Home “Our show is so twisted”: comparing impoliteness in Taiwan and Mainland China talk shows
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

“Our show is so twisted”: comparing impoliteness in Taiwan and Mainland China talk shows

  • Cher Leng Lee EMAIL logo and Daoning Zhu
Published/Copyright: May 4, 2022
Become an author with De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

Impoliteness has been a focus of recent research with more emphasis placed on context, situated evaluations and social action. Although talk shows are not the same as everyday conversations, the use of impoliteness to entertain is often an intentional part of the format. This paper uses Chinese talk shows to examine the subtle differences in impoliteness of talk shows in the different Chinese contexts. We compare one TV talk show in Taiwan (Kangxi Laile), and the other in Mainland China (Huahua Wanwu), both with the same hosts and similar program formats, to examine how impoliteness is shown at personal, relational, and group levels. Comparing how this is done in different contexts will help us better understand what is acceptable and what is not in different Chinese communities, as each community is different given the different historical, political, and sociological backgrounds, which will lead to different manifestations of (im)politeness.


Corresponding author: Cher Leng Lee, Department of Chinese Studies, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore, E-mail:

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for all the helpful comments.

Appendix: Details of the episodes used in KX & HH

References

Bi, Xiaoyi & Elizabeth Marsden. 2020. Managing interpersonal relationships: Teasing as a method of professional identity construction. Journal of Pragmatics 165. 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.003.Search in Google Scholar

Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in interaction. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.167Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Wei-Lin M. & Michael Haugh. 2021. Teasing and claims to non-serious intent in Chinese talk shows. East Asian Pragmatics 6(2). 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.18158.Search in Google Scholar

Chang, Wei-Lin M., Hsi-Yao Su & Michael Haugh. 2021. Taking it too far: The role of ideological discourses in contesting the limits of teasing and offence. Pragmatics 31(3). 382–405. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.20003.cha.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 1996. Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics 25(3). 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in the television quiz show: The weakest link. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 35–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.35.Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using language to cause offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511975752Search in Google Scholar

Culpeper, Jonathan & Oliver Holmes. 2013. (Im)politeness and exploitative TV in Britain and North America: The X factor and American Idol. In Nuria Lorenzo-Dus & Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich (eds.), Real talk: Reality television and discourse analysis in action, 169–198. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137313461_9Search in Google Scholar

Dynel, Marta. 2013. Impoliteness as disaffiliative humour in film talk. In Marta Dynel (ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory, 105–145. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/thr.1.07dynSearch in Google Scholar

Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester, Northampton & MA: St. Jerome Pub.Search in Google Scholar

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch & Nuria Lorenzo-Dus. 2013. Identity and impoliteness: The expert in the talent show. Journal of Politeness Research 9(1). 97–121.10.1515/pr-2013-0005Search in Google Scholar

Gumperz, John. 1992. Contextualization revisited. In Peter Auer & Aldo Di Luzio (eds.), The contextualization of language, 39–53. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.22.04gumSearch in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2010. When is an email really offensive?: Argumentativity and variability in evaluations of impoliteness. Journal of Politeness Research 6. 7–31.10.1515/jplr.2010.002Search in Google Scholar

Haugh, Michael. 2015. Impoliteness and taking offence in initial interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 86. 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.018.Search in Google Scholar

He, Ming & Shao-jie Zhang. 2011. Re-conceptualizing the Chinese concept of face from a face-sensitive perspective: A case study of modern Chinese TV drama. Journal of Pragmatics 43(9). 2360–2372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.03.004.Search in Google Scholar

Hinze, Carl. 2005. Looking into “face”: The importance of Chinese mian and lian as emic categories. In Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini & Maurizio Gotti (eds.), Asian business discourse(s), 169–210. Berne: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, Hsien Chin. 1944. The Chinese concept of “face”. American Anthropologist 46(1). 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1944.46.1.02a00040.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Mei-ling. 2014. A study of impoliteness strategies in a Taiwanese talk show: A case study of Kang Xi Lai Le. Taiwan: Providence University MA thesis.Search in Google Scholar

Jayyusi, Lena. 1991. Values and moral judgement: Communicative praxis as moral order. In Graham Button (ed.), Ethnomethodology and the human sciences, 227–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511611827.011Search in Google Scholar

Lee, Cher Leng, Yao Chen & Gek Leng Tan. 2013. Silence and face-work in two Chinese TV talk shows. Discourse, Context & Media 2(1). 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2013.01.002.Search in Google Scholar

Li, Qing Kinnison. 2017. Power, integrity, and mask – An attempt to disentangle the Chinese face concept. Journal of Pragmatics 114. 32–48.10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.015Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. 2004. Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110926552Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard Watts. 2005. Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1). 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1515/jplr.2005.1.1.9.Search in Google Scholar

Locher, Miriam A. & Richard Watts. 2008. Relational work and impoliteness: Negotiating norms of linguistic behaviour. In Derek Bousfield & Miriam A. Locher (eds.), Impoliteness in language: Studies on its interplay with power in theory and practice, 77–99. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110208344Search in Google Scholar

Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. 2009. Television discourse analysing language in the media. Basingstoke & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-137-11717-5Search in Google Scholar

Luckmann, Thomas. 2002. Moral communication in modern societies. Human Studies 25(1). 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014838423896.10.1023/A:1014838423896Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615238Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2009. Impoliteness in a cultural context. Journal of Pragmatics 41. 1047–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.10.014.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, Sara. 2011. Discursive approaches to politeness and impoliteness. In Linguistic Politeness Research Group (ed.), Discursive approaches to politeness, 19–56. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110238679.19Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, Anne Warfield. 2010. Social order as moral order. In Steven Hitlin & Stephen Vaisey (eds.), Handbook of the sociology of morality, 91–121. NY: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4419-6896-8_6Search in Google Scholar

Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2017. What makes teasing impolite in Australian and British English? “Step[ping] over those lines […] you shouldn’t be crossing”. Journal of Politeness Research 13(2). 175–207. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0034.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2002. Managing rapport in talk: Using rapport sensitive incidents to explore the motivational concerns underlying the management of relations. Journal of Pragmatics 34(5). 529–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(01)00039-x.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2007. Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics 39(4). 639–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.12.004.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. Face, (im)politeness and rapport. In Helen Spencer-Oatey (ed.), Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory, 2nd edn., 11–47. London & New York: Continuum.10.5040/9781350934085.ch-002Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen & Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate. East Asian Pragmatics 1(1). 73–106. https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.v1i1.29084.Search in Google Scholar

Spencer-Oatey, Helen & Jianyu Xing. 2019. Interdisciplinary perspectives on interpersonal relations and the evaluation process: Culture, norms, and the moral order. Journal of Pragmatics 151. 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.02.015.Search in Google Scholar

Tolson, Andrew. 2006. Media talk: Spoken discourse on TV and Radio. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748626311Search in Google Scholar

van der Bom, Isabel & Sara Mills. 2015. A discursive approach to the analysis of politeness data. Journal of Politeness Research 11(2). 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2015-0008.Search in Google Scholar

Yang, Na & Wei Ren. 2020. Jocular mockery in the context of a localised playful frame: Unpacking humour in a Chinese reality TV show. Journal of Pragmatics 162. 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.04.006.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-05-04
Published in Print: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 16.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/glochi-2022-2015/html?lang=en
Scroll to top button