Abstract
Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) and Zaprionus indianus (Gupta) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) are invasive pests affecting berry crops in México. Z. indianus benefit from fruit damage caused by D. suzukii larvae, worsening infestations. Morelos state ranks eighth in Mexico for blackberry production, but these pests had not been previously reported in its berry crops. This study aimed to survey raspberry and blackberry crops in Morelos for coinfestations. Twelve multi-hole transparent traps baited with fermented juice were placed in raspberry and blackberry crops to capture flies. Additionally, 32 fruits per crop were collected, and emerging specimens were identified. The captured specimens were: 62.4 % D. suzukii, 2.4 % Z. indianus, 20.8 % Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen), other Diptera (12.3 %), Coleoptera (1 %), Hymenoptera (0.6 %), arachnids (0.3 %), Thysanoptera (0.1 %), and Hemiptera (0.1 %). From the collected blackberries, 23 male and 25 female D. suzukii, three Z. indianus, and 27 other drosophilids emerged. Similarly, from the raspberries, 19 male and 21 female D. suzukii, two Z. indianus and 13 other drosophilids, were recorded. This study provides the first evidence of D. suzukii and Z. indianus in berry crops in Morelos, Mexico, emphasizing the need for monitoring and management strategies.
Resumen
Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) y Zaprionus indianus (Gupta) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) son plagas invasoras que afectan los cultivos de bayas en México. Z. indianus se beneficia de los daños en la fruta causados por las larvas de D. suzukii, lo que empeora las infestaciones. El estado de Morelos ocupa el octavo lugar en México en producción de zarzamora, pero estas plagas no se habían reportado previamente en sus cultivos de bayas. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo estudiar los cultivos de frambuesa y zarzamora en Morelos para detectar coinfestaciones. Se colocaron doce trampas transparentes de múltiples agujeros cebadas con jugo fermentado en cultivos de frambuesa y mora para capturar moscas. Además, se recolectaron 32 frutas por cultivo y se identificaron los especímenes emergentes. De las moscas capturadas, 62.4 % fueron D. suzukii, 2.4 % Z. indianus, 20.8 % Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen), otros dípteros (12.3 %), coleópteros (1 %), himenópteros (0.6 %), arácnidos (0.3 %), tisanópteros (0.1 %) y hemípteros (0.1 %). De las zarzamoras colectadas emergieron 23 machos y 25 hembras de D. suzukii, tres Z. indianus y otros 27 drosófilos. De manera similar, de las frambuesas, se registraron 19 machos y 21 hembras de D. suzukii, dos Z. indianus y otros 13 drosófilos. Este estudio proporciona la primera evidencia de D. suzukii y Z. indianus en cultivos de bayas en Morelos, México, enfatizando la necesidad de estrategias de monitoreo y manejo.
Spotted-wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), that are native to Southeast Asia, have become an invasive pest in Europe and the USA since 2008, affecting various fruits such as cherries, blueberries, raspberries and blackberries (Stacconi 2022). D. suzukii can cause annual losses of up to US $511.3 million due to larval damage (De Ros et al. 2021). These species thrive in temperatures between 20 and 25 °C, with females capable of entering reproductive diapause for survival (Kirschbaum et al. 2020). Zaprionus indianus (Gupta) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) was originally from Africa but has been distributed widely in tropical countries around the world. Z. indianus was generally considered a secondary pest, as it typically did not attack unripe and undamaged fruits (van der Linde et al. 2006). However, Z. indianus is now known to cause direct damage to undamaged oranges, peaches, and figs while they are still on the tree (Tidon et al. 2003). The coexistence of D. suzukii and Z. indianus negatively affects fruits, as Z. indianus takes advantage of the damage caused by D. suzukii for oviposition and larval development (de Paiva Mendonça et al. 2023).
Weather plays a key role in insect dispersal (Bebber et al. 2013). Climate change influences habitat selection and range expansion by enabling species to exploit higher latitudes and warmer conditions (Eickermann et al. 2023). Insects adapted to colder environments may benefit from rising temperatures through extended foraging periods and shorter developmental times (Kovac et al. 2023). For instance, Z. indianus thrives at an optimal temperature of 28 °C, requiring at least 13 °C for ovarian maturation. Cold temperatures do not reduce its fitness; females enter an ovarian lapse without losing fertility (Lavagnino et al. 2020). Likewise, D. suzukii adapts to diverse environmental conditions, including altitude, wind speed, precipitation, temperature, and human land use, facilitating its global spread (Feng et al. 2024). It prefers temperate, humid climates, with optimal development between 20 and 25 °C. Mated females undergo reproductive diapause in response to low temperatures (Cini et al. 2012). Both species exhibit significant phenotypic flexibility and genetic diversity, enhancing their adaptability to varying climates and host plants (Gibert et al. 2019; Little et al. 2020; Olazcuaga et al. 2020). This adaptability has contributed to their success as invasive species. In Mexico, their activity is limited to morning and afternoon, likely as a strategy to avoid extreme midday heat (Cruz-Esteban, personal observation).
Mexico is leading in berry production and exports in Latin America, generating revenues of US $241 million and providing 350,000 jobs (Huerta 2019). The main producing states of these berries are Jalisco, Michoacán, Guanajuato, and Baja California, with a total cultivated area of 44,000 ha and an annual production of 800,000 tonnes/yr (Garcia et al. 2022). Morelos state is eighth in Mexico in terms of blackberry production (Garcia et al. 2022). The presence of D. suzukii and Z. indianus on berry crops has not been reported before in Morelos. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to survey raspberry and blackberry crops in Morelos for coinfestations of these drosophilid pests.
To detect the presence of drosophilids in Hueyapan, Morelos, Mexico on one farm that cultivates multiple berry crops, in a raspberry crop site (18.8658611 °N, 98.7006667 °W, 2,221 m. a.s.l.) and a blackberry crop site (18.8655000 °N, 98.7006667 °W, 2,221 m. a.s.l.), 12 multi-hole transparent traps were built (Cruz-Esteban 2021; Cruz-Esteban et al. 2021; Figure 1A). A cylindrical plastic container (14 cm in height × 10.5 cm in diameter) with a flat lid (Plásticos Adheribles del Bajío, León, Mexico) was used. Around the container, approximately 50 holes, each with a diameter of 2.5 mm, were evenly distributed 2 cm below the lid to allow the entry of insects. Inside, a piece of yellow cardboard was placed as a visual stimulus (5 × 5 cm, R = 245, G = 213, B = 39). The bait was a homemade fermented product, prepared as follows: 60 g of raspberries (harvested), 60 g of blueberries (Paradise S.A.P.I de C.V., Jalisco, Mexico), and 40 g of sugar (Zucarmex S. A. de C. V., Sinaloa, Mexico) were added to 1 L of water (Cruz-Esteban et al. 2024). The mixture was left to ferment for 7 days at 25 ± 2 °C before use, and 250 mL of the fermented juice was used as an attractant and drowning solution. On the farm, six traps were randomly distributed within and between each berry crop site, with a distance of 20 m between. The traps were placed 1 m above the ground. The traps were monitored weekly (every 7 days) for 5 weeks, from 6 May to 3 June 2024. In each monitoring session, the flies from each trap were collected, placed in containers with alcohol, and transported to the Insect Chemical Ecology Laboratory at Centro de Desarrollo de Productos Bióticos (CEPROBI), Instituto Politécnico Nacional, located in the state of Morelos, Mexico for the identification and counting of the captured drosophilid flies. Additionally, 32 ripe blackberry fruits and 32 ripe raspberry fruits were randomly collected, one from each plant, and transported to the laboratory in a cooler at 4 °C (Figure 1B and C). The fruits were placed in groups of five and one group of two in transparent 1 L plastic containers (14 cm high × 10.5 cm in diameter) with flat lids perforated with a needle to allow ventilation (Plásticos Adheribles del Bajío, León, Mexico). The fruits were kept in the laboratory at 25 ± 2 °C and 60–70 % relative humidity (RH) until the emergence of the offspring of the flies that may have oviposited in these fruits. The identification of the drosophilid flies captured by traps and those that emerged from the fruits was carried out based on the reports by Miller et al. (2017). Male D. suzukii have a black spot on the distal part of their forewings and 5–6 completely black tergites, while females have a large, dark, serrated ovipositor (Figure 1D). Z. indianus is characterized by two longitudinal white stripes bordered by black lines on the mesonotum (Figure 1E).

(A) Trap used in the monitoring of Drosophila in raspberry and blackberry in Morelos, Mexico in 2024. (B) Infested blackberry. (C) Infested raspberry. (D) Drosophila suzukii and (E) Zaprionus indianus.
Trapping data were analyzed using R software version 4.4.2 (R Core Team 2022). The number of Drosophila captured (captures/trap/week) was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model with a negative binomial distribution, with crop and monitoring date as fixed variables, and replicate (trap) as a random effect (α = 0.05). Captures by sex were compared using the Chi-square test with Yates correction with the package DescTools (Signorell et al. 2016).
Most of the specimens captured were D. suzukii (62.4 %, 755 individuals), Z. indianus (2.4 %, 29 individuals), and Drosophila melanogaster (Meigen) (Diptera: Drosophilidae) (20.8 %, 252 individuals). The remaining specimens were: other Diptera (12.3 %), Coleoptera (1 %), Hymenoptera (0.6 %), arachnids (0.3 %), Thysanoptera (0.1 %), and Hemiptera (0.1 %). Statistical analyses showed a non-significant effect on D. suzukii captures between crops (F = 2.2, df = 1; P = 0.1420), monitoring dates (F = 0.98, df = 4; P = 0.919), or their interaction (F = 5.6, df = 4; P = 0.2308) (Table 1). Numerically, more D. suzukii were captured in raspberries (15.2 ± 1.7) than in blackberries (10.0 ± 1.6), with similar values across all monitoring dates. Both males and females were captured in similar proportions (G = 1.2, df = 1, P = 0.2752) (Table 1).
Mean number (±SE) of male and female Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus captured in raspberry and blackberry crops (captures/trap/week) in 2024 in Morelos, Mexico.
Crops | Date | D. suzukii | Z. indianus | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Female | Male | Total | Female | Male | Total | ||
Raspberry | 06-May | 8.5 ± 2.9 | 7.8 ± 2.9 | 16.3 ± 5.6 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.3 |
13-May | 9.2 ± 2.6 | 8.0 ± 2.0 | 17.2 ± 4.6 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | |
20-May | 6.7 ± 1.8 | 7.3 ± 1.5 | 14.0 ± 3.0 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | |
27-May | 7.8 ± 2.3 | 8.5 ± 1.8 | 16.3 ± 4.0 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | |
3-June | 6.0 ± 1.3 | 6.2 ± 1.5 | 12.2 ± 2.6 | 0.5 ± 0.2 | 0.5 ± 0.3 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | |
Blackberry | 06-May | 5.5 ± 2.7 | 4.2 ± 1.7 | 9.7 ± 4.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 |
13-May | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 1.0 | 8.0 ± 2.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.5 | |
20-May | 5.5 ± 2.6 | 4.2 ± 1.7 | 9.7 ± 4.2 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | |
27-May | 5.5 ± 2.7 | 4.2 ± 1.7 | 9.7 ± 4.2 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 1.0 ± 0.4 | |
3-June | 6.5 ± 2.7 | 6.3 ± 1.7 | 12.8 ± 4.2 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 1.5 ± 0.4 |
-
No significant differences were observed in D. suzukii or Z. indianus captures between crops, monitoring dates, or their interaction. Captures by sex were compared using the Chi-square test with Yates correction (α = 0.05). The number of Drosophila captured (captures/trap/week) was analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model with a negative binomial distribution (α = 0.05).
Similarly, Z. indianus captures showed no significant effect between crops (F = 0.28, df = 1; P = 0.5961), monitoring dates (F = 1.1, df = 4; P = 0.8939), or their interaction (F = 0.3124, df = 4; P = 0.9890), with similar captures across all crops and monitoring dates. Both males and females were captured in similar proportions (G = 1.0, df = 1, P = 0.3167) (Table 1).
Notably, 23 male and 25 female D. suzukii, along with three Z. indianus and 27 other drosophilids, emerged from the collected blackberries (32 fruits), while 19 male and 21 female D. suzukii, along with two Z. indianus and 13 other drosophilids, emerged from the raspberries (32 fruits).
The presence of D. suzukii and Z. indianus attacking various hosts has been reported in different regions or states of Mexico (SENASICA 2019; Supplementary 1). There are records of both species in guava crops in Veracruz (Lasa and Tadeo 2015), and in blueberries, blackberries, and raspberries in Michoacan (Cruz-Esteban 2021). The first report of Z. indianus in Mexico was in 2002 in Chiapas state (Castrezana 2007), and was confirmed by Cruz-Esteban et al. (2022). Both species also were captured in the mountains of Tehuacan, Puebla (Cruz-Esteban et al. 2022), in Argentina (Escobar et al. 2018), and Z. indianus has reported on the Island of Maui, Hawaii, USA (Willbrand et al. 2018), and North-East Algeria (Khaldi et al. 2021). There is a previous report of D. suzukii and Z. indianus on fig fruits in Morelos, Mexico (Bautista et al. 2017), which is somewhat unusual, as it is not known that D. suzukii has a strong preference for this fruit. In our study, adults of D. suzukii and Z. indianus were captured in fermented juice traps and emerged from blackberry and raspberry ripe fruits (Supplementary 1). The fact that both species were captured by the same trap is due to the fact that both are attracted to chemical volatiles produced by fermentation (Cruz-Esteban 2021; Cruz-Esteban et al. 2021; Cruz-Esteban et al. 2022). This is the first time that D. suzukii and Z. indianus have been captured using traps baited with home-made fermented products in commercial berry crops in the state of Morelos, México.
Castro-Sosa et al. (2017) identified Morelos as a suitable habitat for D. suzukii, noting that environmental conditions were favorable for its establishment and reproduction, based on modeling of environmental variables and non-cultivated host fruits. At that time, only guava, a non-cultivated host, was available in Morelos. However, the situation has changed with the introduction of cultivated fig, blackberry, and raspberry crops. In addition, environmental changes in various regions of this state in recent years have been marked by temperature fluctuations, including lower temperatures that have persisted for longer periods. Calabria et al. (2012) observed that D. suzukii prefers higher altitudes with cooler summers and high humidity, unlike the warmer climates in the U.S. and Europe. Feng et al. (2024) found that the species has adapted to various environmental conditions, which may contribute to its spread in Morelos, aided by the presence of host crops. In contrast, Z. indianus typically thrives in warm climates but has shown adaptability to colder conditions (da Mata et al. 2010), demonstrating environmental plasticity and the ability to persist in temperate regions. This suggests that the potential distribution of both species may be influenced by climate change. The presence of these invasive species in Hueyapan, Morelos, underscores the need to define their ecological niche and assess their interactions with other pests and natural enemies in berry crops. It is essential to prioritize research on their impact, distribution, and infestation of commercial and wild fruits in the region, as well as emphasize the need for monitoring and management strategies for both populations.
Funding source: Secretaria de Investigación y Posgrado, Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Award Identifier / Grant number: 20240337
Acknowledgments
We thank Magister Hilda Elizabet Flores Moctezuma for contact with farmers Mr. Quirino Barrios Dorantes, Mr. Horacio Barrios Morales who allowed us fieldwork in their berry crops. Ph. D. Valentina Díaz Grisales for guidance on taxonomy and photography, Bs. Atmospheric Science Fructuoso Romero Cortés for help and guidance with atmospheric data curation, Ph. D. Augustin Jesús Gonzaga Segura for his laboratory recommendations, and Ecoetología de Insectos Laboratory, Escuela de Estudios Superiores del Jicarero, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos.
-
Research ethics: Not applicable.
-
Informed consent: Not applicable.
-
Author contributions: LAFV: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing-original draft. SCE: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-review, editing & analyzed the data. HRP: Resources, Writing-review & editing. PRGS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing-review & editing.
-
Use of Large Language Models, AI and Machine Learning Tools: None declared.
-
Conflict of interest: All other authors state no conflict of interest.
-
Research funding: Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado. Proyecto No. 20240337 del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (SIP-IPN).
-
Data availability: The data are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
Bautista, N., Illescas, C.P., López, E., Velazquez, L.J., and García, C.D.J. (2017). Presence of Drosophilidae (Diptera: Ephydroidea) flies associated with fig fruits in Morelos, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 100: 813–816, https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0409.Suche in Google Scholar
Bebber, D.P., Ramotowski, M.A., and Gurr, S.J. (2013). Crop pests and pathogens move polewards in a warming world. Nat. Clim. Change 3: 985–988, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1990.Suche in Google Scholar
Calabria, G., Máca, J., Bächli, G., Serra, L., and Pascual, M. (2012). First records of the potential pest species Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Europe. J. Appl. Entomol. 136: 139–147, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.2010.01583.x.Suche in Google Scholar
Castrezana, S. (2007). New records of Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in North America and a key to identify some Zaprionus species deposited in the Drosophila Tucson Stock Center. Drosophila Inform. Serv. 90: 34–36.Suche in Google Scholar
Castro-Sosa, R., Castillo-Peralta, M.D.R., Monterroso-Rivas, A.I., Gomez-Díaz, J.D., Flores-González, E., and Rebollar-Alviter, Á. (2017). Potential distribution of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in relation to alternate hosts in Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 100: 787–794, https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0409.Suche in Google Scholar
Cini, A., Ioriatti, C., and Anfora, G. (2012). A review of the invasion of Drosophila suzukii in Europe and a draft research agenda for integrated pest management. Bull. Insectol. 65: 149–160.Suche in Google Scholar
Cruz-Esteban, S. (2021). It is not the color of the trap, but the color as a close-range stimulus inside the trap that increases capture of Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in berry crops. Crop Protect. 141: 2–7, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105449.Suche in Google Scholar
Cruz-Esteban, S., Garay-Serrano, E., and Rojas, J.C. (2021). Effect of visual cues and a fermentation-based attractant blend on trap catch of two invasive Drosophila flies in berry crops in Mexico. J. Econ. Entomol. 114: 152–160, https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toaa296.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Cruz-Esteban, S., Hernández-Ledesma, P., and Cultid-Medina, C. (2022) Presence of economically important Drosophila flies in tropical landscapes of Mexico. Proc. Zool. Soc. 75: 391–393, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-022-00445-2.Suche in Google Scholar
Cruz-Esteban, S., Rojas-Sanchez, M.L., Soto-Cuellar, E., Alavez-Rosas, D., and Rojas, J.C. (2024). Comparison of home-made and commercial baits for trapping Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberry crops. Fla. Entomol. 107: 20240003, https://doi.org/10.1515/flaent-2024-0003.Suche in Google Scholar
da Mata, R.A., Tidon, R., Côrtes, L.G., De Marco, P., and Diniz-Filho, J.A.F. (2010). Invasive and flexible: niche shift in the drosophilid Zaprionus indianus (Insecta, Diptera). Biol. Invas. 12: 1231–1241, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-009-9542-0.Suche in Google Scholar
de Paiva Mendonça, L., Haddi, K., and Godoy, W.A.C. (2023). Effects of co-occurrence and intra- and interspecific interactions between Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus. PLoS One 18: e0281806, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281806.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
De Ros, G., Grassi, A., and Pantezzi, T. (2021). Recent trends in the economic impact of Drosophila suzukii. In: FRM, Garcia (Ed.). Drosophila suzukii management. Springer Nature, Switzerland, pp. 11–28.10.1007/978-3-030-62692-1_2Suche in Google Scholar
Eickermann, M., Junk, J., and Rapisarda, C. (2023). Climate change and insects. Insects 14: 678, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14080678.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Escobar, L.I., Ovruski Alderete, S.M., and Kirschbaum, D.S. (2018). Foreign invasive pests Drosophila suzukii (Matsamura) and Zaprionus indianus Gupta (Diptera: Drosophilidae) threaten fruit production in northwestern Argentina, https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/bitstream/handle/11336/82329/CONICET_Digital_Nro.23520155-0903-4f6a-a937-6bf8c3fddb87_A.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (Accessed on 10 February 2025).Suche in Google Scholar
Feng, S., DeGrey, S.P., Guédot, C., Schoville, S.D., and Pool, J.E. (2024). Genomic diversity illuminates the environmental adaptation of Drosophila suzukii. Genome Biol. Evol. 16: evae195, https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evae195.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Garcia, F.R.M., Lasa, R., Funes, C.F., and Buzzetti, K. (2022). Drosophila suzukii management in Latin America: current status and perspectives. J. Econ. Entomol. 115: 1008–1023, https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/toac052.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Gibert, P., Debat, V., and Ghalambor, C.K. (2019). Phenotypic plasticity, global change, and the speed of adaptive evolution. Curr. Op. Insect. Sci. 35: 34–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2019.06.007.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Huerta, J.C. (2019). Las berries ya son el tercer producto agrícola de México más exportado. El Financiero, https://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/economia/las-berries-se-colocan-como-el-tercer-producto-agricola-mexicano-mas-exportado-al-extranjero/ (Accessed on 10 February 2025).Suche in Google Scholar
Khaldi, M., Barech, G., Bendjedou, H., and Aouari, I. (2021). First detection and infestation levels of the invasive fruit fly Zaprionus indianus Gupta, 1970 (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in pomegranate orchards from Algeria. African Entomol. 29: 173–179, https://doi.org/10.4001/003.029.0173.Suche in Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, D.S., Funes, C.F., Buonocore-Biancheri, M.J., Suárez, L., and Ovruski, S.M. (2020). The biology and ecology of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) In: FRM, Garcia (Ed.). Drosophila suzukii Management. Springer, Cham.10.1007/978-3-030-62692-1_4Suche in Google Scholar
Kovac, H., Nagy, J.M., Käfer, H., and Stabentheiner, A. (2023). Relationship between nest and body temperature and microclimate in the paper wasp Polistes dominula. Insects 14: 886, https://doi.org/10.3390/insects14110886.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Lasa, R. and Tadeo, E. (2015). Invasive drosophilid pests Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Veracruz, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 98: 987–988, https://doi.org/10.1653/024.098.0332.Suche in Google Scholar
Lavagnino, N.J., Fanara, J.J., and Mensch, J. (2020). Comparison of overwintering survival and fertility of Zaprionus Indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae) flies from native and invaded ranges. J. Therm. Biol. 87: 102470, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.102470.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed
Little, C.M., Chapman, T.W., and Hillier, N.K. (2020). Plasticity is key to success of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) invasion. J. Insect Sci. 20: 5, https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa034.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
Miller, M.E., Marshall, S.A., and Grimaldi, D.A. (2017). A review of the species of Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) and genera of Drosophilidae of Northeastern North America. Canad. J. Arthropod Identif. 31: 1–282, https://doi.org/10.5063/F11J97Q0.Suche in Google Scholar
Olazcuaga, L., Loiseau, A., Parrinello, H., Paris, M., Fraimout, A., Guedot, C., Diepenbrock, L.M., Kenis, M., Zhang, J., Chen, X., et al.. (2020). A whole-genome scan for association with invasion success in the fruit fly Drosophila suzukii using contrasts of allele frequencies corrected for population structure. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37: 2369–2385, https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa098.Suche in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
R Core Team. (2022). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.Suche in Google Scholar
SENASICA (Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria). (2019). Mosca el vinagre de las alas manchadas Drosophila suzukii Matsumura, Ficha Técnica No. 7. Servicio Nacional de Sanidad, Inocuidad y Calidad Agroalimentaria, Secretaría de Agricultura y Desarrollo Rural, Mexico, p. 21.Suche in Google Scholar
Signorell, A., Aho, K., Alfons, A., Anderegg, N., Aragon, T., and Arppe, A. (2016). DescTools: tools for descriptive statistics. R package version 0. 99: 18.Suche in Google Scholar
Stacconi, V.R. (2022). Drosophila suzukii (spotted wing drosophila). PlantwisePlus Knowledge Bank 109283, CABI (Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International) Compendium online, https://doi.org/10.1079/pwkb.species.109283.Suche in Google Scholar
Tidon, R., Leite, D.F., and Leão, B.F.D. (2003). Impact of the colonisation of Zaprionus (Diptera, Drosophilidae) in different ecosystems of the Neotropical region: 2 years after the invasion. Biol. Conserv. 112: 299–305, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00322-1.Suche in Google Scholar
van der Linde, K., Steck, G.J., Hibbard, K., Birdsley, J.S., Alonso, L.M., and Houle, D. (2006). First records of Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae), a pest species on commercial fruits from Panama and the United States of America. Fla. Entomol. 89: 402–404, https://doi.org/10.1653/0015-4040(2006)89[402:FROZID]2.0.CO.10.1653/0015-4040(2006)89[402:FROZID]2.0.CO;2Suche in Google Scholar
Willbrand, B., Pfeiffer, D., Leblanc, L., and Yassin, A. (2018). First report of African fig fly, Zaprionus indianus Gupta (Diptera: Drosophilidae), on the island of Maui, Hawaii, USA, in 2017 and potential impacts to the Hawaiian entomofauna. Proc. Hawaiian Entomol. Soc. 50: 55–65.Suche in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/flaent-2024z089).
© 2025 the author(s), published by De Gruyter on behalf of the Florida Entomological Society
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Parasitism of Halyomorpha halys and Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) sentinel eggs in Central Florida
- Genetic differentiation of three populations of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in Mexico
- Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) associated with blueberry cultivation in Central Mexico
- First report of Phidotricha erigens (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Epipaschiinae) injuring mango inflorescences in Puerto Rico
- Seed predation of Sabal palmetto, Sabal mexicana and Sabal uresana (Arecaceae) by the bruchid Caryobruchus gleditsiae (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), with new host and distribution records
- Genetic variation of rice stink bugs, Oebalus spp. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) from Southeastern United States and Cuba
- Selecting Coriandrum sativum (Apiaceae) varieties to promote conservation biological control of crop pests in south Florida
- First record of Mymarommatidae (Hymenoptera) from the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
- First field validation of Ontsira mellipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a potential biological control agent for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in South Carolina
- Field evaluation of α-copaene enriched natural oil lure for detection of male Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in area-wide monitoring programs: results from Tunisia, Costa Rica and Hawaii
- Abundance of Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and other thrips in commercial snap bean fields in the Homestead Agricultural Area (HAA)
- Performance of Salvinia molesta (Salviniae: Salviniaceae) and its biological control agent Cyrtobagous salviniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in freshwater and saline environments
- Natural arsenal of Magnolia sarcotesta: insecticidal activity against the leaf-cutting ant Atta mexicana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
- Ethanol concentration can influence the outcomes of insecticide evaluation of ambrosia beetle attacks using wood bolts
- Post-release support of host range predictions for two Lygodium microphyllum biological control agents
- Missing jewels: the decline of a wood-nesting forest bee, Augochlora pura (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), in northern Georgia
- Biological response of Rhopalosiphum padi and Sipha flava (Hemiptera: Aphididae) changes over generations
- Argopistes tsekooni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a new natural enemy of Chinese privet in North America: identification, establishment, and host range
- A non-overwintering urban population of the African fig fly (Diptera: Drosophilidae) impacts the reproductive output of locally adapted fruit flies
- Fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on four economically important host fruits from Fujian Province, China
- Carambola fruit fly in Brazil: new host and first record of associated parasitoids
- Establishment and range expansion of invasive Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae) in Texas
- A micro-anatomical investigation of dark and light-adapted eyes of Chilades pandava (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
- Scientific Notes
- Early stragglers of periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) found in Louisiana
- Attraction of released male Mediterranean fruit flies to trimedlure and an α-copaene-containing natural oil: effects of lure age and distance
- Co-infestation with Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae): a threat for berry crops in Morelos, Mexico
- Observation of brood size and altricial development in Centruroides hentzi (Arachnida: Buthidae) in Florida, USA
- New quarantine cold treatment for medfly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in pomegranates
- A new invasive pest in Mexico: the presence of Thrips parvispinus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in chili pepper fields
- Acceptance of fire ant baits by nontarget ants in Florida and California
- Examining phenotypic variations in an introduced population of the invasive dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
- Note on the nesting biology of Epimelissodes aegis LaBerge (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
- Mass rearing protocol and density trials of Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of air potato
- Cardinal predation of the invasive Jorō spider Trichophila clavata (Araneae: Nephilidae) in Georgia
- Retraction
- Retraction of: Examining phenotypic variations in an introduced population of the invasive dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
Artikel in diesem Heft
- Frontmatter
- Research Articles
- Parasitism of Halyomorpha halys and Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) sentinel eggs in Central Florida
- Genetic differentiation of three populations of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in Mexico
- Tortricidae (Lepidoptera) associated with blueberry cultivation in Central Mexico
- First report of Phidotricha erigens (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Epipaschiinae) injuring mango inflorescences in Puerto Rico
- Seed predation of Sabal palmetto, Sabal mexicana and Sabal uresana (Arecaceae) by the bruchid Caryobruchus gleditsiae (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), with new host and distribution records
- Genetic variation of rice stink bugs, Oebalus spp. (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) from Southeastern United States and Cuba
- Selecting Coriandrum sativum (Apiaceae) varieties to promote conservation biological control of crop pests in south Florida
- First record of Mymarommatidae (Hymenoptera) from the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
- First field validation of Ontsira mellipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) as a potential biological control agent for Anoplophora glabripennis (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in South Carolina
- Field evaluation of α-copaene enriched natural oil lure for detection of male Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in area-wide monitoring programs: results from Tunisia, Costa Rica and Hawaii
- Abundance of Megalurothrips usitatus (Bagnall) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and other thrips in commercial snap bean fields in the Homestead Agricultural Area (HAA)
- Performance of Salvinia molesta (Salviniae: Salviniaceae) and its biological control agent Cyrtobagous salviniae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in freshwater and saline environments
- Natural arsenal of Magnolia sarcotesta: insecticidal activity against the leaf-cutting ant Atta mexicana (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
- Ethanol concentration can influence the outcomes of insecticide evaluation of ambrosia beetle attacks using wood bolts
- Post-release support of host range predictions for two Lygodium microphyllum biological control agents
- Missing jewels: the decline of a wood-nesting forest bee, Augochlora pura (Hymenoptera: Halictidae), in northern Georgia
- Biological response of Rhopalosiphum padi and Sipha flava (Hemiptera: Aphididae) changes over generations
- Argopistes tsekooni (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a new natural enemy of Chinese privet in North America: identification, establishment, and host range
- A non-overwintering urban population of the African fig fly (Diptera: Drosophilidae) impacts the reproductive output of locally adapted fruit flies
- Fitness of Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on four economically important host fruits from Fujian Province, China
- Carambola fruit fly in Brazil: new host and first record of associated parasitoids
- Establishment and range expansion of invasive Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae: Phycitinae) in Texas
- A micro-anatomical investigation of dark and light-adapted eyes of Chilades pandava (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
- Scientific Notes
- Early stragglers of periodical cicadas (Hemiptera: Cicadidae) found in Louisiana
- Attraction of released male Mediterranean fruit flies to trimedlure and an α-copaene-containing natural oil: effects of lure age and distance
- Co-infestation with Drosophila suzukii and Zaprionus indianus (Diptera: Drosophilidae): a threat for berry crops in Morelos, Mexico
- Observation of brood size and altricial development in Centruroides hentzi (Arachnida: Buthidae) in Florida, USA
- New quarantine cold treatment for medfly Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) in pomegranates
- A new invasive pest in Mexico: the presence of Thrips parvispinus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in chili pepper fields
- Acceptance of fire ant baits by nontarget ants in Florida and California
- Examining phenotypic variations in an introduced population of the invasive dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)
- Note on the nesting biology of Epimelissodes aegis LaBerge (Hymenoptera: Apidae)
- Mass rearing protocol and density trials of Lilioceris egena (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of air potato
- Cardinal predation of the invasive Jorō spider Trichophila clavata (Araneae: Nephilidae) in Georgia
- Retraction
- Retraction of: Examining phenotypic variations in an introduced population of the invasive dung beetle Digitonthophagus gazella (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae)