Home Clinician factors associated with delayed diagnosis of appendicitis
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Clinician factors associated with delayed diagnosis of appendicitis

  • Kenneth A. Michelson ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Finn L.E. McGarghan , Emma E. Patterson , Mark L. Waltzman , Margaret E. Samuels-Kalow and Kimberly F. Greco
Published/Copyright: December 12, 2022

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the association of clinician demographics and practice patterns with delayed diagnosis of appendicitis.

Methods

We included children with appendicitis at 13 regional emergency departments (EDs). We screened patients with a previous ED visit within 7 days for delayed diagnosis by chart review. We evaluated the association of clinician characteristics using logistic regression with random intercepts for site and clinician and delay as the outcome.

Results

Among 7,452 children with appendicitis, 105 (1.4%) had delayed diagnosis. Clinicians in the lowest quartile of obtaining blood in their general practice were more likely to have delayed diagnosis (odds ratio 4.9 compared to highest quartile, 95% confidence interval 1.8, 13.8). Clinicians’ imaging rates, specialty, sex, and experience were not associated with delayed diagnosis.

Conclusions

Clinicians who used more blood tests in their general practice had a lower risk of delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, possible evidence that lower risk tolerance has benefits.


Corresponding author: Kenneth A. Michelson, MD, MPH, Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, BCH 3066, Boston, MA 02115, USA; and Department of Pediatrics, South Shore Hospital, Weymouth, MA, USA, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: Dr. Michelson received funding through the CRICO Foundation.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The local Institutional Review Board deemed the study exempt from review.

References

1. McManus, ML, França, UL. Availability of inpatient pediatric surgery in the United States. Anesthesiology 2021;134:852–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/aln.0000000000003766.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Goyal, MK, Chamberlain, JM, Webb, M, Grundmeier, RW, Johnson, TJ, Lorch, SA, et al.. Racial and ethnic disparities in the delayed diagnosis of appendicitis among children. Acad Emerg Med 2021;28:949–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14142.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Michelson, KA, Reeves, SD, Grubenhoff, JA, Cruz, AT, Chaudhari, PP, Dart, AH, et al.. Clinical features and preventability of delayed diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2122248. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22248.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

4. Green, SM, Rothrock, SG. Evaluation styles for well-appearing febrile children: are you a “risk-minimizer” or a “test-minimizer”. Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:211–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(99)70396-3.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Michelson, KA, McGarghan, FLE, Patterson, EE, Samuels-Kalow, ME, Waltzman, ML, Greco, KF. Delayed diagnosis of serious paediatric conditions in 13 regional emergency departments. BMJ Qual Saf 2022 Sep 30. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015314 [Epub ahead of print].Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Michelson, KA, Williams, DN, Dart, AH, Mahajan, P, Aaronson, EL, Bachur, RG, et al.. Development of a rubric for assessing delayed diagnosis of appendicitis, diabetic ketoacidosis and sepsis. Diagnosis 2021;8:219–25. https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2020-0035.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

7. Feudtner, C, Feinstein, JA, Zhong, W, Hall, M, Dai, D. Pediatric complex chronic conditions classification system version 2: updated for ICD-10 and complex medical technology dependence and transplantation. BMC Pediatr 2014;14:199. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-199.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

8. Jain, S, Elon, LK, Johnson, BA, Frank, G, Deguzman, M. Physician practice variation in the pediatric emergency department and its impact on resource use and quality of care. Pediatr Emerg Care 2010;26:902–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0b013e3181fe9108.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Jena, AB, Schoemaker, L, Bhattacharya, J, Seabury, SA. Physician spending and subsequent risk of malpractice claims: observational study. BMJ 2015;351:h5516. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5516.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

10. Khidir, H, McWilliams, JM, O’Malley, AJ, Zaborski, L, Landon, BE, Smulowitz, PB. Analysis of consistency in emergency department physician variation in propensity for admission across patient sociodemographic groups. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2125193. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25193.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

11. Marchese, AL, Fine, AM, Levy, JA, Monuteaux, MC, Michelson, KA. Physician risk perception and testing behaviors for children with fever. Pediatr Emerg Care 2022;38:e805–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/pec.0000000000002413.Search in Google Scholar

12. Naiditch, JA, Lautz, TB, Daley, S, Pierce, MC, Reynolds, M. The implications of missed opportunities to diagnose appendicitis in children. Acad Emerg Med 2013;20:592–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12144.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Mahajan, P, Basu, T, Pai, CW, Singh, H, Petersen, N, Bellolio, MF, et al.. Factors associated with potentially missed diagnosis of appendicitis in the emergency department. JAMA Netw Open 2020;3:e200612. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0612.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

14. Michelson, KA, Buchhalter, LC, Bachur, RG, Mahajan, P, Monuteaux, MC, Finkelstein, JA. Accuracy of automated identification of delayed diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis and sepsis in the ED. Emerg Med J 2019;36:736–40. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2019-208841.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2022-11-04
Accepted: 2022-11-22
Published Online: 2022-12-12

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Frontmatter
  2. Editorials
  3. An equation for excellence in clinical reasoning
  4. Quantifying diagnostic excellence
  5. Review
  6. A scoping review of distributed cognition in acute care clinical decision-making
  7. Opinion Papers
  8. Context matters: toward a multilevel perspective on context in clinical reasoning and error
  9. Occam’s razor and Hickam’s dictum: a dermatologic perspective
  10. Original Articles
  11. Differences in clinical reasoning between female and male medical students
  12. Introducing second-year medical students to diagnostic reasoning concepts and skills via a virtual curriculum
  13. Bad things can happen: are medical students aware of patient centered care and safety?
  14. Impact of diagnostic checklists on the interpretation of normal and abnormal electrocardiograms
  15. Cerebrospinal fluid lactate as a predictive biomarker for tuberculous meningitis diagnosis
  16. Empowering quality data – the Gordian knot of bringing real innovation into healthcare system
  17. Collective intelligence improves probabilistic diagnostic assessments
  18. Why people fail to participate in annual skin cancer screening: creation of the perceptions of annual skin cancer screening scale (PASCSS)
  19. Instructions on appropriate fasting prior to phlebotomy; effects on patient awareness, preparation, and biochemical parameters
  20. Clinician factors associated with delayed diagnosis of appendicitis
  21. Real-world assessment of the clinical performance of COVID-VIRO ALL IN rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen test
  22. Lack of a prompt normalization of immunological parameters is associated with long-term care and poor prognosis in COVID-19 affected patients receiving convalescent plasma: a single center experience
  23. Letters to the Editor
  24. Uncontrolled confounding in COVID-19 epidemiology
  25. VAPES: a new mnemonic for considering paroxysmal disorders
  26. Congress Abstracts
  27. SIDM2022 15th Annual International Conference
Downloaded on 13.9.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/dx-2022-0119/html
Scroll to top button