Constructicography at work: implementation and application of the German Constructicon

References

Baker, Collin F, Charles J Fillmore and John B. Lowe. 1998. The Berkeley FrameNet Project. Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics-Volume 1. Association for Computational Linguistics. 86–90.10.3115/980845.980860Search in Google Scholar

Boas, Hans C. 2013. Wie viel Wissen steckt in Wörterbüchern? Eine frame-semantische Perspektive. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 57. 75–97.10.1515/zfal-2013-0004Search in Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2002. Constructional Idioms, Morphology, and the Dutch Lexicon. Journal of Germanic linguistics 14(4). 301–327.10.1017/S1470542702000168Search in Google Scholar

Breindl, Eva. 2014. C2.2. Negationsinduzierende additive Konnektoren. In Anna E. Volodina and Ulrich Hermann Waßner (eds.), Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren. 2: Semantik der deutschen Satzverknüpfer Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache. Berlin u.a.: De Gruyter. 451–510.10.1515/9783110341447Search in Google Scholar

Castilho, Richard Eckart de et al. 2016. A Web-based Tool for the Integrated Annotation of Semantic and Syntactic Structures. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language Technology Resources and Tools for Digital Humanities (LT4DH). Osaka, Japan: The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee. 76–84.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrovol’skij, Dimitrij. 2011. Phraseologie und Konstruktionsgrammatik. In Alexander Lasch and Alexander Ziem (eds.), Konstruktionsgrammatik III. Aktuelle Fragen und Lösungsansätze. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag. 111–130.Search in Google Scholar

Eggs, Frederike. 2011. Zur Funktionalität des Konnektors geschweige denn. In Eva Breindl, Gisella Ferraresi and Anna Volodina (eds.), Satzverknüpfungen. Zur Interaktion von Form, Bedeutung und Diskursfunktion Linguistische Arbeiten. Berlin: De Gruyter. 229–262.10.1515/9783110252378.229Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J. 2008. Border Conflicts: FrameNet Meets Construction Grammar. In Elisenda Bernal and Janet De Cesaris (eds.), Proceedings of the XIII EURALEX International Congress. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra. 49–68.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J, Paul Kay, and Mary C O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone. Language 64. 501–538.10.2307/414531Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Russell R Lee-Goldman, and Russell Rhodes. 2012. The FrameNet Constructicon. In Hans C. Boas and Ivan A. Sag (eds.), Sign-based Construction Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 283–299.Search in Google Scholar

Fillmore, Charles J., Miriam R.L. Petruck, Josef Ruppenhofer and Abby Wright. 2003. FrameNet in Action: The Case of Attaching. International Journal of Lexicography 16, 297–332.10.1093/ijl/16.3.297Search in Google Scholar

Jurafsky, Daniel. 1992. An On-Line Computational Model of Human Sentence Interpretation. AAAI-92 Proceedings, 302–308.Search in Google Scholar

Laviola, Adrieli et al. 2017. The Brazilian Portuguese Constructicon: Modeling Constructional Inheritance, Frame Evocation and Constraints in FrameNet Brasil. Proceedings of the AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding. Palo Alto: AAAI Publications. 193–196.Search in Google Scholar

Lyngfelt, Benjamin, et al. (eds.). 2018. Constructicography: Constructicon development across languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.10.1075/cal.22Search in Google Scholar

Ohara, Kyoko Hirose. 2013. Toward Constructicon Building for Japanese in Japanese FrameNet. Veredas 17(1). 11–28.Search in Google Scholar

Pasch, Renate. 2000. Zur Bedeutung von deutsch geschweige (denn). Linguistik online 6 (2).10.13092/lo.6.1010Search in Google Scholar

Petrov, Slav et al. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics Association for Computational Linguistics. 433–440.10.3115/1220175.1220230Search in Google Scholar

Schmid, Helmut. 1999. Improvements in part-of-speech tagging with an application to German. Natural language processing using very large corpora. Springer. 13–25.10.1007/978-94-017-2390-9_2Search in Google Scholar

Sköldberg, Emma et al. 2013. Between Grammars and Dictionaries: a Swedish Constructicon. In Iztok Kosem et al. (eds.), Electronic lexicography in the 21st century: thinking outside the paper Ljubiljana and Tallinn: Troijna, Institute for Applied Slovene Studies und Eesti Keele Instituut. 310–327.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, John R. 2012. The Mental Corpus: How Language is Represented in the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290802.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander. 2014. Von der Kasusgrammatik zum FrameNet: Frames, Konstruktionen und die Idee eines Konstruktikons. In Alexander Ziem and Alexander Lasch (eds.), Grammatik als Netzwerk von Konstruktionen? Sprachwissen im Fokus der Konstruktionsgrammatik. Sprache und Wissen Berlin: De Gruyter. 263–290.10.1515/9783110353693.263Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander. 2018. Tag für Tag Arbeit über Arbeit: konstruktionsgrammatische Zugänge zu Phraseoschablonen mit nominaler Reduplikation. In Kathrin Steyer (ed.), Sprachliche Verfestigung. Wortverbindungen, Muster, Phrasem-Konstruktionen Tübingen: Narr. 25–48.Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander and Hans C. Boas. 2017. Towards a Constructicon for German. The AAAI 2017 Spring Symposium on Computational Construction Grammar and Natural Language Understanding. Technical Report SS-17–02 Stanford University. 274–277.Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander and Michael Ellsworth. 2016. Exklamativsätze im FrameNet-Konstruktikon am Beispiel des Englischen. In Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer (eds.), Satztypen und Konstruktionen. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. 146–191.10.1515/9783110423112-006Search in Google Scholar

Ziem, Alexander and Johanna Flick. 2018. A FrameNet Constructicon Approach to Constructional Idioms. In Tatiana Fedulenkova (ed.), Modern phraseology issues: Materials of the international phraseological conference in memory of Elisabeth Piirainen Arkhangelsk. 142–161.Search in Google Scholar