La critica sestana ai numeri pitagorici

Bibliografia

Annas, J., and J. Barnes. 2000. Sextus Empiricus. Outlines of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barnes, J. 1988. “Scepticism and the Arts.” In Method, Medicine and Metaphysics, edited by R. J. Hankinson, 53–77. Alberta: Academic Printing.10.1515/APEIRON.1988.21.2.53Search in Google Scholar

Bett, R. 2006. “La double ‘schizophrénie’ de M. 1–6 et ses origines historiques.” In Sur le Contre les professeurs de Sextus Empiricus, edited by J. Delattre, 17–34. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Université Charles-de-Gaulle-Lille 3.Search in Google Scholar

Bett, R. 2012. Sextus Empiricus. Against the Physicists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139048811Search in Google Scholar

Bett, R. 2018. Sextus Empiricus. Against Those in the Disciplines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Blank, D. L. 1998. Sextus Empiricus. Against the Grammarians. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brennan, T. 2015. “Number: M 10.148–309.” In Sextus Empiricus and Ancient Physics, edited by K. Algra, and K. Ierodiakonou, 324–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107706590.010Search in Google Scholar

Brisson, L. 2006. “Contre les Arithméticiens (Pros Arithmêtikous) ou contre ceux qui enseignent que les nombres sont des principes.” In Sur le Contre les professeurs de Sextus Empiricus, edited by J. Delattre, 67–77. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Université Charles-de-Gaulle-Lille 3.Search in Google Scholar

Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bury, R. G. 1936. Sextus Empiricus. Against the Physicists, Against the Ethicists. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/DLCL.sextus_empiricus-ethicists.1936Search in Google Scholar

Cardullo, R. L. 2013. Aristotele. Metafisica. Libri A, α, B. Roma: Carocci.Search in Google Scholar

Catapano, M. 2016. “Natura e storia nello scetticismo urbano di Sesto Empirico.” Syzetesis 3 (1): 9–27.Search in Google Scholar

Cattanei, E. 1996. Enti matematici e metafisica. Platone, l’Accademia e Aristotele a confronto. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Search in Google Scholar

Centrone, B. 2015. “Medioplatonismo e neopitagorismo, un confronto difficile.” Rivista di storia della filosofia 70 (2): 399–423, https://doi.org/10.3280/sf2015-002007.Search in Google Scholar

Cornelli, G. 2013. In Search of Pythagoreanism. Pythagoreanism as an Historiographical Category. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110306507Search in Google Scholar

Cornelli, G., R. McKirahan, and C. Macris. 2013. On Pythagoreanism. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110318500Search in Google Scholar

Corti, L. 2009. Scepticisme et langage. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Corti, L. 2015a. “Scepticism, Number, and Appearances: The ἀριθμητική τέχνη and Sextus’ Targets in M I–VI.” Philosophie antique 15: 121–45, https://doi.org/10.4000/philosant.376.Search in Google Scholar

Corti, L. 2015b. “Sextus, the Number Two and the Phaedo.” In Ancient Readings of Plato’s Phaedo, edited by S. Delcomminette, P. d’Hoine, and M. A. Gavray, 90–106. Leiden & Boston: Brill.10.1163/9789004289543_006Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, J. 2003. The Heirs of Plato. A Study of the Old Academy (347–274 BC). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198237669.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Dorter, K. 1989. “The Theory of Forms and Parmenides I.” In Plato. Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 3, edited by J. Anton, and A. Preus, 183–201. Albany: State University of New York Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dye, G., and B. Vitrac. 2009. Le Contre les géomètres de Sextus Empiricus: sources, cibles, structure. Leiden: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Eichorn, R. E. 2014. “How (Not) to Read Sextus Empiricus.” Ancient Philosophy 34 (1): 121–49, https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil20143418.Search in Google Scholar

Eichorn, R. E. 2020. “Sextus Empiricus on Isostheneia and Epochê: A Developmental Model.” Sképsis: Revista de Filosofia 11 (21): 188–209.Search in Google Scholar

Erler, M. 2013. “Chain of Proof in Lucretius, Sextus, and Plato: Rhetorical Tradition and Philosophy.” In Épicurisme et Scepticisme, edited by S. Marchand, and F. Verde, 25–43. Roma: Sapienza Università Editrice.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, F. 2004. Platone. Parmenide. Milano: BUR.Search in Google Scholar

Forcignanò, F. 2015. “Partecipazione, mescolanza, separazione: Platone e l’immanentismo.” Elenchos 36 (1): 5–44, https://doi.org/10.1515/elen-2015-360102.Search in Google Scholar

Forcignanò, F. 2017. Forme, linguaggio, sostanze. Il dibattito sulle idee nell’Accademia antica. Milano: Mimesis.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1990. “An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism.” In Epistemology: Companions to Ancient Thought, Vol. I, edited by S. Everson, 225–50. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Fronterotta, F. 2001. Methexis. La teoria platonica delle idee e la partecipazione delle cose empiriche. Dai dialoghi giovanili al Parmenide. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Search in Google Scholar

Gaiser, K. 1998. Testimonia platonica. Le antiche testimonianze sulle dottrine non scritte di Platone, edited by G. Reale. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Search in Google Scholar

Gallop, D. 1975. Plato. Phaedo. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 1996. “Wie über Ideen sprechen? Parmenides” In Platon. Seine Dialoge in der Sicht neuer Forschungen, edited by T. Kobusch, and B. Mojsich, 146–66. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Search in Google Scholar

Graeser, A. 2003. Platons Parmenides. Stuttgart: Steiner.Search in Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1995. The Sceptics. The Arguments of the Philosophers. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Horky, P. S. 2013. “Theophrastus on Platonic and ‘Pythagorean’ Imitation.” The Classical Quarterly 63 (2): 686–712, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838813000189.Search in Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M. 2008. “La critica di Sesto Empirico all’interpretazione di Platone ‘aporetico’.” In Anthropine sophia: studi di filologia e storiografia filosofica in memoria di Gabriele Giannantoni, edited by F. Alesse, F. Aronadio, M. C. Dalfino, L. Simeoni, and E. Spinelli, 457–80. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Ioppolo, A. M. 2009. La testimonianza di Sesto Empirico sull’Accademia scettica. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1979. Studi sull’Accademia platonica antica. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1980. Speusippo. Frammenti. Napoli: Bibliopolis.Search in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 1992. “Sesto, Platone, l’Accademia antica e i pitagorici.” Elenchos 13 (2): 121–67.Search in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 2008. “Senocrate in Sesto Empirico.” Rivista di storia della filosofia 63: 477–83.Search in Google Scholar

Isnardi Parente, M. 2012. Senocrate e Ermodoro. Frammenti e Testimonianze, edizione rivista e aggiornata a cura di T. Dorandi. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale.Search in Google Scholar

Janáček, K. 1972. Sextus Empiricus’ Sceptical Methods. Praha: Universita Karlova.Search in Google Scholar

Janáček, K. 2000. Sexti Empirici Indices, editio tertia completior. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Krämer, H. J. 1989. Platone e i fondamenti della metafisica. Saggio sulla teoria dei principi e sulle dottrine non scritte di Platone, edited by G. Reale. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.Search in Google Scholar

Leszl, W. 1975. Il De ideis di Aristotele e la teoria platonica delle idee. Firenze: Olschki.Search in Google Scholar

Lünstroth, M. 2008. «Teilhaben» und «Erleiden» in Platons Parmenides. Göttingen: Edition Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar

Marchand, S. 2018. Le scepticisme: vivre sans opinions. Paris: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Martos Montiel, J. F. 2012. Sexto Empirico. Contra los dogmáticos. Madrid: Gredos.Search in Google Scholar

Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics: A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary, Vol. I. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, C. J. 1993. Plato. Phaedo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Russo, A. 1972. Sesto Empirico. Contro i matematici. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Russo, A., and G. Indelli. 1990. Sesto Empirico. Contro i fisici, contro i moralisti. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Sedley, D. 1998. “Platonic Causes.” Phronesis 43 (2): 114–32, https://doi.org/10.1163/15685289860511050.Search in Google Scholar

Sluiter, I. 2000. “The Rethoric of Scepticism.” In Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, edited by J. Sihvola, 93–115. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 1997. “On Using the Past in Sextus Empiricus: The Case of Democritus.” Hyperboreus 3 (1): 151–73.Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2000. “Sextus Empiricus. The Neighbouring Philosophies and the Sceptical Tradition.” In Ancient Scepticism and the Sceptical Tradition, edited by J. Sihvola, 35–61. Helsinki: Societas Philosophica Fennica.Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2005. Questioni scettiche. Letture introduttive al pirronismo antico. Roma: Lithos.Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2010. “Pyrrhonism and the Specialized Sciences.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, edited by R. Bett, 249–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521874762.014Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2015. “Sesto Empirico: Iceberg scettico della nozione di ἐποχή.” Archivio di Filosofia 83 (1–2): 193–207.Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2016a. “‘Are Flute-Players better than Philosophers?’ Sextus Empiricus on Music, against Pythagoras.” In Pythagorean Knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: Askesis, Religion, Science, edited by A. B. Renger, and A. Stavru, 305–18. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.10.2307/j.ctvc770xm.24Search in Google Scholar

Spinelli, E. 2016b. “Sextus Empiricus.” In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques, Vol. 6, edited by R. Goulet, 265–300. Paris: CNRS Éditions.10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah30137Search in Google Scholar

Staab, G. 2009. “Das Kennzeichen des neuen Pythagoreismus innerhalb der kaiserzeitlichen Platoninterpretation: „Pythagoreischer” Dualismus und Einprinzipienlehre im Einklang.” In The Origins of the Platonic System. Platonisms of the Early Empire and their Philosophical Contexts, edited by M. Bonazzi, and J. Opsomer, 55–88. Louvain: Peeters.Search in Google Scholar

Tescari, O. 1926. Sesto Empirico. Schizzi pirroniani. Bari: Laterza.Search in Google Scholar

Trabattoni, F. 2011. Platone. Fedone. Traduzione di S. Martinelli Tempesta. Torino: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. 2017. Pseudopythagorica Dorica. Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9781501505485Search in Google Scholar

Ulacco, A. 2020. “The Creation of Authority in Pseudo-Pythagorean Texts and their Reception in Late Ancient Philosophy.” In Falsifications and Authority in Antiquity, the Middle Ages and the Renaissance, edited by J. Papy, and E. Gielen, 183–214. Turnhout: Brepols.10.1484/M.LECTIO-EB.5.119647Search in Google Scholar

Zhmud, L. 2012. Pythagoras and the Early Pythagoreans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289318.001.0001Search in Google Scholar