Wisdom in Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen

Sergio Ariza

doi:10.1515/elen-2022-0014

Artikel

Wisdom in Gorgias’ Encomium of Helen

Sergio Ariza

Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 17. November 2022

Veröffentlicht von

Veröffentlichen auch Sie bei De Gruyter Brill

Informationen für Autor*innen

Aus der Zeitschrift Elenchos Band 43 Heft 2

Abstract

This paper argues that the Encomium of Helen must be seen as a speech about the value and importance of wisdom in human life and not as much as one as about logos. Gorgias sustains his vision based on a certain intellectualism which reduces moral faults to intellectual errors. This intellectualist program comprises a rationalization of emotions and a commitment with a certain tradition that discriminates between a minority with knowledge and a majority with only opinion. The consequence for Helen is that she can be excused from her action at the expense of being reproached for her lack of wisdom and is thus relegated to the ignorant majority. Therefore, what is initially praise and an apology turns into severe blame. For this, I argue, the encomium can be qualified as an amusement (paignion). For the Encomium’s listeners the amusement becomes a challenge that demands they decipher the speech’s paradoxical character and appeal to their own wisdom to not be reproached like Helen. Thus the Encomium cannot be seen as a treaty nor as mere joke but rather as an intellectual agôn between the speech and the listener, which serves them “to arm the soul for contests of excellence”, as the epigram dedicated to Gorgias in Delfos says.

Keywords: Gorgias; Greek rhetoric; emotions; intellectualism; discourse theory

Corresponding author: Sergio Ariza, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia, E-mail: sariza@uniandes.edu.co

References

Buccheim, Th. 1989. Gorgias von Leontini. Reden, Fragmente und Testimonien. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Calogero, G. 1957. “Gorgias and the Socratic Principle Nemo Sua Sponte Peccat.” Journal of Hellenic Studies 77: 12–7, https://doi.org/10.2307/628627.Suche in Google Scholar

Claus, D. 1981. Toward the Soul. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Cole, T. 1991. The Origins of Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.10.56021/9780801840555Suche in Google Scholar

Consigny, S. 2001. Gorgias, Sophist and Artist. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Suche in Google Scholar

De Romilly, J. 1975. Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Massachusetts & London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674331457Suche in Google Scholar

Echeñique, J. 2012. “El Encomio de Helena y la Responsabilidad Moral.” Methexis 25: 35–50, https://doi.org/10.1163/24680974-90000595.Suche in Google Scholar

Enos, R. L. 1976. “The Epistemology of Gorgias’ Rhetoric: A Re-examination.” Southern Speech Communication Journal 42: 35–51, https://doi.org/10.1080/10417947609372331.Suche in Google Scholar

Faraone, Ch. 1999. Ancient Greek Love Magic. Cambridge & London: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/9780674036703Suche in Google Scholar

Flashar, H. 1956. “Die Medizinischen Grundlagen der Lehre von der Wirkung der Dichtung in der Griechischen Poetik.” Hermes 84: 12–48.Suche in Google Scholar

Gagarin, M. 2001. “Did the Sophists Aim to Persuade?” Rhetorica: A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 19: 275–91, https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.2001.19.3.275.Suche in Google Scholar

Ioli, R. 2013. Gorgia. Testimonianze e Frammenti. Roma: Carocci.Suche in Google Scholar

Irwin, T. 1999. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.10.1093/oseo/instance.00258595Suche in Google Scholar

MacDowell, D. M. 1982. Gorgias. Encomium of Helen. London: Bristol Classical Press.10.2307/4349533Suche in Google Scholar

McComiskey, B. 2002. Gorgias and the New Sophistic Rhetoric. Carbondale & Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Mourelatos, A. P. D. 1987. “Gorgias on the Function of Language.” Philosophical Topics 15: 135–70, https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics19871527.Suche in Google Scholar

Poulakos, J. 1983. “Gorgias’ Encomium to Helen and the Defense of Rhetoric.” Rhetorica. A Journal of the History of Rhetoric 1: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1525/rh.1983.1.2.1.Suche in Google Scholar

Schiappa, E. 1995. “Gorgias’s Helen Revisited.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81: 310–24, https://doi.org/10.1080/00335639509384118.Suche in Google Scholar

Segal, Ch. P. 1962. “Gorgias and the Psychology of the Logos.” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66: 99–155, https://doi.org/10.2307/310738.Suche in Google Scholar

Sorabji, R. 2000. Emotion and Peace of Mind. From Stoic Agitation to Christian Temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Sprague, R. K. 1972. The Older Sophists. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.Suche in Google Scholar

Verdenius, W. J. 1981. “Gorgias’ Doctrine of Deception.” In The Sophists and their Legacy, edited by G. B. Kerferd, 116–28. Wisbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Wardy, R. 1996. The Birth of Rhetoric. Gorgias, Plato and their Successors. London: Routledge.Suche in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-11-17

Published in Print: 2022-12-16

Sie haben derzeit keinen Zugang zu diesem Inhalt.

Artikel in diesem Heft

https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2022-0014

Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel

Gorgias; Greek rhetoric; emotions; intellectualism; discourse theory