Home A new green approach to Fenton’s chemistry using tea dregs and coffee grounds as raw material
Article Open Access

A new green approach to Fenton’s chemistry using tea dregs and coffee grounds as raw material

  • Claudio Kendi Morikawa

    Claudio Kendi Morikawa completed his graduate study at University of São Paulo State-UNESP Ilha Solteira Campus, Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil, and in 1993, he completed his Master of Science study at Federal University of Lavras, Brazil. In 2003, he received his PhD in Environmental Bioremediation at the Tohoku University, Japan. From 2005 to 2007, he did his postdoctoral research at University of Tokyo, Japan. His research interests are in the fields of catalysis, human nutrition, plant protection and soil science and plant nutrition. He has more than 20 scientific and professional publications and five patents, and more than 20 oral and poster presentations at international conferences presenting his scientific work. Since 2008, he has been a researcher at the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, National Institute of Tea and Vegetable Science, Japan.

    EMAIL logo
Published/Copyright: March 22, 2014
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Fenton’s chemistry has long been useful in industry because of the power of hydrogen peroxide (HP), in the presence of ferrous iron (Fe2+), to produce a highly reactive free radical species capable of oxidizing aqueous materials. However, its application has been limited due to the rapid oxidation of ferrous iron. The rapid oxidation of ferrous iron limits the production of free radicals necessary for a powerful reaction. We developed two ‘green’ iron catalysts using used tea leaves (tea dregs) or coffee grounds as raw material. The new ‘green’ iron catalysts contained iron in a reductive stable status for a Fenton catalyst. The study showed that the developed ‘green’ iron catalysts can be used as iron fertilizer and for the Fenton’s reaction on the degradation of methylene blue (MB), and in the disinfection of Escherichia coli. The tea and coffee polyphenols were estimated to be responsible for the reductive stable state of the iron in the developed catalysts, due to their reducing power and chelating iron ability. The developed new ‘green’ iron catalysts are expected to diffuse in wide fields such as food, medicine, public health, agriculture, the environment, etc.

1 Introduction

Coffee and tea are the mostly consumed beverages in the world, and the coffee grounds and tea dregs which are waste materials thereof, are daily produced in large amounts throughout the world. The world production of coffee green beans and tea was estimated to be 7.42×109 and 3.52×109 kg, respectively [1]. During the entire coffee processing chain, several residues are obtained. These residues can be divided into two categories: those generated in the producing countries, representing >50% of the coffee fruit mass, and those produced in the consuming countries after beverage preparation. Finding a use for these residues should be desirable. More sustainable uses for coffee and tea residues are increasingly important. Over the past years, several strategies have been tentatively applied, particularly in the producing countries where the direct discarding of these residues has been the cause of numerous environmental problems over decades. In particular, efforts are being made to implement adequate disposal approaches and potential reuses, including horticultural, animal feed, biodiesel, fuel pellets, or activated carbons [2–5]. In an in vitro experiment, a ‘green’ one-step approach has been developed for the synthesis of nanoscale zero-valent iron particles at room temperature [6]. In some of our previous works [7, 8] we showed that coffee and tea residues enriched with ferrous sulfate and zinc sulfate are effective in increasing iron and zinc in edible parts of leaf radish and rice. However, actually, the spent coffee and tea materials are used only in composts, deodorants and the like and a new recycle method for these materials is necessary.

In this work, we tried to use ferric iron (Fe3+) and coffee grounds or tea dregs as raw materials to develop a new ‘green’ iron catalyst material and to test it as iron fertilizer and as a catalyst on the Fenton’s reaction for degradation of methylene blue (MB), and disinfection of Escherichia coli (E. coli).

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

2.1.1 Chemicals

All chemicals used in this study were prepared using de-ionized water from a Millipore system with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm-1. Ferric chloride anhydrous and E. coli ATCC 11229 was purchased from Kanto Chemical (Tokyo, Japan). Ferrous chloride tetrahydrate, 2,2′bipyridyl, iron(III) ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (FeEDTA), 35% hydrogen peroxide (HP), ammonia solution [25% (w/w)] 2,2-Bipyridyl and NaCl were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Tokyo, Japan). Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid was purchased from Tokyo Kasei (Tokyo, Japan). MB was purchased from Merk KGaA (Japan). Bacto-Tryptone, Bacto-Yeast Extract, and Bacto Agar were purchased from Becton Dickinson (Le Pont de Claix, France).

2.1.2 Wastes

Tea dregs and coffee grounds were collected from a tea and coffee beverage industry.

2.2 Methods

2.2.1 Synthesis of ‘green’ iron catalysts

Figure 1 shows the production processes of the catalysts. Used tea leaves or coffee grounds (88 g) were mixed with 12 g of ferric chloride anhydrous (FeIIICl3) and 300 ml of water. The mixture was heated at 98°C for 24 h and dried at room temperature. Then, it was ground before use. The Fe catalysts developed from used tea leaves were named TEA-Fe and those developed from coffee grounds were named CAF-Fe.

Figure 1 Photographic image of the reagents: (A) ferric chloride anhydrous solution (FeIIICl3) with (B) tea dregs or coffee grounds and (C)  the product of the reaction. The detection of reduced Fe was made by adding 2,2′bipyridyl to the C solution. The red color indicates the  presence of ferrous iron.
Figure 1

Photographic image of the reagents: (A) ferric chloride anhydrous solution (FeIIICl3) with (B) tea dregs or coffee grounds and (C) the product of the reaction. The detection of reduced Fe was made by adding 2,2′bipyridyl to the C solution. The red color indicates the presence of ferrous iron.

2.2.2 Chemical characterization of iron catalysts

The chemical composition of used tea leaves and coffee grounds are described by Morikawa and Saigusa [7]. The surface morphology of the Fe catalysts was characterized by a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi s4800, Tokyo, Japan) and the chemical state of iron on both materials was measured by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific K-Alpha, MA, USA). The amount of Fe2+ and Fe3+ in the Fe catalysts was measured by a colorimetric method using 2,2′-dipyridil [9] by a spectrophotometer at 525 nm. The total Fe in plant tissues and other samples was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (Thermo Fisher Scientific iCAP, Tokyo, Japan). The total amount of hydroxyl radicals generated during 60 s of reaction was measured by chemiluminescence (ATTO Octa AB-2270, Tokyo, Japan) [10].

2.2.3 Treatment protocols

2.2.3.1 Test the ‘green’ iron catalysts as iron fertilizer

A pot experiment was conducted in a greenhouse to evaluate the ‘green’ iron catalysts as fertilizer using a horizon C of Andosol (ammonium bicarbonate – DTPA extractable Fe of 12.6 mg kg-1) with soil pH adjusted to 6.5 and an alkaline soil (ammonium bicarbonate – DTPA extractable Fe of 12.6 mg kg-1) with original pH of 9.2. Pack-choi (Brassica rapa var. chinensis) was chosen as the test plant due to the high ascorbic acid content that enhances the absorption of iron by humans. Increased amounts of the new ‘green’ iron catalysts TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe of 0 (control), 0.25 and 0.5 g kg-1 air dried soil were applied. The treatments were named as follows: no application or control (CNT), 0.25 g kg-1 dry soil of TEA-Fe (TEA-Fe 1) or CAF-Fe (CAF-Fe 1) and 0.5 g kg-1 dry soil of TEA-Fe (TEA-Fe 2) or CAF-Fe (CAF-Fe 2). For all treatments, NPK was applied at the rate of 0.5, 0.5 and 0.5 g plant-1. Plants were harvested after 60 days of growth.

2.3.3.2 Degradation of MB

Ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeII), Ferric chloride anhydrous (FeIII), FeEDTA, ‘green’ iron catalyst developed using tea dregs (TEA-Fe) and ‘green’ iron catalyst developed using coffee grounds (CAF-Fe) were tested for the Fenton’s reaction. The pH of the MB:H2O2 solution was 4.5. All of the experiments were carried out at 25°C. The treatments described in Table 1 were performed in triplicate.

Table 1

Volume of each reagent used in the degradation treatments.

Treatments1 name0.017 mm Methylene blue (MB)(A)100 mm Hydrogen peroxyde (HP)(B)Deionized water(C)1 mm Fe solutionTotal volume
Ferrous chloride tetrahydrate(D)Ferric chloride anhydrous(E)FeEDTA(F)|CAF-Fe|(G)TEA-Fe(H)
ml
HP801010100
FeII+HP8O1010100
FeIII+HP801010100
Fe-EDTA+HP801010100
CAF-Fe3+HP801010100
TEA-Fe4+HP801010100
CAF-Fe8021010100
TEA-Fe801010100

1The order of addition of the reagents was of A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H to the microplate wells.

2The symbol ‘–’ means no addition of the respective reagent.

3CAF-Fe: ‘green’ Fe catalysts developed using coffee grounds.

4TEA-Fe: ‘green’ Fe catalysts developed using tea dregs.

Stock solutions of TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe were prepared dissolving 2.8 g of each catalyst in 1 l of deionized water and filtering in a 5A filter. The obtained solution contained 1 mmol l-1 Fe as TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe catalysts. Stock solutions containing 1 mmol l-1 Fe as ferrous chloride tetrahydrate, ferric chloride anhydrous and FeEDTA were prepared for the experiment. Eighty microliters of a 0.017 mmol l-1 MB solution were added to a microplate of 96 wells. Then, 10 μl of 0.1 mmol l-1 H2O2 and 10 μl of each Fe catalyst material were sequentially added to the solution, giving a final concentration of 10 mmol l-1 H2O2, 0.1 mmol/l Fe and 0.014 mmol l-1 MB. The absorbance of MB was determined spectrophotometrically (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Multiskan FC, Tokyo, Japan) at 650 nm. The measurements were made every 2 min of reaction, during a total of 30 min. The samples were mixed 5 s prior to the absorbance measurements.

2.4.3.3 Disinfection of E. coli

Pure E. coli ATCC11229 isolates were incubated in LB Broth Miller medium for 48 h at 37°C in a shaker table. A mixed cell culture was collected in order to determine the initial cell concentration and dilutions of 10-4 to 10-6 were spread in LB agar Broth medium-containing Petri dishes. Then, all plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C and the colony forming units (CFU) per milliliter were counted. The LB Broth Miller medium was prepared adding the following to 800 ml deionized water: 10 g Bacto-tryptone, 5 g Bacto-yeast extract and 10 g NaCl. Then, the pH was adjusted to 7.5 with NaOH, the volume adjusted to 1 l with deionized water and sterilization by autoclaving at 120°C for 20 min was performed. The LB agar Broth medium was prepared adding agar to the LB Broth Miller medium before the autoclaving step. About 10 ml of LB agar was spread on the Petri dishes for bacteria incubation.

The disinfectant experiment was performed in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes, using the ‘green’ iron catalysts developed from tea dregs and coffee grounds. The E. coli ATCC11229 disinfection capacity of HP with TEA-Fe or CAF-Fe was compared to that of HP alone. Table 2 shows the treatments. After 10 min of contact time, 100 μl of 10-1, 10-2 and 10-3 dilutions were inoculated into E. coli 3 M Petrifilms, incubated at 42°C for 48 h and then counted.

Table 2

Volume of each reagent used in the disinfection treatments.

Treatments1108E. coli solution(A)100 mm Hydrogen peroxide (HP)(B)Deionized water(C)10 mm Fe solutionTotal volume
CAF-Fe(D)TEA-Fe(E)
μl
Control1029901000
HP101008901000
CAF-Fe3+HP101007901001000
TEA-Fe4+HP101007901001000

1The order of addition of the reagents was of A+B+C+D+E.

2The symbol ‘–’ means no addition of the respective reagent.

3CAF-Fe: ‘green’ Fe catalysts developed using coffee grounds.

4TEA-Fe: ‘green’ Fe catalysts developed using tea dregs.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Data were subjected to analysis of variance, and treatment means were compared by the least significant difference test at p≤0.05 (LSD0.05) [11].

3 Results

3.1 Chemical characterization of iron catalysts

Figure 2 shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) TEA-Fe and (b) CAF-Fe catalysts, and Figures 3 and 4 show the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey on the Fe2p3/2 and O1s regions. SEM images of the surface of both catalysts showed that they are composed of particles of variable sizes and shapes. For the Fe2p3/2 spectrum, the binding energy of the main peak was located at aproximately 711 eV and 725 eV, which are attributable to the ferric (Fe3+) and ferrous (Fe2+) iron. The absence of peak at approximately 707 eV suggests that both materials do not contain zero-valent iron. The photoelectron peak of O1s in Figure 4 can be decomposed into three separate peaks at 533 eV, 532 eV and 530 eV, representing the binding energies of oxygen in O-C, C=O and metal oxides chemically or physically adsorbed.

Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of ‘green’ (A) TEA-Fe and (B) CAF-Fe catalysts.
Figure 2

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of ‘green’ (A) TEA-Fe and (B) CAF-Fe catalysts.

Figure 3 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey on Fe 2p3/2 of ‘green’ (A) TEA-Fe and (B) CAF-Fe catalysts.
Figure 3

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey on Fe 2p3/2 of ‘green’ (A) TEA-Fe and (B) CAF-Fe catalysts.

Figure 4 X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey on O1s regions of ‘green’ (A) TEA-Fe and (B) CAF-Fe catalysts.
Figure 4

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey on O1s regions of ‘green’ (A) TEA-Fe and (B) CAF-Fe catalysts.

The major components on the surface of both materials were C and O. Some minor Fe, Cl, N and P were also detected. There was some Si signal on the CAF-Fe catalyst. There was some Mg signal on the TEA-Fe catalyst. The chemical state of iron in both ‘green’ iron catalysts includes ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) only, and Fe0 (zero-valent iron) was not found. From these results, we can conclude that the obtained results were not due to the presence of Fe0 in the materials.

Figure 5 shows the total amount of radicals generated during 60 s of reaction. The formation of hydroxyl radicals by Fe2+ and H2O2 is responsible for the luminol chemiluminescence [12]. Thus, the present study showed that the generation of hydroxyl radicals by both ‘green’ iron catalysts was higher than for the tested Fe salts (ferrous chloride tetrahydrate and ferric chloride anhydrous). The total amount of hydroxyl radicals {‧OH} generated was as follows: TEA-Fe>CAF-Fe>FeII>FeIII.

Figure 5 Total amount of hydroxyl radicals generated (as light) during 60 s of reaction of 1 mm of hydrogen peroxide with 0.1 mm of Fe as ferrous chloride tetrahydrate, ferric chloride anhydrous, CAF-Fe and TEA-Fe catalysts measured by a Luminescencer Octa AB-2270 using luminol.
Figure 5

Total amount of hydroxyl radicals generated (as light) during 60 s of reaction of 1 mm of hydrogen peroxide with 0.1 mm of Fe as ferrous chloride tetrahydrate, ferric chloride anhydrous, CAF-Fe and TEA-Fe catalysts measured by a Luminescencer Octa AB-2270 using luminol.

3.2 Degradation of MB

From Figure 6, it is clear that the complete degradation of MB using TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe catalysts in the presence of H2O2 occurred within 20 min, while using FeII, FeIII and FeEDTA were around 50%, 25% and 10%, respectively. Lower degradation of MB was observed using HP, TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe alone. In general, the degradation of MB occurred gradually, indicating that the hydroxyl radicals {‧OH}, which are responsible for the degradation, were generated continuously as shown in Figure 5.

Figure 6 Effect of ‘green’ Fe catalysts and 10 mm hydrogen peroxide (HP) on degradation rate of 0.017 mm methylene blue (MB). Degradation rate versus time of MB with 10 mm HP, MB with 0.1 mm Fe as CAF-Fe and 10 mm HP (CAF-Fe+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as TEA-Fe and 10 mMHP (TEA-Fe+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeII+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as ferric chloride anhydrous (FeIII+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as Fe-EDTA (Fe-EDTA+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as CAF-Fe only (CAF-Fe) and MB with 0.1 mm Fe as TEA-Fe (TEA-Fe). The picture shows (A) HP and (B) TEA-Fe+HP treatments, respectively.
Figure 6

Effect of ‘green’ Fe catalysts and 10 mm hydrogen peroxide (HP) on degradation rate of 0.017 mm methylene blue (MB). Degradation rate versus time of MB with 10 mm HP, MB with 0.1 mm Fe as CAF-Fe and 10 mm HP (CAF-Fe+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as TEA-Fe and 10 mMHP (TEA-Fe+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as ferrous chloride tetrahydrate (FeII+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as ferric chloride anhydrous (FeIII+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as Fe-EDTA (Fe-EDTA+HP), MB with 0.1 mm Fe as CAF-Fe only (CAF-Fe) and MB with 0.1 mm Fe as TEA-Fe (TEA-Fe). The picture shows (A) HP and (B) TEA-Fe+HP treatments, respectively.

3.3 Disinfection of E. coli

Bacterial infections are a major cause of disease and even human death. Disinfectants are widely used as effective agents to kill or eliminate bacteria in various ways. They can be mainly divided into five agents: alkylating, sulfhydryl combining, oxidizing, dehydrating and permeable. In our experiment, the oxidizing capacity of Fenton’s reaction using the new ‘green’ iron catalysts developed was evaluated. As shown in Figure 7, the best disinfection effects were found using TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe catalysts in the presence of 10 mm H2O2. E. coli ATCC11229 was completely disinfected in those treatments, while it survived in the 10 mm H2O2 alone treatment. No sterilization effects were found using only TEA-Fe or CAF-Fe without H2O2.

Figure 7 Effect of 10 mm hydrogen peroxide (HP) and TEA-Fe (1 mm Fe) and CAF-Fe (1 mm Fe) with 10 mm HP on disinfection of Escherichia coli ATCC11229. The picture shows 3 M Petrifilms of (A) 10 mm HP and (B) 10 mm of HP with the ‘green’ TEA-Fe catalyst treatments, respectively. E.coli coliforms are blue colonies. nd means not determined.
Figure 7

Effect of 10 mm hydrogen peroxide (HP) and TEA-Fe (1 mm Fe) and CAF-Fe (1 mm Fe) with 10 mm HP on disinfection of Escherichia coli ATCC11229. The picture shows 3 M Petrifilms of (A) 10 mm HP and (B) 10 mm of HP with the ‘green’ TEA-Fe catalyst treatments, respectively. E.coli coliforms are blue colonies. nd means not determined.

3.4 Test the ‘green’ iron catalysts as iron fertilizer

The applications of increased levels of both ‘green’ iron catalysts to the soil significantly enhanced (p>0.05) the concentrations of Fe in the leaves of pak choi (Table 3). High Fe concentrations of 2.52 and 3.02 mg kg-1 fresh weight basis were found in leaves of plants grown in the calcareous soil for the TEA-Fe 2 and CAF-Fe 2 treatments, respectively. Those values were 2.27 and 2.72 times greater than those in CNT treatment. Thus, the TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe catalysts were effective in increasing the concentrations of Fe in the edible parts of pak choi at greenhouse conditions.

Table 3

Effect of treatments on the Fe content of the edible part of pack-choi.

TreatmentTotal amount applied g kg-1 soilAndosol (pH 6.5)Calcareous soil (pH 9.2)
FeSEFeSE
mg kg-1 fresh weight
Control0.000.530.031.110.04
TEA-Fe1 10.250.740.041.160.09
TEA-Fe 20.500.790.022.520.11
CAF-Fe2 10.250.540.021.400.06
CAF-Fe 20.500.560.033.020.37
LSD (0.05)0.100.57

1TEA-Fe: ‘green’ Fe catalysts developed using tea dregs.

2CAF-Fe: ‘green’ Fe catalysts developed using coffee grounds.

4 Discussion

The problems related to the application of the use of Fe2+ and the standard Fenton’s reaction for in situ chemical oxidation can be alleviated through the use of chelates capable of binding ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) iron. Nontoxic chelates such as citrate or gluconic acid have been used successfully in in-situ chemical oxidation process. Gluconic acid and HP can be generated on site, eliminating the need for transportation of highly concentrated HP [13]. The use of a chelate for remediation in aerobic environments minimizes Fe2+ oxidation by O2. Dissolved oxygen has no effect on the degradation of trichlorophenol by the chelate-modified Fenton’s reaction using polyacrylic acid as the chelating agent [14]. Most of the tested chelates for Fenton’s reaction in the literature are of a high cost, making their practical use limited. We believe that the polyphenols of tea dregs and coffee grounds reduced and chelated the iron creating a good condition for degradation of MB by the Fenton’s reaction. However, more detailed studies concerning the mechanism of degradation by the developed materials are necessary.

The poor sterilization effect of 10 mm H2O2 solution could be explained by the possible production of catalase by the E. coli that can decompose H2O2, greatly hindering the inactivation effect, while in the TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe treatments, the decomposition of H2O2 into hydroxyl radicals {‧OH} occurred quickly, killing the bacteria before H2O2 decomposition by catalase.

HP possesses bactericidal and inhibitory activity due to its properties as an oxidant, and due to its capacity to generate other cytotoxic oxidizing species, such as hydroxyl radicals. The bactericidal activity of H2O2 coupled with rapid breakdown makes it a desirable sterilizing agent for use on some food contact surfaces and packaging materials in aseptic filling operations. Residual H2O2 is dependent on the presence or absence of peroxidase in the produce item [15].

The use of H2O2 in food industry for disinfection of whole and fresh-cut produce has been investigated in recent years. Microbial populations on whole cantaloupes, grapes, prunes, raisins, walnuts, and pistachios were significantly reduced upon treatment with H2O2 vapor [16]. Treatment by dipping in H2O2 solution reduced microbial populations on fresh-cut bell peppers, cucumber, zucchini, cantaloupe and honeydew melon, but did not alter sensory characteristics. Treatment of other produce was not as successful. H2O2 vapor concentrations necessary to control Pseudomonas tolaasii caused mushrooms to turn brown, while anthocyanin-bleaching occurred in strawberries and raspberries. Shredded lettuce was severely browned upon dipping in a solution of H2O2. Combinations of 5% H2O2 with acidic surfactants at 50°C produced a three to four log reduction of nonpathogenic E. coli inoculated onto the surfaces of unwaxed Golden Delicious apples [17]. It is important to note that most of the works on disinfection using H2O2 have been made with concentrations of H2O2 higher than those used in this work.

Figure 8 shows the estimated mechanism involved in the absorption of iron from the ‘green’ iron catalysts by pak choi plants and the estimated mechanism related to the Fenton reaction using the ‘green’ iron catalysts. Fenton’s chemistry is a very well-known process and it is one of the high potential oxidation technologies, because it produces a highly reactive species {‧OH} [18, 19]. In most of the studies, Fe2+ is used as a catalyst instead of Fe3+, as indicated in Reaction (I):

Figure 8 Estimated mechanism for disinfection and degradation processes using tea and coffee polyphenols and iron.
Figure 8

Estimated mechanism for disinfection and degradation processes using tea and coffee polyphenols and iron.

(I)Fe2++H2O2Fe3++OH-+·OHk=76 (I)
(II)Fe3++H2O2Fe2++H++OH+OH2k=0.02 (II)

From the above equation, it is clear that the rate constant of Reaction (I) is more than that of Reaction (II). So the rate of oxidation of pollutant is also more in the case of Reaction (I) than Reaction (II). From Figure 5, it is clear that degradation of MB was increased more by the use of TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe than the FeII and FeIII treatments. It is also observed that when using TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe catalysts, no precipitation of iron hydroxide was found at the end of the reaction, while in the case of FeII, precipitation of ferric hydroxide was obtained. The Fenton applications are limited, due to the generation of excessive amounts of ferric hydroxide sludge that requires additional separation processes and disposal [20]. We supposed that the use of the developed ‘green’ iron catalysts could solve the problem.

No significant degradation of MB was obtained in the FeIII treatment. The MB was completely degraded within 20 min by TEA-Fe and CAF-Fe catalysts in the presence of H2O2. The higher generation of hydroxyl radicals {‧OH} (Figure 4) and the high content of active Fe2+ of ‘green’ iron catalysts was probably responsible for the results. The reduction and chelation functions of the polyphenols of the coffee grounds and tea dregs were estimated as a mechanism to give a stable Fenton reaction in our experiment. However, more detailed research is necessary to elucidate the real mechanism.

Tea and coffee contains substances such as ascorbic acid and polyphenols (catechins, chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, caffeine, tannic acid and others) that are known to be natural antioxidants. These substances can reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+ and form complexes with both ions. The process of iron reduction is often attributed to both antioxidant and prooxidant activity of these compounds [21, 22]. Fukumoto and Mazza [23] noted dual antioxidant and prooxidant activities for a variety of plant-derived polyphenols, including gallic acid, protocatechuic acid, syringic acid, vanillic acid, ellagic acid, caffeic acid, coumaric acid, chlorogenic acid, ferulic acid, myricetin, quercetin, rutin, kaempferol, (+)-catechin, (−)-epicatechin, delphinidin and malvidin. The (ÿ)-epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), a major catechin in green tea EGCG caused apoptotic cell death in osteoclastic cells, due mainly to promotion of the reduction of Fe3+to Fe2+ to trigger Fenton’s reaction, which affords a hydroxyl radical from HP [24]. Probably, the reduction of Fe3+ that generates Fe2+ which can catalyze the Fenton reaction seems to be the cause for the hydroxyl radical generation in our experiments.

Increasing the amount of bioavailable Fe and other micronutrients in plant foods for human consumption is a challenge which is particularly important for developing countries. Despite its abundance in soil, iron is still one of the most common nutrients limiting plant growth and development, because it exists mostly in a low-soluble form which is hardly available for plants. Therefore, plants have evolved two distinct uptake strategies: the reduction (Strategy I) mechanism of dicotyledonous plants, including pak choi and non-gramineous plants and the chelation (Strategy II) mechanism of graminaceous plants. In strategy II, or the chelation mechanism, which is exhibited by graminaceous plants, there is a release of Fe-chelating substances like mugineic acid (MA) in response to Fe-deficiency stress. The MA released in the plant rhizosphere solubilizes inorganic Fe3+-compounds by chelation, and the Fe3+-MAs complexes are taken up through a specific transport system in the root plasma membrane. In strategy I, or the reduction mechanism, plant iron mobilization is attained by releasing substances that increase the solubility of oxidized iron in the soil and reduction to Fe2+ by a ferric chelate reductase induced by iron deficiency [25, 26]. The ‘green’ iron catalysts were capable of increasing the content of Fe in the edible parts of pak choi when applied to the soil. Probably, chelated iron is protected from oxidation, precipitation and immobilization by the polyphenols of tea dregs and coffee grounds. In certain conditions, the organic molecules (the ligand polyphenols) can combine and form a ring encircling the iron. The pincer-like manner in which the Fe is bonded to the ligand changes the iron’s surface property and favors the uptake efficiency by plants. On calcareous soils, soil application of Fe fertilizers based on organic Fe salts, Fe complexes of lignosulfonates, citrates, gluconates and synthetic Fe chelates of limited stability [e.g., FeEDTA, iron(III) diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (FeDTPA) and iron(III) hydroxyethylenediaminetriacetic acid (FeHEDTA)] has limited or no results, because these fertilizers are not able to maintain Fe in soil solution. Only Fe chelates of higher stability [iron(III) ethylene diamine-N,N′-bis(hydroxy phenyl acetic acid) (FeEDDHA) and derivatives, with phenolic functional groups] are effective and provide the most efficient treatment to control Fe deficiency [27]. The developed catalysts were effective on supply iron to pak choi plants, especially in alkaline and calcareous soils.

All of the results using the new ‘green’ iron catalysts were obtained in controlled laboratory conditions. The effectiveness of these new materials on catalyzing the Fenton reaction could be influenced by many factors, such as the presence of scavengers and pH of the solution in natural conditions. Thus, more detailed studies concerning the effectiveness of the developed iron materials to catalyze the Fenton reaction in natural conditions are necessary.

In conclusion, the developed ‘green’ iron catalysts can be used as iron fertilizer in agriculture and in the Fenton process, to degrade contaminants or disinfect pathogens like E. coli. The advantage of the Fenton process is the complete destruction of contaminants to harmless compounds, for instance, carbon dioxide and water. However, its application has been limited, due to the low stability of Fe2+ and the generation of an excess amount of ferric hydroxide sludge that requires additional separation processes and disposal. Therefore, the use of developed ‘green’ iron catalysts could minimize these disadvantages. In addition, based on the strong oxidation effect, the new Fenton reaction is expected to be applied in various fields such as food, medicine, public health, agriculture, environmental cleanup, etc. The developed ‘green’ approach Fenton method is highly safe for a human body and the environment. Therefore, the developed method is expected to contribute to the effective use of tea and coffee wastes from the beverage industry, by creating a novel application method for the food waste materials.


Corresponding author: Claudio Kendi Morikawa, National Institute of Vegetable and Tea Science, Vegetable Pest Management and Postharvest Division, 514–2392, Ano, Kusawa 360, Mie, Tsu, Japan, e-mail:

About the author

Claudio Kendi Morikawa

Claudio Kendi Morikawa completed his graduate study at University of São Paulo State-UNESP Ilha Solteira Campus, Ilha Solteira, SP, Brazil, and in 1993, he completed his Master of Science study at Federal University of Lavras, Brazil. In 2003, he received his PhD in Environmental Bioremediation at the Tohoku University, Japan. From 2005 to 2007, he did his postdoctoral research at University of Tokyo, Japan. His research interests are in the fields of catalysis, human nutrition, plant protection and soil science and plant nutrition. He has more than 20 scientific and professional publications and five patents, and more than 20 oral and poster presentations at international conferences presenting his scientific work. Since 2008, he has been a researcher at the National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, National Institute of Tea and Vegetable Science, Japan.

References

[1] FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), FAO Statistical Yearbook 2007–2008 [Online]. (2009). Available: http://www.fao.org [2011, March 8].Search in Google Scholar

[2] Silva MA, Nebra SA, Silva MJM, Sanchez CG. Biomass Bioenergy 1998, 14, 457–167.10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10034-4Search in Google Scholar

[3] Mussatto SI, Machado EMS, Martins S, Teixeira JA. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 661–672.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Franca AS, Oliveira LS. In Agricultural Wastes, Ashworth GS, Azevedo P, Eds., Nova Science Publisher, Inc.: Hauppauge: New York, 2009; Chapter 8, pp. 155–189.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Yang CJ, Yang IY, Oh DH, Bae IH, Cho SG, Kong IG, Uuganbayar D, Nou IS, Choi KS. Asia-Australia J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 16, 867–872.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Mallikarjuna NN, Castle AB, Murdock RC, Hussain SM, Varna RS Green Chem. 2012, 12, 114–122.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Morikawa CK, Saigusa M. Plant Soil 2008, 304, 249–255.10.1007/s11104-008-9544-1Search in Google Scholar

[8] Morikawa CK, Saigusa M. J. Sci. Food Agric. 20011, 91, 2108–2111.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Sullivan DJ. J. – Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 1976, 59, 1156–1161.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Szentmihalyi K, Blazovics A, Vinkler P. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 2003, 47, 107–109.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Gould JF, Gould GF. Biostats Basics: a Student Handbook. W.H. Freeman: New York, 2002.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Yildiz G, Demiryürek AT. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 1998, 39, 179–184.10.1016/S1056-8719(98)00025-2Search in Google Scholar

[13] Ahuja DK, Bachas LG, Bhattacharyya D. Chemosphere 2007, 66, 2193.10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.035Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Li Y, Bachas LG, Bhattacharyya DJ. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 7984.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Juven BJ, Pierson MD. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 1233–1241.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Sapers GM, Simmons GF. Food Technol. 1998, 52, 48–52.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Sapers GM, Miller RL, Mattrazzo AM. J. Food Sci. 1999, 64, 734–737.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Fenton HJH. J. Chem. Soc. 1894, 65, 899–910.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Haber F, Weiss J. Proc. Roy. Soc. London 1934, 147, 332–351.10.1098/rspa.1934.0221Search in Google Scholar

[20] Chang PH. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 49, 213–218.Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ryan P, Hynes MJ. J. Inorg. Biochem. 2007, 101, 585–593.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Pulido R, Bravo L, Saura-Calixto F. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3396–3402.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Fukumoto LR, Mazza G. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3597–3604.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Nakagawa H, Wachi M, Woo JT, Kato M, Kasai S, Takahashi F, Lee IS, Nagai K. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 292, 94–101.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Robinson NJ, Procter C, Connolly E, Guerinot, M. Nature 1999, 397, 694–697.10.1038/17800Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[26] Schmidt W, Schikora A. Planta 2002, 215, 304–311.10.1007/s00425-002-0738-0Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[27] Lucena JJ. In Iron Nutrition in Plants and Rhizospheric Microorganisms, Barton LL, Abadia J, Eds., Springer: New York, 2006, pp. 103–128.10.1007/1-4020-4743-6_5Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-12-10
Accepted: 2014-2-26
Published Online: 2014-3-22
Published in Print: 2014-4-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. In this issue
  3. Editorial
  4. Megatrends – megascience?
  5. 1st EuGSC 2013
  6. First EuCheMS Congress on Green and Sustainable Chemistry
  7. The synthesis of phosphinates: traditional versus green chemical approaches
  8. “Greener” synthesis of bisphosphonic/dronic acid derivatives
  9. A new green approach to Fenton’s chemistry using tea dregs and coffee grounds as raw material
  10. Selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde and phospholipids in aqueous-organic biphasic systems with ruthenium(II) complex catalysts
  11. Microwave-assisted oxidation of benzyl alcohols using supported cobalt based nanomaterials under mild reaction conditions
  12. From trash to resource: a green approach to noble-metals dissolution and recovery
  13. The effect of switchable ionic liquid (SIL) treatment on the composition and crystallinity of birch chips (Betula pendula) using a novel alkanol amine-organic superbase-derived SIL
  14. Interactions of 2,2′-bipyridine herbicide intermediate with humic acid
  15. Laboratory profile
  16. The Applied and Green Photochemistry research group at James Cook University in Townsville, Australia
  17. Conference announcements
  18. 5th International IUPAC Conference on Green Chemistry (Durban, South Africa, August 17–21, 2014)
  19. Ecochem 2014 (Basel, Switzerland, November 11–13, 2014)
  20. Chemeca 2014 (Perth, Western Australia, September 28–October 1, 2014)
  21. 16th International Symposium on Advances in Extraction Technologies (ExTech 2014; Chania, Crete, Greece, May 25–28, 2014)
  22. ISOS XVII BERLIN 2014: The 17th International Symposium on Silicon Chemistry jointly with the 7th European Silicon Days (Berlin, Germany, August 3–8, 2014)
  23. 11th International Symposium on the Scientific Bases for the Preparation of Heterogeneous Catalysts (PREPA11; Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, July 6–10, 2014)
  24. Conferences 2014–2017
  25. Book reviews
  26. Pharmaceutical lifecycle management: making the most of each and every brand
  27. The economic utilisation of food co-products
Downloaded on 28.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/gps-2013-0113/html
Scroll to top button