Home Occam’s razor and Hickam’s dictum: a dermatologic perspective
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Occam’s razor and Hickam’s dictum: a dermatologic perspective

  • Hadassah Stein EMAIL logo and Eve J. Lowenstein
Published/Copyright: November 18, 2022

Abstract

Diagnostic heuristics help ease the cognitive load in our day-to-day work. Occam’s razor or the rule of diagnostic parsimony is a diagnostic heuristic often applied in dermatology. Occam’s razor dictates that all things being equal, one diagnosis (as opposed to several diagnoses) should be sought to explain a patient’s presentation. While this can often be helpful, it can also obscure the full picture. Hickam’s dictum is an aphorism expressing the opposite opinion: “patients can have as many diseases as they damn (or darn) well please.” This acknowledges that multiple simultaneous processes can be at play. This article delves into the implications of use of these approaches and offers tips through cases illustrating the limitations of Occam’s razor and when Hickam’s Dictum should be invoked.


Corresponding author: Hadassah Stein, SUNY Health Science Center at Brooklyn School of Medicine, NY, USA; and SUNY Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: The authors received no funding for this work.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: Not applicable.

References

1. Kelly, J. The diagnostic approach in complex patients: parsimony or plenitude? Am J Med 2021;134:11–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.08.027.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Mani, N, Slevin, N, Hudson, A. The three wise men on diagnosis. BMJ 2011;343:1301–4.10.1136/bmj.d7769Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Redelmeier, DA, Tan, SH, Booth, GL. The treatment of unrelated disorders in patients with chronic medical diseases. N Engl J Med 1998;338:1516–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199805213382106.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Crosskerry, P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:1184–204. https://doi.org/10.1197/aemj.9.11.1184.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kahneman, D. Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011.Search in Google Scholar

6. Croskerry, P, Singhal, G, Mamede, S. Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22:ii58–64. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001712.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Du-Thanh, A, Gustave, V, Dereure, O. Lethal anaplastic large-cell lymphoma occurring in a patient treated with dupilumab. JAAD Case Rep 2021;18:4–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdcr.2021.09.020.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Lee, H, Chung, HJ, Pawar, A, Patorno, E, Kim, DH. Evaluation of risk of bullous pemphigoid with initiation of dipeptidyl peptidase–4 inhibitor vs second-generation sulfonylurea. JAMA Dermatol 2020;156:1107–14. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2158.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Sarah, MM, Brittany, O, Alyssa, W, Akshata, H. Time for a time-out: the value of a diagnostic time-out in prolonged fever and lymphadenopathy. Hosp Pediatr 2019;9:139–41.10.1542/hpeds.2018-0176Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Fitzgerald, FSK. The crack-up. Esquire 1936;41:164.10.1097/00010694-193602000-00028Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-08-21
Accepted: 2022-11-01
Published Online: 2022-11-18

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. An equation for excellence in clinical reasoning
  4. Quantifying diagnostic excellence
  5. Review
  6. A scoping review of distributed cognition in acute care clinical decision-making
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Context matters: toward a multilevel perspective on context in clinical reasoning and error
  9. Occam’s razor and Hickam’s dictum: a dermatologic perspective
  10. Original Articles
  11. Differences in clinical reasoning between female and male medical students
  12. Introducing second-year medical students to diagnostic reasoning concepts and skills via a virtual curriculum
  13. Bad things can happen: are medical students aware of patient centered care and safety?
  14. Impact of diagnostic checklists on the interpretation of normal and abnormal electrocardiograms
  15. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate as a predictive biomarker for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis
  16. Empowering quality data – the Gordian knot of bringing real innovation into healthcare system
  17. Collective intelligence improves probabilistic diagnostic assessments
  18. Why people fail to participate in annual skin cancer screening: creation of the perceptions of annual skin cancer screening scale (PASCSS)
  19. Instructions on appropriate fasting prior to phlebotomy; effects on patient awareness, preparation, and biochemical parameters
  20. Clinician factors associated with delayed diagnosis of appendicitis
  21. Real-world assessment of the clinical performance of COVID-VIRO ALL IN rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test
  22. Lack of a prompt normalization of immunological parameters is associated with long-term care and poor prognosis in COVID-19 affected patients receiving convalescent plasma: a single center experience
  23. Letters to the Editor
  24. Uncontrolled confounding in COVID-19 epidemiology
  25. VAPES: a new mnemonic for considering paroxysmal disorders
  26. Congress Abstracts
  27. SIDM2022 15th Annual International Conference
Downloaded on 31.10.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2022-0093/html
Scroll to top button