Home Quality and conflicts of communication consulting: Demystifying the concept and current practices based on a study of consultants and clients across Europe
Article
Licensed
Unlicensed Requires Authentication

Quality and conflicts of communication consulting: Demystifying the concept and current practices based on a study of consultants and clients across Europe

  • Daniel Ziegele EMAIL logo , Sabrina Doberts , Ansgar Zerfass and Dejan Verčič
Published/Copyright: August 31, 2024

Abstract

Major changes in the technological, societal, political, and economic environment have forced organizations across Europe to reshape and expand their strategic communication activities. However, knowledge of the future viability of public relations, employee and consumer communication, public affairs, or investor relations is often scarce. This has led to an increased demand for external consulting in the field. The quality of such intangible services is difficult to assess; this is a challenge for clients and consultants alike, and often results in conflict. Communication research has rarely addressed this topic to date. This article expands the body of knowledge by introducing the key concepts, exploring drivers for quality assurance, and identifying sources of conflict in an empirical study of 1,558 communication practitioners in 43 European countries. The findings provide insights into current practices, indicate ways to secure quality and avoid conflict, and suggest directions for future research in an area of growing importance.

References

Argenti, P. A. (2023). Corporate communication (8th ed). McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Benazić, D., & Došen, Đ. O. (2012). Service quality concept and measurement in the business consulting market. Trziste, 24(1), 47–66.Search in Google Scholar

Bourland, P. G. (1993). The nature of conflict in firm-client relations: A content analysis of public relations journals 1980–89. Public Relations Review, 19(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0363-8111(93)90059-L10.1016/0363-8111(93)90059-LSearch in Google Scholar

Bronnenmayer, M., Wirtz, B. W., & Göttel, V. (2016). Success factors of management consulting. Review of Managerial Science, 10(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0137-510.1007/s11846-014-0137-5Search in Google Scholar

Bruhn, M. (2020). Qualitätsmanagement für Dienstleistungen [Quality management for services] (12th ed.). Springer Gabler.10.1007/978-3-662-62120-2Search in Google Scholar

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2016). The mediated construction of reality. Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

Darnell, R. (2021). The communications consultant’s foundation: Leveraging public relations expertise for personal and client success. Routledge.10.4324/9781003177951Search in Google Scholar

Dircom. (2021). Guía de buenas prácticas para el proceso de selección de una consultora de Comunicación [Best-practice guide for the process of selecting a communication consultancy firm]. www.dircom.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/GUÍA-BUENAS-PRÁCTICAS.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Engwall, L., & Kipping, M. (2013). Management consulting: Dynamics, debates, and directions. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(2), 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.76543610.1080/1553118X.2013.765436Search in Google Scholar

Ennsfellner, I., Bodenstein, R., & Herget, J. (2014). Exzellenz in der Unternehmensberatung. Qualitätsstandards für die Praxis [Excellence in management consulting. Quality standards for practice]. Springer Gabler.10.1007/978-3-658-01463-6Search in Google Scholar

European Commission (2022). Standard Eurobarometer 96 – Winter 2021–2022. European Commission.Search in Google Scholar

Falkheimer, J., & Heide, M. (Eds.). Research handbook of strategic communication. Edward Elgar.Search in Google Scholar

Frandsen, F., Johansen, W, & Pang, A. (2013). From management consulting to strategic communication: Studying the roles and functions of communication consulting. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(2), 81–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.76543910.1080/1553118X.2013.765439Search in Google Scholar

Frederiksson, M., & Pallas, J. (2017). The localities of mediatization: How organizations translate mediatization into everyday practices. In O. Driessens, G. Bolin, A. Hepp, & S. Hjavard (Eds.), Dynamics of mediatization (pp. 119–136). Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-62983-4_6Search in Google Scholar

Fuhrberg, R. (2010). PR-Beratung: Qualitative Analyse der Zusammenarbeit zwischen PR-Agenturen und Kunden [PR Consulting: Qualitative analysis of the cooperation between PR agencies and clients]. UVK.Search in Google Scholar

Gesellschaft Public Relations Agenturen. (2022). Der Consultancy Management Standard III. https://www.gpra.de/cmsiii/was-ist-cms-iii/Search in Google Scholar

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Hayes, R. A., Robertson, S. L., & Preston, A. N. (2023). Does public relations scholarship need better PR? Practitioners’ perspectives on academic research. Public Relations Review, 49(1), 102273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.10227310.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102273Search in Google Scholar

Hoffjann, O., Hoffstedde, K., & Jaworek, F. (2021). Ready for the unexpected: Theoretical framework and empirical findings on communication consulting. Journal of Communication Management, 25(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-10-2019-013910.1108/JCOM-10-2019-0139Search in Google Scholar

Hou, J. Z. (2016). The emerging “field” of public relations in China: Multiple interplaying logics and evolving actors’ inter-relations. Public Relations Review, 42(4), 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2016.04.00310.1016/j.pubrev.2016.04.003Search in Google Scholar

International Communications Consultancy Organisation. (2022). Consultancy management standard (CMS). https://iccopr.com/member-area-documents/consultancy-management-standard-2/Search in Google Scholar

Ihlen, Ø., & van Ruler, B. (2007). How public relations works: Theoretical roots and public relations perspectives. Public Relations Review, 33(3), 243–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.00110.1016/j.pubrev.2007.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-XSearch in Google Scholar

Jugo, D., Pakozdi, I., & Milas, Z. (2020). Crisis communication consulting: Rethinking the role of PR firms in solving organizational crises. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 25(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2019-008310.1108/CCIJ-07-2019-0083Search in Google Scholar

Kalpokas, I. (2021). Problematising reality: The promises and perils of synthetic media. SN Social Sciences, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43545-020-00010-810.1007/s43545-020-00010-8Search in Google Scholar

Keegan, B. J., Rowley, J., & Tonge, J. (2017). Marketing agency – client relationships: Towards a research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 51(7/8), 1197–1223. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2015-071210.1108/EJM-10-2015-0712Search in Google Scholar

Kemp, S. (2022). Digital 2022. Global overview report. We Are Social/Hootsuite. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2022-global-overview-reportSearch in Google Scholar

Kubr, M. (2002). Management consulting: A guide to the profession (4th ed.). International Labour Office.Search in Google Scholar

Luoma-aho, V., & Badham, M. (Eds). (2023). Handbook on digital corporate communication. Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781802201963Search in Google Scholar

McLeod, S., & Schapper, J. (2020). Understanding quality in planning consultancy: A review and synthesis of the literature. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 44(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X2094392810.1177/0739456X20943928Search in Google Scholar

Meffert, H. (1990). Unternehmensberatung und Unternehmensführung. Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme [Management consulting and corporate management. An empirical survey]. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 50(2), 181–197.Search in Google Scholar

Michaelson, D., & Stacks, D. W. (2011). Standardization in public relations measurement and evaluation. Public Relations Journal, 5(2), 1–22.Search in Google Scholar

Momparler, A., Carmona, P., & Lassala, C. (2015). Quality of consulting services and consulting fees. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1458–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.03310.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.033Search in Google Scholar

Moore, S., & Hübscher, R. (2022). Strategic communication and AI. Public relations with intelligent user interfaces. Routledge.10.4324/9781003111320Search in Google Scholar

Nothhaft, H., Verčič, D., Werder, K. P., & Zerfass, A. (Eds.). (2020). Future directions of strategic communication. Routledge.10.4324/9780429295638Search in Google Scholar

Pincus, J. D., Acharya, L., Trotter, E. P., & Michel, C. (1991). Conflict between public relations agencies and their clients: A game theory analysis. Public Relations Research Annual, 3(1–4), 151–163. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_710.1207/s1532754xjprr0301-4_7Search in Google Scholar

Porter, M. E. (1998). Competitive advantage: creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

PRovoke Media. (2022). Global top 250 PR agency ranking 2022. https://www.provokemedia.com/ranking-and-data/global-pr-agency-rankings/2022-pr-agency-rankings/top-250Search in Google Scholar

Public Relations and Communications Association. (2019). PR and communication census 2019. The Public Relations and Communications Association. https://www.prca.org.uk/sites/default/files/PRCA_PR_Census_2019_v9-8-pdf%20%285%29.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Röttger, U., & Preusse, J. (2013). External consulting in strategic communication: Functions and roles within systems theory. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(2), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2013.76543710.1080/1553118X.2013.765437Search in Google Scholar

Schöller, C. (2018). Berater-Klienten-Interaktion in der PR-Beratung [Consultant-client interaction in PR consulting]. Springer VS.10.1007/978-3-658-18878-8Search in Google Scholar

Stieglitz, S., Zerfass, A., Ziegele, D., Clausen, S., & Berger, K. (2022). Communications trend radar 2022. Language awareness, closed communication, gigification, synthetic media & cybersecurity. Communication Insights, 14, 1–38. https://www.akademische-gesellschaft.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/communications-trend-radar-2022.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Sudhaman, A. (2022). 2022 agency rankings: Global PR industry bounces back with 11 % growth. PRovoke Media. https://www.provokemedia.com/long-reads/article/2022-agency-rankings-global-pr-industry-bounces-back-with-11-growthSearch in Google Scholar

Tench, R., Fawkes, J, & Palihawadana, D. (2002). Freelancing: Issues and trends for public relations practice. Journal of Communication Management, 6(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/1363254021080714310.1108/13632540210807143Search in Google Scholar

Verčič, D., Tench, R., & Tkalac Verčič, A. (2018). Collaboration and conflict between agencies and clients. Public Relations Review, 44(1), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.11.00110.1016/j.pubrev.2017.11.001Search in Google Scholar

Veres, Z., & Varga-Toldi, K. (2021). ERIP: service quality model of management consulting projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 36(7), 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2020-022610.1108/JBIM-05-2020-0226Search in Google Scholar

von Platen, S. (2018). Communication consulting and consultancies. In R. L. Heath, & W. Johansen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of strategic communication (pp. 187–195). Wiley.10.1002/9781119010722.iesc0026Search in Google Scholar

Watson, T. (2012). The evolution of public relations measurement and evaluation. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.01810.1016/j.pubrev.2011.12.018Search in Google Scholar

Wiencierz, C., Röttger, U., & Fuhrmann, C. (2021). Agile cooperation between communication agencies and companies. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.189814410.1080/1553118X.2021.1898144Search in Google Scholar

Wiesenberg, M., & Verčič, D. (2021). The status quo of the visual turn in public relations practice. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 46(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-011110.1515/commun-2019-0111Search in Google Scholar

Wippersberg, J. (2012). Ziele, Evaluation und Qualität in der Auftragskommunikation [Objectives, evaluation and quality in commissioned communication]. UVK.Search in Google Scholar

Zerfaß, A., & Thobe, S. (2013). Qualität der Kommunikationsberatung [Quality of communication consulting]. PR Magazin, 44(9), 64–70.Search in Google Scholar

Ziegele, D., & Zerfass, A. (2024). The evolution of communication consulting: A long-term comparison of service quality in strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2024.236569210.1080/1553118X.2024.2365692Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2024-08-31
Published in Print: 2025-05-28

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Articles in the same Issue

  1. Titelseiten
  2. Articles
  3. Communication and academic burnout: The effects of social support and participation in decision-making
  4. With time comes trust? The development of misinformation perceptions related to COVID-19 over a six-month period: Evidence from a five-wave panel survey study in the Netherlands
  5. A qualitative examination of (political) media diets across age cohorts in five countries
  6. Oldies but goldies? Comparing the trustworthiness and credibility of ‘new’ and ‘old’ information intermediaries
  7. Life online during the pandemic : How university students feel about abrupt mediatization
  8. Publishing strategies and professional demarcations: Enacting media logic(s) in European academic climate communication through open letters
  9. International cooperation on (counter)publics between tradition and reorientation: Social democracy and its media in the Cold War era
  10. The Silicon Valley paradox: A qualitative interview study on the social, cultural, and ideological foundations of a global innovation center
  11. Quality and conflicts of communication consulting: Demystifying the concept and current practices based on a study of consultants and clients across Europe
  12. Hate speech mainstreaming in the Greek virtual public sphere: A quantitative and qualitative approach
  13. Examining the spread of disinformation on Facebook during the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic: A case study in Switzerland
  14. COVID-19 vaccine reviews on YouTube: What do they say?
  15. It’s the political economy after all: Implications of the case of Israel’s media system transition on the theory of media systems
  16. Periods of upheaval and their effect on mediatized ways of life: Changes in media use in the wake of separation, new partnership, children leaving the parental home, and relocation
  17. Solving the crisis with “do-it-yourself heroes”? The media coverage on pioneer communities, Covid-19, and technological solutionism
  18. What makes audiences resilient to disinformation? Integrating micro, meso, and macro factors based on a systematic literature review
  19. “That’s just, like, your opinion” – European citizens’ ability to distinguish factual information from opinion
  20. Book reviews
  21. Cuelenaere, E., Willems, G., & Joye, S. (Eds.) (2021). European film remakes. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474460668. 272 pp.
  22. Cushion, S. (2024). Beyond mainstream media: Alternative media and the future of journalism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003360865. 193 pp.
  23. Frau-Meigs, D., & Corbu, N. (2024). Disinformation debunked: Building resilience through media and information literacy. Routledge. 328 pp. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003387404
Downloaded on 7.11.2025 from https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/commun-2023-0049/html
Scroll to top button