 (2009) 323–326.10.1016/S1002-0721(08)60243-4Search in Google Scholar
[13] S. Das, A. Amarnath Reddy, S. Ahmad, R. Nagarajan and G.Vijaya Prakash, Chem. Phys. Lett., 508 (2011) 117–120.10.1016/j.cplett.2011.04.029Search in Google Scholar
[14] Z. Zhang, Y. Wang, H. Wang, Z. Sun and L. Jia, J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 152 (2009) 012050.10.1088/1742-6596/152/1/012050Search in Google Scholar
[15] Y. Li, Y. Chang, Y. Lin, Y.Chang and Y. Lin, J. Alloys Compd., 439 (2007) 367–375.10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.08.269Search in Google Scholar
[16] R. Luciana, P. Kassab, R. Almeida, D.M. da Silva, T.A.A. de Assumpção and C.B. de Araújo, J. Appl. Phys., 105 (2009) 103505.10.1063/1.3126489Search in Google Scholar
[17] S. Ram, O.P., Lamba and H.D. Bist, Pramana, 23 (1984) 1.10.1007/BF02846436Search in Google Scholar
[18] S. Lee, K. Kim, J. Kim, Y. Jeong and J. Kang, Phys. Status Solidi (A) Appl. Mater., 210 (2013) 1093–1097.10.1002/pssa.201228773Search in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Estimation for Iron Redox Equilibria in Multicomponent Slags
- The Effect of Multi-inclined Holes on the Creep Properties of Nickel-Based Superalloy
- Estimation of Various Properties of CaO–“FeO”–SiO2 System at 1,673 K by Mass Triangle Model
- The Enhancing Effect of Microwave Irradiation and Ultrasonic Wave on the Recovery of Zinc Sulfide Ores
- The Self-assembled Deposition on the Surface of Mono-crystalline Silicon Induced by High-Current Pulsed Electron Beam
- Numerical Model of Dephosphorization Reaction Kinetics in Top Blown Converter Coupled with Flow Field
- Morphological Evolution of Low-Grade Silica Fume at Elevated Temperature
- Discussion of Carbon Emissions for Charging Hot Metal in EAF Steelmaking Process
- Predictive Models for Modulus of Rupture and Modulus of Elasticity of Particleboard Manufactured in Different Pressing Conditions
- Photoluminescence Properties of Eu3+-activated Silicate Phosphors
- Synthesis, Acidity and Catalytic of the Rare Earth Ce Loaded on the Composite Pore Zeolite Catalyst for Hydrogenation Cracking
Articles in the same Issue
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Estimation for Iron Redox Equilibria in Multicomponent Slags
- The Effect of Multi-inclined Holes on the Creep Properties of Nickel-Based Superalloy
- Estimation of Various Properties of CaO–“FeO”–SiO2 System at 1,673 K by Mass Triangle Model
- The Enhancing Effect of Microwave Irradiation and Ultrasonic Wave on the Recovery of Zinc Sulfide Ores
- The Self-assembled Deposition on the Surface of Mono-crystalline Silicon Induced by High-Current Pulsed Electron Beam
- Numerical Model of Dephosphorization Reaction Kinetics in Top Blown Converter Coupled with Flow Field
- Morphological Evolution of Low-Grade Silica Fume at Elevated Temperature
- Discussion of Carbon Emissions for Charging Hot Metal in EAF Steelmaking Process
- Predictive Models for Modulus of Rupture and Modulus of Elasticity of Particleboard Manufactured in Different Pressing Conditions
- Photoluminescence Properties of Eu3+-activated Silicate Phosphors
- Synthesis, Acidity and Catalytic of the Rare Earth Ce Loaded on the Composite Pore Zeolite Catalyst for Hydrogenation Cracking