Emergent pseudo-coordination in spoken German. A corpus-based exploration

References

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2011. Action, prosody and emergent constructions: The case of and. In Peter Auer and Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions – emerging and emergent, 263–292. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110229080.263Search in Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and mood in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Sandra A. Thompson. 2008. On assessing situations and events in conversation: “extraposition” and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10. 443–467.10.1177/1461445608091882Search in Google Scholar

Di Meola, Claudio. 1994. Kommen und gehen. Eine kognitiv-linguistische Untersuchung der Polysemie deiktischer Bewegungsverben. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Search in Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2003. Argument structure: Grammar in use. In John W. Du Bois, Lorraine E. Kumpf and William J. Ashby (eds.), Preferred Argument Structure. Grammar as architecture for function, 11–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/sidag.14.04dubSearch in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 1972. How to know whether you’re coming or going. In Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen (ed.), Linguistik 1971. Referate des 6. Linguistischen Kolloquiums 11.-14. August in Kopenhagen, 369–379. Frankfurt a.M.: Athenäum.Search in Google Scholar

Haddington, Pentti, Jarmo H. Jantunen and Jari Sivonen. 2011. Language and affect: Go-say and come-say constructions in Finnish. Sky Journal of Linguistics 24. 75–117.Search in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd and Tania Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511613463Search in Google Scholar

Hesse, Andrea 2009. Zur Grammatikalisierung der Pseudokoordination im Norwegischen und in den anderen skandinavischen Sprachen. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Hilpert, Martin and Christian Koops. 2008. A quantitative approach to the development of complex predicates. The case of Swedish Pseudo-Coordination with sitta ‘sit’. Diachronica 25(2). 240–259.10.1075/dia.25.2.06hilSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 2002. Hendiadys and auxiliation in English. In Joan Bybee and Michael Noonan (eds.), Complex sentences in grammar and discourse. Essays in honor of Sandra A. Thompson, 145–173. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/z.110.09hopSearch in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul. 2008. Emergent serialization in English: Pragmatics and typology. In Jeff Good (ed.) Linguistic universals and language change, 253–284. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199298495.003.0011Search in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald. 1990. Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics 1(1). 5–38.10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.5Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1991. Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. II: Focus on types of grammatical markers, 493–535. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.19.2.21lehSearch in Google Scholar

Newman, John and Jingxia Lin. 2006. The purposefulness of going: A corpus-linguistic study. In Jacek Walinski, Krzysztof Kredens and Stanislaw Gozdz-Roszkowski (eds.), Practical applications in language and computers 2005 proceedings, 293–308. Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Newman, John and Sally Rice. 2004. Patterns of usage for English sit, stand, and lie: A cognitively inspired exploration in corpus linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics 15(3). 351–396.10.1515/cogl.2004.013Search in Google Scholar

Newman, John and Sally Rice. 2008. Asymmetry in English multi-verb sequences. A corpus-based approach. In: Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (ed.), Asymmetric events, 3–23. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.11.03newSearch in Google Scholar

Proske, Nadine. 2013. Informationsmanagement im gesprochenen Deutsch. Eine diskurspragmatische Untersuchung syntaktischer Strukturen in Alltagsgesprächen. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar

Proske, Nadine. 2017. Perspektivierung von Handlungen und Zuschreibung von Intentionalität durch pseudokoordiniertes kommen. In Arnulf Deppermann, Nadine Proske and Arne Zeschel (eds.), Verben im interaktiven Kontext. Bewegungsverben und mentale Verben im gesprochenen Deutsch, 177–247. Tübingen: Narr.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, Daniel. 2013. Verbal Pseudocoordination in English: A syntactic analysis with reference to diachronic, dialectal and cross-linguistic variation. Manuscript. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/42581 (15 March, 2019).Search in Google Scholar

Schmidtke-Bode, Karsten. 2009. A typology of purpose clauses. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl.88Search in Google Scholar

Selting, Margret et al. 2009. Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10. 353–402.Search in Google Scholar

Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2000. The English GO-(PRT)-AND-VERB construction. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 26. 259–270.10.3765/bls.v26i1.1158Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth C. and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486500Search in Google Scholar