Outlook for modified wood use and regulations in circular economy

References

Augustsson, A., Sörme, L., Karlsson, A., Amneklev, J. (2017) Persistent hazardous waste and the quest toward a circular economy: the example of arsenic in chromated copper arsenate-treated wood. J. Ind. Ecol. 21:689–699.10.1111/jiec.12516Suche in Google Scholar

Chamberlin, L., Boks, C. (2018) Marketing approaches for a circular economy: using design frameworks to interpret online communications. Sustainability 10:1–27.10.3390/su10062070Suche in Google Scholar

Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste (Waste Framework Directive). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/. Accessed February 26, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2018/851 of the European Parliament and of the Council, 30 May 2018, amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.L_.2018.150.01.0109.01.ENG&toc=OJ:L:2018:150:TOC. Accessed February 18, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Domenech, T., Bahn-Walkowiak, B. (2019) Transition towards a resource efficient circular economy in Europe: policy lessons from the EU and the member states. Ecol. Econ. 155:7–19.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.11.001Suche in Google Scholar

Domenech, T., Bleischwitz, R., Doranova, A., Panayotopoulos, D., Roman, L. (2019) Mapping Industrial Symbiosis Development in Europe: typologies of networks, characteristics, performance and contribution to the Circular Economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 141:76–98.10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.016Suche in Google Scholar

EC. (2015) Closing the loop – an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy, European Commission, Communication COM (2015) 614/2. Available at: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-6203_en.htm. Accessed January 9, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Esposito, M., Tse, T., Soufani, K. (2017) Is the circular economy a new fast-expanding market? Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 59:9–14.10.1002/tie.21764Suche in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2015) Closing the loop – an EU action plan for the circular economy. COM/2015/0614 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614. Accessed February 18, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

European Commission. (2018) Construction and demolition waste. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/construction_demolition.htm. Accessed February 18, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2018a) Municipal waste statistics. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Municipal_waste_statistics. Accessed January 9, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Eurostat. (2018b) Waste statistics. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/environment/waste. Accessed January 9, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S.N., de Carvalho, M.M., Evans, S. (2018) Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. J. Cleaner Prod. 190:712–721.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159Suche in Google Scholar

Genovese, A., Acquaye, A.A., Figueroa, A., Koh, S.L. (2017) Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: evidence and some applications. Omega 66:344–357.10.1016/j.omega.2015.05.015Suche in Google Scholar

Heräjärvi, H., Pirhonen, I., Räty, T., Saukkola, P. (2010a) Increased sustainability for wood construction by recycling. In: Forests for the Future: Sustaining Society and the Environment. XXIII IUFRO World Congress. Eds. Parrotta, J.A., Carr, M.A. Int. Forest. Rev. 12:10.Suche in Google Scholar

Heräjärvi, H., Pirhonen, I., Saukkola, P. (2010b) Recycling of modified wood products. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Wood Modification ECWM5. Eds. Hill, C.A.S., Militz, H., Andersons, B. September 20–21, 2010. Latvian State University of Wood Chemistry, Riga, Latvia. pp. 285–290.Suche in Google Scholar

Hetemäki, L., Hurmekoski, E. (2016) Forest products markets under change: review and research implications. Curr. Forest. Rep. 2:177–188.10.1007/s40725-016-0042-zSuche in Google Scholar

Hill, C.A.S. (2006) Wood modification – chemical, thermal and other processes. Wiley Series in Renewable Resources, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.10.1002/0470021748Suche in Google Scholar

Hill, C.A.S. (2011) Wood modification: an update. BioResources 6:918–919.10.15376/biores.6.2.918-919Suche in Google Scholar

Husgafvel, R., Linkosalmi, L., Hughes, M., Kanerva, J., Dahl, O. (2018) Forest sector circular economy development in Finland: a regional study on sustainability driven competitive advantage and an assessment of the potential for cascading recovered solid wood. J. Cleaner Prod. 181:483–497.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.176Suche in Google Scholar

Jarre, M., Petit-Boix, A., Priefer, C., Meyer, R., Leipold, S. (2019) Transforming the bio-based sector towards a circular economy – what can we learn from wood cascading? Forest Policy Econ. 101872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.017Suche in Google Scholar

Jonsson, O., Lindberg, S., Roos, A., Hugosson, M., Lindström, M. (2008) Consumer perceptions and preferences on solid wood, wood-based panels, and composites: a repertory grid study. Wood Fiber Sci. 40:663–678.Suche in Google Scholar

Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R., Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J., Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., Hekkert, M. (2018) Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecol. Econ. 150:264–272.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028Suche in Google Scholar

Kiseleva, V., Möttönen, V., Heräjärvi, H., Riala, M., Toppinen, A. (2017) Production and markets of modified wood in Russia. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 12:72–81.10.1080/17480272.2015.1024736Suche in Google Scholar

Klaiman, K., Ortega, D.L., Garnache, C. (2016) Consumer preferences and demand for packaging material and recyclability. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 115:1–8.10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.08.021Suche in Google Scholar

Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., Seppälä, J. (2018) Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol. Econ. 143:37–46.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041Suche in Google Scholar

Kubba, S. (2009) LEED Practices, Certification, and Accreditation Handbook. Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington.Suche in Google Scholar

Kunttu, J., Hurmekoski, E., Heräjärvi, H., Hujala, T., Leskinen, P. (2019) Preferable utilisation patterns of wood product industries’ by-products in Finland. Forest Policy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101946.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.101946Suche in Google Scholar

Lazarevic, D., Kautto, P., Antikainen, R. (2019) Finland’s wood-frame multi-storey construction innovation system: analysing motors of creative destruction. Forest Policy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.006Suche in Google Scholar

Leskinen, P., Cardellini, G., González-García, S., Hurmekoski, E., Sathre, R., Seppälä, J., Smyth, C., Stern, T., Verkerk, J.P. (2018) Substitution effects of wood-based products in climate change mitigation. From Science to Policy 7. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland.10.36333/fs07Suche in Google Scholar

Lewandowski, M. (2016) Designing the business models for circular economy – towards the conceptual framework. Sustainability 8:1–28.10.3390/su8010043Suche in Google Scholar

Marques, R.C., Da Cruz, N.F. (2016) Recycling and extended producer responsibility: the European experience. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London.10.4324/9781315604121Suche in Google Scholar

Möttönen, V., Boren, H., Heräjärvi, H. (2018) Puun ominaisuuksien modifiointi, Menetelmät ja tutkimuksen tila [Wood Modification: Methods and State of Research]. Luonnonvara- ja biotalouden tutkimus 11/2018. Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki. (In Finnish)Suche in Google Scholar

Näyhä, A. (2019) Finnish forest-based companies in transition to the circular bioeconomy – drivers, organizational resources and innovations. Forest Policy Econ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.022.10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.022Suche in Google Scholar

Oliveux, G., Dandy, L.O., Leeke, G.A. (2015) Current status of recycling of fibre reinforced polymers: review of technologies, reuse and resulting properties. Prog. Mater. Sci. 72:61–99.10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.01.004Suche in Google Scholar

Petchwattana, N., Covavisaruch, S., Sanetuntikul, J. (2012) Recycling of wood-plastic composites prepared from poly(vinyl chloride) and wood flour. Constr. Build. Mater. 28:557–560.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.024Suche in Google Scholar

Richter, J.L., Koppejan, R. (2016) Extended producer responsibility for lamps in Nordic countries: best practices and challenges in closing material loops. J. Cleaner Prod. 123:167–179.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.131Suche in Google Scholar

Rüter, S., Werner, F., Forsell, N., Prins, C., Vial, E., Levet, A.L. (2016) ClimWood2030 – climate benefits of material substitution by forest biomass and harvested wood products: perspective 2030. Final report (No. 42). Thünen Report.Suche in Google Scholar

Sandberg, D., Kutnar, A. (2016) Thermally modified timber: recent developments in Europe and North America. Wood Fiber Sci. 48:28–39.Suche in Google Scholar

Sandberg, D., Kutnar, A., Mantanis, G. (2017) Wood modification technologies – a review. iForest Biogeosci. Forest. 10:895–908.10.3832/ifor2380-010Suche in Google Scholar

Scheel, C. (2016) Beyond sustainability. Transforming industrial zero-valued residues into increasing economic returns. J. Cleaner Prod. 131:376–386.10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.018Suche in Google Scholar

Sitra. (2016) Leading the cycle. Finnish road map to a circular economy 2016–2025, Sitra studies 121.2016.Suche in Google Scholar

Sommerhuber, P.F., Welling, J., Krause, A. (2015) Substitution potentials of recycled HDPE and wood particles from post-consumer packaging waste in Wood-Plastic Composites. Waste Manag. 46:76–85.10.1016/j.wasman.2015.09.011Suche in Google Scholar PubMed

Van Ewijk, S., Stegemann, J.A. (2016) Limitations of the waste hierarchy for achieving absolute reductions in material throughput. J. Cleaner Prod. 132:122–128.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.051Suche in Google Scholar

Varho, V., Rautiainen, A., Peltonen, M., Niemi, J., Ovaska, U. (2018) Biopaths to Carbon Neutrality. Publications of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry 2018: 3, Helsinki, Finland. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-453-977-7.Suche in Google Scholar

Veleva, V., Bodkin, G. (2018) Corporate-entrepreneur collaborations to advance a circular economy. J. Cleaner Prod. 188:20–37.10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.196Suche in Google Scholar

Watkins, E., Gionfra, S., Schweitzer, J.-P., Pantzar, M., Janssens, C., ten Brink, P. (2017) EPR in the EU Plastics Strategy and the Circular Economy: a focus on plastic packaging. Institute for European Environmental Policy. https://ieep.eu/uploads/articles/attachments/9665f5ea-4f6d-43d4-8193-454e1ce8ddfe/EPR%20and%20plastics%20report%20IEEP%2019%20Dec%202017%20final%20rev.pdf?v=63680919827. Accessed February 18, 2019.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilts, H., O’Brien, M. (2019) A policy mix for resource efficiency in the EU: key instruments, challenges and research needs. Ecol. Econ. 155:59–69.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.05.004Suche in Google Scholar

Witjes, S., Lozano, R. (2016) Towards a more Circular Economy: proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 112:37–44.10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.015Suche in Google Scholar

Yu, C.W.F., Kim, J.T. (2012) Long-term impact of formaldehyde and VOC emissions from wood-based products on indoor environments; and issues with recycled products. Indoor Built Environ. 21:137–149.10.1177/1420326X11424330Suche in Google Scholar