Shifted convolution sums for higher rank groups

References

[1] F. V. Atkinson, The mean value of the zeta-function on the critical line, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 47 (1941), 174–200. 10.1112/plms/s2-47.1.174Suche in Google Scholar

[2] L. Barthel and D. Ramakrishnan, A nonvanishing result for twists of L-functions of GL⁢(n), Duke Math. J. 74 (1994), no. 3, 681–700. 10.1215/S0012-7094-94-07425-5Suche in Google Scholar

[3] P. T. Bateman, On the representations of a number as the sum of three squares, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 71 (1951), 70–101. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1951-0042438-4Suche in Google Scholar

[4] J. Bourgain, On the Fourier–Walsh spectrum of the Moebius function, Israel J. Math. 197 (2013), no. 1, 215–235. 10.1007/s11856-013-0002-2Suche in Google Scholar

[5] P. Deligne, La conjecture de Weil. I, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 43 (1974), 273–307. 10.1007/BF02684373Suche in Google Scholar

[6] J.-M. Deshouillers and H. Iwaniec, An additive divisor problem, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 26 (1982), no. 1, 1–14. 10.1112/jlms/s2-26.1.1Suche in Google Scholar

[7] T. Estermann, Über die Darstellungen einer Zahl als Differenz von zwei Produkten, J. Reine Angew. Math. 164 (1931), 173–182. 10.1515/crll.1931.164.173Suche in Google Scholar

[8] D. Goldfeld, Automorphic Forms and L-functions for the Group GL⁢(n,𝐑), Cambridge Stud. Adv. Math. 99, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 2006. 10.1017/CBO9780511542923Suche in Google Scholar

[9] D. Goldfeld and X. Li, The Voronoi formula for GL⁢(n,ℝ), Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2008 (2008), no. 2, Article ID rnm144. Suche in Google Scholar

[10] G. H. Hardy, On the representation of a number as the sum of any number of squares, and in particular of five, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 21 (1920), no. 3, 255–284. 10.1090/S0002-9947-1920-1501144-7Suche in Google Scholar

[11] D. R. Heath-Brown, The fourth power moment of the Riemann zeta function, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 38 (1979), no. 3, 385–422. 10.1112/plms/s3-38.3.385Suche in Google Scholar

[12] H. Iwaniec and E. Kowalski, Analytic Number Theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 53, American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2004. 10.1090/coll/053Suche in Google Scholar

[13] H. Jacquet and J. A. Shalika, On Euler products and the classification of automorphic representations. I, Amer. J. Math. 103 (1981), no. 3, 499–558. 10.2307/2374103Suche in Google Scholar

[14] H. H. Kim, Functoriality for the exterior square of GL4 and the symmetric fourth of GL2, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16 (2003), no. 1, 139–183. 10.1090/S0894-0347-02-00410-1Suche in Google Scholar

[15] E. M. Kıral and F. Zhou, The Voronoi formula and double Dirichlet series, Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016), no. 10, 2267–2286. 10.2140/ant.2016.10.2267Suche in Google Scholar

[16] G. Lü, J. Wu and W. Zhai, Shifted convolution of cusp-forms with θ-series, Ramanujan J. 40 (2016), no. 1, 115–133. 10.1007/s11139-015-9678-8Suche in Google Scholar

[17] W. Luo, Shifted convolution of cusp-forms with θ-series, Abh. Math. Semin. Univ. Hambg. 81 (2011), no. 1, 45–53. 10.1007/s12188-010-0046-8Suche in Google Scholar

[18] W. Luo, Z. Rudnick and P. Sarnak, On the generalized Ramanujan conjecture for GL⁢(n), Automorphic Forms, Automorphic Representations, and Arithmetic (Fort Worth 1996), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 66, American Mathematical Society, Providence (1999), 301–310. 10.1090/pspum/066.2/1703764Suche in Google Scholar

[19] S. D. Miller and W. Schmid, Automorphic distributions, L-functions, and Voronoi summation for GL⁢(3), Ann. of Math. (2) 164 (2006), no. 2, 423–488. 10.4007/annals.2006.164.423Suche in Google Scholar

[20] S. D. Miller and W. Schmid, A general Voronoi summation formula for G⁢L⁢(n,ℤ), Geometry and Analysis. No. 2, Adv. Lect. Math. (ALM) 18, International Press, Somerville (2011), 173–224. Suche in Google Scholar

[21] R. Munshi, Shifted convolution sums for GL⁢(3)×GL⁢(2), Duke Math. J. 162 (2013), no. 13, 2345–2362. 10.1215/00127094-2371416Suche in Google Scholar

[22] N. J. E. Pitt, On shifted convolutions of ζ3⁢(s) with automorphic L-functions, Duke Math. J. 77 (1995), no. 2, 383–406. 10.1215/S0012-7094-95-07711-4Suche in Google Scholar

[23] D. Ramakrishnan, Modularity of the Rankin–Selberg L-series, and multiplicity one for SL⁢(2), Ann. of Math. (2) 152 (2000), no. 1, 45–111. 10.2307/2661379Suche in Google Scholar

[24] X. Ren and Y. Ye, Resonance and rapid decay of exponential sums of Fourier coefficients of a Maass form for GLm⁢(ℤ), Sci. China Math. 58 (2015), no. 10, 2105–2124. 10.1007/s11425-014-4955-3Suche in Google Scholar

[25] A. Selberg, On the estimation of Fourier coefficients of modular forms, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 8 (1965), 1–15. 10.1090/pspum/008/0182610Suche in Google Scholar

[26] R. A. Smith, The average order of a class of arithmetic functions over arithmetic progressions with applications to quadratic forms, J. Reine Angew. Math. 317 (1980), 74–87. 10.1515/crll.1980.317.74Suche in Google Scholar

[27] Q. Sun, Shifted convolution sums of G⁢L3 cusp forms with θ-series, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2017 (2017), no. 6, 1805–1829. 10.1093/imrn/rnw083Suche in Google Scholar

[28] R. C. Vaughan, The Hardy–Littlewood Method, 2nd ed., Cambridge Tracts in Math. 125, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1997. 10.1017/CBO9780511470929Suche in Google Scholar

[29] L. Weinstein, The hyper-Kloosterman sum, Enseign. Math. (2) 27 (1981), no. 1–2, 29–40. Suche in Google Scholar