Startseite The Trump Effect: Nationalized Narratives and Congressional Outcomes in the 2024 Elections
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

The Trump Effect: Nationalized Narratives and Congressional Outcomes in the 2024 Elections

  • Jamie Carson EMAIL logo , Aaron Hitefield und Megan Wall
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 18. Februar 2025
Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Abstract

The 2024 elections resulted in a rightward shift, with Republicans taking back both the presidency and Senate while holding onto a very slim majority in the House of Representatives. Despite multiple felony convictions and near constant controversy, Donald Trump defeated Kamala Harris to win the presidency and all six of the swing states he had lost to Joe Biden in 2020. Down-ballot Republicans were also successful in their congressional races. Though Democrats had controlled the Senate since 2020, Republicans ultimately flipped four seats to take a 53–47 advantage in the chamber. Lastly, despite some concern among pundits that the dysfunctional Republican leadership in the House could negatively affect Republicans’ reelection chances across the board, Republicans were able to retain the House majority by a narrow margin of 220 to 215. This article highlights the political conditions and circumstances that defined the 2024 contest especially considering the increasingly nationalized nature of U.S. elections.


Corresponding author: Jamie Carson, UGA Athletic Association Professor of Political Science, University of Georgia, Athens, USA, E-mail:
We thank Stewart Ulrich for collection of the U.S. House primary election data used in this article.

References

Aldrich, John H., Jamie L. Carson, Brad T. Gomez, and Jennifer L. Merolla. 2023. Change and Continuity in the 2020 and 2022 Elections. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.10.4135/9781544356730Suche in Google Scholar

Banks, Jeffery S., and Rod Kiewiet. 1989. “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 997–1015. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111118.Suche in Google Scholar

Canon, David T. 1993. “Sacrificial Lambs or Strategic Politicians? Political Amateurs in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 37 (November): 1119–41. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111546.Suche in Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., Hardin Spencer, and Aaron Hitefield. 2021. “You’re Fired! Donald Trump and the 2020 Congressional Elections.” The Forum 18 (4): 627–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2020-2103.Suche in Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., and Aaron A. Hitefield. 2023. “A Red Wave or a Ripple? Nationalized Politics and the 2022 Midterm Elections.” The Forum 21 (1): 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/for-2023-2002.Suche in Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., and Gary C. Jacobson. 2024. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 11th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Suche in Google Scholar

Carson, Jamie L., Joel Sievert, and Ryan D. Williamson. 2024. Nationalized Politics: Evaluating Electoral Politics across Time. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197669655.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Hassell, Hans J. G., and Neil Visalvanich. 2019. “The Party’s Primary Preferences: Race, Gender, and Party Support of Congressional Primary Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 63 (4): 905–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12461.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83 (September): 773–93. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962060.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2015. “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 3 (July): 861–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/681670.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2023. “The 2022 Elections: A Test of Democracy’s Resilience and the Referendum Theory of Midterms.” Political Science Quarterly 138 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/psquar/qqad002.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2024. The Dimensions and Implications of the Public’s Reactions to the January 6, 2021, Invasion of the U.S. Capitol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009495387Suche in Google Scholar

Jacobson, Gary C. 2025. “The Congress: Choosing A (Precariously) Unified Government.” In The Elections of 2024, edited by Michael Nelson. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, Forthcoming.10.2307/jj.28833768.10Suche in Google Scholar

Krasno, Jonathan S., and Donald Philip Green. 1988. “Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections.” The Journal of Politics 50 (November): 920–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131385.Suche in Google Scholar

Porter, Rachel, and Sarah A. Treul. 2024. “Evaluating (in)Experience in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 69 (1): 284–98, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12854.Suche in Google Scholar

Sievert, Joel, and Kevin K. Banda. 2024. “All Politics Are National: Partisan Defection in National and Subnational Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 105 (2): 180–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13347.Suche in Google Scholar

Sievert, Joel, and Seth McKee. 2019. “Nationalization in U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Politics Research 47 (5): 1055–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18792694.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2025-02-18

© 2025 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Heruntergeladen am 30.10.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/for-2025-2008/pdf?lang=de&srsltid=AfmBOor2aw5v5lXAFvBnP5JUIcJlcHfYJP5y8gYJwmdyqkwWZEhF3quA
Button zum nach oben scrollen