Beyond anaphoric and emphatic: diversity and unity in the functions of literary Chinese reflexive zì

References

Aissen, Judith. 1987. Tzotzil clause structure. Dordrecht, Boston: D. Reidel.10.1007/978-94-009-3741-3Suche in Google Scholar

Aldridge, Edith. 2008. Phase theory and Old Chinese reflexives. Paper presented at the 5th Theoretical East Asian Languages Workshop. University of Potsdam.Suche in Google Scholar

Aldridge, Edith. 2009. Local and long distance reflexives in Archaic Chinese. In Simon Fraser University working papers in linguistics, vol. 2: Proceedings of the 2nd meeting of the international conference on East Asian linguistics, vol. 2.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2004. Accessibility marking: Discourse functions, discourse profiles, and processing cues. Discourse Processes 37(2). 91–116. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315046105-2.Suche in Google Scholar

Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511791314Suche in Google Scholar

Capistrán Garza, Alejandra. 2015. Multiple object constructions in P’orhépecha: Argument realization and valence-affecting morphology (Brill’s Studies in the Indigenous Languages of the Americas 9). Leiden; Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004288874Suche in Google Scholar

Chamoreau, Claudine. 2009. Hablemos purépecha: Wantee juchari anapu (Colección Kw’anískuyarhani 3), 1st edn. Morelia, Mich. [Mexico]: Universidad Intercultural Indígena de Michoacán: Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo: Institut de Recherche pour le Developpement: Ambassade de France au Mexique: Grupo Kw’anískuyarhani de Estudiosos del Pueblo Purépecha: Fondo Editorial Morevallado.Suche in Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary. 1999. The double unaccusative construction in Sinitic languages. In Doris L. Payne & Immanuel Barshi (eds.), External Possession (Typological Studies in Language 39), 195. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.39.13chaSuche in Google Scholar

Chéng, Gōng 程工. 1999. Hànyǔ “zìjǐ” yì cí de tèzhí 汉语“ 自己” 一词的性质 [On the nature of ziji in Chinese]. Dāngdài yǔyánxué 《当代语言学》 [Contemporary Linguistics] 1(2). 33–43.Suche in Google Scholar

Clark, Eve V. & Kathie L. Carpenter. 1989. The notion of source in language acquisition. Language 65(1). 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/414840.Suche in Google Scholar

Cohen, Dana. 2004. Intensive reflexives from sentence to discourse. Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Language Typology and Universals 51(1). 335–346.Suche in Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard. 1998. Reference-tracking: Description and explanation. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 51(1). 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1524/stuf.1999.52.34.335.Suche in Google Scholar

Constantinou, Harris. 2014. Intensifiers: Meaning and distribution. London: University College London.Suche in Google Scholar

Croft, William. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure (Oxford Linguistics). Oxford [England]; New York: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Dǒng, Xiùfāng 董秀芳. 2002. Gǔ Hànyǔ zhōng de “zì” hé “jǐ” – Xiàndài Hànyǔ “zìjǐ” de tèshuxìng de láiyuán古汉语中的“自”和“己”──现代汉语“自己”的特殊性的来源 [“Zi” (自) and “Ji” (己) in Classical Chinese──The Historical Source of the Peculiarity of “Ziji” (自己) in Modern Chinese]. Research in Ancient Chinese Language 54. 69–75.Suche in Google Scholar

Edmondson, Jerold A. & Frans Plank. 1978. Great expectations: An intensive self analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy 2(3). 373–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00149014.Suche in Google Scholar

Fù, Shuǎng 付爽. 2010. Qiǎnxī Shìhuō Xīnyǔ zhōng de “zì” 浅析《世说新语》 中的“自.” [A simple analysis of zì in the Shìhuō Xīnyǔ]. Xiāngfán Zhìyè Jìshù Xuéyuàn Xúbào 《襄樊职业技术学院学报》 [Journal of Xiangfan Vocational and Technical College] 9(3). 70–72.Suche in Google Scholar

Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From discourse process to grammatical construction: On left-dislocation in English (Studies in Discourse and Grammar v. 1). Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Pub.10.1075/sidag.1Suche in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. & Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd edn. London: New York: Arnold.Suche in Google Scholar

Harbsmeier, Christoph 何莫邪. 1981. Aspects of classical Chinese syntax. London and Malmö: Curzon Press. (Scandinavian Institute of Asian Studies Monograph Series; 45).Suche in Google Scholar

Hé, Jiànzhāng 何建章. 1990. Zhàn Guó Cè Zhùshì 战国策注释 [An Annotation of the Zhàn Guó Cè]. Beijing: Zhōnghuá Shūjú 中华书局 [Zhōnghuá Book Company].Suche in Google Scholar

Hockett, Charles F. 1966. What Algonquian is really like. International Journal of American Linguistics 32(1). 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1086/464880.Suche in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2003. Grammaticalization (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics), 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Hsu, Hsiu-Ling 許秀玲. 2014. Hànyǔ fǎnshēncí “zì” yǔ “jǐ” zhī yánjiù – lìshí yǔfǎ fēnbù jí gōngnéng 漢語反身詞「自」與「己」之研究–歷時語法分佈及功能 [A Study on Monosyllabic Bare Reflexive Zi and Ji Based on Diachronic Chinese Corpora]. Yǔwén yǔ guójì yánjiù 語文與國際研究 [Languages and International Studies] 11. 1–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Huang, Nick & Tom McCoy. 2011. Personal datives. Yale grammatical diversity project: English in North America. Updated by Katie Martin (2018). http://ygdp.yale.edu/phenomena/personal-datives (accessed 11 August 2021).Suche in Google Scholar

Huáng, Wěijiā 黄伟嘉. 1987. Jiǎjīnwén zhōng “zài, yú, zì, cóng” sì zì jiècí yòngfǎ de fāzhǎn biànhuà jí qí xiāngyù guānxì 甲金文中“在、于、自、从”四字介词用法的发展变化及其相互关系 [The development and metamorphosis of the usage of the four characters “zài, yú, zì, cóng” Oracle and Bronze Script and the interrelationships]. Shǎnxī shīfàn dàxué xuébào (zhéxué shèhuì kēxué bǎn) 《陕西师范大学学报 (哲学社会科学版)》 [Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)] 1987. 1.Suche in Google Scholar

Jacques, Guillaume & Anton Antonov. 2014. Direct/inverse systems. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(7). 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12079.Suche in Google Scholar

Jiǎ, Shuài 贾帅. 2014. “Zuǒzhuàn” dàicí yǔfǎ fēnxī yánjiù 《左传》 代词语法分析研究 [An analytic study of pronouns in the Zuǒ Zhuàn]. Xi’an: Xīběi Dàxué 西北大学 [Northwest University].Suche in Google Scholar

Jiang, Canzhong & Xu Wen. 2022. Semantics of the Chinese passive construction with retained object. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 9(1). 64–86. https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21012.jia.Suche in Google Scholar

Kemmer, Suzanne. 1995. Emphatic and reflexive-self: Expectations, viewpoint, and subjectivity. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: Linguistic Perspectives, 55–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554469.004Suche in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard. 2001. Intensifiers and reflexive pronouns. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, 747–759. Berlin, New York: De Gryuter Mouton. (Handbooks of linguistics and communication science; 20).Suche in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2000a. Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Traci Walker (eds.), Reflexives: Forms and functions (Typological Studies in Language; 40), 41–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.40.03konSuche in Google Scholar

König, Ekkehard & Peter Siemund. 2000b. The development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Diachronica 17(1). 39–84. https://doi.org/10.1075/dia.17.1.04kon.Suche in Google Scholar

Kuno, Susumu. 1987. Functional syntax: Anaphora, discourse, and empathy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Lai, Ryan Ka Yau 黎嘉祐 & Michelle Man-Long Pang 彭文朗. 2023. Rethinking the description and typology of Cantonese causative–resultative constructions: A dynamic constructionist lens. Languages 8(2). 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8020151.Suche in Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topics, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620607Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Langacker, Ronald W. 2008. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Nachdr. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

LaPolla, Randy J. 1995. ‘Ergative’ marking in Tibeto-Burman. In Yoshio Nishi, James A. Matisoff & Yasuhiko Nagano (eds.), New horizons in Tibeto-Burman morphosyntax, 189–228. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology. (Senri Ethnological Studies; 41).Suche in Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1991. Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27(1). 107–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700012433.Suche in Google Scholar

Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: a functional reference grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Liú, Píng 刘平. 2006. Gǔ Hànyǔ zhōng xūcí “zì” de yǔfǎhuà lìchéng 古汉语中虚词 “自” 的语法化历程 [The grammaticalisation journey of Old Chinese ‘zì’]. Lánzhōu jiàoyù xuéyuàn xuébào 兰州教育学院学报 [Journal of Lanzhou Institute of Education] 2. 38.Suche in Google Scholar

Méi, Zǔlín 梅祖麟. 1991. Cóng Hàndài de “dòng, shā”, “dòng, sǐ” lái kàn dòngbǔ jiégòu de fāzhǎn - jiān lùn Zhōnggǔ Shíqī qǐcí de shīshòu guānxì de zhōnglìhuà 從漢代的 “動, 殺”, “動, 死” 來看動補結構的發展-兼論中古時期起詞的施受關係的中立化 [On the V-‘kill’ and V-‘die’ structures in the Han dynasty and the development of V-Complement structures -The neutralization of the thematic status of the initial constituent in the sentence in Medieval Chinese]. Yǔyánxué Lùncóng 語言學論叢 [Linguistics Anthology] 16. 112–136.Suche in Google Scholar

Peyraube, Alain. 1996. Recent issues in Chinese historical syntax. In C.-T. James Huang & Yen-hui Audrey Li (eds.), New horizons in Chinese linguistics, 161–213. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.10.1007/978-94-009-1608-1_6Suche in Google Scholar

Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Reinhart, Tanya & Eric Reuland. 1993. Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4). 657–720.Suche in Google Scholar

Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32(3). 439–492. https://doi.org/10.1162/002438901750372522.Suche in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2003. Intensifiers in English and German: A comparison (Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics 6). London; New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203165126Suche in Google Scholar

Siemund, Peter. 2014. The emergence of English reflexive verbs: An analysis based on the Oxford English Dictionary. English Language and Linguistics 18(1). 49–73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000270.Suche in Google Scholar

Stern, Nancy. 2004. The semantic unity of reflexive, emphatic, and other-self pronouns. American Speech 79(3). 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-270.Suche in Google Scholar

Stern, Nancy. 2022. Reflexivity, role conflicts, and the meaning of English self pronouns. Manuscrito 45(1). 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2022.v45n1.ns.Suche in Google Scholar

Sturgeon, Donald. 2021. Chinese text project: A dynamic digital library of premodern Chinese. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 36(1 Suppl). i101–i112. https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz046.Suche in Google Scholar

Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and emphasis: On focus and scope in English (English Language Series title no. 15). London; New York: Longman.Suche in Google Scholar

Tournadre, Nicolas. 1995. Tibetan ergativity and the trajectory model. Senri Ethnological Studies 41. 261–275.Suche in Google Scholar

Wáng, Lì 王力. 1984. Zhōngguó yǔfǎ lǐlùn 《中国语法理论》 [Chinese Grammatical Theory]. Jìnán 濟南: Shāndōng Jiàoyù chūbǎnshè 山东教育出版社. (Wáng Lì wénjí 《王力文集》 [Collected Works of Wáng Lì]; 1).Suche in Google Scholar

Wei, Pei-ch’uan 魏培泉. 2004. Hàn Wèi Liùcháo Chēngdàicí Yánjiù《漢魏六朝稱代詞研究》 [A Study of the Pronouns of the Han, Wei and Six Dynasties Periods], 6. Taipei: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica [中央研究院語言學硏究所].Suche in Google Scholar

Witzlack-Makarevich, Alena & Balthasar Bickel. 2013. Towards a questionnaire on grammatical relations: A project bridging between typology and field linguistics. Tomsk Journal of Linguistics and Anthropology 2. 124–134. https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-110092.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhāng, Jué 张觉, Jìng Mǎ 马静, Péng Xú 徐鹏, Jīng Yáng 杨晶, Yányán Liú 刘妍妍 & Fēngyà Gù 顾风亚. 2007. A translation and annotation of the Hánfēizǐ 韩非子译注 (诸子译注丛书). Shanghai, China: Shànghǎi Gují Chūbǎnshè上海古籍出版社.Suche in Google Scholar

Zhāng, Wànqǐ 张万起 & Shàngcí Liú 刘尚慈. 1998. Shìshuō Xīnyǔ Yìzhù 《世说新语译注》 [A Translation and Annotation of the Shìshuō Xīnyǔ]. Beijing: 中华书局 [Zhonghua Book Company].Suche in Google Scholar

Zhū, Guànmíng 朱冠明. 2007. Cóng zhōnggǔ fódiǎn kàn “zìjǐ” de xíngchéng 从中古佛典看 “自己” 的形成 [Examining the formation of ziji through Middle Chinese Buddhist texts]. Zhōngguó yǔwén 《中国语文》 [Studies of the Chinese Language] 5. 402–411.Suche in Google Scholar