Startseite Examining the spread of disinformation on Facebook during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study in Switzerland
Artikel
Lizenziert
Nicht lizenziert Erfordert eine Authentifizierung

Examining the spread of disinformation on Facebook during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study in Switzerland

  • Mirjam Baumann EMAIL logo und Edda Humprecht ORCID logo
Veröffentlicht/Copyright: 2. Oktober 2024
Communications
Aus der Zeitschrift Communications Band 50 Heft 2

Abstract

Disinformation poses a significant threat to democratic societies, particularly in the context of the Covid-19 health crisis. This study delves into the prevalence and nature of disinformation in social media by analyzing Facebook accounts of political actors and alternative media within the unique Swiss landscape during the first wave of the pandemic. Using standardized quantitative content analysis, we categorize posts as either accurate, reconfigured, or fabricated. Our findings reveal a disconcerting pattern: Disinformation was shared more frequently than accurate information. Notably, right-wing politicians and parties, alongside alternative media sources, emerged as the most prolific disseminators of disinformation. Digging deeper, we discovered that the predominant form of disinformation shared on social media was reconfigured disinformation, signifying manipulated or contextually distorted information. This prevalence of reconfigured disinformation on social media platforms raises pressing concerns about the public’s ability to discern fact from fiction. Moreover, our study shines a spotlight on the inadvertent or perhaps deliberate contributions of right-wing politicians and parties and alternative media sources to the propagation of disinformation. By examining this phenomenon within the Swiss context during the initial wave of the pandemic, we provide valuable insights into the dynamics of disinformation and its implications for society during crisis situations.

Keywords: disinformation; content analysis; alternative media; political actors

References

Aïmeur, E., Amri, S., & Brassard, G. (2023). Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: A review. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-023-01028-510.1007/s13278-023-01028-5Suche in Google Scholar

Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.21110.1257/jep.31.2.211Suche in Google Scholar

Apuke, O. D., & Omar, B. (2021). Fake news and COVID-19: Modelling the predictors of fake news sharing among social media users. Telematics and Informatics, 56, 101475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.10147510.1016/j.tele.2020.101475Suche in Google Scholar

Balakrishnan, V., Zhen, N. W., Chong, S. M., Han, G. J., & Lee, T. J. (2022). Infodemic and fake news – A comprehensive overview of its global magnitude during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021: A scoping review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 78, 103144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.10314410.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103144Suche in Google Scholar

Baptista, J. P., & Gradim, A. (2022). Online disinformation on Facebook: The spread of fake news during the Portuguese 2019 election. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 30(2), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.184341510.1080/14782804.2020.1843415Suche in Google Scholar

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190923624.001.0001Suche in Google Scholar

Benkler, Y., Faris, R., Roberts, H., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review, 1–12.Suche in Google Scholar

Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33, 122–139.10.1177/0267323118760317Suche in Google Scholar

Boberg, S., Quandt, T., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020). Pandemic populism: Facebook pages of alternative news media and the Corona crisis—A computational content analysis. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.02566v3Suche in Google Scholar

Bochsler, D., Hänggeli, R., & Häusermann, S. (2015). Consensus lost? Disenchanted democracy in Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review, 21(4), 475–490.10.1111/spsr.12191Suche in Google Scholar

Boulianne, S., & Humprecht, E. (2023). Perceived exposure to misinformation and trust in institutions in four countries before and during a pandemic. International Journal of Communication, 17, 2024–2047.Suche in Google Scholar

Boulianne, S., & Lee, S. (2022). Conspiracy beliefs, misinformation, social media platforms, and protest participation. Media and Communication, 10(4), 30–41.10.17645/mac.v10i4.5667Suche in Google Scholar

Brennen, J. S., Simon, F. M., Howard, P. N., & Nielsen, R. K. (2020). Types, sources, and claims of COVID-19 misinformation. Reuters Institute, 7, 1–13.Suche in Google Scholar

Brosius, H. B., Haas, A., & Koschel, F. (2012). Methoden der empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Eine Einführung [Methods of empirical communication research: An introduction]. Springer VS.10.1007/978-3-531-94214-8Suche in Google Scholar

Bundeskanzlei (2020). Parteien von links bis rechts [Parties from left to right]. Retrieved from https://ch-info.swiss/edition-2020/direkte-demokratie/parteien-von-links-nach-rechtsSuche in Google Scholar

Correctiv (2018). Häufig gestellte Fragen: Wie wir arbeiten [FAQs: How we work]. Retrieved from https://correctiv.org/faktencheck/ueber-uns/2018/10/04/haeufig-gestellte-fragen/Suche in Google Scholar

de Vreese, C. H., Esser, F., Aalberg, T., Reinemann, C., & Stanyer, J. (2018). Populism as an expression of political communication content and style: A new perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/194016121879003510.1177/1940161218790035Suche in Google Scholar

Duffy, A., Tandoc, E., & Ling, R. (2020). Too good to be true, too good not to share: The social utility of fake news. Information, Communication & Society, 23(13), 1965–1979. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.162390410.1080/1369118X.2019.1623904Suche in Google Scholar

Farhall, K., Carson, A., Wright, S., Gibbons, A., & Lukamto, W. (2019). Political elites’ use of fake news discourse across communications platforms. International Journal of Communication, 13, 4353–4375.Suche in Google Scholar

Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 U. S. presidential election. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication.Suche in Google Scholar

Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.1239410.1111/pops.12394Suche in Google Scholar

Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., & Brinkschulte, F. (2020). Between mainstream and alternative – Co-orientation in right-wing populist alternative news media. Disinformation in Open Online Media. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_1210.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12Suche in Google Scholar

Fulterer, R. (2021, January 30). Gansers Jünger. NZZ. Retrieved from https://www.nzz.ch/gesellschaft/wie-daniele-ganser-der-corona-skepsis-den-boden-bereitete-ld.1598675Suche in Google Scholar

Giglietto, F., Marino, G., Terenzi, M., Righetti, N., & Rossi, L. (2021). Coordinated hateful disinformation on Italian politics and social issues, since 2017. SSRN Electronic Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.377726310.2139/ssrn.3777263Suche in Google Scholar

Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign. European Research Council, 9(4).Suche in Google Scholar

Gupta, A., Li, H., Farnoush, A., & Jiang, W. (2022). Understanding patterns of COVID infodemic: A systematic and pragmatic approach to curb fake news. Journal of Business Research, 140, 670–683.10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.032Suche in Google Scholar

Hameleers, M. (2020a). Populist disinformation: Exploring intersections between online populism and disinformation in the US and the Netherlands. Politics and Governance, 8(1), 146–157. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i1.247810.17645/pag.v8i1.2478Suche in Google Scholar

Hameleers, M. (2020b). My reality is more truthful than yours: Radical right-wing politicians’ and citizens’ construction of “fake” and “truthfulness” on social media—Evidence from the United States and the Netherlands. International Journal of Communication, 14(18).Suche in Google Scholar

Hameleers, M. (2023). Disinformation as a context-bound phenomenon: Toward a conceptual clarification integrating actors, intentions and techniques of creation and dissemination. Communication Theory, 33(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtac02110.1093/ct/qtac021Suche in Google Scholar

Hameleers, M., Humprecht, E., Möller, J., & Lühring, J. (2021). Degrees of deception: The effects of different types of COVID-19 misinformation and the effectiveness of corrective information in crisis times. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1699–1715. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.202127010.1080/1369118X.2021.2021270Suche in Google Scholar

Hameleers, M., & Minihold, S. (2020). Constructing discourses on (un)truthfulness: Attributions of reality, misinformation, and disinformation by politicians in a comparative social media setting. Communication Research, 49(8), 1176–1199. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365022098276210.1177/0093650220982762Suche in Google Scholar

Holt, K., Ustad Figenschou, T., & Frischlich, L. (2019). Key dimensions of alternative news media. Digital Journalism, 7(7), 860–869.10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715Suche in Google Scholar

Humprecht, E., Esser, F., & van Aelst, P. (2020). Resilience to online disinformation: A framework for cross-national comparative research. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25, 493–516.10.1177/1940161219900126Suche in Google Scholar

Humprecht, E., Esser, F., van Aelst, P., Staender, A., & Morosoli, S. (2023). The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1342–1362. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.200674410.1080/1369118X.2021.2006744Suche in Google Scholar

Jünger, J., & Keyling, T. (2013). Facepager. Ein Programm zur automatisierten Datenerhebung im Netz [Facepager. A programme for the automatized data collection on the internet].Suche in Google Scholar

Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. Data & Society Research Institute.Suche in Google Scholar

Morosoli, S., Van Aelst, P., Humprecht, E., Staender, A., & Esser, F. (2022). Identifying the drivers behind the dissemination of online misinformation: A study on political attitudes and individual characteristics in the context of engaging with misinformation on social media. American Behavioral Scientist, 00027642221118300.10.1177/00027642221118300Suche in Google Scholar

Motta, M., Stecula, D., & Farhart, C. (2020). How right-leaning media coverage of COVID-19 facilitated the spread of misinformation in the early stages of the pandemic in the US. Canadian Journal of Political Science/Revue Canadienne de Science Politique, 53(2), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000842392000039610.1017/S0008423920000396Suche in Google Scholar

Mourão, R. R., & Robertson, C. T. (2019). Fake news as discursive integration: An analysis of sites that publish false, misleading, hyperpartisan and sensational information. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2077–2095. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.156687110.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871Suche in Google Scholar

Naeem, S. B., Bhatti, R., & Khan, A. (2021). An exploration of how fake news is taking over social media and putting public health at risk. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 38(2), 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.1232010.1111/hir.12320Suche in Google Scholar

Osmundsen, M., Bor, A., Vahlstrup, P. B., Bechmann, A. & Petersen, M. B. (2021). Partisan polarization is the primary psychological motivation behind political fake news sharing on Twitter. American Political Science Review, 115(3), 999–1015. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542100029010.1017/S0003055421000290Suche in Google Scholar

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.00710.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007Suche in Google Scholar

Schwaiger, L., Schneider, J., & Vogler, D. (2020). Mediennutzung [Media use]. In fög (Ed.), Qualität der Medien Jahrbuch 2020 (pp. 135–143). Schwabe Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Schweiger, W. (2017). Der (des)informierte Bürger im Netz. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-16058-610.1007/978-3-658-16058-6Suche in Google Scholar

Silverman, C. (2016, November 16). This analysis shows how viral fake news outperformed real news on Facebook. Buzzfeed. Retrieved from https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook#.heAKVvVWzSuche in Google Scholar

Staender, A., Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Morosoli, S., & van Aelst, P. (2021). Is sensationalist disinformation more effective? Three facilitating factors at the national, individual, and situational level. Digital Journalism, 10(6) 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.196631510.1080/21670811.2021.1966315Suche in Google Scholar

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “fake news”. A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6, 137–153.10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143Suche in Google Scholar

Tandoc, E. C., Lim, D., & Ling, R. (2020). Diffusion of disinformation: How social media users respond to fake news and why. Journalism, 21, 381–398.10.1177/1464884919868325Suche in Google Scholar

Trilling, D., Tolochko, P., & Burscher, B. (2017). From newsworthiness to shareworthiness. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 94(1), 38–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769901665468210.1177/1077699016654682Suche in Google Scholar

Van Bavel, J. J., Harris, E. A., Pärnamets, P., Rathje, S., Doell, K. C., & Tucker, J. A. (2021). Political psychology in the digital (mis)information age: A model of news belief and sharing. Social Issues and Policy Review, 15(1), 84–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/sipr.1207710.1111/sipr.12077Suche in Google Scholar

Van der Linden, S., Panagopoulos, C., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2021). The paranoid style in American politics revisited: An ideological asymmetry in conspiratorial thinking. Political Psychology, 42(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.1268110.1111/pops.12681Suche in Google Scholar

Viera, A., & Garrett, J. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: The Kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37(5), 360–363.Suche in Google Scholar

Vogler, D., Schwaiger, L., Rauchfleisch, A., Marschlich, S., Siegen, D., Udris, L., Eisenegger, M., Schneider, J. (2021). Wahrnehmung von Desinformation in der Schweiz [Perception of disinformation in Switzerland]. In fög (Ed.), Jahrbuch Qualität der Medien 2021 (pp. 25–36). Schwabe Verlag.Suche in Google Scholar

Wardle, C. (2018). The need for smarter definitions and practical, timely empirical research on information disorder. Digital Journalism, 6(8), 951–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2018.150204710.1080/21670811.2018.1502047Suche in Google Scholar

Wardle, C. (2019). First draft’s essential guide to understanding information disorder. First draft.Suche in Google Scholar

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making. Council of Europe.Suche in Google Scholar

Wilczek, B. (2020). Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business journalism. PLOS ONE, 15(11), e0241389. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.024138910.1371/journal.pone.0241389Suche in Google Scholar

Yablokov, I. (2015). Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: The case of Russia Today (RT). Politics, 35(3–4), 301–315.10.1111/1467-9256.12097Suche in Google Scholar

Zeng, J., & Chan, C. (2021). A cross-national diagnosis of infodemics: Comparing the topical and temporal features of misinformation around COVID-19 in China, India, the US, Germany and France. Online Information Review, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-09-2020-041710.1108/OIR-09-2020-0417Suche in Google Scholar
Published Online: 2024-10-02
Published in Print: 2025-05-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Articles
  3. Communication and academic burnout: The effects of social support and participation in decision-making
  4. With time comes trust? The development of misinformation perceptions related to COVID-19 over a six-month period: Evidence from a five-wave panel survey study in the Netherlands
  5. A qualitative examination of (political) media diets across age cohorts in five countries
  6. Oldies but goldies? Comparing the trustworthiness and credibility of ‘new’ and ‘old’ information intermediaries
  7. Life online during the pandemic : How university students feel about abrupt mediatization
  8. Publishing strategies and professional demarcations: Enacting media logic(s) in European academic climate communication through open letters
  9. International cooperation on (counter)publics between tradition and reorientation: Social democracy and its media in the Cold War era
  10. The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation center
  11. Quality and conflicts of communication consulting: Demystifying the concept and current practices based on a study of consultants and clients across Europe
  12. Hate speech mainstreaming in the Greek virtual public sphere: A quantitative and qualitative approach
  13. Examining the spread of disinformation on Facebook during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study in Switzerland
  14. COVID-19 vaccine reviews on YouTube: What do they say?
  15. It’s the political economy after all: Implications of the case of Israel’s media system transition on the theory of media systems
  16. Periods of upheaval and their effect on mediatized ways of life: Changes in media use in the wake of separation, new partnership, children leaving the parental home, and relocation
  17. Solving the crisis with “do-it-yourself heroes”? The media coverage on pioneer communities, Covid-19, and technological solutionism
  18. What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review
  19. “That’s just, like, your opinion” – European citizens’ ability to distinguish factual information from opinion
  20. Book reviews
  21. Cuelenaere, E., Willems, G., & Joye, S. (Eds.) (2021). European film remakes. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474460668. 272 pp.
  22. Cushion, S. (2024). Beyond mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360865. 193 pp.
  23. Frau-Meigs, D., & Corbu, N. (2024). Disinformation debunked: Building resilience through media and information literacy. Routledge. 328 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003387404
https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2023-0059
Schlagwörter für diesen Artikel
disinformation; content analysis; alternative media; political actors

Artikel in diesem Heft

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Articles
  3. Communication and academic burnout: The effects of social support and participation in decision-making
  4. With time comes trust? The development of misinformation perceptions related to COVID-19 over a six-month period: Evidence from a five-wave panel survey study in the Netherlands
  5. A qualitative examination of (political) media diets across age cohorts in five countries
  6. Oldies but goldies? Comparing the trustworthiness and credibility of ‘new’ and ‘old’ information intermediaries
  7. Life online during the pandemic : How university students feel about abrupt mediatization
  8. Publishing strategies and professional demarcations: Enacting media logic(s) in European academic climate communication through open letters
  9. International cooperation on (counter)publics between tradition and reorientation: Social democracy and its media in the Cold War era
  10. The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation center
  11. Quality and conflicts of communication consulting: Demystifying the concept and current practices based on a study of consultants and clients across Europe
  12. Hate speech mainstreaming in the Greek virtual public sphere: A quantitative and qualitative approach
  13. Examining the spread of disinformation on Facebook during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study in Switzerland
  14. COVID-19 vaccine reviews on YouTube: What do they say?
  15. It’s the political economy after all: Implications of the case of Israel’s media system transition on the theory of media systems
  16. Periods of upheaval and their effect on mediatized ways of life: Changes in media use in the wake of separation, new partnership, children leaving the parental home, and relocation
  17. Solving the crisis with “do-it-yourself heroes”? The media coverage on pioneer communities, Covid-19, and technological solutionism
  18. What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review
  19. “That’s just, like, your opinion” – European citizens’ ability to distinguish factual information from opinion
  20. Book reviews
  21. Cuelenaere, E., Willems, G., & Joye, S. (Eds.) (2021). European film remakes. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474460668. 272 pp.
  22. Cushion, S. (2024). Beyond mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360865. 193 pp.
  23. Frau-Meigs, D., & Corbu, N. (2024). Disinformation debunked: Building resilience through media and information literacy. Routledge. 328 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003387404
Jetzt anmelden und 20% sparen
Institutioneller Zugang
Wie funktioniert Authentifizierung?
Haben Sie eine Idee, wie wir unsere Website verbessern können?
Bitte schreiben Sie uns.
© 2025 De Gruyter Brill
Heruntergeladen am 7.11.2025 von https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2023-0059/html?lang=de
Button zum nach oben scrollen